[Issue 11216] Make synchronized statement `nothrow`
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11216 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/05b15ab05279a70b30f4a580c705526e70e09155 fix Issue 11216 - Make synchronized statement `nothrow` - require Object.Monitor lock and unlock functions to be nothrow - change methods of all core.sync classes to nothrow https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/46061e646ae547d297aeae448eb246e251118344 Merge pull request #1013 from MartinNowak/fix11216 fix Issue 11216 - Make synchronized statement `nothrow` --
[Issue 11216] Make synchronized statement `nothrow`
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11216 --- Comment #6 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to 2.067 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/05b15ab05279a70b30f4a580c705526e70e09155 fix Issue 11216 - Make synchronized statement `nothrow` https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/46061e646ae547d297aeae448eb246e251118344 Merge pull request #1013 from MartinNowak/fix11216 --
[Issue 11216] Make synchronized statement `nothrow`
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11216 --- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to 2.067 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/47c679964003ca75290e3174df85b0641eb5d282 fix Issue 11216 - Make synchronized statement `nothrow` https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/dc118391e51ddb69093780c157b1ca41e26add90 Merge pull request #4115 from MartinNowak/fix11216 --
[Issue 11216] Make synchronized statement `nothrow`
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11216 Mathias LANG changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC||pro.mathias.l...@gmail.com Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #8 from Mathias LANG --- Well, since it was reverted, it should have been reopened. Revert in DMD: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4459 Revert in Druntime: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/1188 --
[Issue 11216] Make synchronized statement `nothrow`
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11216 Mathias Lang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Mathias Lang --- *** Issue 16009 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** --
[Issue 11216] Make synchronized statement `nothrow`
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11216 FeepingCreature changed: What|Removed |Added CC||default_357-l...@yahoo.de --- Comment #10 from FeepingCreature --- Still an issue in 2018. --
[Issue 11216] Make synchronized statement `nothrow`
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11216 --- Comment #11 from FeepingCreature --- Istm a possible approach would be: * Define SimpleMonitor : Monitor with nothrow * change DMD to use nothrow when locking SimpleMonitors * subclass druntime's Mutex with SimpleMutex : Mutex, SimpleMonitor * use SimpleMutex as the mutex implementation for class monitors Then synchronized(this) should be nothrow without breaking existing code that depends on Mutex/Monitor. It would only break if you were assigning to _monitor, and that's easily fixed by using a separate member. I don't know how to implement this on the DMD side though. --
[Issue 11216] Make synchronized statement `nothrow`
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11216 --- Comment #1 from Denis Shelomovskij 2013-10-10 17:14:31 MSD --- Also in the case in the description are there any possibilities to supply a user monitor? If not, this subcase is clearly a "rejects-valid" bug. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 11216] Make synchronized statement `nothrow`
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11216 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P5 CC||c...@dawg.eu --- Comment #2 from Martin Nowak --- I'm in favor of doing this. Is there a migration path for requiring nothrow on the Monitor Interface without breaking code? --
[Issue 11216] Make synchronized statement `nothrow`
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11216 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||13561 --
[Issue 11216] Make synchronized statement `nothrow`
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11216 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4115 --
[Issue 11216] Make synchronized statement `nothrow`
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11216 --- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/47c679964003ca75290e3174df85b0641eb5d282 fix Issue 11216 - Make synchronized statement `nothrow` - mark _d_monitorenter/exit as nothrow https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/dc118391e51ddb69093780c157b1ca41e26add90 Merge pull request #4115 from MartinNowak/fix11216 fix Issue 11216 - Make synchronized statement `nothrow` --
