[Issue 8441] mixin containing template functions causes compiler errors
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8441 jfanati...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|9347| Severity|blocker |major -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10141] wrong error message with Tuple!(int) : Error: static assert Cannot put a char[] into a Appender!(string)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10141 --- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-07-15 00:19:47 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/8c5cce3e6ffd63ad3af23caf2e15ea7a3eabeea5 fix Issue 10141 - wrong error message with Tuple!(int) : Error: static assert Cannot put a char[] into a Appender!(string) Essentially it's bad code if it branches based on the condition `global.errors != 0`. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/390a9340cad6f9c44757cd4782792b08d95a56ba Merge pull request #2346 from 9rnsr/fix10141 Issue 10141 - wrong error message with Tuple!(int) : Error: static assert Cannot put a char[] into a Appender!(string) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10644] New: Win64: wrong code when passing arguments through ...
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10644
Summary: Win64: wrong code when passing arguments through ...
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: r.sagita...@gmx.de
--- Comment #0 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2013-07-15 00:25:39
PDT ---
An example from the unittest of std.outbuffer:
import std.outbuffer;
void main()
{
OutBuffer buf = new OutBuffer();
buf.printf(%d, 42);
assert(buf.toString() == 42);
}
build and run for win64 throws the assertion.
Checking the implementation of OutBuffer.printf shows that there is no uniform
abstraction for passing arguments to printf(string format, ...) anyway, and the
Win64 version seems broken.
This also applies to stream.printf.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10633] Win64: wrong codegen with %=
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10633 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2013-07-15 02:14:32 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2347 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10633] Win64: wrong codegen with %=
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10633 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10645] New: Wrong codegen for shared struct with constructor and pass to atomicLoad
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10645
Summary: Wrong codegen for shared struct with constructor and
pass to atomicLoad
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: jfanati...@gmx.at
--- Comment #0 from jfanati...@gmx.at 2013-07-15 03:02:10 PDT ---
The following simple code:
---
cat app2.d EOF
import core.atomic;
import std.stdio;
struct Test {
this(long v) {
val = v;
}
long val;
}
void main() {
shared(Test) test = Test(7);
auto buf = atomicLoad(test);
writefln(buf: %s, orig: %s, buf, cast(Test)test);
}
EOF
---
produces the following output:
buf: Test(0), orig: Test(7)
instead of the expected:
buf: Test(7), orig: Test(7)
Assembly with objdump -d -g -C -S -l app2.o (full output appended):
void main() {
0:55 push %rbp
1:48 8b ec mov%rsp,%rbp
4:48 83 ec 10 sub$0x10,%rsp
/home/robert/projects/phobosx/source/app2.d:11
shared(Test) test = Test(7);
8:48 8d 45 f0 lea-0x10(%rbp),%rax-0x10 is
right
c:48 31 c9 xor%rcx,%rcx
f:48 89 08 mov%rcx,(%rax)
12:48 be 07 00 00 00 00 movabs $0x7,%rsi
19:00 00 00
1c:48 89 c7 mov%rax,%rdiused here
correctly
1f:e8 00 00 00 00 callq 24 _Dmain+0x24
24:48 8d 75 f0 lea-0x10(%rbp),%rsi
/home/robert/projects/phobosx/source/app2.d:12
auto buf = atomicLoad(test);
28:48 8d 7d f8 lea-0x8(%rbp),%rdi now -0x8, why?
2c:e8 00 00 00 00 callq 31 _Dmain+0x31
It seems that the wrong address gets passed to atomicLoad. If you remove the
constructor of Test the right address (-0x10) is used. Various transformation
of this program all have the same wrong output: You can make test global, put
it in a union together with a plain long, create a non shared temporary before
assigning to the shared variable, use casts, ... The only thing that helps is
removing the constructor.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10645] Wrong codegen for shared struct with constructor and pass to atomicLoad
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10645 --- Comment #1 from jfanati...@gmx.at 2013-07-15 03:10:02 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1233) Full assembly dump -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10570] Example of `how` function for AutoImplement should work for non-abstract class
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10570 --- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-07-15 05:05:01 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/bb50a33f1b27d94b7558661df1719d6e72afecda Fixes Issue 10570 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/3095e8904a46a849a62ec03ea48f85525c7fe95a Merge pull request #1401 from tom-tan/fix_generateLogger Fix Issue 10570 - Example of `how` function for AutoImplement should work for non-abstract class -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10570] Example of `how` function for AutoImplement should work for non-abstract class
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10570 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10474] When takeExactly returns a new range type, it fails to propagate all relevant attributes
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10474 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-07-15 05:05:29 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/32c3998ebda05bfed210f31d8ee70c845f014852 Fix for issue# 10474. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/9b78a6f5e70935f6f709cea67379f8e34f6c3957 Merge pull request #1377 from jmdavis/10474 Fix for issue# 10474 - takeExactly fails to propagate all relevant attributes -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10474] When takeExactly returns a new range type, it fails to propagate all relevant attributes
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10474 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Version|unspecified |D2 Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10646] New: [ICE] when casting dynamic array/static array to class reference
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10646
Summary: [ICE] when casting dynamic array/static array to class
reference
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: henn...@still-hidden.de
--- Comment #0 from Henning Pohl henn...@still-hidden.de 2013-07-15 06:31:45
PDT ---
void main() {
class C { }
C[] csd;
C[2] css;
auto c1 = cast(C)csd;
auto c2 = cast(C)css;
}
---
test.d(6): Error: e2ir: cannot cast csd of type C[] to type test.main.C
test.d(7): Error: e2ir: cannot cast css of type C[2LU] to type test.main.C
---
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10646] [ICE] when casting dynamic array/static array to class reference
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10646 Henning Pohl henn...@still-hidden.de changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice, pull --- Comment #1 from Henning Pohl henn...@still-hidden.de 2013-07-15 06:36:32 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2348 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10647] New: AutoImplement should implement overridden member functions with 'override' attributes
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10647
Summary: AutoImplement should implement overridden member
functions with 'override' attributes
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: tta...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Tomoya Tanjo tta...@gmail.com 2013-07-15 07:05:36 PDT ---
The following code should be compiled with no error messages but it does not.
---
// It is like BlackHole but it also overrides non-virtual functions
string generateDoNothing(C, alias fun)() @property
{
import std.traits;
string stmt;
static if (is(ReturnType!fun == void))
stmt ~= ;
else
{
string returnType = ReturnType!fun.stringof;
stmt ~= return ~returnType~.init;;
}
return stmt;
}
// A class to be overridden
class Foo{
void bar(int a) { }
}
// Do nothing template
template DoNothing(Base)
{
import std.typecons;
alias DoNothing = AutoImplement!(Base, generateDoNothing, isAlwaysTrue);
}
template isAlwaysTrue(alias fun)
{
enum isAlwaysTrue = true;
}
void main()
{
auto foo = new DoNothing!Foo();
foo.bar(13);
}
---
In dmd v2.064-devel-390a934 on Linux 64bit, it is compiled with the message
Deprecation: overriding base class function without using override attribute
is deprecated.
The reason is that current AutoImplement implements overridden member functions
with 'override' attritubes only for the abstract functions.
It is the reason why WhiteHole and BlackHole work without depcerated messages.
They only override abstract functions.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10648] New: std.traits.isMutable is true for struct defined immutable
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10648
Summary: std.traits.isMutable is true for struct defined
immutable
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-07-15 10:13:33 PDT ---
With dmd 2.064alpha this code runs with no assert errors:
import std.traits: isMutable;
immutable struct Foo {}
void main () {
static assert(isMutable!Foo);
}
Issue found by JS:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/xjpfwfydzxxwqisvq...@forum.dlang.org
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10649] New: immutable/const aggregate definitions not consistent
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10649
Summary: immutable/const aggregate definitions not consistent
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: pub...@dicebot.lv
--- Comment #0 from Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv 2013-07-15 12:07:17 PDT ---
immutable struct A
{
struct B
{
int x;
}
int x;
static int y;
}
void main()
{
A.y = 42; // works
A a;
// a.x = 42; // fails
A.B b;
b.x = 42; // works
}
-
Applying const/immutable qualifier to aggregate definition propagates it only
to fields and methods of struct/class. static fields and nested definitions are
left mutable which is extremely confusing and inconsistent with usual
transitivity.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10357] std.typecons.Nullable!(SysTime).Nullable.__ctor!() error instantiating
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10357
Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.co
||m
--- Comment #1 from Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com 2013-07-15
13:13:48 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
With D 2.063, the following code does no longer compile:
import std.datetime;
import std.typecons;
unittest
{
Nullable!SysTime time = SysTime(0);
}
A work around is:
unittest {
Nullable!SysTime time;
time = SysTime(0);
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10593] array's reserve/capacity go haywire if length has been changed prior
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10593 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|x86 |All OS/Version|Windows |All Severity|critical|blocker --- Comment #2 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2013-07-15 13:40:35 PDT --- I'm marking this as blocker. The fact that a reserve could fail, while still doing something, is highly problematic. I also believe this is the issue creating the failures here: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1413 Will provide more information as I can. Also: Confirmed on all platforms. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9607] std.random.randomShuffle and partialShuffle don't work with Xorshift
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9607 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-07-15 15:16:10 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/e86bc65639036d240d5ec6ce0254ccebee097943 Fix Issue 9607 - std.random.randomShuffle() and partialShuffle() don't work with Xorshift. This is an instance of Issue 2803, a clash between a template parameter and a default argument. I've used the workaround proposed in that issue thread: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2803#c1 Tests have been included to ensure that these functions work with all possible RNG types. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/443b54e30b4b67b8968ecde51dcae66c855c135b Merge pull request #1362 from WebDrake/randomshuffle Fix Issue 9607 - std.random.randomShuffle() and partialShuffle() don't work with Xorshift. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10394] opBinaryRight!in and tuple
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10394
--- Comment #3 from Justin Whear jus...@economicmodeling.com 2013-07-15
15:45:23 PDT ---
An update on this issue: we have worked around this by switching away from in
to a method-based approach, so this is no longer blocking for the reporter. I
think this issue remains valid until it's decided whether the in operator (or
operators in general) will allow a tuple on the left hand side. Here's a
simplified example that matches with our use case:
-
struct Graph(T, Address...)
{
struct Node
{
Address address;
T payload;
}
...
Node* opBinaryRight(string op)(Address address) if (op == in)
{
...
}
}
void main()
{
Graph!(double, int, string) graph;
auto node = ...procure a node from somwhere...
// node.address is preferred to tuple(node.address)
if (auto inGraph = node.address in graph)
{
...
}
}
-
As I said, we have worked around this because it's not unreasonable for binary
operators to only allow one value on each side, but it was also nice to have
this kind of syntax in 2.062 and previous.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10434] Don't use Random as template parameter name in std.random (or anywhere else)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10434 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx --- Comment #2 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2013-07-15 16:16:22 PDT --- +1 for RandGen, self-documenting and doesn't clash with existing symbol. Rng is a bit obscure for those not in the know. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9607] std.random.randomShuffle and partialShuffle don't work with Xorshift
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9607 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10642] Win64: wrong codegen comparing different sized integer arguments
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10642 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #2 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2013-07-15 16:55:23 PDT --- compile with dmd -O -m64 test.d produces Need to add -unittest -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10650] New: std.bitmanip.FixedBitArray
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10650
Summary: std.bitmanip.FixedBitArray
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-07-15 17:00:54 PDT ---
This is a struct with no defined constructor that uses a bit array of
statically known size:
import std.bitmanip: BitArray;
struct Foo {
enum nBits = 1_024;
size_t[nBits / size_t.sizeof] buffer;
BitArray bitSet;
bool isInitialized = false;
void bar() /*pure nothrow*/ {
if (!isInitialized) {
bitSet.init(buffer, nBits);
isInitialized = true;
}
// ...
}
}
void main() {}
A statically known size is useful to reduce pressure a bit on the GC, to
increase cache locality, etc. So I suggest to introduce in std.bitmanip a
simple FixedBitArray based on BitArray that offers a simpler usage for
statically known sizes of bit arrays:
struct FixedBitArray(size_t nBits) {
private size_t[nBits / size_t.sizeof + (nBits % size_t.sizeof) ? 1 : 0]
buffer;
...
}
import std.bitmanip: FixedBitArray;
struct Foo {
FixedBitArray!(1_024) bitSet;
void bar() pure nothrow {
// ...
}
}
void main() {}
An alternative name is BoundedBitArray as in the Ada 2012 bounded
collections.
An alternative is to modify BitArray to allow both usages nicely.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10642] Win64: wrong codegen comparing different sized integer arguments
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10642 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS/Version|Windows |All Severity|normal |major --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2013-07-15 17:48:51 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2349 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10605] Lambda grammar is not sufficient
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10605 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-07-15 17:59:55 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/commit/f7e72cc9885eaab905810ef5afc448c5bf197292 fix Issue 10605 - Lambda grammar is not sufficient Improve Lambda grammar and describe rewrite rule https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/commit/c73a1f5cdd283a9bc741d8883defee9901c1234d Merge pull request #351 from 9rnsr/fix_lambda Issue 10605 - Lambda grammar is not sufficient -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10648] std.traits.isMutable is true for struct defined immutable
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10648
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-07-15 18:07:35 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
With dmd 2.064alpha this code runs with no assert errors:
import std.traits: isMutable;
immutable struct Foo {}
void main () {
static assert(isMutable!Foo);
}
Issue found by JS:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/xjpfwfydzxxwqisvq...@forum.dlang.org
It is not an issue. Because:
1. Qualified struct declaration and its behavior is properly documented.
http://dlang.org/struct#ConstStruct
2. The struct name `Foo` always represent 'mutable type Foo'. And, isMutable
tests whether the type qualifier is mutable or not.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10605] Lambda grammar is not sufficient
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10605 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10646] No front-end error for invalid casting dynamic array/static array to class reference
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10646
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice |
Summary|[ICE] when casting dynamic |No front-end error for
|array/static array to class |invalid casting dynamic
|reference |array/static array to class
||reference
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-07-15 18:54:52 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
void main() {
class C { }
C[] csd;
C[2] css;
auto c1 = cast(C)csd;
auto c2 = cast(C)css;
}
---
test.d(6): Error: e2ir: cannot cast csd of type C[] to type test.main.C
test.d(7): Error: e2ir: cannot cast css of type C[2LU] to type test.main.C
---
I think there's no Internal Compiler Error. These are proper errors but just
come from glue layer.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10651] New: Throwing non-Throwable object causes ICE
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10651
Summary: Throwing non-Throwable object causes ICE
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: ice
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: k.hara...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-07-15 19:08:19 PDT ---
Code:
void main()
{
alias T = int;
throw new T(); // ICE
}
Output:
test.d(4): Error: can only throw class objects derived from Throwable, not type
int*
assert statement.c(4894) cd
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10651] Throwing non-Throwable object causes ICE
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10651 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-07-15 19:14:50 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2350 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10647] AutoImplement should implement overridden member functions with 'override' attributes
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10647 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, rejects-valid --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-07-15 19:49:26 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1416 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10651] Throwing non-Throwable object causes ICE
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10651 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-07-15 20:42:56 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/4a3faa1be01d9518aa5286f686f8927689bc4d7d fix Issue 10651 - Throwing non-Throwable object causes ICE https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/0627f87bbd34db8493d21c8d88c32fef49065980 Merge pull request #2350 from 9rnsr/fix10651 Issue 10651 - Throwing non-Throwable object causes ICE -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10651] Throwing non-Throwable object causes ICE
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10651 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8318] Cannot override a method with inferred return type
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8318 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yazan.dab...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-07-15 22:05:18 PDT --- *** Issue 9784 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9784] Fail to use auto when implementing class interface methods
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9784 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-07-15 22:05:18 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 8318 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
