Re: How to list all process directories under /proc/

2017-09-22 Thread angel via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Sunday, 17 September 2017 at 08:15:58 UTC, Ky-Anh Huynh wrote:

Hi,

I want to list all processes by scanning /proc/. The following 
code doesn't work


[code]
  foreach (string fstatm; dirEntries("/proc/", "[0-9]*", 
SpanMode.shallow)) {

writefln("pid %s", fstatm);
  }
[/code]

as it only list a few entries before exiting

[code]
pid /proc/9
pid /proc/935
pid /proc/9146
pid /proc/9149
pid /proc/9150
pid /proc/9151
pid /proc/9756
pid /proc/9759
pid /proc/9760
pid /proc/9761
[/code]

I don't want to use `SpanMode.depth` or `SpanMode.breadth` 
because it will scan so deeply and there would be a permission 
problem.


Any ideas?

Thanks a lot



Are you familiar with libprocps ?
Maybe you had better make use of this library, or, at least, peek 
into its code, for reference.


Re: How to list all process directories under /proc/

2017-09-19 Thread Ky-Anh Huynh via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 18:32:06 UTC, Matt Jones wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 13:32:29 UTC, Ky-Anh Huynh 
wrote:




Btw, is that a bit weird that range is not supported in glob 
pattern :) Is there a design reason for this?


That is strange. But then again, every glob library I've seen 
works a little bit differently.


I see. Maybe I'm using Linux and Ruby too much. Missing character 
range doesn't really hurt, but the feature should be documented. 
Should we improve the documentation? To be fair, the syntax 
specification is clear after I read it twice, but the link to 
Wiki page is confusing, because Wiki page mentions the popular 
(FIXME) implementation with character range.


Re: How to list all process directories under /proc/

2017-09-19 Thread Matt Jones via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 13:32:29 UTC, Ky-Anh Huynh wrote:



Btw, is that a bit weird that range is not supported in glob 
pattern :) Is there a design reason for this?


That is strange. But then again, every glob library I've seen 
works a little bit differently.


Re: How to list all process directories under /proc/

2017-09-19 Thread Ky-Anh Huynh via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 06:35:18 UTC, Matt Jones wrote:
On Sunday, 17 September 2017 at 08:37:33 UTC, Ky-Anh Huynh 
wrote:



[...]


The problem with matching "[0123456789]*" is that it will match 
files like "1blah" and "8stuff". It looks like glob patterns 
are not robust enough to handle match patterns you want. A 
regex would probably be enough. Something like this works:


[...]



I understand. Thanks a lot.

Btw, is that a bit weird that range is not supported in glob 
pattern :) Is there a design reason for this?


Re: How to list all process directories under /proc/

2017-09-18 Thread Matt Jones via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Sunday, 17 September 2017 at 08:37:33 UTC, Ky-Anh Huynh wrote:

The official documentation here 
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_path.html#.globMatch refers to the 
wiki page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glob_%28programming%29 
. However I think the popular glob rules (man 7 glob) are not 
supported.


The problem with matching "[0123456789]*" is that it will match 
files like "1blah" and "8stuff". It looks like glob patterns are 
not robust enough to handle match patterns you want. A regex 
would probably be enough. Something like this works:


string[] getProcNumbers() {
import std.file : dirEntries, SpanMode;
import std.path : baseName;
import std.regex : regex, match;
import std.algorithm : map, filter;
import std.array : array;

auto r = regex(`^/proc/[0-9]*$`);

string[] entries =
dirEntries("/proc/", SpanMode.shallow)
.map!(n => n.name)
.filter!(n => match(n, r))
.array();

return entries;
}

int main() {
import std.stdio : stdout;

foreach (entry ; getProcNumbers()) {
stdout.writefln("%s", entry);
}

return 0;
}


Re: How to list all process directories under /proc/

2017-09-17 Thread Ky-Anh Huynh via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Sunday, 17 September 2017 at 08:32:24 UTC, Ky-Anh Huynh wrote:


My bad. Range doesn't support. The correct pattern is

[code]
  foreach (string fstatm; dirEntries("/proc/", "[0123456789]*", 
SpanMode.shallow)) {

writefln("pid %s", fstatm);
  }
[/code]

Is there a way to make this simpler?


The official documentation here 
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_path.html#.globMatch refers to the 
wiki page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glob_%28programming%29 . 
However I think the popular glob rules (man 7 glob) are not 
supported.


Re: How to list all process directories under /proc/

2017-09-17 Thread Ky-Anh Huynh via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Sunday, 17 September 2017 at 08:15:58 UTC, Ky-Anh Huynh wrote:

Hi,

I want to list all processes by scanning /proc/. The following 
code doesn't work


[code]
  foreach (string fstatm; dirEntries("/proc/", "[0-9]*", 
SpanMode.shallow)) {

writefln("pid %s", fstatm);
  }
[/code]

as it only list a few entries before exiting

[code]
pid /proc/9
pid /proc/935
pid /proc/9146
pid /proc/9149
pid /proc/9150
pid /proc/9151
pid /proc/9756
pid /proc/9759
pid /proc/9760
pid /proc/9761
[/code]

I don't want to use `SpanMode.depth` or `SpanMode.breadth` 
because it will scan so deeply and there would be a permission 
problem.


Any ideas?

Thanks a lot


My bad. Range doesn't support. The correct pattern is

[code]
  foreach (string fstatm; dirEntries("/proc/", "[0123456789]*", 
SpanMode.shallow)) {

writefln("pid %s", fstatm);
  }
[/code]

Is there a way to make this simpler?





How to list all process directories under /proc/

2017-09-17 Thread Ky-Anh Huynh via Digitalmars-d-learn

Hi,

I want to list all processes by scanning /proc/. The following 
code doesn't work


[code]
  foreach (string fstatm; dirEntries("/proc/", "[0-9]*", 
SpanMode.shallow)) {

writefln("pid %s", fstatm);
  }
[/code]

as it only list a few entries before exiting

[code]
pid /proc/9
pid /proc/935
pid /proc/9146
pid /proc/9149
pid /proc/9150
pid /proc/9151
pid /proc/9756
pid /proc/9759
pid /proc/9760
pid /proc/9761
[/code]

I don't want to use `SpanMode.depth` or `SpanMode.breadth` 
because it will scan so deeply and there would be a permission 
problem.


Any ideas?

Thanks a lot