Adding Toc for the "longish" spec pages.
It seems to me that some of the language reference/spec pages that are somewhat long, could provide a Toc (Table of contents) which should help users see an overview of what's there and improve the searchability and the navigation of the content. The 'Functions' page has a Toc already.
Re: Adding Toc for the "longish" spec pages.
On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 12:06:12 UTC, tipdbmp wrote: It seems to me that some of the language reference/spec pages that are somewhat long, could provide a Toc (Table of contents) which should help users see an overview of what's there and improve the searchability and the navigation of the content. The 'Functions' page has a Toc already. If you have a suggestion for improving the documentation, please file an issue at https://issues.dlang.org/ Occasionally contributors go fishing for easy issues like that in the issues list and will submit pull requests. Even better, you may want to file a pull request yourself at https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org Mike
Re: Adding Toc for the "longish" spec pages.
On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 12:13:02 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote: On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 12:06:12 UTC, tipdbmp wrote: It seems to me that some of the language reference/spec pages that are somewhat long, could provide a Toc (Table of contents) which should help users see an overview of what's there and improve the searchability and the navigation of the content. The 'Functions' page has a Toc already. If you have a suggestion for improving the documentation, please file an issue at https://issues.dlang.org/ Occasionally contributors go fishing for easy issues like that in the issues list and will submit pull requests. Even better, you may want to file a pull request yourself at https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org Mike Yes, opening an issue or PR is the best way to move things forward. In this case, this is already on my radar and will happen soon (since a couple of weeks we already got a footer pagination). It's pretty ugly because Ddoc is used for dlang.org which makes trivial stuff like this rather complicated :/
Re: Adding Toc for the "longish" spec pages.
On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 12:17:47 UTC, Seb wrote: On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 12:13:02 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote: [...] Yes, opening an issue or PR is the best way to move things forward. In this case, this is already on my radar and will happen soon (since a couple of weeks we already got a footer pagination). It's pretty ugly because Ddoc is used for dlang.org which makes trivial stuff like this rather complicated :/ TOC generation is there -> https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/2043
