[Issue 10738] double2 ^^ 2 and double2 ^^ 3 are missing
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #2 from Walter Bright --- Now it errs with the messages: test.d(6): Error: incompatible types for (x) ^^ (cast(__vector(double[2]))2.0): both operands are of type __vector(double[2]) test.d(7): Error: incompatible types for (x) ^^ (cast(__vector(double[2]))3.0): both operands are of type __vector(double[2]) which is adequate. --
[Issue 10738] double2 ^^ 2 and double2 ^^ 3 are missing
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added CC|b2.t...@gmx.com | --
[Issue 10738] double2 ^^ 2 and double2 ^^ 3 are missing
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid |diagnostic CC||b2.t...@gmx.com Hardware|x86 |All OS|Linux |All --
[Issue 10738] double2 ^^ 2 and double2 ^^ 3 are missing
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 Iain Buclawchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuc...@gdcproject.org --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw --- SIMD ^^ is neither generic, nor a trivial thing to implement. We should really just flat out error here. --
[Issue 10738] double2 ^^ 2 and double2 ^^ 3 are missing
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 Walter Brightchanged: What|Removed |Added Keywords||SIMD CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --