Graphing
How would I go about graphing time series data (specifically, candles, moving averages, etc) in D and dynamically updating such charts? Thanks, --anonymouse
Re: Bug in usage of associative array: dynamic array with string as a key
On Friday, 30 June 2023 at 19:05:23 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
I have code roughly like the following:
dstring str = "name"d;
uint ordinal = (( str in Decls.ordinals ) !is null) ?
Decls.ordinals[ str ] : -1;
struct Decls
{
uint[ dstring] ordinals;
}
//and
Decls.ordinals[ str ] = ordinal_counter++;
The problem is that it always returns ordinal== -1 from the
expression. Can you sort me out? I took this from the example
given in the language reference under arrays, testing for
membership (or similar, I forget the subssection title).
From good old printfs it seems to be the case that the array is
being populated (elsewhere) with the expected correct values.
Taking out the if doesn’t seem to help either. I don’t have a
way of examining the contents of the dynamic array directly to
check that they are actually being stored as expected, other
than seeing that that line of code is indeed being executed
with the expected values of str going in. Note that I’m using
32-bit dstrings everywhere, not strings of bytes.
Fool that I am. I did those good old printfs a while back, and
now I recheck them I see that something has become broken and it
seems that the insertions are not happening now. So thankyou for
your kindness and I’ll post again if that doesn’t solve the
non-issue.
Re: Bug in usage of associative array: dynamic array with string as a key
On Friday, 30 June 2023 at 21:25:23 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 07:05:23PM +, Cecil Ward via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: [...] It would help if you could post the complete code that reproduces the problem. Or, if you do not wish to reveal your code, reduce it to a minimal case that still exhibits the same problem, so that we can see it for ourselves. The snippets you provided do not provide enough information to identify the problem. T I would indeed need to cut it down massively, as the original code is ~2k lines. Mind you, I will just end up with the example at https://dlang.org/spec/hash-map.html#testing_membership in the language docs, under associative arrays - 13.3 testing membership. Would anyone else care to try that example out as that might be quicker? That’s because as all I did was copy that basically, with the only substantive change being deleting the variable p, but I’m still testing whether or not I get a null pointer. I thought I had checked that the insertions were all as expected, so I’ll go and recheck that next.
Re: Bug in usage of associative array: dynamic array with string as a key
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/duetqujuoceancqtj...@forum.dlang.org Try HashMap see if it is still a problem. If no, then it's another example of the built in AA problem.
Re: Bug in usage of associative array: dynamic array with string as a key
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 07:05:23PM +, Cecil Ward via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: [...] It would help if you could post the complete code that reproduces the problem. Or, if you do not wish to reveal your code, reduce it to a minimal case that still exhibits the same problem, so that we can see it for ourselves. The snippets you provided do not provide enough information to identify the problem. T -- What's the difference between a 4D tube and an overweight Dutchman? One is a hollow spherinder, and the other is a spherical Hollander.
Re: Bug in usage of associative array: dynamic array with string as a key
On 6/30/23 13:16, Cecil Ward wrote: On Friday, 30 June 2023 at 19:58:39 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote: Note that you can do `uint ordinal = Decls.ordinals.get(str, -1);`. Is the second argument an ‘else’ then, my friend? Yes, .get and friends appear in this table: https://dlang.org/spec/hash-map.html#properties Ali
Re: Bug in usage of associative array: dynamic array with string as a key
On Friday, 30 June 2023 at 19:58:39 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
On Friday, 30 June 2023 at 19:05:23 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
I have code roughly like the following:
dstring str = "name"d;
uint ordinal = (( str in Decls.ordinals ) !is null) ?
Decls.ordinals[ str ] : -1;
struct Decls
{
uint[ dstring] ordinals;
}
//and
Decls.ordinals[ str ] = ordinal_counter++;
The problem is that it always returns ordinal== -1 from the
expression. Can you sort me out?
Impossible to tell without a complete repro, I'm afraid. The
expression, at least, looks correct at first glance.
Note that you can do `uint ordinal = Decls.ordinals.get(str,
-1);`.
Is the second argument an ‘else’ then, my friend?
Re: Bug in usage of associative array: dynamic array with string as a key
On Friday, 30 June 2023 at 20:12:08 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 6/30/23 12:05, Cecil Ward wrote:
> I have code roughly like the following:
>
> dstring str = "name"d;
Aside: One almost never needs dstring.
> uint ordinal = (( str in Decls.ordinals ) !is null) ?
> Decls.ordinals[ str ] : -1;
>
> struct Decls
> {
> uint[ dstring] ordinals;
Do you mean 'ordinals' is 'static'? Otherwise, Decls.ordinals
does not compile.
> }
>
> //and
> Decls.ordinals[ str ] = ordinal_counter++;
Are you doing that *after* you initialize 'ordinal' as you show
here? :)
Ali
Hi Ali, ‘ordinal’ is a static initialised explicitly with zero.
Re: Bug in usage of associative array: dynamic array with string as a key
On 6/30/23 12:05, Cecil Ward wrote:
> I have code roughly like the following:
>
> dstring str = "name"d;
Aside: One almost never needs dstring.
> uint ordinal = (( str in Decls.ordinals ) !is null) ?
> Decls.ordinals[ str ] : -1;
>
> struct Decls
> {
> uint[ dstring] ordinals;
Do you mean 'ordinals' is 'static'? Otherwise, Decls.ordinals does not
compile.
> }
>
> //and
> Decls.ordinals[ str ] = ordinal_counter++;
Are you doing that *after* you initialize 'ordinal' as you show here? :)
Ali
Re: Bug in usage of associative array: dynamic array with string as a key
On Friday, 30 June 2023 at 19:05:23 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
I have code roughly like the following:
dstring str = "name"d;
uint ordinal = (( str in Decls.ordinals ) !is null) ?
Decls.ordinals[ str ] : -1;
struct Decls
{
uint[ dstring] ordinals;
}
//and
Decls.ordinals[ str ] = ordinal_counter++;
The problem is that it always returns ordinal== -1 from the
expression. Can you sort me out?
Impossible to tell without a complete repro, I'm afraid. The
expression, at least, looks correct at first glance.
Note that you can do `uint ordinal = Decls.ordinals.get(str,
-1);`.
Bug in usage of associative array: dynamic array with string as a key
I have code roughly like the following:
dstring str = "name"d;
uint ordinal = (( str in Decls.ordinals ) !is null) ?
Decls.ordinals[ str ] : -1;
struct Decls
{
uint[ dstring] ordinals;
}
//and
Decls.ordinals[ str ] = ordinal_counter++;
The problem is that it always returns ordinal== -1 from the
expression. Can you sort me out? I took this from the example
given in the language reference under arrays, testing for
membership (or similar, I forget the subssection title).
From good old printfs it seems to be the case that the array is
being populated (elsewhere) with the expected correct values.
Taking out the if doesn’t seem to help either. I don’t have a way
of examining the contents of the dynamic array directly to check
that they are actually being stored as expected, other than
seeing that that line of code is indeed being executed with the
expected values of str going in. Note that I’m using 32-bit
dstrings everywhere, not strings of bytes.
Re: IntelliJ D language plugin
I use it and contribute to it ;)
IntelliJ D language plugin
Have anyone had any luck with it? So far I'm trying to install DMD as SDK but it fails with not a valid D compiler home. -- Dmitry Olshansky https://olshansky.me
Re: Debugging by old fashioned trace log printfs / writefln
On Thursday, June 29, 2023 12:27:22 PM MDT Cecil Ward via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I’m trying to debug my D program with old-fashioned printfs stuck
> in various strategic places, actually using writefln(). My
> problem is that the addition of printf fights with the existing
> declarations for pure nothrow @nogc @safe and I have to adjust
> them, then put them back correctly when the writefln() trace
> statements are later removed.
>
> Is there something else I could be using, something that is
> allowed to violate the checking rules for purity, nothrow, @nogc?
> Would pragma( msg, "…" ) do the trick? Is that what I should be
> using?
pragma(msg, ...) and writeln are fundamentally different.
pragmas are run when code is compiled. When you calling a function during
CTFE, you are calling that function. You are not compiling it. It has
already been compiled at that point. That function may be being called as
part of compiling another function, but function that you're calling has
already been compiled. So, something like
string foo() { return "foo"; }
void bar(int i)
{
pragma(msg, foo());
}
will compile just fine, and it will print out "foo" at compile time, whereas
void bar(int i)
{
pragma(msg, i);
}
will not compile.
void bar(int i)
{
writeln(i);
}
will compile, but it won't print anything when it's compiled, and it cannot
be called with CTFE. However, it will of course print out if called at
runtime.
If you need to print out a message during testing, and the function in
question has attributes that writeln does not satisfy, then you can use
debug statements and compile the code with the -debug flag.
https://dlang.org/spec/version.html#debug
e.g.
void foo() pure @safe
{
debug
{
writeln("hello");
}
}
Of course, you have to be very careful when you do that, since you'll get
undefined behavior if the debug statements have side effects which violate
the guarantees that those attributes are supposed to make (e.g. mutating a
global variable in a pure function or throwing an exception from a nothrow
function), but simply printing out stuff shouldn't be a problem unless
generating the strings to print has side effects.
- Jonathan M Davis
Re: is Dlang support Uniform initialization like c++
On 6/30/23 08:18, lili wrote:
How too wirte this: addPoint({4,5}, {4,6})
In this case, arrays are better but only if you don't define a
constructor, which you don't need for simple types like Point below:
struct Point {
int x;
int y;
}
void main() {
// The type is explicit on the left-hand side
Point[] points = [ {1,2} ];
}
Ali
Re: Debugging by old fashioned trace log printfs / writefln
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 03:43:14PM +, Cecil Ward via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
[...]
> Since I can pass my main function some compile-time-defined input, the
> whole program should be capable of being executed with CTFE, no? So in
> that case pragma( msg ) should suffice for a test situation? Would
> pragma(message) have the advantage over writefln that I don’t have to
> pervert the function attributes like nogc nothrow pure ?
Just use the `debug` statement:
auto pureFunc(Args args) pure {
...
debug writefln("debug info: %s", ...);
...
}
Compile with `-debug` to enable the writefln during development. When
not compiling with `-debug`, the writefln will not be compiled and the
function will actually be pure.
The problem with pragma(msg) is that it happens very early in the
compilation process; some things may not be available to it, such as the
value of variables in CTFE. This may limit its usefulness in some
situations. For more details on this, see:
https://wiki.dlang.org/Compile-time_vs._compile-time
T
--
He who sacrifices functionality for ease of use, loses both and deserves
neither. -- Slashdotter
Re: is Dlang support Uniform initialization like c++
On 6/30/23 11:18 AM, lili wrote:
struct Point {
int x;
int y;
this(int x, int y) { this.x =x; this.y=y;}
}
void addPoint(Point a, Point b) {
...
}
How too wirte this: addPoint({4,5}, {4,6})
You have to write `Point(4, 5)`. The advantage is we don't need to deal
with the complexity of C++ overloading rules.
-Steve
Re: is Dlang support Uniform initialization like c++
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 03:18:41PM +, lili via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> struct Point {
> int x;
> int y;
> this(int x, int y) { this.x =x; this.y=y;}
> }
>
> void addPoint(Point a, Point b) {
>...
> }
>
> How too wirte this: addPoint({4,5}, {4,6})
addPoint(Point(4,5), Point(4,6));
T
--
"No, John. I want formats that are actually useful, rather than over-featured
megaliths that address all questions by piling on ridiculous internal links in
forms which are hideously over-complex." -- Simon St. Laurent on xml-dev
Re: Debugging by old fashioned trace log printfs / writefln
On Thursday, 29 June 2023 at 23:54:45 UTC, Chris Katko wrote: On Thursday, 29 June 2023 at 18:27:22 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote: I’m trying to debug my D program with old-fashioned printfs stuck in various strategic places, actually using writefln(). My problem is that the addition of printf fights with the existing declarations for pure nothrow @nogc @safe and I have to adjust them, then put them back correctly when the writefln() trace statements are later removed. Is there something else I could be using, something that is allowed to violate the checking rules for purity, nothrow, @nogc? Would pragma( msg, "…" ) do the trick? Is that what I should be using? pragma(msg, "") is only for compile time. It for debugging functions/templates if they're actually used (which static path is used), instantiated, and you can also get type values from template inputs to confirm they're what you expect. "Oh this is a char[][] not a char[]!" pragmas are the D equivalent of C/C++ pragmas. In this case, C/C++: ```C #pragma message( message-string ) ``` Since I can pass my main function some compile-time-defined input, the whole program should be capable of being executed with CTFE, no? So in that case pragma( msg ) should suffice for a test situation? Would pragma(message) have the advantage over writefln that I don’t have to pervert the function attributes like nogc nothrow pure ?
is Dlang support Uniform initialization like c++
struct Point {
int x;
int y;
this(int x, int y) { this.x =x; this.y=y;}
}
void addPoint(Point a, Point b) {
...
}
How too wirte this: addPoint({4,5}, {4,6})
Re: Mixin and compile-time functions for code generation
On 24.06.23 18:31, Cecil Ward wrote:
I have a function that can be run at compile-time and which will be able
to output code to be injected into the D source code stream. Can I get
mixin whatever to do this for me? Mixin with a function that runs at
compile-time and creates the required source ? Like D’s solution for a
replacement for function-style C preprocessor macros ? - but far more
advanced and capable ?
I need to re-read Ali Çehreli’s excellent book for the third time.
Is this what you want todo:
```d
import std.string : format, capitalize;
import std.stdio : writeln;
string getter(string v)
{
return "auto get%s() { return %s; }".format(v.capitalize, v);
}
class T
{
int abc;
mixin(getter("abc"));
}
void main() {
auto t = new T();
writeln(t.getAbc());
}
```
