[Issue 12065] Some refused implicit string cast in pure methods
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12065
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
Platform|x86 |All
OS/Version|Windows |All
--- Comment #1 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2014-02-03 23:07:17 EST ---
It's a bug, the compiler thinks that `const(Bar[])` could potentially produce a
`char[]`.
string func1(in char[] x) pure
{
char[] m = .dup;
return m; // works, can't get a char[] from const(char[]) without casting
}
enum Bar : char { A }
string func2(in Bar[] x) pure
{
char[] m = .dup;
return m; // doesn't work, but should
}
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12068] New: `enum` as `inout` function parameter isn't enough for `inout` return.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12068
Summary: `enum` as `inout` function parameter isn't enough for
`inout` return.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: verylonglogin@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2014-02-03
17:01:01 MSK ---
This code should compile:
---
enum E { a }
inout(int) f(inout E);
---
Error: inout on return means inout must be on a parameter as well for
inout(int)(inout(E))
---
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9662] Implement RDMD test suite
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9662 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7653] remove function literals cannot be class members annoyance
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7653
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2014-02-03
15:58:53 EET ---
Another test case:
enum x = { return 5; }; // allowed
struct S
{
enum y = { return 5; }; // forbidden
}
Looking at the compiler code and its history, it looks like an artificial
limitation left in the code from ancient times (dmd 0.90).
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9695] Ddoc should emit enum member initializers
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9695 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2014-02-03 05:58:56 PST --- Marking as WONTFIX, although for JSON we'll probably have to introduce initializers to the output to allow DTOH to emit proper C++ header code. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9450] make assert an implicit version (assert)
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9450 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com |nob...@puremagic.com --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2014-02-03 06:06:23 PST --- We might have to close this one down: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1614#issuecomment-13091053 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9408] invariant should be non-const by default and settable to const
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9408 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull AssignedTo|andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com |nob...@puremagic.com --- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2014-02-03 06:09:05 PST --- Unassigning myself until there's a consensus. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7653] remove function literals cannot be class members annoyance
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7653
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2014-02-03
16:08:25 EET ---
Sorry, that's not right. I forgot the parens.
enum x = { return 5; }(); // allowed
struct S
{
enum y = { return 5; }(); // forbidden
}
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11545] Aggregate function literal member should not have access to enclosing scope
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11545 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch --- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2014-02-03 06:29:34 PST --- *** Issue 7653 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7653] remove function literals cannot be class members annoyance
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7653 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2014-02-03 06:29:34 PST --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 11545 *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9450] make assert an implicit version (assert)
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9450 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-02-03 07:25:54 PST --- I think so too. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11824] A stack variable escaping problem in CTFE Phobos code
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11824
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com
Severity|normal |regression
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2014-02-03
17:47:33 EET ---
I have encountered the same problem:
import std.algorithm;
import std.array;
auto f(int arr) { return [5]; }
immutable x = [1].map!f.array();
This is a regression from 2.064.2.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11824] A stack variable escaping problem in CTFE Phobos code
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11824 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2014-02-03 17:57:23 EET --- Introduced in https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1655 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11824] A stack variable escaping problem in CTFE Phobos code
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11824 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-02-03 08:11:37 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) Introduced in https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1655 The fix is trivial, I'll push it tonight. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11824] A stack variable escaping problem in CTFE Phobos code
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11824
monarchdo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||CTFE
--- Comment #4 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-02-03 09:27:55 PST ---
I can work *around* the issue, but there is a CTFE bug in there to begin with.
Here is a reduced test case:
//
int foo(T)()
{
T[] arr = new T[](1);
T* getAddr(ref T a)
{
return a;
}
getAddr(arr[0]);
return 5;
}
void main()
{
enum a = foo!int(); //OK!
enum b = foo!(int[])(); //FAILS!
}
//
main.d(6): Error: returning a pointer to a local stack variable
main.d(8):called from here: getAddr(arr[0])
main.d(15):called from here: foo()
//
First of all: foo() ? What are the template parameters?
Second, I *think* there is a rejects valid: getAddr rejects return a if a is
of type T[], but not T.
To be perfectly pedantic: a happens to be a stack variable, yes, but *not*
inside getAddr 's scope. So this should not be rejected during CTFE I think.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12069] New: ctRegex is 3x slower then R-T ?
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12069
Summary: ctRegex is 3x slower then R-T ?
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: dmitry.o...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2014-02-03
11:14:04 PST ---
On behalf of Walter Bright, the benchmark:
import std.datetime;
import std.stdio;
import std.regex;
void ct()
{
string phone = +31 650 903 7158;
//auto phoneReg = regex(r^\+([1-9][0-9]*) [0-9 ]*$);
static phoneReg = ctRegex!r^\+([1-9][0-9]*) [0-9 ]*$;
auto m = match(phone, phoneReg);
assert(m);
assert(m.captures[0] == +31 650 903 7158);
assert(m.captures[1] == 31);
}
void rt()
{
string phone = +31 650 903 7158;
auto phoneReg = regex(r^\+([1-9][0-9]*) [0-9 ]*$);
//static phoneReg = ctRegex!r^\+([1-9][0-9]*) [0-9 ]*$;
auto m = match(phone, phoneReg);
assert(m);
assert(m.captures[0] == +31 650 903 7158);
assert(m.captures[1] == 31);
}
void main()
{
auto r = benchmark!(ct, rt)(1_000_000);
writefln(ct = %s msecs, rt = %s, r[0].msecs, r[1].msecs);
}
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12069] ctRegex is 3x slower then R-T ?
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12069 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2014-02-03 11:19:09 PST --- And a sample run: C:\cbx\marsdmd foo -O -release -inline -noboundscheck C:\cbx\marsfoo ct = 6281 msecs, rt = 1984 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12069] ctRegex is 3x slower then R-T ?
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12069 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2014-02-03 11:51:46 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1906 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12069] ctRegex is 3x slower then R-T ?
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12069 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2014-02-03 12:22:09 PST --- Should also add this benchmark code to: http://dlang.org/regular-expression.html -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12070] New: Variant opCall not static
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12070
Summary: Variant opCall not static
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com 2014-02-03
13:17:12 PST ---
In previous versions the following code compiled because there was no opCall:
import std.variant;
void main() {
auto v = Variant();
}
Error: need 'this' for 'opCall' of type '@trusted VariantN!(20u)()'
The opCall isn't static so it requires a this. A work around seems to be to add
null:
Variant(null);
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12069] ctRegex is 3x slower then R-T ?
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12069 --- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-02-03 13:50:01 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/b64c0919162a2bb9ac730f6f3980fe527c1bc9e0 fix issue 12069 On Win32 allocating large blocks (512K) is forwarded to VirtualAlloc/VirtualFree. Doing these calls is expensive especially in a loop. As a temporary solution a block size of a segmented stack is decreased to ~1/8 of critical size. The code needs to be adapted once allocators are in std. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/908908164cbcf3fb6690912b155cd133c4861392 Merge pull request #1906 from blackwhale/issue-12069 Fix issue 12069 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12028] Disallow side effects in asserts
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12028 Dylan Knutson tcdknut...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcdknut...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Dylan Knutson tcdknut...@gmail.com 2014-02-03 14:01:09 PST --- Andrej, I believe that was me! It would have been nice to have that code checked for side effects in assert statements. I'm in support of this enhancement request. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12046] Rebindable supports arrays
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com Component|tools |Phobos --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2014-02-04 00:07:15 EET --- Why was the component set to tools? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2152] Parentheses usage inconsistency.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2152 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2014-02-04 00:14:35 EET --- After porting to D2 and adding static to Klasa methods (I assume that was a reduction error), problem does not manifest under 2.065 git. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2152] Parentheses usage inconsistency.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2152 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2014-02-04 00:16:30 EET --- Oops, never mind about the static bit. Everything else stands. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3107] [meta] Property syntax
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3107 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2014-02-04 00:17:47 EET --- All dependencies satisfied. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 918] (D1 only): Template order matter, version block change something with typedef, and another template bug.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=918 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2014-02-04 00:23:14 EET --- (In reply to comment #5) It can be closed now I think, but still I will want to test it in DMD 1.x. Closing as 1.x is discontinued. Anyone knows what changes in compiler possibly made all this fixes, regression and fixes? I can try historical version and check which have what behaviour. I would not want to close error because it dissapered by random chance :) If you still would like to know, let me know and I'll do a progression test :) -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3137] choosing the template declaration for a template instantiation involves more than partial ordering by specialization
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3137 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2014-02-04 00:34:49 EET --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 1659 *** -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12028] Disallow side effects in asserts
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12028 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-02-03 14:33:11 PST --- A discussion thread: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/yzopesnnlgidhelsr...@forum.dlang.org A problem raised by Brad Roberts: I have one semi-large code base where I validate the locking semantics by adding assert(!lock.try_acquire)'s. That's clearly a side effect, but also clearly should never have one if the code is correct. And an answer by Marco Leise: Basically lock.try_acquire is pure when it returns false, and if not, the program is terminated anyways so it doesn't make a difference. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1659] template alias parameters are chosen over all but exact matches.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1659
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2014-02-04
00:32:36 EET ---
Still happens with 2.064. The typedef part is no longer relevant as the
language feature is going away, but the class hierarchy part remains.
Shorter test case:
class Foo { }
class Bar : Foo { }
void f(T : Foo)() { }
void f(alias T)() { assert(false); }
void main()
{
f!Bar();
}
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12069] ctRegex is 3x slower then R-T ?
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12069 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-02-03 15:20:12 PST --- Commit pushed to 2.065 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/f1eadb913608ad1e1acd800e6c36b2b50b2a9f12 Merge pull request #1906 from blackwhale/issue-12069 Fix issue 12069 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9792] length field of a const SortedRange
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9792
Justin Whear jus...@economicmodeling.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jus...@economicmodeling.com
--- Comment #1 from Justin Whear jus...@economicmodeling.com 2014-02-03
16:25:48 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
I'd like this code to work:
import std.algorithm: sort;
void main() {
const data = [1, 5, 2].sort();
auto len = data.length;
}
DMD 2.063alpha gives:
temp.d(4): Error: mutable method std.range.SortedRange!(int[], a
b).SortedRange.length is not callable using a const object
Additionally `contains`, and probably `lowerBound`, `equalRange`, and
`upperBound`.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11457] Cannot compile 64bit apps with Visual Studio 2013
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11457 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-02-03 18:51:15 PST --- Commit pushed to 2.065 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/e4933242c8f0d133afc2c5cee1c5d70c3e3c01cf Merge pull request #3092 from rainers/win64_sdk81 issue 11457: add Windows SDK 8.1 library search path to sc.ini -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11824] A stack variable escaping problem in CTFE Phobos code
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11824 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull Component|Phobos |DMD Platform|x86 |All OS/Version|Windows |All --- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2014-02-03 21:52:04 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) I can work *around* the issue, but there is a CTFE bug in there to begin with. [snip] To be perfectly pedantic: a happens to be a stack variable, yes, but *not* inside getAddr 's scope. So this should not be rejected during CTFE I think. Yes, this is a compiler bug. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3204 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12046] Rebindable supports arrays
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12046 --- Comment #3 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-02-03 22:43:48 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) Why was the component set to tools? I accidentally the wrong in the drop down menu. Sorry :/ -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12071] New: Algebraic won't take delegate returning structure
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12071
Summary: Algebraic won't take delegate returning structure
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com 2014-02-03
23:25:18 PST ---
The following code compiled with 2.064 but fails with an error with 2.065.
import std.variant;
void main() {
Structure example() { return Structure.init; }
auto m = VariantTest(example);
}
struct Structure {}
alias Algebraic!(Structure delegate()) VariantTest;
--
C:\opt\dmd\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\variant.d(559): Error: static
assert Cannot store a Structure in a VariantN!(8u, Structure delegate()).
Valid types are (Structure delegate())
C:\opt\dmd\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\variant.d(531):instantiated
from here: opAssign!(Structure)
C:\opt\dmd\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\variant.d(600):instantiated
from here: handler!(Structure delegate())
C:\opt\dmd\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\variant.d(550):instantiated
from here: opAssign!(Structure delegate()) test.d(6):instantiated from
here: __ctor!(Structure delegate())
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12071] Algebraic won't take delegate returning structure
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12071 Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #1 from Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com 2014-02-03 23:31:30 PST --- Sorry, should say 2.065 beta 3 -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
