[Issue 7468] Ddoc does not output DOCTYPE declaration

[d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7468

wolframw  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||wolfr...@protonmail.com
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

--- Comment #3 from wolframw  ---
DOCTYPE is now expected to be in the Ddoc macro definition file and was added
to the default macro file by https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6173.

--

[Issue 7468] Ddoc does not output DOCTYPE declaration

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7468

Andrei Alexandrescu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||bootcamp
 CC||and...@erdani.com

--

[Issue 7468] Ddoc does not output DOCTYPE declaration

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7468

Andrei Alexandrescu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|unspecified |D2

--

[Issue 7468] Ddoc does not output DOCTYPE declaration

[d-bugmail]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7468



--- Comment #2 from syntaxcolor...@gmail.com 2012-02-12 12:00:54 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=1073)
Patch to add DOCTYPE declaration.

I've attached a patch to add a transitional DOCTYPE declaration.  The default
Ddoc output format is still rather messy, but at least now it's valid HTML.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 7468] Ddoc does not output DOCTYPE declaration

[d-bugmail]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7468


Stewart Gordon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||ddoc
 CC||s...@iname.com


--- Comment #1 from Stewart Gordon  2012-02-12 10:52:01 PST ---
The default DDoc macros are a hornet's nest of presentational markup that ought
to be logical.  I ended up using a custom ddoc file that redefines a lot.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---