[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

2022-12-17 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073

Iain Buclaw  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P1  |P3

--


[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

2017-01-20 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073

Jonathan M Davis  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||issues.dl...@jmdavisprog.co
   ||m

--- Comment #12 from Jonathan M Davis  ---
(In reply to greenify from comment #10)
> > All of these useless options left to sloppy range implementations don't 
> > bring value.
> 
> This has probably been proposed before, but what about letting the compiler
> insert an opDollar alias if length is defined? This should greatly help to
> avoid sloppy implementation differences and one can still opt to use the
> opDollar overloads for superior performance.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7177 covers fixing it so that ranges
that define length automatically get opDollar, but it's never gone anywhere.
There has been discussion on it from time to time, but without implementing it,
requiring ranges to work with $ is going to break a lot of code, since odds are
that very few folks are implementing opDollar. Phobos itself doesn't do it
consistently.

But it's pretty ridiculous that we can't use $ with anything but arrays (which
is basically where we sit now), and it really should be fixed. I did fix it
some time ago so that isRandomAccessRange and hasSlicing verify that $ works
correctly if it works (at least verifies it as much as can be done statically),
but they've never required that $ works, because so few ranges implement
opDollar, and issue #7177 has never been implemented. I'd have changed
isRandomAccessRange and hasSlicing to require that $ work years ago if it
weren't for that.

--


[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

2017-01-06 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073

--- Comment #11 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to stable at https://github.com/dlang/phobos

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/06c9dca2daf3edfde85ba01a9d22d842621fad1c
[Issue 16073] Fix incorrect uses of random access range primitives in
std.range.package

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/86ef3a224ed05bfe52b63caedc53ebdcf5be513e
Merge pull request #4463 from JackStouffer/issue16073

--


[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

2016-12-24 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073

greenify  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||greeen...@gmail.com

--- Comment #10 from greenify  ---
> All of these useless options left to sloppy range implementations don't bring 
> value.

This has probably been proposed before, but what about letting the compiler
insert an opDollar alias if length is defined? This should greatly help to
avoid sloppy implementation differences and one can still opt to use the
opDollar overloads for superior performance.

--


[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

2016-12-24 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073

--- Comment #9 from Andrei Alexandrescu  ---
We can leave hasLength as is for the time but at least new algorithms should
just use $. All of these useless options left to sloppy range implementations
don't bring value.

--


[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

2016-12-24 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073

--- Comment #8 from Jack Stouffer  ---
(In reply to Andrei Alexandrescu from comment #7)
> I think we should require opDollar to be implemented instead.

That would be a breaking change, as suddenly hasLength would fail for lots of
user types.

--


[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

2016-12-24 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073

Andrei Alexandrescu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||and...@erdani.com

--- Comment #7 from Andrei Alexandrescu  ---
I think we should require opDollar to be implemented instead.

--


[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

2016-10-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073

--- Comment #6 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/06c9dca2daf3edfde85ba01a9d22d842621fad1c
[Issue 16073] Fix incorrect uses of random access range primitives in
std.range.package

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/86ef3a224ed05bfe52b63caedc53ebdcf5be513e
Merge pull request #4463 from JackStouffer/issue16073

Partial Fix for Issue 16073 (part 3)

--


[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

2016-10-01 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073

--- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to stable at https://github.com/dlang/phobos

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/a818c7e059bf0e37609c7030b8306daf54909beb
[Issue 16073] Fix incorrect uses of random access range primitives in
std.algorithm.iteration

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/3a1db06f41eca48e1b1b46ca05bb221c01714160
[Issue 16073] Fix incorrect uses of random access range primitives in
std.algorithm.mutation

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/74398e70cf79acab6a352e7bbec614ce2f91dffb
[Issue 16073] Fix incorrect uses of random access range primitives in
std.algorithm.searching

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/e216c10b2ce08cb8ae5c64983a2f24367f4b86e4
Merge pull request #4383 from JackStouffer/issue16073

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/94d74ac8f5772e3e32f7c2e2b4b59fd0783a6ad5
[Issue 16073] Fix incorrect uses of random access range primitives in
std.algorithm.sorting

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/c5bb43ce54d7feb244ba032c43aecd7aa7c9356a
Merge pull request #4425 from JackStouffer/issue16073

--


[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

2016-06-14 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073

--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/94d74ac8f5772e3e32f7c2e2b4b59fd0783a6ad5
[Issue 16073] Fix incorrect uses of random access range primitives in
std.algorithm.sorting

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/c5bb43ce54d7feb244ba032c43aecd7aa7c9356a
Merge pull request #4425 from JackStouffer/issue16073

Partial Fix for Issue 16073 (part 2)

--


[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

2016-06-02 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073

--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/a818c7e059bf0e37609c7030b8306daf54909beb
[Issue 16073] Fix incorrect uses of random access range primitives in
std.algorithm.iteration

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/3a1db06f41eca48e1b1b46ca05bb221c01714160
[Issue 16073] Fix incorrect uses of random access range primitives in
std.algorithm.mutation

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/74398e70cf79acab6a352e7bbec614ce2f91dffb
[Issue 16073] Fix incorrect uses of random access range primitives in
std.algorithm.searching

https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/e216c10b2ce08cb8ae5c64983a2f24367f4b86e4
Merge pull request #4383 from JackStouffer/issue16073

Partial Fix for Issue 16073

--


[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

2016-05-31 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073

--- Comment #2 from Jack Stouffer  ---
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/4383

--


[Issue 16073] Ranges without opDollar not supported

2016-05-25 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16073

Jack Stouffer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||j...@jackstouffer.com

--- Comment #1 from Jack Stouffer  ---
I'd imagine this is an issue throughout Phobos. All functions that use
isRandomAccessRange need to be checked as well.

--