Re: Using mir to work with matrices
On 1/29/21 8:20 PM, 9il wrote: On Friday, 29 January 2021 at 15:35:49 UTC, drug wrote: Between is there a plan to implement some sort of static slice where the lengths of the dimensions are known in compile time? Compiler help is very useful. No. BLAS/LAPACK API's can't use compile-time information. User matrix I see loops can be optimized by the compiler using constants and without introducing new types. If you need a stack-allocated matrix, then a 1D stack-allocated array can be used > import mir.slice.slice; double[12] payload; auto matrix = payload[].sliced(3, 4); Yes, it's how I did it.
Re: Using mir to work with matrices
On Friday, 29 January 2021 at 15:35:49 UTC, drug wrote: Between is there a plan to implement some sort of static slice where the lengths of the dimensions are known in compile time? Compiler help is very useful. No. BLAS/LAPACK API's can't use compile-time information. User matrix loops can be optimized by the compiler using constants and without introducing new types. If you need a stack-allocated matrix, then a 1D stack-allocated array can be used import mir.slice.slice; double[12] payload; auto matrix = payload[].sliced(3, 4);
Re: Using mir to work with matrices
On 1/29/21 4:50 PM, 9il wrote: On Tuesday, 26 January 2021 at 14:43:08 UTC, drug wrote: It is not easy to understand what mir library one should use to work with matrices. mir-glas turns out unsupported now and I try to use mir-blas. I need to reimplement my Kalman filter version to use more high dimension matrix than 4x4 plus Kronecker product. Is mir-blas recommended to work with matrices? Yes, it is wrapper around a common BLAS libraries such as OpenBLAS or Intel MKL. I've implemented the filter using mir-lapack. But then I found lubeck - I didn't try it but it seemed that it provided more high level functionality like matrix inversion (`inv` wrapper is much handy than `getrf_` and `dgetri_` combination I used directly). So my first thought was that lubeck should be more preferable but then I found there was lubeck2 so I didn't know what to think further. But I pretty well understand the situation and the reasons behind it. Thank you for you efforts! Between is there a plan to implement some sort of static slice where the lengths of the dimensions are known in compile time? Compiler help is very useful.
Re: Using mir to work with matrices
On Tuesday, 26 January 2021 at 14:43:08 UTC, drug wrote: It is not easy to understand what mir library one should use to work with matrices. mir-glas turns out unsupported now and I try to use mir-blas. I need to reimplement my Kalman filter version to use more high dimension matrix than 4x4 plus Kronecker product. Is mir-blas recommended to work with matrices? Yes, it is wrapper around a common BLAS libraries such as OpenBLAS or Intel MKL.
Using mir to work with matrices
It is not easy to understand what mir library one should use to work with matrices. mir-glas turns out unsupported now and I try to use mir-blas. I need to reimplement my Kalman filter version to use more high dimension matrix than 4x4 plus Kronecker product. Is mir-blas recommended to work with matrices?
