[Issue 11193] [ICE] String template argument mixed with variadic template arguments causes ICE
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11193 monkeywork...@hotmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11198] Error messages for declaring a 'version' inside main() and other functions are unclear
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11198 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, pull CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-14 18:27:16 EST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2760 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11193] [ICE] String template argument mixed with variadic template arguments causes ICE
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11193 --- Comment #2 from monkeywork...@hotmail.com 2013-11-13 23:25:39 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) > I get > > testx.d(1): Error: undefined identifier A > testx.d(1): Error: undefined identifier A > testx.d(7): Error: not a property test!"a b c" > > An no ice. > > Possibly fixed? Those are some weird errors, but it looks like the ICE is no longer happening. Should I make a new bug report for the errors? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8735] Can't use alias this on template + ICE: Assertion failure: 't' on line 100 in file 'aliasthis.c'
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8735
--- Comment #6 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-13 23:01:59 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Two bugs. First bug:
>
> struct Foo
> {
> int test(string op)() { return 0; }
> alias test!"*" this;
> }
>
> test.d(15): Error: no identifier for declarator test!("*")
> test.d(15): Error: semicolon expected to close alias declaration
This is not a bug. AliasThisDeclaration only accepts an "Identifier" as the
forwarding target.
http://dlang.org/declaration
AliasThisDeclaration:
alias Identifier this
So it is invalid bug, or may be filed as an enhancement separately.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11193] [ICE] String template argument mixed with variadic template arguments causes ICE
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11193 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-14 17:57:23 EST --- I get testx.d(1): Error: undefined identifier A testx.d(1): Error: undefined identifier A testx.d(7): Error: not a property test!"a b c" An no ice. Possibly fixed? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11102] [ddoc] stray ( / ) without line or column numbers
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11102 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-14 17:15:28 EST --- Without a test case, it's very difficult to fix. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11080 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #27 from yebblies 2013-11-14 17:05:47 EST --- Sounds like a good candidate for a lint tool. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8179] ICE(e2ir.c) with failed fixed size array cast
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8179 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8179] ICE(e2ir.c) with failed fixed size array cast
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8179 --- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-11-13 20:35:51 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/88b0e504d6b13e3707e6f0d904ee6bf9e1a5236c fix Issue 8179 - ICE(e2ir.c) with failed fixed size array cast https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/66216b55c5b40a50c503963532f882d611fa7500 Merge pull request #2752 from WalterBright/fix8179b fix Issue 8179 - ICE(e2ir.c) with failed fixed size array cast -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11513] [REG 2.064] Assertion in module.c
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11513 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice, pull Platform|x86_64 |All OS/Version|Linux |All Severity|normal |regression --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-13 20:06:11 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2759 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11309] std.concurrency: OwnerTerminated message doesn't work
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11309 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11492] Executable with thread termination crashes (worked in 2.63, works on Windows)
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11492 --- Comment #13 from Martin Nowak 2013-11-13 16:07:28 PST --- Looks much like a duplicate of bug 11406. Can you check whether ld.bfd works for you? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11513] New: [REG 2.064] Assertion in module.c
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11513 Summary: [REG 2.064] Assertion in module.c Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: dragosc...@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Dragos Carp 2013-11-13 15:16:15 PST --- a.d module a; import b; - b.d module a.b; - dmd 2.063 produces error dmd -c a.d a.d(3): Error: module a.b package name 'a' in file b.d conflicts with usage as a module name in file a.d dmd 2.064 after implementation of DIP37 asserts dmd -c a.d dmd: module.c:595: void Module::parse(): Assertion `pkg' failed. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11492] Executable with thread termination crashes (worked in 2.63, works on Windows)
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11492
--- Comment #12 from Atila Neves 2013-11-13 14:55:32
PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Apparently it crashes in the Variant code when it tests for conversion.
> Can you try the following small program with your setup?
>
> cat > bug.d << CODE
> import std.concurrency, std.variant, std.stdio;
>
> void main()
> {
> Variant v;
> v = new OwnerTerminated(thisTid);
> if (v.convertsTo!Tid())
> writeln("does convert");
> else
> writeln("doesn't convert");
> }
> CODE
It crashes on the convertsTo line. I copied std.variant into my own copy and
inserted writelns since I couldn't get gdb to tell me where it crashed.
convertsTo seems to have all its local variables in order then promptly crashes
when it calls fptr in line 633. It makes it through to handler!(A) up to line
294 then crashes on the switch. Again, no help from the debugger. I printed the
value of selector just before the switch statement and it contains, as
expected, OpID.testConversion. I also added a writeln after every case,
including default, and none of them are printed. I tried single-stepping but it
just seems to crash on the switch.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11492] Executable with thread termination crashes (worked in 2.63, works on Windows)
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11492
--- Comment #11 from Martin Nowak 2013-11-13 13:49:19 PST ---
Apparently it crashes in the Variant code when it tests for conversion.
Can you try the following small program with your setup?
cat > bug.d << CODE
import std.concurrency, std.variant, std.stdio;
void main()
{
Variant v;
v = new OwnerTerminated(thisTid);
if (v.convertsTo!Tid())
writeln("does convert");
else
writeln("doesn't convert");
}
CODE
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11501] dirEntries fails with "Failed to stat file" when encountering broken symlinks
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11501 Mike Wey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||mike-...@planet.nl Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Mike Wey 2013-11-13 13:15:52 PST --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 8298 *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8298] dirEntries special linux file in Home dir
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8298 Mike Wey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thelastmamm...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Mike Wey 2013-11-13 13:15:52 PST --- *** Issue 11501 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11506] pure evaluation should be shortcircuited
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11506 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #4 from Walter Bright 2013-11-13 12:22:31 PST --- Yes, bearophile's right, I forgot about nothrow. But the compiler is a bit conservative by requiring nothrow. For throwing pure functions, the foo()+foo() case can still be replaced with 2*foo() if the arguments to foo are identical, even if foo throws. The obvious case of this is the no-argument case, which bearophile mentioned. Also, if foo() returns memory that it new'd, it cannot be elided: pure nothrow string foo(); return foo() ~ foo(); so things are a bit complicated, but there's still optimization opportunity. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11512] New: Regression (2.065 git-head): Can't build Phobos docs with win32 makefile
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11512 Summary: Regression (2.065 git-head): Can't build Phobos docs with win32 makefile Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-11-13 10:56:54 PST --- C:\dmd-git\dmd2\src\phobos>make -f win32.mak HTML Error: don't know how to make './std.ddoc' Worked fine a while ago, but not anymore. The 2.064.2 release works fine too. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11507] Associative Array Documentation
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11507
Chuck Allison changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ch...@freshsources.com
--- Comment #2 from Chuck Allison 2013-11-13 10:19:40
PST ---
Is this what you had in mind?
string[] words = (cast(string)(read(filename))).split();
int[string] counts;
foreach (word; words)
++counts[word];
foreach (w; sort(counts.keys))
writefln("%s: %d", w, counts[w]);
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11494] std.array.appender is not nothrow
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #4 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2013-11-13 10:17:38 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I'm not sure what's going on here, maybe it is trying to parse the string. But
> the appender issue itself might be invalid and/or already fixed in the newest
> dmd though.
It's trying to parse the string.
If you want to "interpret" the string as ubytes, you can use
"std.string.representation". This will "reinterpret" your string according to
its type:
string => immutable(ubyte)[]
wchar[] => ushort[]
dchar[] => uint[]
However, this will not *allocate* a new array, and it is not safe either. It
*is* nothrow though. If you want a new array, I'd recommend adding a ".dup",
but that's not nothrow.
I don't know any 1 liners that are @safe, pure and nothrow. My recommendation
would be to make an explicit trusted helper that will do it for you. Eg:
ubyte[] str2ubyte(in char[] str) pure nothrow
{
auto arr = uninitializedArray!(ubyte[])(str.length);
arr[]=str.representation()[];
return arr;
}
You could templatize too, just like representation, so as to work on any width.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11494] std.array.appender is not nothrow
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
--- Comment #3 from Adam D. Ruppe 2013-11-13
09:22:14 PST ---
The specific thing that got this was here:
import std.conv;
import std.array;
void main() nothrow @safe {
string s = "foo";
auto b = to!(ubyte[])(s);
}
testarray.d(6): Error: 'std.conv.to!(ubyte[]).to!(string).to' is not nothrow
Though, now the change I did in the pull isn't fixing it. When I first played
with this, it was on my other computer which has an older dmd, so maybe
something else has changed since then, but this test here still fails to
compile on my desktop.
I'm not sure what's going on here, maybe it is trying to parse the string. But
the appender issue itself might be invalid and/or already fixed in the newest
dmd though.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11494] std.array.appender is not nothrow
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
monarchdo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2013-11-13 08:52:31 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> This propagates up to to!(array)(other_array) making it not work in nothrow
> too, despite the fact they otherwise don't throw anything except out of memory
> errors.
What do you mean? This works fine on my HEAD. It's even safe and pure:
//
import std.conv, std.array;
void main() nothrow @safe pure
{
int[] arr;
to!(int[])(arr);
appender(arr);
}
//
This is with 2.064.2. In 2.063.2 it's not @safe.
Are you sure the problem in "to" isn't that the duplicated array contains
objects with throwing postblits by any chance?
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11511] New: DDoc - the parameter list of a variadic function cannot be documented properly
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11511 Summary: DDoc - the parameter list of a variadic function cannot be documented properly Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: ddoc Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: ru...@rumbu.ro --- Comment #0 from Răzvan Ștefănescu 2013-11-13 08:33:17 PST --- Assuming the following function: void foo(int i, ...) Documentation of the variable parameter list is not formatted correctly: Example ///Parameters: i = some integer parameter ///... = variable length list of arguments The DDoc output will not automatically align and break the line after "i" documentation Documenting "..." as something else (e.g. "args") will output a compiler warning. Proposal: interpret "..." as parameter or accept "args" as replacement without warning. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11494] std.array.appender is not nothrow
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11494 Adam D. Ruppe changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Adam D. Ruppe 2013-11-13 08:20:50 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1690 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11510] Relax restriction for overlapped pointer field access in safe code/during CTFE
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11510 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-13 07:35:16 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2757 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11427] anonymous unions break structs in @safe code
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11427
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Schuetze 2013-11-03 01:52:10
PST ---
Compile this code
///
struct S
{
union
{
ubyte a;
int x;
}
void[] arr;
}
int foo() @safe
{
S s1 = S();
S s2;
return 0;
}
with "dmd -c test.d" fails with
test.d(14): Error: variable test.foo.s2 unions containing pointers are not
allowed in @safe functions
Please note that the first variable s1 is ok!
This is also triggered in std.format with this code:
import std.format;
import std.array;
void foo()
{
FormatSpec!char spec = FormatSpec!char();
auto s = appender!string;
formattedWrite(s, "%s", "hello");
}
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-13 07:35:24 PST ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2757
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11510] Relax restriction for overlapped pointer field access in safe code/during CTFE
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11510 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-13 07:11:59 PST --- (In reply to comment #0) > // This is necessary to avoid related compiler bug > S _dummy = S(); The "related bug" is bug 11427. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11504] [CTFE] JSONValue cannot make in CTFE
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11504 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||11510 --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-13 07:13:55 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > This problem is settled by supporting union formally in CTFE. For that, I posted a compiler enhancement issue 11510. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11510] New: Relax restriction for overlapped pointer field access in safe code/during CTFE
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11510
Summary: Relax restriction for overlapped pointer field access
in safe code/during CTFE
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: CTFE, spec
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: k.hara...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-13 07:10:31 PST ---
Currently in @safe code, declaring struct variable which contains any
overlapped pointer(==reference) fields is entirely disallowed.
struct S {
union {
size_t x;
int* y; // pointer field
}
int[] arr;
}
// This is necessary to avoid related compiler bug
S _dummy = S();
void test() @safe {
S s;
// Error: variable s unions containing pointers are not allowed
// in @safe functions
}
However I think this is too limited behavior. Even if S.y is an overlapped
pointer field,
1. Declaring a variable typed S
2. Both reading and writing unoverlapped field S.arr
3. Both reading and writing overlapped field S.x
4. Writing overlapped pointer field S.y
should be allowed.
Especially, by combining #3 and #4, you can reinterpret int* to size_t under
the @safe code. But it is nothing wrong, as same as
declaring size_t variable with void initializer.
void test() @safe {
size_t num = void;
}
Even the value of 'num' is garbage, using it won't cause any memory corruption
in @safe. So currently it is properly accepted by compiler.
---
And the semantics should also work during CTFE. For CTFE, one following
restriction is necessary.
- Any field value reinterpretation by using two overlapped fields is
disallowed.
If it's detected in CTFE, should raise compile-time error.
Therefore, following code should work as expected.
bool test() {
S s;// declaration is OK
s.y = [1,2,3].ptr;// writing overlapped pointer field is OK
assert(s.y[0..3] == [1,2,3]); // reading valid field is OK
s.x = 10;
assert(s.x == 10);
// There's no reinterpretation between S.x and S.y
return true;
}
static assert(test()); // run CTFE
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11509] AA.dup @property
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11509 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid | Summary|AA.rehash doesn't compile |AA.dup @property |with -property | Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-11-13 06:19:07 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > Currently this is not a bug. > > In object.di, AssociativeArray template struct defines 'rehash' and 'dup' > method as normal function. So under -property switch, you cannot call them > without parenthesis. Thank you. I think AA.dup should become a @property, for uniformity with array dup. And perhaps rehash too. So now it's a low priority enhancement request. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11492] Executable with thread termination crashes (worked in 2.63, works on Windows)
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11492 --- Comment #10 from Atila Neves 2013-11-13 05:35:51 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) > Can you find out the function where the segfault happens? In the original example: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x77308700 (LWP 5006)] 0x00471b83 in std.variant.__T8VariantNVm32Z.VariantN.__T7handlerTC3std11concurrency15OwnerTerminatedZ.handler() ( parm=, pStore=, selector=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/variant.d:294 294 switch (selector) (gdb) bt #0 0x00471b83 in std.variant.__T8VariantNVm32Z.VariantN.__T7handlerTC3std11concurrency15OwnerTerminatedZ.handler() ( parm=, pStore=, selector=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/variant.d:294 #1 0x0046f5eb in std.variant.__T8VariantNVm32Z.VariantN.__T10convertsToTS3std11concurrency3TidZ.convertsTo() ( this=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/variant.d:633 #2 0x0046f57e in std.concurrency.Message.__T10convertsToTS3std11concurrency3TidZ.convertsTo() ( this=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/concurrency.d:123 #3 0x0046f005 in std.concurrency.MessageBox.__T3getTPFNaNbNfS3std11concurrency3TidZvTDFNbNfC3std11concurrency15OwnerTerminatedZvZ.get() ( this=, msg=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/concurrency.d:1150 #4 0x0046f277 in std.concurrency.MessageBox.__T3getTPFNaNbNfS3std11concurrency3TidZvTDFNbNfC3std11concurrency15OwnerTerminatedZvZ.get() ( this=, msg=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/concurrency.d:1189 #5 0x0046f2ba in std.concurrency.MessageBox.__T3getTPFNaNbNfS3std11concurrency3TidZvTDFNbNfC3std11concurrency15OwnerTerminatedZvZ.get() ( this=, msg=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/concurrency.d:1201 #6 0x0046f32c in std.concurrency.MessageBox.__T3getTPFNaNbNfS3std11concurrency3TidZvTDFNbNfC3std11concurrency15OwnerTerminatedZvZ.get() ( this=, list=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/concurrency.d:1217 #7 0x0046ef51 in std.concurrency.MessageBox.__T3getTPFNaNbNfS3std11concurrency3TidZvTDFNbNfC3std11concurrency15OwnerTerminatedZvZ.get() ( this=, _param_1=, _param_0=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/concurrency.d:1314 #8 0x0046ed9a in std.concurrency.__T7receiveTPFNaNbNfS3std11concurrency3TidZvTDFNbNfC3std11concurrency15OwnerTerminatedZvZ.receive() ( _param_1=, _param_0=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/concurrency.d:635 #9 0x0046ba78 in thread_local_singleton.threadWriter() () at thread_local_singleton.d:8 #10 0x00472863 in std.concurrency.__T6_spawnTPFZvZ._spawn() (this=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/concurrency.d:487 #11 0x00495466 in core.thread.Thread.run() () #12 0x004951ed in thread_entryPoint () #13 0x77bc70a2 in start_thread () from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0 #14 0x773ee49d in clone () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11492] Executable with thread termination crashes (worked in 2.63, works on Windows)
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11492 --- Comment #9 from Atila Neves 2013-11-13 05:34:13 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) > Can you find out the function where the segfault happens? In the last example (the one from TDPL) I don't get a segfault, I get SIGILL: #0 0x004a44f0 in ?? () #1 0x77ecef08 in ?? () #2 0x77de668d in _dl_lookup_symbol_x () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #3 0x004695eb in std.variant.__T8VariantNVm32Z.VariantN.__T10convertsToTS3std8typecons35__T5TupleTS3std11concurrency3TidTiZ5TupleZ.convertsTo() ( this=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/variant.d:633 #4 0x0046957e in std.concurrency.Message.__T10convertsToTS3std11concurrency3TidTiZ.convertsTo() ( this=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/concurrency.d:125 #5 0x00468fb6 in std.concurrency.MessageBox.__T3getTDFNbNfS3std11concurrency3TidiZvTPFNaNfC3std11concurrency14LinkTerminatedZvTPFNaNfC3std11concurrency15OwnerTerminatedZvTPFS3std7variant17__T8VariantNVm32Z8VariantNZvZ.get() ( this=, msg=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/concurrency.d:1150 #6 0x004693a6 in std.concurrency.MessageBox.__T3getTDFNbNfS3std11concurrency3TidiZvTPFNaNfC3std11concurrency14LinkTerminatedZvTPFNaNfC3std11concurrency15OwnerTerminatedZvTPFS3std7variant17__T8VariantNVm32Z8VariantNZvZ.get() ( this=, list=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/concurrency.d:1238 #7 0x00468ef9 in std.concurrency.MessageBox.__T3getTDFNbNfS3std11concurrency3TidiZvTPFNaNfC3std11concurrency14LinkTerminatedZvTPFNaNfC3std11concurrency15OwnerTerminatedZvTPFS3std7variant17__T8VariantNVm32Z8VariantNZvZ.get() ( this=, _param_3=, _param_2=, _param_1=, _param_0=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/concurrency.d:1314 #8 0x00468c41 in std.concurrency.__T11receiveOnlyTS3std11concurrency3TidTiZ.receiveOnly() ( __HID10=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/concurrency.d:718 #9 0x0045e9c8 in concurrency_tdpl.fun() (high=, low=) at concurrency_tdpl.d:15 #10 0x0045ebc9 in std.concurrency.__T6_spawnTPFiiZvTiTiZ._spawn() (this=) at /usr/include/dlang/dmd/std/concurrency.d:487 #11 0x00485996 in core.thread.Thread.run() () #12 0x0048571d in thread_entryPoint () #13 0x77bc70a2 in start_thread () from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0 #14 0x773ee49d in clone () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11492] Executable with thread termination crashes (worked in 2.63, works on Windows)
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11492 --- Comment #8 from Atila Neves 2013-11-13 05:32:57 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) > Both examples work correctly for me. > In the latter there is an unhandled exception. > std.concurrency.OwnerTerminated@std/concurrency.d(234): Owner terminated I get that unhandled exception in 2.063. On 2.064 it crashes. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11509] AA.rehash doesn't compile with -property
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11509 --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-13 05:02:42 PST --- Currently this is not a bug. In object.di, AssociativeArray template struct defines 'rehash' and 'dup' method as normal function. So under -property switch, you cannot call them without parenthesis. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11509] AA.rehash doesn't compile with -property
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11509 --- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-11-13 03:25:57 PST --- The same happens with ".dup". -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11509] New: AA.rehash doesn't compile with -property
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11509
Summary: AA.rehash doesn't compile with -property
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-11-13 03:02:58 PST ---
Problem found by Gary Willoughby:
void main() {
int[string] aa;
aa.rehash;
}
dmd 2.065alpha gives (compiling with "-property"):
temp.d(3): Error: not a property aa.rehash
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9737] std.net.curl and SSL - documentation missing
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9737
--- Comment #9 from Jacob Carlborg 2013-11-13 02:18:40 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I see the certificate bundle file (and the scripts to regenerate it) are
> installed by dmd in the ./dmd2/windows folder
> It seems that the file is not picked automatically by libcurl even if I copy
> it
> along the EXE (tried with ca-bundle.crt and curl-ca-bundle.crt). So on Windows
> would be optimal if std.net.curl would set automatically the option, if the
> ca-bundle.crt is in the same folder as the EXE (or make this configurable).
> Then the documentation should specify that you need to deliver with your EXE
> the dlang/dmd2/windows/ca-bundle.crt
Can't we build one in, into Phobos using import("ca-bundle.crt");?
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10162] Opposite of std.string.representation
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10162 --- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-11-13 02:00:59 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > Most of my use cases are to sort a char[]. It's a common operation. So instead of unrepresentation an alternative solution is to introduce a little std.ascii.asciiSort (it could also be named just std.ascii.sort, or std.algorithm.asciiSort): char[] s1 = ['t', 'e', 's', 't']; string t1 = s1.asciiSort; string s2 = "test"; string t2 = s2.dup.asciiSort.assumeUnique; -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8313] stack overflow on recursive ifti evaluation
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8313 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright 2013-11-13 01:46:09 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2753 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9737] std.net.curl and SSL - documentation missing
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9737 --- Comment #8 from Tavi Cacina 2013-11-13 01:44:38 PST --- I see the certificate bundle file (and the scripts to regenerate it) are installed by dmd in the ./dmd2/windows folder It seems that the file is not picked automatically by libcurl even if I copy it along the EXE (tried with ca-bundle.crt and curl-ca-bundle.crt). So on Windows would be optimal if std.net.curl would set automatically the option, if the ca-bundle.crt is in the same folder as the EXE (or make this configurable). Then the documentation should specify that you need to deliver with your EXE the dlang/dmd2/windows/ca-bundle.crt -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
