[Issue 9873] Built-in tuple should support equality comparison
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9873 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6852] Cannot compare instances of ParameterStorageClassTuple
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6852 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Platform|Other |All Resolution||FIXED OS/Version|Windows |All --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2013-04-04 22:13:37 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > What gives? ParameterTypeTuple doesn't suffer from these issues. It seems it's > impossible to compare equality of storage classes between two functions. :s ParameterStorageClassTuple makes a tuple of values, so > alias ParameterStorageClassTuple Stores; > > static assert(Stores!(t1) == Stores!(t2)); // NG > static assert(Stores!T1 == Stores!T2); // NG value comparison would work, but > static assert(is(Stores!t1 == Stores!t2)); // NG > static assert(is(Stores!T1 == Stores!T2)); // NG type comparison would not work. >From 2.063, value tuple comparison would work by fixing issue 9873. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9873] Built-in tuple should support equality comparison
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9873 --- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara 2013-04-04 22:08:40 PDT --- *** Issue 9192 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9192] Allow opEquals for .tupleof expressions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9192 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2013-04-04 22:08:40 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 9873 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9880] Redundant template instance displaying in error message
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9880 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2013-04-04 22:03:42 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1845 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9880] New: Redundant template instance displaying in error message
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9880
Summary: Redundant template instance displaying in error
message
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: k.hara...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Kenji Hara 2013-04-04 21:57:37 PDT ---
This invalid code:
void foo(T)(int) if (is(T == int)) {}
void main() { alias f = foo!string; }
Outputs:
test.d(2): Error: template instance foo!(string) foo!(string) does not match
template declaration foo(T)(int) if (is(T == int))
"foo!(string)" is displayed twice - it's redundant. Should be:
test.d(2): Error: template instance foo!(string) does not match template
declaration foo(T)(int) if (is(T == int))
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9879] Built-in sizeof should return ErrorExp if error occurs in aggregate type semantics
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9879 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2013-04-04 21:19:38 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1843 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9879] New: Built-in sizeof should return ErrorExp if error occurs in aggregate type semantics
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9879
Summary: Built-in sizeof should return ErrorExp if error occurs
in aggregate type semantics
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: k.hara...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Kenji Hara 2013-04-04 21:12:54 PDT ---
>From bug 4269:
With this code, `__traits` should return `false`, but doesn't.
static if (__traits(compiles,A.sizeof)) pragma(msg, "A.sizeof compiles!");
class A { void foo(B b); }
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9873] Built-in tuple should support equality comparison
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9873 --- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-04-04 20:41:15 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/7cd887634de72410535ee70a1f7255629122bd27 fix Issue 9873 - Built-in tuple should support equality comparison https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/0ae89aaf57506f02c43852ef7758dfcaf4c9095f Merge pull request #1836 from 9rnsr/fix9873 Issue 9873 - Built-in tuple should support equality comparison -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9844] DMD (-m64) int long initialisation bug
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9844 Index Int changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vlad.z.4...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Index Int 2013-04-04 20:34:29 PDT --- The recent version of LDC (based on DMD v2.062 and LLVM 3.3svn) does not suffer from this issue. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9871] std.typecons.asArray
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9871 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|std.typecons.asRange|std.typecons.asArray --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-04-04 20:10:52 PDT --- With the latest version I think "asArray" is a better name. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9878] New: std.algorithm.cartesianProduct results order
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9878
Summary: std.algorithm.cartesianProduct results order
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-04-04 19:48:53 PDT ---
This is an example of Python usage of its product() function:
>>> from itertools import product
>>> list(product([0, 1], repeat=3))
[(0, 0, 0), (0, 0, 1), (0, 1, 0), (0, 1, 1), (1, 0, 0), (1, 0, 1), (1, 1, 0),
(1, 1, 1)]
This is a similar usage of Phobos std.algorithm.cartesianProduct:
import std.stdio, std.algorithm, std.string, std.conv, std.array;
void main() {
auto bits = [0, 1];
auto p = cartesianProduct(bits, bits, bits);
p.text.replace("Tuple!(int, int, int)", "").writeln;
}
Its output:
[(0, 0, 0), (1, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0), (1, 1, 0), (0, 0, 1), (1, 0, 1), (0, 1, 1),
(1, 1, 1)]
I'd like cartesianProduct() to give its results in the same order as Python. If
you see in Python the results are like the binary numbers:
000
001
010
011
100
101
110
111
I think this is a more natural and more useful order.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5937] Problem with map!delegate(iota(floating point))
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5937 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9773] ref parameter with default value should not compile
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9773 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9844] DMD (-m64) int long initialisation bug
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9844 --- Comment #5 from safety0ff.b...@gmail.com 2013-04-04 13:54:00 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1206) this kludge makes things work for me This kludge makes things work for me. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9773] ref parameter with default value should not compile
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9773 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-04-04 12:58:18 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/706b18758a63715aef4b1821e7b66b1d4e5ee467 fix Issue 9773 - ref parameter with default string literal should not compile https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/630e484c7e20cb156bf71404a342a8b98459cfde Merge pull request #1829 from 9rnsr/fix9773 Issue 9773 - ref parameter with default string literal should not compile -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9872] format should include class field values
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9872
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-04-04
11:49:19 PDT ---
How's this for a funky workaround:
diff --git a/std/format.d b/std/format.d
index 8896e38..84169c0 100644
--- a/std/format.d
+++ b/std/format.d
@@ -2512,15 +2512,32 @@ if (is(T == class) && !is(T == enum))
put(w, "null");
else
{
+Object o = val; // workaround
+string delegate() dg = &o.toString;
+
static if (hasToString!(T, Char) > 1 || (!isInputRange!T &&
!is(BuiltinTypeOf!T)))
{
-formatObject!(Writer, T, Char)(w, val, f);
+if (dg.funcptr != &Object.toString)
+formatObject!(Writer, T, Char)(w, val, f);
+else
+{
+enum ident = __traits(identifier, T);
+
+mixin(format(q{
+static struct %s
+{
+typeof(T.tupleof) fields;
+}
+%s s;
+s.fields = val.tupleof;
+}, ident, ident));
+
+formatValue(w, s, f);
+}
}
else
{
//string delegate() dg = &val.toString;
-Object o = val; // workaround
-string delegate() dg = &o.toString;
if (dg.funcptr != &Object.toString) // toString is overridden
{
formatObject(w, val, f);
Yeah it's just a joke. But it works. :P
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9877] Assertion failure in iota for float parameters
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9877 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-04-04 11:26:10 PDT --- Dupe of Issue 6531? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9877] New: Assertion failure in iota for float parameters
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9877
Summary: Assertion failure in iota for float parameters
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: acehr...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #0 from Ali Cehreli 2013-04-04 11:24:19 PDT ---
The following program asserts when compiled with -m32. (-m64 runs.)
import std.range;
void main()
{
float st = 0.000;
float step = 12.038554191589355;
float en = 999.200012207031250;
iota(st, en, step);
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5937] Problem with map!delegate(iota(floating point))
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5937 Ali Cehreli changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acehr...@yahoo.com --- Comment #2 from Ali Cehreli 2013-04-04 11:18:02 PDT --- This doesn't seem to be an issue anymore. Both of the programs compile and run successfully. (After removing two extraneous semicolons.) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9876] deprecated is not announced
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9876 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-04-04 08:31:57 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > This code should announce deprecation: > --- > alias a b; > deprecated enum a = 0; > --- > > It is hoped that the following message is announced: > --- > $ dmd -c main > main.d(1): Deprecation: variable main.a is deprecated However I think this should be silent: --- deprecated alias a b; deprecated enum a = 0; --- -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9876] New: deprecated is not announced
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9876 Summary: deprecated is not announced Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: zan77...@nifty.com --- Comment #0 from SHOO 2013-04-04 07:35:19 PDT --- This code should announce deprecation: --- alias a b; deprecated enum a = 0; --- It is hoped that the following message is announced: --- $ dmd -c main main.d(1): Deprecation: variable main.a is deprecated -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9875] opDispatch is wrongly set to safe
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9875 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-04-04 07:19:08 PDT --- Oh and I'm using 2.063 git-head. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9875] New: opDispatch is wrongly set to safe
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9875
Summary: opDispatch is wrongly set to safe
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-04-04
07:17:16 PDT ---
import std.string;
mixin template Mixin()
{
auto test()() // must be template to reproduce
{
static struct Dispatch // move outside of 'test' and it works
{
void opDispatch(string name, Args...)(Args args)
{
assert(0, format("%s", ""));
}
}
return Dispatch();
}
}
mixin Mixin!();
void main()
{
test().foo();
}
Error: safe function 'test.Mixin!().test!().test.Dispatch.opDispatch!("foo",
).opDispatch' cannot call system function 'std.string.format!(char,
string).format'
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9346] nested struct calls disabled postblit
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9346 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull Version|unspecified |D2 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2013-04-04 07:10:30 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1838 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9874] Function call syntax disuniformity in template constraints
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9874 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2013-04-04 06:03:14 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1837 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9874] New: Function call syntax disuniformity in template constraints
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9874
Summary: Function call syntax disuniformity in template
constraints
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-04-04 05:02:04 PDT ---
It seems inside the template constraints functions must be called with a
trailing (), unlike from other functions:
bool foo() {
return true;
}
void bar1(T)(T) if (foo()) {} // OK
void bar2(T)(T) if (foo) {} // error
void main() {
foo; // OK
bar1(0);
bar2(0);
}
dmd 2.063alpha gives:
temp.d(5): Error: constraint foo is not constant or does not evaluate to a bool
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9873] Built-in tuple should support equality comparison
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9873 --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-04-04 03:46:36 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Will this fix any of these?: > > Issue 6582 > Issue 9192 Sorry that should have been: Issue 6852 Issue 9192 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9873] Built-in tuple should support equality comparison
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9873 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-04-04 03:46:04 PDT --- Will this fix any of these?: Issue 6582 Issue 9192 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6178
--- Comment #16 from Kenji Hara 2013-04-04 03:11:17 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Than this a part of a bigger shit.
>
> /* Known as a problem of filling newly created space of AA array
>with T.init before assigning actual object.
>If operation is interrupted, this leads to AA array containing
>"orphan" T.init objects by no reason. Was reported in BZ.
> */
> import std.stdio;
>
> int foo()
> {
> throw new Exception("");
> }
>
> int[int] array;
>
> void main()
> {
> try
> {
> array[1] = foo();
> }
> catch(Exception e)
> {
>
> }
> writeln(array);
> }
>
> Compiling with -O => [1:0]
> Compiling with -release => []
> Compiling with -noboundscheck => []
>
> So, it appears that there is not only bug with AA assignment, but the bug
> depends on compiler options.
It was bug 3825, and has already fixed in 2.063 (git head).
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9873] Built-in tuple should support equality comparison
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9873 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2013-04-04 02:55:31 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1836 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9873] New: Built-in tuple should support equality comparison
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9873
Summary: Built-in tuple should support equality comparison
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: k.hara...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Kenji Hara 2013-04-04 02:42:06 PDT ---
Test case:
template Seq(T...) { alias Seq = T; }
struct Tup(T...) { T field; alias field this; }
void main()
{
auto seq1 = Seq!(1, "hi");
auto tup1 = Tup!(int, string)(1, "hi");
assert(Seq!(1, "hi") == Seq!(1, "hi"));
assert(Seq!(1, "hi") == seq1);
assert(Seq!(1, "hi") == tup1);
assert(seq1 == Seq!(1, "hi", [1,2])); // should be compiler error
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9858] const alias this fails when opAssign is present
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9858 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9865] Crash on bogus import / circular reference
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9865 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9829] rdmd passes '--' to dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9829 Alex R�nne Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||a...@lycus.org Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9829] rdmd passes '--' to dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9829 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-04-04 01:39:50 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools/commit/e1c792bf17ef65efdb171f4658817dfe65dc7271 fix Issue 9829 - getting program and arguments before calling getopt on the shortended args avoids the need for the '--' getopt separator in the first place https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools/commit/e34bb76a96269c54e0748df568183e30ca470674 Merge pull request #54 from dawgfoto/fix9829 fix Issue 9829 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9858] const alias this fails when opAssign is present
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9858 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-04-04 01:24:48 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/c6ebfc21c8fd050b13dfd8cb2da8803797d261bc fix Issue 9858 - const alias this fails when opAssign is present Type::makeXXX had unintentionally taken over Type(Struct|Class)::att field. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/afd7c3d0555d7407bc55a2fb3e3dbf864413d23e Merge pull request #1828 from 9rnsr/fix9858 [REG2.063a] Issue 9858 - const alias this fails when opAssign is present -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9465] Wrong code for delegate call
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9465 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |critical -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9872] format should include class field values
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9872
--- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-04-04
00:32:34 PDT ---
Workaround:
private mixin template genToString()
{
override string toString()
{
import std.array;
import std.conv;
import std.string;
Appender!(string[]) result;
foreach (val; this.tupleof)
{
result ~= to!string(val);
}
return format("%s(%s)", __traits(identifier, typeof(this)),
result.data.join(", "));
}
}
class C
{
int x, y;
mixin genToString;
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9872] format should print class fields
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9872 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9872] New: format should print class fields
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9872
Summary: format should print class fields
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-04-04
00:27:25 PDT ---
This is an unfortunate inconsistency:
import std.stdio;
import std.string;
struct S
{
int x, y;
}
class C
{
int x, y;
}
void main()
{
auto s1 = format("%s", S());
auto s2 = format("%s", new C());
writeln(s1); // S(0, 0)
writeln(s2); // test.C
}
It forces us to either always define a toString() method or call some custom
user-provided formatting function. format() should try to print the values of
the class fields if the toString method is not defined.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
