== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmx.com)'s article > On Friday, March 18, 2011 18:58:49 Sean Eskapp wrote: > > == Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmx.com)'s article > > > > > On Friday, March 18, 2011 17:56:44 Sean Eskapp wrote: > > > > I've been trying for weeks to build the D bindings of SFML2, but > > > > with > > > > > > little success. The main issue is that I get a myriad of linker > > > > errors > > > > > > (documented at http://www.sfml-dev.org/forum/viewtopic.php? > > > > p=28345#28345), > > > > > > but I can't figure out what linking options would solve them. > > > > > > > > Can anybody shed some light on this? > > > > > > Just glancing at it, it looks like you might be missing pthreads, > > > > though that > > > > > would be pretty weird. You don't normally need to specify - > > > > lpthread. But those > > > > > symbols sure look like they're likely pthread-related. > > > - Jonathan M Davis > > > > I've tried -lpthread and -lm, and neither seemed to help. Is it > > possible there are platform issues, since D (to my knowledge) is 32- > > bit, and I'm 64-bit? > Well, as of dmd 2.052, if you pass -m64 to dmd, it'll compile in 64-bit on > Linux, but if you don't pass it -m64 (or if you explicitly pass it -m32), it > will compile in 32-bit. And if it's compiling in 32-bit, then you need the 32- > bit versions of whatever libraries that you're using. pthread is one of them. > So, if you don't have a 32-bit version of pthread installed, then that would > explain it. > - Jonathan M Davis
Perfect, thanks!