[Issue 7709] Segfault when trying to use any property of an AA, which is the return type of a CTFE function with inout parameters.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7709 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7709] Segfault when trying to use any property of an AA, which is the return type of a CTFE function with inout parameters.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7709 SomeDude lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #4 from SomeDude lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com 2012-04-21 06:50:05 PDT --- Works with 2.059 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7709] Segfault when trying to use any property of an AA, which is the return type of a CTFE function with inout parameters.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7709 --- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-03-30 06:31:43 PDT --- Works now, on git head. I don't think this had anything to do with CTFE. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7709] Segfault when trying to use any property of an AA, which is the return type of a CTFE function with inout parameters.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7709 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #1 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-03-15 03:13:51 PDT --- Duplicate of bug 7602? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7709] Segfault when trying to use any property of an AA, which is the return type of a CTFE function with inout parameters.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7709
--- Comment #2 from kenn...@gmail.com 2012-03-15 03:35:33 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Duplicate of bug 7602?
I don't think so (at least on the surface). This variant of 7602 works (as
described in 7602's title):
--
string[] test7602b()
{
int[string] array = [2: 3];
return array.keys;
}
enum str = test();
--
But this variant of 7709 fails:
--
inout(int[int]) test7709c(inout(int) bb)
{
int[int] arr = [1: 2];
arr.keys;
return null;
}
enum str = test7709c(2);
--
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
