Re: Static initialization of rectangular arrays
On Thursday, 29 August 2019 at 19:06:04 UTC, kinke wrote: Sorry, that was wrt. the linked bugzilla and not this example here. - What does work is `static double[6][3] matrix = [0, 0, 0]`, i.e., initializing each nested 1D array with a scalar 0. I guess I'll use this workaround, though obviously it becomes more impractical the larger the outermost array dimension is ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Re: Static initialization of rectangular arrays
On Thursday, 29 August 2019 at 18:59:22 UTC, kinke wrote: On Thursday, 29 August 2019 at 18:11:50 UTC, Les De Ridder wrote: It's a known bug[1]. As a workaround you could use a `static this()`: Or LDC, and GDC probably too. Sorry, that was wrt. the linked bugzilla and not this example here. - What does work is `static double[6][3] matrix = [0, 0, 0]`, i.e., initializing each nested 1D array with a scalar 0.
Re: Static initialization of rectangular arrays
On Thursday, 29 August 2019 at 18:11:50 UTC, Les De Ridder wrote: It's a known bug[1]. As a workaround you could use a `static this()`: Or LDC, and GDC probably too.
Re: Static initialization of rectangular arrays
On Thursday, 29 August 2019 at 15:10:26 UTC, rombankzero wrote:
[...]
Is this a bug, or am I missing something? It would be really
convenient to be able to statically initialize rectangular
arrays in this way. Example: I have a struct that has a member
that's a rectangular float array, but I have no way of telling
the compiler that I want it default-initialized to all-zeroes
(instead of NaNs)!
It's a known bug[1].
As a workaround you could use a `static this()`:
static double[6][3] matrix;
static this()
{
matrix = 0;
}
[1] https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19178
