Re: Position of unittest attributes
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 09:42:44 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 22/03/2015 10:29 p.m., Stefan Frijters wrote:
So I was trying to add some attributes to unittests in my
code, but
apparently they are only allowed *before* the unittest
keyword, which I
think makes it much harder to quickly see the unittests when
scrolling
through the code:
void foo() @safe pure nothrow @nogc { } // Ok - I normally use
this
style, and Phobos does too, I think?
@safe pure nothrow @nogc void bar() { } // Ok
@safe pure nothrow @nogc unittest { foo(); } // Ok
unittest @safe pure nothrow @nogc { bar(); } // Nope
I looked through the D grammar and it does seem to disallow
this, so
it's not a bug as such, but is there a particular reason to
not allow it?
Post attributes to e.g. functions are a relatively new standard
in D. It'll simply be nobody has brought it up as of yet.
File it into the issue tracker.
Thank you.
While filing in the summary field in Bugzilla it actually showed
me an issue already exists
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10925 , so I just bumped
it a bit.
Re: Position of unittest attributes
On 22/03/2015 10:29 p.m., Stefan Frijters wrote:
So I was trying to add some attributes to unittests in my code, but
apparently they are only allowed *before* the unittest keyword, which I
think makes it much harder to quickly see the unittests when scrolling
through the code:
void foo() @safe pure nothrow @nogc { } // Ok - I normally use this
style, and Phobos does too, I think?
@safe pure nothrow @nogc void bar() { } // Ok
@safe pure nothrow @nogc unittest { foo(); } // Ok
unittest @safe pure nothrow @nogc { bar(); } // Nope
I looked through the D grammar and it does seem to disallow this, so
it's not a bug as such, but is there a particular reason to not allow it?
Post attributes to e.g. functions are a relatively new standard in D.
It'll simply be nobody has brought it up as of yet.
File it into the issue tracker.
Position of unittest attributes
So I was trying to add some attributes to unittests in my code,
but apparently they are only allowed *before* the unittest
keyword, which I think makes it much harder to quickly see the
unittests when scrolling through the code:
void foo() @safe pure nothrow @nogc { } // Ok - I normally use
this style, and Phobos does too, I think?
@safe pure nothrow @nogc void bar() { } // Ok
@safe pure nothrow @nogc unittest { foo(); } // Ok
unittest @safe pure nothrow @nogc { bar(); } // Nope
I looked through the D grammar and it does seem to disallow this,
so it's not a bug as such, but is there a particular reason to
not allow it?
