[Issue 11425] Broken shadowing variable diagnostic
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11425 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-17 18:34:40 EST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2793 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11532] New: Variadics using the C ABI should not accept D-specific types
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11532 Summary: Variadics using the C ABI should not accept D-specific types Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: and...@erdani.com --- Comment #0 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2013-11-16 23:21:11 PST --- The ABI for C variadics (e.g. printf and friends) does not understand D data types, in particular slices and fixed-size arrays. We should reject statically any passing of D-specific data through C-style variadics. This has been a very nagging issue during a port of a large C codebase. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1171] Cannot create a static array with the length of a const static array in function scope, D1 only
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1171 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2013-11-17 18:17:10 EST --- Closing because D1 is no longer supported. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3279] (D1 only) Confusing error message when comparing types
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3279 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #5 from yebblies 2013-11-17 18:10:07 EST --- Closing because D1 is no longer supported. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3573] pure and nothrow allow function return type to be inferred
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3573 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burg.bas...@yahoo.com --- Comment #2 from yebblies 2013-11-17 18:08:31 EST --- *** Issue 11491 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11491] @safe prefix allows procedures without return type
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11491 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2013-11-17 18:08:31 EST --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3573 *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4715] Bad error message with update for already defined variable
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4715 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-17 18:06:52 EST --- The second case has a syntax error, and doesn't get through parsing. There is no way to get semantic errors if it won't parse. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5222] label prepending block in 'ThenStatement' breaks creating new scope
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5222 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-17 18:03:14 EST --- Fixed now, there was a bug with if/mixin that was probably the same root cause. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5116] spurious 'is used as a type' error after template lookup error
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5116 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #2 from yebblies 2013-11-17 18:04:40 EST --- Appears to be fixed. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6764] (D1 only) IFTI fails on typesafe variadic function over static array with non IntegerLiteral length
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6764 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from yebblies 2013-11-17 17:56:09 EST --- Closing because D1 is no longer supported. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7853] Almost useless error message related to postblit with AA of const struct
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7853 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||WORKSFORME -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8059] Deprecate .classinfo
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8059 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from yebblies 2013-11-17 17:44:49 EST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2792 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8092] Static accepted without declaration
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8092 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-17 17:16:06 EST --- Now prints: testx.d(6): Error: Declaration expected, not '}' -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9256] A purity-related error message in case of member access
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9256 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from yebblies 2013-11-17 17:09:46 EST --- Now gives both: testx.d(5): Error: pure nested function 'main' cannot access mutable data 'x' testx.d(5): Error: need 'this' for 'x' of type 'int' Good enough? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9562] Built-in runtime properties should become error with `Type.prop`
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9562 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | --- Comment #2 from yebblies 2013-11-17 17:03:32 EST --- Whoops, forgot to use -o- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2791 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5113] (D1 only): stray e2ir: in casting error message
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5113 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #9 from yebblies 2013-11-17 16:57:54 EST --- Andrei has been closing them, D1 is dead. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5113] (D1 only): stray e2ir: in casting error message
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5113 Denis Shelomovskij changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE | Summary|stray e2ir: in casting |(D1 only): stray e2ir: in |error message |casting error message --- Comment #8 from Denis Shelomovskij 2013-11-17 09:53:45 MSK --- (In reply to comment #7) > Duplicate or wontfix, D1 is dead and 7514 is the same issue. > > *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 7514 *** Yes but we still have lots of "D1 only" issues. You can propose to WONTFIX them all but closing only this one is inconsistent. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9562] Built-in runtime properties should become error with `Type.prop`
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9562 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-17 16:46:05 EST --- Fails now: testx.d(9): Error: type int[1] is not an expression testx.d(10): Error: type int[1] is not an expression testx.d(11): Error: type int[1] is not an expression testx.d(12): Error: type int[1] is not an expression testx.d(9): Error: type char[1] is not an expression testx.d(10): Error: type char[1] is not an expression testx.d(11): Error: type char[1] is not an expression testx.d(12): Error: type char[1] is not an expression testx.d(8): Error: type int[] is not an expression testx.d(9): Error: type int[] is not an expression testx.d(10): Error: type int[] is not an expression testx.d(11): Error: type int[] is not an expression testx.d(12): Error: type int[] is not an expression testx.d(8): Error: type char[] is not an expression testx.d(9): Error: type char[] is not an expression testx.d(10): Error: type char[] is not an expression testx.d(11): Error: type char[] is not an expression testx.d(12): Error: type char[] is not an expression -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10685] Immutable interval foreach to propagate index value range
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10685 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2013-11-17 16:43:57 EST --- Same thing as 9570 / static array index *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 9570 *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9620] Error messages of failed pure enforcement
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9620 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Platform|x86 |All OS/Version|Windows |All --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-17 16:41:25 EST --- The error messages now match, but still refer to the outer function instead of the nested one. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2790 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9570] Wrong foreach index implicit conversion error
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9570 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Severity|minor |enhancement --- Comment #2 from yebblies 2013-11-17 16:44:41 EST --- Same thing for foreach(immutable i; 0..7) etc -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9570] Wrong foreach index implicit conversion error
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9570 --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-17 16:43:57 EST --- *** Issue 10685 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9690] cannot access to @disable'd symbol from inner function of another @disable'd
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9690 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Severity|minor |enhancement -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9831] Error message with failed lambda inference
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9831 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Platform|x86 |All OS/Version|Windows |All --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-17 16:16:54 EST --- x => c does not have a type yet, the problem is in inferring the type, not converting. I'm tempted to close as invalid, but I'll leave it up to you. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9861] Spurious 'is used as type' error with failed template instantiation
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9861 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-17 16:13:26 EST --- Seems to have been fixed at some point. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3013] Duplicate error message on calling a function with a type
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3013 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10546] UFCS hides actual static assert failure in opDispatch
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10546 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-17 16:06:38 EST --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 8387 *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8387] Semantic errors in opDispatch body are not reported
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8387 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||turkey...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from yebblies 2013-11-17 16:08:52 EST --- *** Issue 8097 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8097] opDispatch produces confusing error message when rejected by a template constraint
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8097 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from yebblies 2013-11-17 16:08:52 EST --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 8387 *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3013] Duplicate error message on calling a function with a type
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3013 --- Comment #8 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-11-16 21:09:12 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/7e59edf65460423ea93d1c1ee04928f26e1b82b8 Fix Issue 3013 - Duplicate error message on calling a function with a type https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/4f4901d782e8d3dc6ccce151e013d953b3b21963 Merge pull request #2786 from yebblies/issue3013 Issue 3013 - Duplicate error message on calling a function with a type -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10760] compiler drops opDispatch if it contains an error(s)
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10760 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from yebblies 2013-11-17 16:06:40 EST --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 8387 *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8387] Semantic errors in opDispatch body are not reported
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8387 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||temta...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2013-11-17 16:06:40 EST --- *** Issue 10760 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8387] Semantic errors in opDispatch body are not reported
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8387 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k.hara...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from yebblies 2013-11-17 16:06:38 EST --- *** Issue 10546 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10241] Probably wrong "did you mean" suggestion in error message
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10241 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-17 16:09:43 EST --- Issue 9644? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10805] wrong error message for wrong delimited string
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10805 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-17 16:04:43 EST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2789 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11263] Better code formatting in error messages with refused lambdas
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11263 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-17 15:55:55 EST --- There is _some_ room for improvement, but matching the original formatting is out of the question. You don't usually want the original text anyway, you want the result of semantic. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11263] Better code formatting in error messages with refused lambdas
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11263 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|x86 |All OS/Version|Windows |All Severity|minor |enhancement -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7514] [e2ir] Error in e2ir at dynamic array to static array cast
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7514 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||11484 --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2013-11-17 15:37:34 EST --- I put the fix in the pull in issue 11484 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5113] stray e2ir: in casting error message
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5113 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #7 from yebblies 2013-11-17 15:38:06 EST --- Duplicate or wontfix, D1 is dead and 7514 is the same issue. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 7514 *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7514] [e2ir] Error in e2ir at dynamic array to static array cast
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7514 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||baseball@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from yebblies 2013-11-17 15:38:07 EST --- *** Issue 5113 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11484] [e2ir] Error in e2ir at cast to/from static array
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11484 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, pull --- Comment #7 from yebblies 2013-11-17 15:31:04 EST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2788 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11485] [e2ir] Error in e2ir at numeric/bool to class/interface cast
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11485 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, pull CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2013-11-17 15:10:14 EST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2788 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9644] Spell checker gives silly suggestions for 1-2 character symbols
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9644 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from yebblies 2013-11-17 14:55:43 EST --- I've implemented the difference limit as min(strlen(id) - 1, 2). https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2787 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3013] Duplicate error message on calling a function with a type
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3013 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Platform|x86 |All Version|1.043 |D2 Summary|Weird implicit conversion |Duplicate error message on |error with cryptic mangled |calling a function with a |name - assigning to invalid |type |arraytype.function call | OS/Version|Windows |All --- Comment #7 from yebblies 2013-11-17 14:38:36 EST --- Currently prints: DMD v2.065 DEBUG testx.d(4): Error: string is not an expression testx.d(4): Error: string is not an expression testx.d(4): Error: cannot pass type string as function argument Which is pretty accurate except for the duplicate errors. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2786 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11508] [REG 2.064] Wrong code with -O on x86_64 for char comparisons
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11508 --- Comment #6 from yebblies 2013-11-17 12:53:56 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) > Looks fixed in master now. yebblies, you can go ahead and claim Facebook's bug > bounty over at > https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1325896-reg-2-064-wrong-code-with-o-on-x86_64-for-char-comparisons > for this fix! $$$ -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11112] Unable to execute shell commands in different threads
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC||c...@dawg.eu --- Comment #3 from Martin Nowak 2013-11-16 17:33:36 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1696 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1832] reading/writing an archive causes data loss; std.zip horribly broken
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1832 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||and...@erdani.com --- Comment #3 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2013-11-16 16:58:10 PST --- Please redo your patch as a pull request at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/. Thanks! -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1832] reading/writing an archive causes data loss; std.zip horribly broken
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1832 --- Comment #2 from Andrea Fontana 2013-11-16 15:54:04 PST --- Created an attachment (id=1290) My patch as explained in bug's comment See previous comment -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10508] qsort_r is not present on older Linux systems
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10508 --- Comment #2 from Artem Tarasov 2013-11-16 14:41:34 PST --- Some people still run CentOS 5. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9466] Compiler crash with code-coverage generation with large files
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9466 --- Comment #17 from Walter Bright 2013-11-16 14:33:32 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2785 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11520] [bionic] qsort is missing on linux/bionic
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11520 --- Comment #1 from Martin Nowak 2013-11-16 14:01:25 PST --- An existing (though copyrighted) implementation was removed with https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/45f1755cf13a1a376cc1572b5a9327d95fc0db75. Also the used qsort_r isn't present in older glibc versions (see bug 10508). -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10508] qsort_r is not present on older Linux systems
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10508 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@dawg.eu --- Comment #1 from Martin Nowak 2013-11-16 13:59:31 PST --- GLIBC 2.8 is almost 5 years old. Why do you need to use such an old libc? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11531] New: For a faster std.algorithm.group on strings
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11531 Summary: For a faster std.algorithm.group on strings Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-11-16 13:28:06 PST --- This is a low-priority enhancement request. >From my tests I've seen you can speed up std.algorithm.group applied on strings more than twice if you instead apply it on a immutable(ubyte)[] using std.string.representation. Dmitry Olshansky has suggested some ideas that can improve the performance of std.algorithm.group applied on strings: As to group it has to find runs of identical items. It can be speed up for Unicode if you take into account 2 simple tricks: - you don't need to decode - just identify the size of current dchar (stride) and see how many repetitions of such follow it; - special case if the current (w)char ASCII (or BMP for UTF-16) so as to speed up counting (1 char vs variable length slice of 1-4 chars, ditto with wchar). -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9466] Compiler crash with code-coverage generation with large files
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9466 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | --- Comment #16 from Walter Bright 2013-11-16 12:17:36 PST --- Running under valgrind uncovered the error. Will post fix shortly. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11447] Closure provide bogus values
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11447
--- Comment #2 from deadalnix 2013-11-16 12:10:06 PST ---
OK, I've been able to spend some time making this report look better.
a.d :
class A {
}
import std.algorithm;
import std.array;
struct TemplateInstancier {
auto instanciateFromResolvedArgs(A a) {
auto bs = [B(a)];
static A gladeulfeurah;
gladeulfeurah = a;
// XXX: have to put array once again to avoid multiple map.
string id = bs.map!(
b => b.apply!(
function string() { assert(0); },
delegate string(i) {
assert(a is gladeulfeurah, "tagazok");
return "";
}
)
).join;
}
}
enum Tag {
Undefined,
A,
}
struct B {
A a;
Tag tag;
this(A a) {
tag = Tag.A;
this.a = a;
}
}
auto apply(alias undefinedHandler, alias handler)(B b) {
final switch(b.tag) with(Tag) {
case Undefined :
return undefinedHandler();
case A :
return handler(b.a);
}
}
fail.d:
import a;
void main() {
auto a = new A();
TemplateInstancier().instanciateFromResolvedArgs(a);
}
Compile via:
dmd -c -offail.o fail.d -m64 -w -debug -gc
dmd -c -ofa.o a.d -m64 -w -debug -gc
gcc -o fail fail.o a.o -m64 -lphobos2 -export-dynamic -ldl
Run via:
./fail
The program assert fail with the message tagazok. The value of the variable a
in the closure is incorrect.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11529] Unclear error message when rvalue is passed as `ref'
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11529 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-11-16 12:08:41 PST --- 2.062: test.d(6): Error: function test.f (ref S s) is not callable using argument types (S) test.d(6): Error: S() is not an lvalue 2.063: test.d(6): Error: function test.f (ref S s) is not callable using argument types (S) Caused by https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1842 which I objected to. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9466] Compiler crash with code-coverage generation with large files
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9466 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #15 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-11-16 11:35:50 PST --- (In reply to comment #14) > Cannot reproduce with 2.064 or 2.065 head. Looks like it's gone with the release version on 2.064. Reopen if you run into it again. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9466] Compiler crash with code-coverage generation with large files
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9466 --- Comment #14 from Walter Bright 2013-11-16 11:32:34 PST --- Cannot reproduce with 2.064 or 2.065 head. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11508] [REG 2.064] Wrong code with -O on x86_64 for char comparisons
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11508 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-11-16 11:16:53 PST --- Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/e3f5bb6040e4889932d3a1f06b0cd812e91790f1 Merge pull request #2776 from yebblies/issue11508 Issue 11508 - [REG 2.064] Wrong code with -O on x86_64 for char comparisons -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6010] -fPIC is broken on freebsd/64
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6010 --- Comment #4 from Brad Roberts 2013-11-16 10:43:57 PST --- I'm curious what was broken and when it was fixed. It definitely was thoroughly broken back when initially adding freebsd 32 and 64 to the test fleet. Not worth the time to bisect though. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6010] -fPIC is broken on freebsd/64
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6010 Brad Roberts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11530] New: need gdb dwarf test suite
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11530 Summary: need gdb dwarf test suite Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: c...@dawg.eu --- Comment #0 from Martin Nowak 2013-11-16 10:36:39 PST --- I'm about to overhaul dmd's DWARF information and will try to fix the outstanding issues. It seems (subjective) that the current state is worse than a year ago. So in any case we'll need a test suite to avoid regressions. In the best case we find/write a tool that verifies correct debug information. Otherwise we could try to automate gdb sessions but this is probably a very slow test. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11508] [REG 2.064] Wrong code with -O on x86_64 for char comparisons
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11508 tchaje...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from tchaje...@gmail.com 2013-11-16 10:36:47 PST --- Looks fixed in master now. yebblies, you can go ahead and claim Facebook's bug bounty over at https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1325896-reg-2-064-wrong-code-with-o-on-x86_64-for-char-comparisons for this fix! -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6010] -fPIC is broken on freebsd/64
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6010 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-11-16 10:26:13 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/5085acbadba20b0c2d0f94ba6822853200030109 close Issue 6010 - fPIC is broken on FreeBSD/64 - The ABI doesn't differ from linux so reenable the tests. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/46c194b696d8ca9604e97c61a41a19a3787d5df5 Merge pull request #2781 from dawgfoto/fix6010 close Issue 6010 - fPIC is broken on FreeBSD/64 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11508] [REG 2.064] Wrong code with -O on x86_64 for char comparisons
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11508 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-11-16 10:28:05 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/f0e66ee8779936795fdb799a203b181371b38f7f Issue 11508 - [REG 2.064] Wrong code with -O on x86_64 for char comparisons https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/51125bbed57caad4d326419470be07790915de5a Merge pull request #2776 from yebblies/issue11508 Issue 11508 - [REG 2.064] Wrong code with -O on x86_64 for char comparisons -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11529] New: Unclear error message when rvalue is passed `ref`
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11529
Summary: Unclear error message when rvalue is passed `ref`
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: rscr...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Roy Crihfield 2013-11-16 10:17:52 PST
---
Compiling this:
struct S {}
void f(ref S s) {}
void main()
{
f(S());
}
Gives an error without a clear explanation:
Error: function f730.f (ref S s) is not callable using argument types (S)
This should at the very least give an indication that the struct passed is a
temporary. Especially for those unfamiliar with the language, there's no
obvious indication of a type mismatch.
The same issue applies to `const ref' and `in ref' parameters.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5569] 64 bit Dwarf symbolic debug info not recognized by gdb
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5569 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||c...@dawg.eu Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from Martin Nowak 2013-11-16 10:08:52 PST --- This should be fixed by now. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11528] appender: crash with -inline -O
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11528 Rainer Schuetze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Rainer Schuetze 2013-11-16 08:39:59 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1695 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11528] New: appender: crash with -inline -O
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11528
Summary: appender: crash with -inline -O
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: r.sagita...@gmx.de
--- Comment #0 from Rainer Schuetze 2013-11-16 08:29:39
PST ---
This program is tweaked to cause a crash when building for Win32:
import std.array;
void main()
{
auto arr = appender!string();
asm { mov EBX,-1; }
arr.put("1");
}
>dmd -inline -O -g test.d
>test
object.Error: Integer Divide by Zero
0x004222B6 in _ULDIV
0x00404D2A in stdarrayAppender at m:\s\d\rainers\phobos\std\array.d(2453)
0x004234C0 in memset
0x0040F76E in _d_newitemT
0x00405AC0 in stdarrayAppender at m:\s\d\rainers\phobos\std\array.d(2339)
0x0040E5F8 in rtdmain2_d_run_mainrunAll__lambda1
0x0040E5CB in rtdmain2_d_run_mainrunAll
0x0040E4E1 in _d_run_main
0x0040CD90 in main at M:\s\d\rainers\bugs\rs165\test.d(3)
0x75EC850D in BaseThreadInitThunk
0x77DDBF39 in RtlInitializeExceptionChain
0x77DDBF0C in RtlInitializeExceptionChain
This is caused by the bsr intrinsic having undefined behaviour for 0 (i.e. the
previous value of the destination register is preserved).
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11504] [CTFE] JSONValue cannot make in CTFE
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11504 John Colvin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||john.loughran.colvin@gmail. ||com --- Comment #6 from John Colvin 2013-11-16 12:50:11 GMT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > The reason why the code mentioned above was OK in the past is a thing by > > > the > > > bugs of the compilers. (SeeAlso: Issue11427 > > > > std.json was refactored a while ago and it might be the cause of this > > regression. But I still don't understand what the problem is with this code > > *right now*. Can anyone try to explain what SHOO meant in plain English? > > I separately filed the true std.json regression as issue 11527. I would argue that is not necessarily a bug. See my comments in issue 11527 and https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1693 https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11510 is the real problem here, as you rightly point out. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10922] Compiler segfaults when using __traits(parent, {})
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10922 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10922] Compiler segfaults when using __traits(parent, {})
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10922
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-11-16 04:46:22 PST ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/3371989030cedd3d58732fc423e68ce83a33e40c
fix Issue 10922 - Compiler segfaults when using __traits(parent, {})
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/a86eb6c5702beff5fe786b0b2c6d5a954be85565
Merge pull request #2779 from 9rnsr/fix10922
Issue 10922 - Compiler segfaults when using __traits(parent, {})
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11527] JSONValue cannot set values through named fields
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11527 John Colvin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||john.loughran.colvin@gmail. ||com --- Comment #3 from John Colvin 2013-11-16 12:43:18 GMT --- I thought this was by design as part of the new API? One of the goals was to add type-safety. auto v = JSONValue(1); and JSONValue v; v.type = JSON_TYPE.INTEGER; v.integer = 1; are both valid. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10084] ICE(toir.c) alias template parameter
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10084
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, rejects-valid
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-16 04:38:18 PST ---
Make the OP code more readable.
void callFunc(T, alias func)() {
void call(Member)() {
func!Member();
}
call!T;
}
template Mix() {
void save() {
void saveImpl(Member)() {
}
callFunc!(typeof(this), saveImpl);
}
}
struct S {
mixin Mix;
}
With 2.064, the code doesn't occur ICE. Instead following errors printed:
test.d(3): Error: function test.callFunc!(S, saveImpl).callFunc.call!(S).call
cannot access frame of function test.S.Mix!().save
test.d(5): Error: template instance test.callFunc!(S,
saveImpl).callFunc.call!(S) error instantiating
test.d(12):instantiated from here: callFunc!(S, saveImpl)
test.d(12): Error: template instance test.callFunc!(S, saveImpl) error
instantiating
However compiler should accept the code. All of template functions instantiated
in save() -
callFunc!(S, saveImpl),
callFunc!(S, saveImpl).call!T == callFunc!(S, saveImpl).call!Member
callFunc!(S, saveImpl).call!T.func!Member == save.saveImpl!Member
should capture the frame pointer of save() member function.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2780
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10922] Compiler segfaults when using __traits(parent, {})
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10922 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-16 03:43:07 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2779 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11375] [profile+nothrow] Semantic 'no throw' error with -profile switch
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11375 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11375] [profile+nothrow] Semantic 'no throw' error with -profile switch
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11375 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-11-16 03:27:25 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/f633cf3796920ff7c3062cc0218e2b2654f8630c Fix Issue 11375 - [profile+nothrow] Semantic 'no throw' error with -profile switch https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/c5147ac15bc5cca6dbfd53f33505b7f1d06e4098 Merge pull request #2765 from yebblies/issue11375 Issue 11375 - [profile+nothrow] Semantic 'no throw' error with -profile switch -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11525] REG(2.065): Error: 'a[] *= a[]' each element is not a scalar, it is a Complex!double
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11525 --- Comment #3 from yebblies 2013-11-16 22:07:08 EST --- Yes, but unless the 2.064 behavior was intentional, this is an enhancement and not a regression. I remember this being discussed before but I don't know where. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11504] [CTFE] JSONValue cannot make in CTFE
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11504 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||CTFE Component|Phobos |DMD --- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-16 02:41:13 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > The reason why the code mentioned above was OK in the past is a thing by the > > bugs of the compilers. (SeeAlso: Issue11427 > > std.json was refactored a while ago and it might be the cause of this > regression. But I still don't understand what the problem is with this code > *right now*. Can anyone try to explain what SHOO meant in plain English? I separately filed the true std.json regression as issue 11527. After fixing the bug, the OP case will print following errors. C:\dmd2\src\phobos\std\json.d(181): Error: Unions with overlapping fields are not yet supported in CTFE C:\dmd2\src\phobos\std\json.d(103):called from here: this.assign(v) test.d(6):called from here: v.integer(1L) test.d(12):called from here: foo() The error is caused by issue 11510, and could be fixed by my compiler enhancement fix. I change this to dmd issue. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11527] JSONValue cannot set values through named fields
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11527 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, rejects-valid --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-16 02:41:33 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1693 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8664] Compiler causes stack overflow with recursive typedef and option -g
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8664 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11527] JSONValue cannot set values through named fields
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11527 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-16 02:32:27 PST --- This is git-head (2.065a) regression. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11527] New: JSONValue cannot set values through named fields
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11527
Summary: JSONValue cannot set values through named fields
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: k.hara...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-16 02:31:46 PST ---
Following test cases will throw JSONException in runtime:
import std.json;
void main()
{
JSONValue v;
v.integer = 1;
}
Output:
std.json.JSONException@std\json.d(91): JSONValue is not an integer
This is caused by:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1421
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8664] Compiler causes stack overflow with recursive typedef and option -g
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8664 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-11-16 02:22:07 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/e248270405b8b572115e0474180b258a0d2b73a0 fix Issue 8664 - Compiler causes stack overflow with recursive typedef and option -g https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/a4319e8383c4a78ef32f51e5e1175cb27439b4e9 Merge pull request #2777 from WalterBright/fix8664 fix Issue 8664 - Compiler causes stack overflow with recursive typedef and option -g -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 10483] ICE(expression.c) .init of struct with block initialized 2D static array
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10483 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Component|coffimplib |DMD Version|D1 |D1 & D2 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-16 02:10:52 PST --- I don't know this is really an issue in D1, but same bug had existed in 2.063 and earlier, and it's fixed in 2.064, by: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2136 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8255] [CTFE] ICE when passing 'ref' literal
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8255 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |FIXED -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9366] D1: Appending a value cast to void to a void[] crashes DMD.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9366 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mailnew4s...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from 2013-11-16 02:09:39 PST --- This, as well as 11 other ICE reports, are D1 only. Should these be closed, as D1 is not supported anymore? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8511] Segfault with forward-referenced enum
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8511 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |FIXED -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6439] [CTFE] union fields are initialized independently
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6439 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-16 02:05:09 PST --- Worksforme from 2.064. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1687] "extern (C++) interface" and vtbl
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1687 --- Comment #9 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2013-11-16 02:02:08 PST --- ... and thanks! -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1687] "extern (C++) interface" and vtbl
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1687 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #8 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2013-11-16 02:01:47 PST --- Worked as expected after I pulled the latest. Closing. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2481] mixing field into anonymous struct inside class generates field overlapping vtable
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2481 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-16 02:03:30 PST --- Worksforme in D2 with test case, and D1 is not supported anymore. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3991] Void initializers in unions considered overlapping
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3991 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2013-11-16 02:04:10 PST --- Worksforme in D2 with test case, and D1 is not supported anymore. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11526] New: buffer overflow detected __fortify_fail when building dmd from source
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11526 Summary: buffer overflow detected __fortify_fail when building dmd from source Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: timothee.co...@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Timothee Cour 2013-11-16 01:38:08 PST --- reposting from http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.d.general/135653: On my one of my machines (ubuntu64) I cannot compile from source unless I pass DEBUG=1 flag; without DEBUG=1 I get : $cd src/dmd $make -f posix.mak -j8 #ok till this point $cd ../druntime $make -f posix.mak -j8 DMD=../dmd/dmd ../dmd/dmd -lib -oflib/libdruntime-linuxdefault.a -Xfdruntime.json ...#etc *** buffer overflow detected ***: ../dmd/dmd terminated === Backtrace: = /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #also shows those symbols: __fortify_fail _IO_default_xsputn _IO_vfprintf __vsprintf_chk __sprintf_chk ../dmd/dmd __libc_start_main ../dmd/dmd === Memory map: I get the same from git master. with DEBUG=1 it works on another ubuntu64 machine, I don't have this problem, but I actually need it to work on the 1st machine. Not sure what could be the problem? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11526] buffer overflow detected __fortify_fail when building dmd from source
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11526 Timothee Cour changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timothee.co...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Timothee Cour 2013-11-16 01:39:56 PST --- both machines are 12.04 btw. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11525] REG(2.065): Error: 'a[] *= a[]' each element is not a scalar, it is a Complex!double
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11525 --- Comment #2 from Timothee Cour 2013-11-16 01:32:00 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) > I'm not sure this is supposed to work... Structs with overloaded operators > generally don't work with array operations. I don't see why it shouldn't be allowed (besides the fact that it did work up till now). Without this complex numbers are very much 2nd class citizens for example. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11525] REG(2.065): Error: 'a[] *= a[]' each element is not a scalar, it is a Complex!double
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11525 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from yebblies 2013-11-16 20:27:53 EST --- I'm not sure this is supposed to work... Structs with overloaded operators generally don't work with array operations. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11525] New: REG(2.065): Error: 'a[] *= a[]' each element is not a scalar, it is a Complex!double
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11525
Summary: REG(2.065): Error: 'a[] *= a[]' each element is not a
scalar, it is a Complex!double
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: timothee.co...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Timothee Cour 2013-11-16
01:15:17 PST ---
works in 2.064.2, fails in 2.065
import std.complex;
void main(){
auto a=[Complex!double.init];
a[]*=a[];
}
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11277] Bad default main.d (bad hello world example)
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11277 Rainer Schuetze changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from Rainer Schuetze 2013-11-16 01:03:10 PST --- Templates updated in Visual D 0.3.37 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11032] Win64 lib paths seem to be messed up
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11032 Rainer Schuetze changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from Rainer Schuetze 2013-11-16 01:01:20 PST --- Hopefully sorted out with dmd-2.064 and Visual D 0.3.37 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
