[digitalradio] kt2q
if your interested in 10m MS...let me know. messed with it way back when starting in hscw. it does work, and would be fun to do more. write direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] Re: QSL info for Digital modes
LOTW and EQSL QSOs uploaded as MT63 MFSK work ok for me. MixW won't allow me to change the mode to OLIVIA so I upload them as MT63 and use the Notes to specify the mode was OLIVIA. Rich K2TFT P.S. Gave up on LOTW2566 up and 129 returned. EQSL ~ 90% return. In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Ron Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have asked this question before and yet do not feel comfortable with the way I am logging digital QSO's SSB, CW, RTTY, TOR=AMTOR, PKT, AM, FM, SSTV, ATV, PAC=PACTOR,CLO=CLOVER are recognized ADIF modes and will exchange correctly when using the electronic QSL services such as LOTW and E-QSL My question is what mode does the users of E-QSL and LOTW use for some of the other modes now in wide use by digital users, specifically OLIVIA = ? MFSK16 = ? MT63 = ? Should I be concerned or not? I appreciate your comment. 73 - Ron W4LDE Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] 7070 Sig ID Request
Which brings it to mind that half the spots I see for PSK are not correct. If you see a spot and click on it, your transceiver should NOT wind up on that freq, but on a freq such that the waterfall marker winds up on the exact position of the spotted station. In other words, if the waterfall spot of the spotting station is setting on 14.07148, so should the marker on my waterfall ( and the spot), and not around the 14.070 freq most people are spotting. I too used the tranceiver freq as a spot freq, when I first started out with PSK, but soon discovered that was incorrect, and I wasnt helping others by mis-spotting. Danny -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.18/89 - Release Date: 9/2/2005 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Re: QSL info for Digital modes
Rich, WOW is all I can say about the 90% return from EQSL. I am even on percent returns between LOTW and E-QSL. both low at about 20%. One of the reasons I am seeing a equal or better return on LOTW is the DX stations use it for contest confirmations verses the old paper trail, thus we who worked them during the contest get a confirming QSL. On the other hand E-QSL is not used as much by the contester (DX) stations and most of my E-QSL's are from rag chewing QSO's although I have a good mix of DX E-QSL's Funny is that I have 83 DXCC confirmed via both LOTW and EQSL where I have over 250 DXCC paper QSL's Now when it comes to the mode issue I have recently recommended the use of CLO for Olivia QSO's, I do not think that at this time many of us are using clover so when using electronic QSL service either LOTW or EQSL should not cause any problems. I recommend CLO since an acronym came to mind which is Certainly Love Olivia. CLO is recognized as a valid mode on both services. If I can get a consensus I will going back over the log book and changing the mode and downloading them to the services. Your thoughts Ron W4LDE rich wrote: LOTW and EQSL QSOs uploaded as MT63 MFSK work ok for me. MixW won't allow me to change the mode to OLIVIA so I upload them as MT63 and use the Notes to specify the mode was OLIVIA. Rich K2TFT P.S. Gave up on LOTW2566 up and 129 returned. EQSL ~ 90% return. In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Ron Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have asked this question before and yet do not feel comfortable with the way I am logging digital QSO's SSB, CW, RTTY, TOR=AMTOR, PKT, AM, FM, SSTV, ATV, PAC=PACTOR,CLO=CLOVER are recognized ADIF modes and will exchange correctly when using the electronic QSL services such as LOTW and E-QSL My question is what mode does the users of E-QSL and LOTW use for some of the other modes now in wide use by digital users, specifically OLIVIA = ? MFSK16 = ? MT63 = ? Should I be concerned or not? I appreciate your comment. 73 - Ron W4LDE The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Re: QSL info for Digital modes
Ron, please do not give up on LOTW. It is the only electrical logbook that can be used for DXCC, and will soon be good for WAS and other awards. eQSL will not now, or probably ever, be accepted for those particular awards. You already have you logs in electronic form, you apparently have the certificate for LOTW and it costs nothing to continue it. You do not have to buy verifications if you do not want to, so there is no cost there (unless - again, you want to). I find it extremely difficult to believe that there would be anything like a 90 percent rate on eQSL, or any other mode of QSLing, unless one only makes contacts on nets that use the eQSL system for their own awards. I have uploaded all my logs for the past 21 years to both eQSL and LOTW, and the rate of return is as low on one, as it is on the other (about 9-11 percent). The majority of my contacts are DX, with only a few hundred on contests ( I use contests to look for new countries/modes). I have enough in both systems to get DXCC on LOTW and the 100 countries award on eQSL, but neither comes anywhere near the 332 countries I have with paper logs. What it comes down to is that it is only fair to other ops to continue to confirm via whatever electronic procedure you can, if you are going to QSL at all. Danny -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.18/89 - Release Date: 9/2/2005 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] Installing new MultiPSK - on top of or instead of
I downloaded the new MultiPSK program but I didn't see a recommendation for installing over the top of the old version (like DXLab's updates), or removing the old version and installing the update as new. And if I remove, do I just trash the folder or do I run the Remove control panel. I tried the email link on the web site, but it bounced back as invalid. Suggestions please. Thanks and 73,(like DXLabs updates) Paul Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Re: QSL info for Digital modes
Danny, Thanks for the comments, I have no intention of giving up on LOTW or for that matter E-QSL. They both provide a service to hams world wide. I agree that it is funny that the actual ROR is lower than I initially expected but that seems to be the normal rate 20%, when I first started using LOTW the ROR on that service was below what E-QSL was and I think that it had to do with the certificate issue. My earlier email really had more to do with the mode selection for those services when you want to confirm a Olivia digital mode QSO. Since we have seen a steady decline in the use of AMTOR, PACTOR and CLOVER I have suggested the use of the ADIF approved mode designation CLO for Clover can be also used by the Olivia users to stand for that mode and help end the confusion. Some are using MT63, some MFSK16 while others have suggested RTTY as the mode to use when uploading the log. That was my main point and not to indicate dissatisfaction with either LOTW or E-QSL. Ron - W4LDE Danny Douglas wrote: Ron, please do not give up on LOTW. It is the only electrical logbook that can be used for DXCC, and will soon be good for WAS and other awards. eQSL will not now, or probably ever, be accepted for those particular awards. You already have you logs in electronic form, you apparently have the certificate for LOTW and it costs nothing to continue it. You do not have to buy verifications if you do not want to, so there is no cost there (unless - again, you want to). I find it extremely difficult to believe that there would be anything like a 90 percent rate on eQSL, or any other mode of QSLing, unless one only makes contacts on nets that use the eQSL system for their own awards. I have uploaded all my logs for the past 21 years to both eQSL and LOTW, and the rate of return is as low on one, as it is on the other (about 9-11 percent). The majority of my contacts are DX, with only a few hundred on contests ( I use contests to look for new countries/modes). I have enough in both systems to get DXCC on LOTW and the 100 countries award on eQSL, but neither comes anywhere near the 332 countries I have with paper logs. What it comes down to is that it is only fair to other ops to continue to confirm via whatever electronic procedure you can, if you are going to QSL at all. Danny Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
