bindbc.sfml , sfVideoMode , Error: undefined identifier
I try this,
```
import bindbc.sfml;
import bindbc.sfml.config;
import bindbc.sfml.system;
import bindbc.sfml.window;
void main(){
bool ret=loadSFML();
sfVideoMode m=sfVideoMode(800, 600,24);
}
```
But dub gives undefined identifier sdVideoMode.
Although,
https://bindbc-sfml.dpldocs.info/bindbc.sfml.window.sfVideoMode.html
I must doing something wrong ?
Re: bindbc.sfml , sfVideoMode , Error: undefined identifier
On Saturday, 8 May 2021 at 09:05:18 UTC, Alain De Vos wrote: I must doing something wrong ? Did you define the `SFML_Graphics` version like in the README of bindbc-sfml?
Re: bindbc.sfml , sfVideoMode , Error: undefined identifier
After adding ``` "versions": [ "SFML_Audio", "SFML_Graphics", "SFML_250", ] ``` to dub.json it compiles. The sfml library the freebsd os is version : "sfml-2.5.1_2" .
Re: What does @nogc do to a class?
On Thursday, 6 May 2021 at 22:16:04 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote: On Thursday, 6 May 2021 at 01:04:02 UTC, Jack wrote: Does it allocate the object rather on stack, like auto scope a = new A or what? Further note that auto scope a = new A; can be written shorter as scope a = new A; I'll be using that, thanks!
Without multiples inheritance, how is this done?
let's say I have:
```d
class Base
{
int f()
{
doSomething();
return n * 5;
}
void doSomething() { }
}
class Foo : Base
{
void myMethod() { /* ... */ }
}
class Baa : Base
{
void myMethod2() { /* ... */ }
}
```
then I'd like to make a extended version(making those DRY
routines a class itself) of Foo and Baa, like this:
```d
abstract class DRY : Base
{
this(int n)
{
this.n = n;
}
override int f()
{
super.doSomething();
return n;
}
private int n;
}
```
but the class ExtendFoo and ExtendedBaa must inherit from Foo
and Baa, respectively. But how can I make it inherit the routines
from DRY class too without multiples inheritance? in C++ I'd just
do:
```d
class ExtendedFoo : DRY, Base { /* ... */ }
class ExtendBaa : DRY, Base { /* ... */ }
```
Re: Without multiples inheritance, how is this done?
On Saturday, 8 May 2021 at 18:33:35 UTC, Jack wrote:
```d
abstract class DRY : Base
{
this(int n)
{
this.n = n;
}
override int f()
{
super.doSomething();
return n;
}
private int n;
}
```
You can change that from abstract class to `mixin template`, make
Foo and Baa be `interface`, then use `mixin DRY;` inside your
child class.
Re: Without multiples inheritance, how is this done?
On Saturday, 8 May 2021 at 18:33:35 UTC, Jack wrote:
...
but the class ExtendFoo and ExtendedBaa must inherit from Foo
and Baa, respectively. But how can I make it inherit the
routines from DRY class too without multiples inheritance? in
C++ I'd just do:
class ExtendedFoo : DRY, Base { /* ... */ }
class ExtendBaa : DRY, Base { /* ... */ }
What about this model:
class baseFoo{
// Implement foo stuff
}
class baseFooBar : baseFoo{
// Implement bar stuff
}
class FooBar : baseFooBar{
// Do your FooBar thing!
}
Matheus.
Is there any bettter solution to Windows wide string
Hi all,
I am planning some win32 hobby projects. Now I have this function
to tackle the LPCWSTR data type in win32.
```d
private import std.utf;
auto toWString(S)(S s) { return toUTFz!(const(wchar)*)(s); }
```
Is there any better way to do this ?
Re: Is there any bettter solution to Windows wide string
On Saturday, 8 May 2021 at 20:50:10 UTC, Vinod K Chandran wrote:
Hi all,
I am planning some win32 hobby projects. Now I have this
function to tackle the LPCWSTR data type in win32.
```d
private import std.utf;
auto toWString(S)(S s) { return toUTFz!(const(wchar)*)(s); }
```
Is there any better way to do this ?
iirc that's toUTF16z
Re: Is there any bettter solution to Windows wide string
On Saturday, 8 May 2021 at 21:26:06 UTC, Imperatorn wrote: iirc that's toUTF16z Thanks. Let me check. :)
