[Issue 14056] std.array.assocArray with a const value

2015-03-19 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14056

Martin Nowak  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

--

[Issue 14056] std.array.assocArray with a const value

2015-03-15 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14056

Martin Nowak  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||pull

--- Comment #7 from Martin Nowak  ---
Improve diagnostic message.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3054

--

[Issue 14056] std.array.assocArray with a const value

2015-03-13 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14056

Walter Bright  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com

--- Comment #6 from Walter Bright  ---
(In reply to Kenji Hara from comment #5)
> Introduced by the fix for regression 13701.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13701

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4148

--

[Issue 14056] std.array.assocArray with a const value

2015-02-28 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14056

--- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara  ---
(In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #3)
> (In reply to Ulrich Küttler from comment #1)
> > This seems to be a conscious choice, the function has been restricted to
> > prevent a compile failure on assignment. The question is how to create
> > associative array with immutable values.
> 
> You know where it was introduced? We shouldn't switch from working to
> not-working without a deprecation phase.

Introduced by the fix for regression 13701.

--

[Issue 14056] std.array.assocArray with a const value

2015-02-19 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14056

--- Comment #4 from Ulrich Küttler  ---
(In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #3)
> You know where it was introduced? We shouldn't switch from working to
> not-working without a deprecation phase.

Unfortunately not, I do not know what changed here.

--

[Issue 14056] std.array.assocArray with a const value

2015-02-18 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14056

Martin Nowak  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||c...@dawg.eu

--- Comment #3 from Martin Nowak  ---
(In reply to Ulrich Küttler from comment #1)
> This seems to be a conscious choice, the function has been restricted to
> prevent a compile failure on assignment. The question is how to create
> associative array with immutable values.

You know where it was introduced? We shouldn't switch from working to
not-working without a deprecation phase.

--

[Issue 14056] std.array.assocArray with a const value

2015-02-17 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14056

--- Comment #2 from Ulrich Küttler  ---
Same as Issue 13909.

--

[Issue 14056] std.array.assocArray with a const value

2015-02-17 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14056

Ulrich Küttler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kuett...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Ulrich Küttler  ---
This seems to be a conscious choice, the function has been restricted to
prevent a compile failure on assignment. The question is how to create
associative array with immutable values.

--