[Issue 18734] bitnum parameter of core.bitop.bt should be signed
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3 --
[Issue 18734] bitnum parameter of core.bitop.bt should be signed
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||backend --
[Issue 18734] bitnum parameter of core.bitop.bt should be signed
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 --- Comment #5 from Dlang Bot --- @WalterBright created dlang/dmd pull request #11306 "fix Issue 18734 - bitnum parameter of core.bitop.bt should be signed" fixing this issue: - fix Issue 18734 - bitnum parameter of core.bitop.bt should be signed https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/11306 --
[Issue 18734] bitnum parameter of core.bitop.bt should be signed
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #4 from Dlang Bot --- @WalterBright created dlang/druntime pull request #3141 "fix Issue 18734 - bitnum parameter of core.bitop.bt should be signed" fixing this issue: - fix Issue 18734 - bitnum parameter of core.bitop.bt should be signed https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/3141 --
[Issue 18734] bitnum parameter of core.bitop.bt should be signed
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright --- Huh, you are right. This: https://www.felixcloutier.com/x86/bt doesn't mention it's signed, but the AMD reference says it is. --
[Issue 18734] bitnum parameter of core.bitop.bt should be signed
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 --- Comment #2 from ag0aep6g --- (In reply to uplink.coder from comment #1) > DMD does not recognize bodies only function signatures. > So change it all you like :) it's only going to be used on systems where the > intrinsic can't work. core.bitop.bt is not an intrinsic. The expression in the body is recognized by the optimizer. --
[Issue 18734] bitnum parameter of core.bitop.bt should be signed
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 uplink.co...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uplink.co...@googlemail.com --- Comment #1 from uplink.co...@googlemail.com --- DMD does not recognize bodies only function signatures. So change it all you like :) it's only going to be used on systems where the intrinsic can't work. --
[Issue 18734] bitnum parameter of core.bitop.bt should be signed
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 ag0aep6g changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||18750 Referenced Issues: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18750 [Issue 18750] [Tracker] everything wrong with code generation for bt instruction --
[Issue 18734] bitnum parameter of core.bitop.bt should be signed
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 Ketmar Dark changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org --