[Issue 19717] case of segfault due to undetected forward reference
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19717 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot --- @Basile-z created dlang/dmd pull request #9412 "fix issue 19717 - case of segfault due to undetected forward reference" fixing this issue: - fix issue 19717 - case of segfault due to undetected forward reference https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/9412 --
[Issue 19717] case of segfault due to undetected forward reference
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19717 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE/segfault when using |case of segfault due to |__traits(getMember) on |undetected forward |overloaded function with|reference |"undefined identifier" | |error | --
[Issue 19717] ICE/segfault when using __traits(getMember) on overloaded function with "undefined identifier" error
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19717 --- Comment #1 from Basile-z --- That's a forward ref not detected. If you put the enum decl after foo() overloads it exits with a normal program error. --
[Issue 19717] ICE/segfault when using __traits(getMember) on overloaded function with "undefined identifier" error
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19717 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice CC||b2.t...@gmx.com --
[Issue 19563] extern(C++) Incorrect ABI passing small struct
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19563 --- Comment #3 from Manu --- This bug blocks the druntime `std::string` PR. --
[Issue 19563] extern(C++) Incorrect ABI passing small struct
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19563 --- Comment #2 from Manu --- If anyone knows how to fix this; here's a head-start: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/9411 That commits the unit-test which needs to work. --
[Issue 19179] extern(C++) small-struct by-val uses wrong ABI
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19179 --- Comment #3 from Manu --- I think what should probably happen here, is that while the type in D is POD, the counterpart in C++ is not POD because default initialisation generates a constructor. Perhaps the proper solution is to make the D struct emit a default constructor (this just assign's init), and also force the type to use the non-POD ABI? This way semantics will match C++, and if the C++ class externs to the default constructor; it will link as they expect. --
[Issue 19710] template parameters not deduced when one is is a supplied string, and the other inferred.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19710 --- Comment #2 from Alex --- The solution I found was to make two versions of this attribute function with different names. One for structs and one for classes. The ref is necessary to have it work for structs. The ref fails when used with 'this' in classes. I think the underlying problem is that in the class version, the ref refers to the object reference (pointer), not the object pointed to, so the ref is unnecessary, and in the case where this is passed, illegal. In the struct version, the ref refers to the object itself, and is necessary to prevent it being copied and operations happening to a local version. This is a bit unfortunate, it would be nice to have a template that could work with either. --
[Issue 19717] New: ICE/segfault when using __traits(getMember) on overloaded function with "undefined identifier" error
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19717
Issue ID: 19717
Summary: ICE/segfault when using __traits(getMember) on
overloaded function with "undefined identifier" error
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: dmd
Assignee: nob...@puremagic.com
Reporter: elpenguin...@gmail.com
Reduced code:
```
enum bar = __traits(getMember, mixin(__MODULE__), "foo");
auto foo() {
return foo();
}
void foo(Foo) {}
```
This also prints a misleading error: `Error: cannot overload both property and
non-property functions`
The error appears to have been introduced after DMD 2.070.2.
--
[Issue 19716] activate and activate.fish scripts do not add MANPATH
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19716 --- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot --- @bolry created dlang/installer pull request #367 "Issue 19716 Add MANPATH to activate(.fish)" mentioning this issue: - Issue 19716 Add MANPATH to activate(.fish) https://github.com/dlang/installer/pull/367 --
[Issue 19716] activate and activate.fish scripts do not add MANPATH
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19716 Bo Rydberg changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@puremagic.com|dl...@rydb3rg.com --- Comment #1 from Bo Rydberg --- Created attachment 1734 --> https://issues.dlang.org/attachment.cgi?id=1734=edit Patch to add MANPATH in install.sh --
[Issue 19716] New: activate and activate.fish scripts do not add MANPATH
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19716 Issue ID: 19716 Summary: activate and activate.fish scripts do not add MANPATH Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: installer Assignee: nob...@puremagic.com Reporter: dl...@rydb3rg.com After use of `source ~/dlang/dmd-2.085.0/activate` and/or `source ~/dlang/dmd-2.085.0/activate.fish` they do not include the MANPATH environment variable, thus unable to look up, e.g., man rdmd, man dmd, or man dmd.conf. Suggest modifying `script/install.sh` to add MANPATH to activate source scripts. --
[Issue 19714] Invalid memory operation in class destructor
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19714 Seweryn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Severity|blocker |trivial --
[Issue 19714] Invalid memory operation in class destructor
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19714 --- Comment #3 from Seweryn --- Here are some information about the problem https://wiki.dlang.org/InvalidMemoryOperationError --
[Issue 19714] Invalid memory operation in class destructor
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19714 --- Comment #2 from Seweryn --- OK, thanks. I did not expect that behavior. --
[Issue 19715] New: AutoImplement `self` and `parent` aliases are incorrect for overloaded functions
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19715
Issue ID: 19715
Summary: AutoImplement `self` and `parent` aliases are
incorrect for overloaded functions
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P1
Component: phobos
Assignee: nob...@puremagic.com
Reporter: htven...@gmail.com
The aliases `self` and `parent` are both declared by aliasing the function by
name. For overloaded functions this means the overloads is aliased, not the
exact function being implemented. This is not a problem when just calling
`self` or `parent`, but for reflection purposes it is.
The following should work, but doesn't:
--
import std.typecons : AutoImplement;
interface A
{
void overloaded(int);
void overloaded(float);
}
enum tpl(C, alias fun) = q{
import std.traits : Parameters;
static assert(is(Parameters!self == typeof(args)));
};
alias Impl = AutoImplement!(A, tpl);
--
Output:
$ dmd -o- -c autoimplement.d
/Library/D/dmd/src/phobos/std/typecons.d-mixin-4495(4510): Error: static
assert: is((int) == (float)) is false
autoimplement.d(14):instantiated from here: AutoImplement!(A, tpl,
isAbstractFunction)
--
[Issue 19714] Invalid memory operation in class destructor
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19714 Adam D. Ruppe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||destructiona...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Adam D. Ruppe --- That bug is in your code: you are allocating a new string while the garbage collector is running. The exception is telling you to not do that. I don't know where that's documented though... --
[Issue 19714] New: Invalid memory operation in class destructor
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19714 Issue ID: 19714 Summary: Invalid memory operation in class destructor Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: druntime Assignee: nob...@puremagic.com Reporter: seweryn.kamin...@gmail.com Created attachment 1733 --> https://issues.dlang.org/attachment.cgi?id=1733=edit Sample minimalistic code with runtime error Output of attached example: core.exception.InvalidMemoryOperationError@src/core/exception.d(729): Invalid memory operation --
[Issue 19594] Compiler Crash
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19594 --- Comment #5 from Basile-z --- The SSL certificate of your repo is not valid. $ git clone https://gitlab.vahanus.com/dlang/examples/filescanner.git Clonage dans 'filescanner'... fatal: unable to access 'https://gitlab.vahanus.com/dlang/examples/filescanner.git/': SSL certificate problem: unable to get local issuer certificate --
[Issue 17651] Segfault when parsing Ddoc ESCAPES macro
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17651 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot --- dlang/dmd pull request #9407 "fix issue 17651 - Segfault when parsing Ddoc ESCAPES macro" was merged into master: - ee6e6faf8819a39f0c4aa95c4cc89f9eb3af0c95 by Basile Burg: fix issue 17651 - Segfault when parsing Ddoc ESCAPES macro https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/9407 --
[Issue 19666] Compiler executes illegal instruction casting array to struct pointer
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19666
--- Comment #2 from Basile-z ---
reduced:
---
struct StoreAny {
ubyte[16] store;
this(T)(T value) {
*(cast(T*) store) = value;
}
}
struct SomeStruct {}
enum StoreAny someEnum = StoreAny(SomeStruct());
void main() {
}
---
but code is invalid anyway. I suspect that the intention was more
*(cast(T*) ) = value;
which CTFE cant do anyway.
--
[Issue 19666] Compiler executes illegal instruction casting array to struct pointer
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19666 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||CTFE CC||b2.t...@gmx.com --- Comment #1 from Basile-z --- This is actually an assertion failure during CTFE: --- ERROR: This is a compiler bug. Please report it via https://issues.dlang.org/enter_bug.cgi with, preferably, a reduced, reproducible example and the information below. DustMite (https://github.com/CyberShadow/DustMite/wiki) can help with the reduction. --- DMD v2.085.0-81-g4a73e58c1-dirty predefs DigitalMars Posix linux ELFv1 CRuntime_Glibc CppRuntime_Gcc LittleEndian D_Version2 all D_SIMD D_InlineAsm_X86_64 X86_64 D_LP64 D_PIC assert D_ModuleInfo D_Exceptions D_TypeInfo D_HardFloat binarydmd/generated/linux/debug/64/dmd version v2.085.0-81-g4a73e58c1-dirty configdmd.conf DFLAGS-I./../../../../../druntime/import -I./../../../../../phobos -L-L./../../../../../phobos/generated/linux/debug/64 -L--export-dynamic -fPIC --- core.exception.AssertError@dmd/ctfeexpr.d(1685): Assertion failure ??:? _d_assertp [0x7bc0a8] dmd/ctfeexpr.d:1685 void dmd.ctfeexpr.assignInPlace(dmd.expression.Expression, dmd.expression.Expression) [0x56f0b8] dmd/dinterpret.d:4035 _ZN11Interpreter14assignToLvalueEP6BinExpP10ExpressionS3_ [0x58fd57] dmd/dinterpret.d:3916 void dmd.dinterpret.Interpreter.interpretAssignCommon(dmd.expression.BinExp, dmd.expression.UnionExp function(ref const(dmd.globals.Loc), dmd.mtype.Type, dmd.expression.Expression, dmd.expression.Expression)*, int) [0x58f6ce] dmd/dinterpret.d:4495 _ZN11Interpreter5visitEP9AssignExp [0x5917f4] dmd/expression.d:5718 _ZN9AssignExp6acceptEP7Visitor [0x5ee96d] dmd/dinterpret.d:6491 dmd.expression.Expression dmd.dinterpret.interpret(dmd.expression.UnionExp*, dmd.expression.Expression, dmd.dinterpret.InterState*, dmd.dinterpret.CtfeGoal) [0x597767] dmd/dinterpret.d:1096 _ZN11Interpreter5visitEP12ExpStatement [0x587610] dmd/statement.d:738 _ZN12ExpStatement6acceptEP7Visitor [0x68e051] dmd/dinterpret.d:6523 dmd.expression.Expression dmd.dinterpret.interpret(dmd.expression.UnionExp*, dmd.statement.Statement, dmd.dinterpret.InterState*) [0x597846] dmd/dinterpret.d:1114 _ZN11Interpreter5visitEP17CompoundStatement [0x5876d5] dmd/statement.d:935 _ZN17CompoundStatement6acceptEP7Visitor [0x68e8b1] dmd/dinterpret.d:6523 dmd.expression.Expression dmd.dinterpret.interpret(dmd.expression.UnionExp*, dmd.statement.Statement, dmd.dinterpret.InterState*) [0x597846] dmd/dinterpret.d:1114 _ZN11Interpreter5visitEP17CompoundStatement [0x5876d5] dmd/statement.d:935 _ZN17CompoundStatement6acceptEP7Visitor [0x68e8b1] dmd/dinterpret.d:6523 dmd.expression.Expression dmd.dinterpret.interpret(dmd.expression.UnionExp*, dmd.statement.Statement, dmd.dinterpret.InterState*) [0x597846] dmd/dinterpret.d:966 dmd.expression.Expression dmd.dinterpret.interpretFunction(dmd.expression.UnionExp*, dmd.func.FuncDeclaration, dmd.dinterpret.InterState*, dmd.root.array.Array!(dmd.expression.Expression).Array*, dmd.expression.Expression) [0x58721d] dmd/dinterpret.d:5035 _ZN11Interpreter5visitEP7CallExp [0x592cac] dmd/expression.d:4892 _ZN7CallExp6acceptEP7Visitor [0x5ecfe5] dmd/dinterpret.d:6491 dmd.expression.Expression dmd.dinterpret.interpret(dmd.expression.UnionExp*, dmd.expression.Expression, dmd.dinterpret.InterState*, dmd.dinterpret.CtfeGoal) [0x597767] dmd/dinterpret.d:6501 dmd.expression.Expression dmd.dinterpret.interpret(dmd.expression.Expression, dmd.dinterpret.InterState*, dmd.dinterpret.CtfeGoal) [0x5977c1] dmd/dinterpret.d:87 dmd.expression.Expression dmd.dinterpret.ctfeInterpret(dmd.expression.Expression) [0x585001] dmd/expression.d:1548 _ZN10Expression13ctfeInterpretEv [0x5e4f34] dmd/initsem.d:393 dmd.init.Initializer dmd.initsem.initializerSemantic(dmd.init.Initializer, dmd.dscope.Scope*, dmd.mtype.Type, dmd.init.NeedInterpret).visitExp(dmd.init.ExpInitializer) [0x631552] dmd/initsem.d:523 _Z19initializerSemanticP11InitializerP5ScopeP4Type13NeedInterpret [0x62fee2] dmd/dsymbolsem.d:1274 _ZN22DsymbolSemanticVisitor5visitEP14VarDeclaration [0x5bb8f3] dmd/declaration.d:1640 _ZN14VarDeclaration6acceptEP7Visitor [0x5810c1] dmd/dsymbolsem.d:365 _Z15dsymbolSemanticP7DsymbolP5Scope [0x5b8b84] dmd/dsymbolsem.d:1979 void dmd.dsymbolsem.DsymbolSemanticVisitor.visit(dmd.dmodule.Module).__lambda2!(dmd.dsymbol.Dsymbol).__lambda2(dmd.dsymbol.Dsymbol) [0x5bdf97] dmd/dsymbol.d:97 void dmd.dsymbol.foreachDsymbol(dmd.root.array.Array!(dmd.dsymbol.Dsymbol).Array*, void delegate(dmd.dsymbol.Dsymbol)) [0x5b2f8f] dmd/dsymbolsem.d:1976 _ZN22DsymbolSemanticVisitor5visitEP6Module [0x5bdf23] dmd/dmodule.d:1290 _ZN6Module6acceptEP7Visitor [0x5a10ed] dmd/dsymbolsem.d:365 _Z15dsymbolSemanticP7DsymbolP5Scope [0x5b8b84] dmd/mars.d:560 int dmd.mars.tryMain(ulong, const(char)**, ref dmd.globals.Param)
[Issue 6401] infinite loop with -inline in gflow.c:accumaecpx
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6401 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b2.t...@gmx.com --- Comment #7 from Basile-z --- the game changer is more the -O switch than -inline. The test case with -release -inline gets successfully compiled, even if it's slow (50 secs here). --
[Issue 17651] Segfault when parsing Ddoc ESCAPES macro
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17651 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Dlang Bot --- @Basile-z created dlang/dmd pull request #9407 "fix issue 17651 - Segfault when parsing Ddoc ESCAPES macro" fixing this issue: - fix issue 17651 - Segfault when parsing Ddoc ESCAPES macro https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/9407 --
[Issue 17651] Segfault when parsing Ddoc ESCAPES macro
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17651 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b2.t...@gmx.com Summary|Segfult when parsing Ddoc |Segfault when parsing Ddoc |ESCAPES macro |ESCAPES macro --
