[Issue 13189] `alias this` is not transitive
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13189 Mike changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slavo5...@yahoo.com See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh ||ow_bug.cgi?id=5380 --
[Issue 5380] alias this is not considered with superclass lookup
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5380 Mike changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh ||ow_bug.cgi?id=13189 --
[Issue 10756] "has no effect in expression" error message with correct type name
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10756 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/f521dd920bf793e0ca3d370335dcffdcbecad866 Issue 10756 - 'has no effect in expression' error message with correct type name https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/311c7f8f0d045fa02d5bc2aa9f4edfe4d47152d1 Merge pull request #7300 from JinShil/fix10756 Issue 10756 - 'has no effect in expression' error message with correc… merged-on-behalf-of: Walter Bright --
[Issue 10756] "has no effect in expression" error message with correct type name
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10756 --- Comment #1 from Mike --- potential fix: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/7300 --
[Issue 17977] [scope] escaping reference to a temporary struct instance
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17977 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh ||ow_bug.cgi?id=12625 --
[Issue 12625] [scope] [DIP1000] implicit slicing of RValue static array should be illegal
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12625 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh ||ow_bug.cgi?id=17977 --
[Issue 17977] New: [scope] escaping reference to a temporary struct instance
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17977
Issue ID: 17977
Summary: [scope] escaping reference to a temporary struct
instance
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: dmd
Assignee: nob...@puremagic.com
Reporter: bugzi...@digitalmars.com
The following code:
struct List {
Elem front() @safe return scope;
~this() @trusted scope;
@disable this(this);
void* data;
}
struct Elem {
void* data;
}
void test() @safe {
Elem elem;
{
// error: elem gets a pointer that has a lifetime limited to List()
elem = List().front;
}
}
--
[Issue 15804] missing UDAs on nested struct template
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15804 John Colvin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||john.loughran.colvin@gmail. ||com Hardware|x86_64 |All OS|Linux |All --- Comment #1 from John Colvin --- the same happens for nested function templates --
[Issue 14956] C++ Mangling incompatible with C++11
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14956
--- Comment #13 from Sahmi Soulaïman (سليمان السهمي)
---
(In reply to Walter Bright from comment #12)
> The code is neither C++ nor D. Please provide an accurate code example, what
> it mangles to, and what it should mangle to. Thanks!
example:
---
#include
std::string toString(char* s)
{
return s;
}
---
The function "toString" above returns `std::string`, thus mangles to:
"_Z8toStringB5cxx11Pc", which is in demangled form:
"toString[abi:cxx11](char*)". The question is: how to emulate the "[abi:cxx11]"
part of the mangling in d? Thanks!
--
[Issue 16183] [REG2.068] compile-time string concatenation fails with CTFE and char[] literal involved
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16183 --- Comment #3 from Mike --- potential fix: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/7298 --
[Issue 14477] Nullable does not work with structs with default constructor disabled
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14477 --- Comment #4 from MichaelZ --- (In reply to MichaelZ from comment #3) > This is currently an issue for us, and it has been proposed we use > Algebraic!Foo instead, which appears to work sufficiently, see below. > > What aspects are against doing it this way? More than a year of working around the issue in various ways, I looked at the Algebraic thing again: One disadvantage of Algebraic is that it doesn't have the same magical implicit .get behaviour as Nullable does :-| --
[Issue 16183] [REG2.068] compile-time string concatenation fails with CTFE and char[] literal involved
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16183
Mike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slavo5...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #2 from Mike ---
Further reduced:
void main()
{
string g(string s) { return s; }
enum string y = ['f'] ~ g("g");
}
Can be worked around with:
void main()
{
string g(string s) { return s; }
enum string y = cast(string)['f'] ~ g("g");
}
weird error :(
--
[Issue 15984] [REG2.071] Interface contracts retrieve garbage instead of parameters
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15984 robin.kup...@rwth-aachen.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||robin.kup...@rwth-aachen.de --- Comment #15 from robin.kup...@rwth-aachen.de --- While the first example works now, parameters in out contracts on interface functions are still garbage. See example https://run.dlang.io/is/c5XDwJ. Placing the contract on the implementing function currently seems to be the only workaround. --
[Issue 17934] [scope] scopeness entrypoint for unique/ref-counted missing
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17934 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --
[Issue 17934] [scope] scopeness entrypoint for unique/ref-counted missing
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17934 --- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/18ad1685dcdca65070f7a1d89efa4410a5936895 fix Issue 17934 - [scope] scopeness entrypoint for unique/ref-counted missing --
[Issue 17976] core.exception.AssertError@ddmd/dsymbolsem.d(1624)
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17976 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from RazvanN --- PR : https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/7297 --
