[Issue 15673] [dox] atan2 docs have broken formatting

2016-06-02 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673

Sönke Ludwig  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||slud...@outerproduct.org
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Sönke Ludwig  ---
Fix has been deployed.

--

[Issue 15673] [dox] atan2 docs have broken formatting

2016-02-17 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673

--- Comment #4 from ag0ae...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to ag0aep6g from comment #3)
> The problem is with macro definitions in ddox. I've filed an issue on ddox:
> https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/ddox/issues/116

The ddox issue has been fixed. For the fix to reach dlang.org there will have
to be a ddox release, and the dlang.org repository will have to be updated to
use it.

--

[Issue 15673] [dox] atan2 docs have broken formatting

2016-02-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673

--- Comment #1 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx ---
This looks like a bug in the new doc generation code. It's failing to format
tables correctly.

--

[Issue 15673] [dox] atan2 docs have broken formatting

2016-02-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673

--- Comment #2 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx ---
You can see the intended formatting here:
https://dlang.org/phobos-prerelease/std_math#.atan2

--

[Issue 15673] [dox] atan2 docs have broken formatting

2016-02-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673

hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
Summary|[Function atan2]|[dox] atan2 docs have
   ||broken formatting

--

[Issue 15673] [dox] atan2 docs have broken formatting

2016-02-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673

ag0ae...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ag0ae...@gmail.com
  Component|phobos  |dlang.org
   Severity|enhancement |normal

--- Comment #3 from ag0ae...@gmail.com ---
The problem is with macro definitions in ddox. I've filed an issue on ddox:
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/ddox/issues/116

--