RE: [digitalradio] Re: Zapped PCs, data recovery, and Windows !

2009-07-25 Thread Brent Gourley
my computer backs up data online to fabrik.com every day. I do have mypics
etc on an external drive, because original drive not big enough.
 
Brent KE4MZ

  _  

From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Andrew O'Brien
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 11:39 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Zapped PCs, data recovery, and Windows !




Thanks  for all the feedback.  I did/do have surge protection in line and am
surprised that other equipment plugged in same circuits were not at all
impacted.  I'd be tempted to switch to Linux for my ham computers if I could
get my Microham Microkeyer to work fully under Linux but last I checked, it
was not possible.  I'd miss DX Lab applications too.

In the future I think I will explore external storage devices and the device
that Dave Bernstein mentioned.  If I have more zapped computers I would like
to avoid researching jumper settings (which seem surprisingly without
industry standardization) on hard drives . Also the issue such as hard drive
belts, housing, railings, etc.  While not really that difficult to handle ,
these things contribute the the overall hassle of switching hard drives.

From a ham radio station readiness perspective, and an overall goal of
simplicity, I'd like to see the ability to have the computers independent of
storage devices .  A  PC gets fried, plug the external storage device in to
a back-up computer and away you go !  

Cue mentions of Fldigi/NBEMS puppyy discs  :)

Andy K3UK.




On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:51 AM, dennisbauer65 dennisba...@bigpond.com
wrote:


  

Hi all don't really understand why the trouble, all i use is a external hard
disk container which plugs into usb port and i can use a vista hard drive or
xp hard drive into xp home i have added new hard drives to different
motherboards all my old hard drives i still have still work, and also the
vista home premium will all plug into this xp op sys and i can read any
files or swap them across, i use fldigi Domino,we have a net on 3530 7pm
Brisbane east coast time most nights, also have MixW reg through Jim Jaffer,
in the States, using digital more and more its great thanking you all Dennis
Bauer.






-- 
Andy 







RE: [digitalradio] duplicate messages

2009-07-09 Thread Brent Gourley
Nope.  I have several yahoogroups subscriptions, but all go to the same
email addy.

Will send Mike's email, both copies, back to him, with the header data when
I figure out how to extract it.

 

-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Andy obrien
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 6:39 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] duplicate messages

Are you subscribed twice ?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:24 PM, ylrgbbg...@comcast.net wrote:


 Anybody know why I might be receiving two copies of all traffic on 
 this server and only this server when I only see one copy each on the web
site?

 Brent, KE4MZ





Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Pages at
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked

Recommended digital mode software:  Winwarbler, FLDIGI, DM780, or Multipsk
Logging Software:  DXKeeper or Ham Radio Deluxe.



Yahoo! Groups Links






Re: [digitalradio] Has anyone tried the ASuS EEE pc 901?

2009-06-25 Thread Brent Gourley
I have run digipan on a 75 mHz P2 W95 notebook.  Long ago.

KE4MZ, Brent
Dothan, AL
bg...@comcast.net
www.wb4zpi.org



- Original Message - 
From: Ralph Mowery ku...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Has anyone tried the ASuS EEE pc 901?





 --- On Mon, 6/22/09, jeffnjr484 jeffnjr...@yahoo.com wrote:

 From: jeffnjr484 jeffnjr...@yahoo.com
 Subject: [digitalradio] Has anyone tried the ASuS EEE pc 901?
 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Monday, June 22, 2009, 11:24 AM
 Hello,

 Has anyone used the ASUS laptop for psk31 or any digital
 modes im looking at it
 for some portable ops
 http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001BYD178/ref=noref?ie=UTF8s=pc
 It looks like a neat computer and the price is outstanding
 just wanted to know
 if anyone has tried it
 jeff kd4qit



 The 901 should be just fine for the digital modes.  I have the ASUS 1000HE 
 which is just about the same computer except for the hard drive vers the 
 solid state memory and a few extras.  I have used Digipan and several 
 other programs for psk31 with no problem.  Runs mmtty fine.  If you do not 
 have a usb to serial port adaptor you may not be able to control the rig. 
 Some of the interface units come with the adaptors for this.

 It does not really take much of a computer to run basic psk31.  I have ran 
 psk 31 with some 200 mhz desktop computers years ago.







 

 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Pages at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/sked

 Recommended digital mode software:  Winwarbler, FLDIGI, DM780, or Multipsk
 Logging Software:  DXKeeper or Ham Radio Deluxe.



 Yahoo! Groups Links



 



Re: [digitalradio] PROPOSED RULE MAKING AND ORDER

2009-04-02 Thread Brent Gourley
the FAA version became final decades ago...

KE4MZ, Brent
Dothan, AL
bg...@comcast.net
www.wb4zpi.org

No trees were destroyed in the sending of this contaminant-free message.
However, we do concede a significant number of electrons may have been 
inconvenienced.
  - Original Message - 
  From: bruce mallon 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 4:33 AM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] PROPOSED RULE MAKING AND ORDER


IT IS ABOUT TIME ..

I was beginning to understand some of them .



--- On Wed, 4/1/09, John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net wrote:


  From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
  Subject: [digitalradio] PROPOSED RULE MAKING AND ORDER
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2009, 10:41 PM




  NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING AND ORDER
  Adopted: April 1 2009
  Comment Date: 60 days after publication in the Federal Register
  Reply Comment Date: 75 days after publication in the Federal Register
  By the Commission: Notice of Proposed Rule making

  1000. A: No radio system owner, or radio system operator, or person or
  persons acting on the direction, or suggestion, or supervision, of 
any radio
  system owner, or radio system operator, may try, attempt to try, or 
make or
  make any attempt to try, to comprehend or understand, any or all, in 
whole
  or in part, of the herein mentioned Federal Communication Commission
  Regulations, except as authorized by the Administrator or an agent 
appointed
  by, or under the supervision of, the Administrator.

  1000. B: If any radio system owner, or radio system operator, or 
group of
  associated radio system owners or radio system operators, becomes 
aware of,
  or realizes, or detects, or discovers, or finds, that he, or she, or 
they,
  are, or have been beginning to, or are about to understand the Federal
  Communication Commission Rules or Regulations or any of its 
provisions, (he)
  (she) (they) must immediately, within three (3) days of such 
discovery or
  awareness, notify, in writing, the Administrator.

  1000. C: Upon receipt of any such above notice of impending 
comprehension,
  the Administrator shall promptly cause said Federal Communication 
Commission
  Rules and/or Regulations to be rewritten in such a form and manner as 
to
  completely and totally eliminate any further possibility of 
comprehension by
  any radio system owner, or radio system operator, or person or persons
  acting on the direction, or suggestion, or supervision, of any radio 
system
  owner or radio system operator.

  1000. D: The Administrator may, at his or her option, require any 
radio
  system owner, or radio system operator, or person or persons acting 
on the
  direction, or suggestion, or supervision, of any radio system owner, 
or
  radio system operator, who commit(s), or attempt(s) to commit, or 
exhibit(s)
  any propensity to commit, the offense of understanding or 
comprehending the
  Federal Communication Commission Rules and/or Regulations, or any part
  thereof, to attend courses of remedial instruction in said Rules 
and/or
  Regulations, until such time as said radio system owner, or radio 
system
  operator, or person or persons acting on the direction, or 
suggestion, or
  supervision, of radio system owner, or radio system operator, 
demonstrate
  that they are no longer capable of exhibiting any comprehension or
  understanding of anything.

  Comment period: Persons wishing to comment upon said NPRM have until 
April
  19, 2009 to send in comments regarding the above NPRM to the 
aforementioned
  agency, in triple quadruplicate, typed, certified, registered, no 
carbons,
  initialed and notarized with a photo identification authorized by the
  Homeland Security Agency, including original radio system license or
  licenses, medical certificate, three letters of recommendation from
  employer, police chief and FBI signifying no felony or misdemeanor
  convictions, poor work habits or personal disgusting habits which 
would
  offend the Administrator, including but not limited to: smoking, 
drinking,
  profanity, watching R rated movies, owning cable TV, non-church 
attendance,
  voting independent, listening to rap music, joining trade 
associations,
  speaking to attorneys, or talking snippy to anyone in Gettysburg.

  Send comments to:
  Administrator
  Federal Communications Commission
  Docket #: 24857-23.45. 3562.A5PU. (6)b
  Attn: Past Due Comments
  125 E SW St. 

Re: [digitalradio] CQ Men In Black?

2009-04-01 Thread Brent Gourley
but who does s/he think is the fool ??

;)

KE4MZ, Brent
Dothan, AL
bg...@comcast.net
www.wb4zpi.org

  - Original Message - 
  From: Gmail - Kevin, Natalia, Stacey  Rochelle 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 7:57 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] CQ Men In Black?


  Remember it's April Fools Day.

  Kevin, ZL1KFM.

- Original Message - 
From: Andy obrien 
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] CQ Men In Black?


On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote:
 All,

 Just copied a most interesting CQ message on 20 meter PSK31 (call sign
 purposely deleted)

 CQ Moon...CQ Mars...CQ Nearby Star Systems...CQ Alien Lifeforms Or Fellow
 Men In Black...DE X Calling CQ and Standing By

 An adult beverages may have played a roll in this : )

 Tony -K2MO

Tony, did you dF the signals to see if there were from our planet?
Perhaps it was the ultimate DX signal.







Re: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams

2009-03-07 Thread Brent Gourley
But humans provided the emcom traffic to the machines, and the machines at 
the far end of the communication deliver it to humans. Without the humans, 
there is no communication.

For genuine, this-is-no-drill emcom, we should use the most effective mode 
possible. Effective being the balance between speed and required accuracy.

KE4MZ, Brent
Dothan, AL
bg...@comcast.net
www.wb4zpi.org



- Original Message - 
From: Christian Crayton n5...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 6:26 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams


 Why is there a need in ham radio for mode wars?

 I think there are several issues at play here.

 On one hand are the proponents of mode x, who think it's the best mode, 
 and will argue its superiority in the face of any logic or reason.  That's 
 a technology thing.  It's no different than PC vs Mac, Icom vs Yaesu vs 
 Kenwood vs Orion vs Ten Tec, etc.

 When it comes to Winlink 2000 and ALE the main issue, at least with me, is 
 that modes dehumanize Amateur Radio.

 ALE and email are the two technologies most directly related to the 
 elimination of human radio operators in commercial communications.  That's 
 what they were designed to do.  Many amateurs are ex-commercial radio 
 operators and have every right to despise these modes.

 Take the idea of emergency communications in amateur radio.  This started 
 because hams had the capability and skill to provide communications, so it 
 was natural to help out in times of need.  But a new school of people only 
 interested in emergency communications, wanting to use HF radio and not 
 interested in learning the skills required of a good operator, turn to 
 Winlink 2000 and ALE.

 Winlink 2000 and ALE are a cancer to amateur radio.  They are evil because 
 they represent machines talking to machines, and we have too much of that 
 in this world already.

 If amateur radio is not about people talking to people, then what are we 
 in this for?  Most hams I know don't really have a beef with digital modes 
 as long as they are used to hold a QSO between human operators.  It's when 
 the mode supports machine to machine communications that people get mad.

 Just my opinion, but I think digital modes will get a better reputation if 
 we successfully communicate what they are really good for.  For example: 
 with my antenna and power restrictions I am only able to communicate with 
 other hams at all via digital modes.  For me, they are the Great 
 Equalizer.





 

 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/sked


 Recommended software:  Winwarbler, FLDIGI, DM780, or Multipsk



 Yahoo! Groups Links



 



Re: [digitalradio] illinoisdigital group

2009-02-23 Thread Brent Gourley
I also own and or moderate groups in other endeavors.

Please check for your email preferences for each email address you use on 
yahoo. If you leave one particular block unchecked, then a list owner/moderator 
cannot send you invitations to join his group.


KE4MZ, Brent
Dothan, AL
bg...@comcast.net
www.wb4zpi.org


  - Original Message - 
  From: JAMES ROSPOPO 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 2:30 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] illinoisdigital group


Rick,

Please read Yahoo's Terms of Use, which is at the bottom of each 
email..  Pay particular attention to the spam policy within the Terms of Use..  
It says in there that your Yahoo ID can be terminated without notice for 
violating that policy.  What Mark was doing fits one of the examples of 
spamming as listed in the spam policy.  Also remember when each of us signed up 
for Yahoogroups we had to accept the conditions of the Terms of Use.  So we 
were informed of what is expected and not allowed when we signed up.

73's

Jim, KE4CON



--- On Mon, 2/23/09, Rick W mrf...@frontiernet.net wrote:

  From: Rick W mrf...@frontiernet.net
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] illinoisdigital group
  To: digitalra...@yahoogroups..com
  Date: Monday, February 23, 2009, 1:59 PM


  I agree that what Mark did was clearly overzealous. If he did this to 
my 
  group I could see that he could be removed or better yet blocked from 
  posting if you don't want to deal with having to moderate each 
message. 
  That would have given him a stronger message.

  But the fact is that you would not find a stronger promoter of 
digital 
  ham radio anyplace. Consider the effort and cost he has donated to 
the 
  cause with his promotional efforts and travel.

  I can see where Yahoo could threaten him with taking down the group 
if 
  they really have received the number of complaints that posters have 
  indicated.

  What I have a real problem with is if they did not warn him. I do not 
  think it is appropriate to just destroy a group without some warning. 
If 
  they had warned him and he continued to do the messaging, then that 
is 
  another thing. Otherwise, as I mentioned, a concerted effort by 
  malicious individuals could cause the destruction of any group.

  73,

  Rick, KV9U

  John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
   Rick this is true but I must ask is there really a need to post it
   to every ham list on yahoo? I was getting it 20 or so times.
  
   On the list that I either own or moderate he was set to no mail.
   This tells me one thing only. He did not want anything going to his 
   in box and must have been reading from the group site.
  
   But since he never posted to the list other them his SPAM that 
   tells me the he also never read anything at all.
  
   There is a move about to keep him off yahoo.
   What do you think is going to happen the next time?
  
   John, W0JAB
  
   

   



  

Re: [digitalradio] Comparison of Performance of Digital Modulation in the Presence of adjacent QRM

2009-02-17 Thread Brent Gourley
here's the url

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/tocresult.jsp?isYear=1982isnumber=23962Submit32=Go+To+Issue



- Original Message - 
From: Andrew O'Brien k3uka...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 10:02 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Comparison of Performance of Digital Modulation in 
the Presence of adjacent QRM


 FYI, anyone have the full articel ?

 Andy
 Comparison of Performance of Digital Modulation Techniques in the
 Presence of Adjacent Channel Interference
 Milstein, L.   Pickholtz, R.   Schilling, D.
 Univ. of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA;


 This paper appears in: Communications, IEEE Transactions on
 Publication Date: Aug 1982
 Volume: 30,  Issue: 8
 On page(s): 1984- 1993
 ISSN: 0090-6778
 Current Version Published: 2003-01-06





 Abstract
 The performance of four digital modulation techniques are compared to
 one another when each is received in the presence of adjacent channel
 interference. The interfering waveforms that each modulation format
 sees are identical to the modulation format under consideration. The
 four types of modulation are QPSK, 8-PSK, 16QASK, and QPR. Upper
 bounds to the probability of error are derived and used to evaluate
 the relative merits of the different schemes.


 .



 

 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/sked


 Recommended software:  Winwarbler, FLDIGI, DM780, or Multipsk



 Yahoo! Groups Links



 



Re: [digitalradio] Re: Real time audio frequency multiplication sofware

2009-01-27 Thread Brent Gourley
the software that came with my Sony digital recorder ICD-P320 does this 
trick. The device will record more than 20 hours. The listener can speed up 
the playback, the pitch never changes.

KE4MZ, Brent
Dothan, AL
bg...@comcast.net
www.wb4zpi.org


- Original Message - 
From: expeditionradio expeditionra...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 3:34 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Real time audio frequency multiplication sofware


 Such devices have been used in music industry, especially vocals,
 guitars, and other instruments.

 They have been variously known as pitch shifters, pitch scalers, or
 harmonizers. This function has become a feature in multi-effects
 boxes for electronic music instruments, recording, and live sound
 processing.

 It is done by changing the rescan rate of digitized audio, and some
 other syncro tricks, and the effect is most recently accomplished in
 real time with a good DSP engine (or several).

 The technique for audio timescale pitch modification is used in
 voice commercials (spots), usually the legal fine print disclaimer
 heard very fast at the end of the spot. The voice is sped up, but the
 pitch is then adjusted back lower to the original speed.

 In my recording studio, I have a DSP multi-effects rack-mount device
 (with 3 DSP engines in it) that has a pitch change feature, selectable
 as one of the many presets, and various parameters can be adjusted
 with a menu, such as octave, percent, or relative pitch change
 up/down. Perhaps this sort of feature could exist as real time PC
 computer software, but I don't know. Real time audio and PC
 computer don't seem to be allowed in the same sentence these days, at
 least in the Windows world.

 73 Bonnie KQ6XA

 Graham g0nbd wrote:
 The event time is not changed, so its not like a tape speed changer
 where the duration is also modified .. amplitude liniartity would be
 'nice' but not 100 % important

 can it be done ? has it ? music production ?


 

 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/sked



 Yahoo! Groups Links



 



Re: [digitalradio] OT: the economy

2009-01-22 Thread Brent Gourley
why is any of this discussion on digitalradio list server?

Nothing destroys a group quicker than a discussion of politics or religion. 
Please take it elsewhere.

KE4MZ, Brent
Dothan, AL
bg...@comcast.net
www.wb4zpi.org

  - Original Message - 
  From: John Gleichweit 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 3:32 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] OT: the economy


  That kind of plan is exactly why we didn't truly prosper until the '80s when 
Reagan dropped the top marginal tax rate to 39%. We don't have a flat 35% tax 
rate right now. In fact, if you look at the distribution of tax revenue, the 
top 5% of taxpayers pay 70% of the taxes, and the bottom 50% pay nothing. 

  The only way to be truly fair would be to get rid of the current tax 
withholding system, and replace it with a flat 22% sales tax with exemptions 
for only food. We would get far more revenue from this method than with the 
withholding system, and would be able to retire the national debt within a 
generation. 


  -- 
  John Smokey Behr Gleichweit FF1/EMT, CCNA, MCSE
  IPN-CAL023 N6FOG UP Fresno Sub MP183.5 ECV1852
  List Owner x10, Moderator x9 CA-OES 51-507
  http://smokeybehr.blogspot.com
  http://www.myspace.com/smokeybehr





--
  From: Howard S. White drpa...@msn.com


  Subject: [sdsixshooters] the economy



  How I would fix the economy

  Greed is hurting all of us. When is there enough wealth to stop getting
  more? If someone gets $100,000,000, 000, he can afford to pay 99% tax and
  learn to live on $1,000,000,000. But our tax laws give that person
  $650,000,000, 000. I don't believe that is fair. So I propose eliminating the
  current 35% flat tax that we currently have.

  Mike's non-flat tax plan

  wealth = tax + spending

  $100B 99% $1B
  $10B 95% $500M
  $1B 90% $100M
  $100M 80% $20M
  $10M 70% $3M
  $1M 50% $500K
  $100K 10% $90K
  $20K 0% $20K

  Some people say that, if poor people did not pay taxes, they would not have
  any incentive to try to gain wealth and live on welfare. This is crazy
  because wealth is the incentive and tax on poor people is just insulting.

  But no one has $100,000,000, 000. I think Exxon-Mobil is trying to, real
  hard. If they had to pay 99% tax, they would not try so hard and we would
  all benefit from that.

  Michael E. Lebo
  San Diego

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

   

Re: [digitalradio] Specification of Frequency for Net Announcement

2008-12-30 Thread Brent Gourley
3579 ? with USB 2 kHz waterfall ?

KE4MZ, Brent
Dothan, AL
bg...@comcast.net
www.wb4zpi.org

No trees were destroyed in the sending of this contaminant-free message.
However, we do concede a significant number of electrons may have been 
inconvenienced.


- Original Message - 
From: Cortland Richmond k...@earthlink.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 10:27 AM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Specification of Frequency for Net Announcement


 This is an often encountered problem. What frequency is my signal when I
 am using [insert mode here]? is the subject of at least one license exam
 question in US Amateur Radio tests.

 In the US, government agencies and the military specify frequency by the
 center of emission. For example, in military 3581 would for LSB voice
 (nominally of 3 KHz BW) require a carrier (dial) setting) of 3582.5 KHz.

 Digital modes, especially sound card modes,should be addressed in a 
 similar
 manner, and with some of care.  A dial setting of 3580 KHz, with operation
 in USB mode, would require a waterfall operating frequency of 1,000 Hz.
 There are reasons to use a lower carrier frequency and a higher waterfall;
 3588 and a 2,000 Hz waterfall choice would reduce any radiation of
 harmonics of the audio input.  Overdriving an audio stage does not produce
 an ALC reading, but it can add significant harmonics to the signal 
 actually
 transmitted.   Keeping audio sent to a rig to the lowest  practical level
 consistent with SNR (where the noise is hum, hiss and the like) we reduce
 harmonics, but it's worth keeping an eye out for.

 If you want your net on 3581, you'll need to specify as above; 3580 USB 1
 KHz waterfall, or 3589 USB 2 KHz waterfall both produce a PSK signal at
 3581 KHz.


 Regards,

 Cortland
 KA5S


 [Original Message]
 From: Kent VE4KEH pb232...@mts.net
 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 Date: 12/30/2008 10:29:17 AM
 Subject: [digitalradio] Specification of Frequency for Net Announcement

 Our ARES group is having difficulty specifying an operating frequency for
 a PSK31 net.  Is there any website which explains the relationship between
 the actual signal frequency, the transceiver frequency, the audio
 (waterfall) frequency, USB and LSB for digital operation?



 

 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/sked



 Yahoo! Groups Links



 



Re: [digitalradio] Comparing data modes

2008-10-04 Thread Brent Gourley
each processor core can only execute one instruction at a time, for one 
application at a time. the data bus can handle either one (32 bit) or two (64 
bit) operations at a time. 
that you can see 5 windows open at once is the magic of the video processor and 
persistence of vision.

Brent Gourley
Dothan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  - Original Message - 
  From: Simon Brown (KNS) 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 3:26 AM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Comparing data modes


  Dave,

  IMO any data program will be talking to the soundcard with a nice big FIFO so 
CPU shouldn't be an issue. From memory I use a 10 second FIFO on receive and 2 
second on transmit.

  I can't think of any problems that could arise as long as there are some free 
CPU cycles. What am I missing?

  Simon Brown, HB9DRV
  www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message - 
From: Dave AA6YQ 


If you're referring to CPU usage as reported by the Windows Task Manager, 
that's an average. The question is whether any app is being starved for CPU 
resources during critical operations.
   

Re: [digitalradio] Diagnosing issues with dropped PC

2008-07-21 Thread Brent Gourley

The cpu is likely ok, the BIOS will flash the F-key message without 
accessing the hard drive, its not getting far enough in the sequence for the 
hard drive.

I had a machine that started doing something similar. It was the motherboard 
circuit that responds to the pushbutton power switch. You may have a cracked 
mother board or memory stick or circuit trace somewhere ??

KE4MZ, Brent
Dothan, AL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wb4zpi.org



- Original Message - 
From: Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: DIGITALRADIO digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 9:27 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Diagnosing issues with dropped PC


 Please excuse the non-ham question but hopefully folks here will have
 an idea or two.


 One of my household PCs (not the ham PC thankfully) was dropped during
 a move to another room .  Out spilled the memory cards , wireless PCI
 card, and the CPU heatsink fan.  After reinstalling  I get the PC to
 briefly boot up and then it shuts it's self down.   The shutdown is
 too quick to get a any beep codes, the first couple of attempts I
 heard a European siren-type noise for a few seconds.  Anyone here have
 any guesses what the issue would be?  I wonder about CPU overheating
 but the fan snapped nicely back in to place and the fan appears to
 work fine.  Any chance the bang to the PC would cause the CPU heatsink
 to lose a seal with the CPU?  I have not taken the CPU heatsink off
 yet, it looks firmly in pace  and apart from some dust in the heatsink
 fins, it looks OK.

 On the most recent attempt I took one of the memory sticks out and the
 PC boot-up lasted long enough to tell me that the firmware had
 detected a change in memory configuration  Then I briefly got the
 flashed message about pressing a F -Key if I wanted to access the BIOS
 .  Then it closed down.  I am taking that as a sign the hardrive was
 briefly accessed.

 I am wondering if one would get similar symptoms if the power supply
 was somehow damaged during the fall ?

 Andy

 

 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/sked

 Check our other Yahoo Groups
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup
 Yahoo! Groups Links



 




Re: [digitalradio] W1SPLPSK logfile

2008-07-01 Thread Brent Gourley

that's computer talk.

the app is expecting to import numbers with which to do math, but is finding 
characters instead. or vice versa. one must change.

KE4MZ, Brent
Dothan, AL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wb4zpi.org

  - Original Message - 
  From: Gary Lesniewski 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 6:08 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] W1SPLPSK logfile


  I have been having problems with the W1SPLPSK application, it will not let me 
add previous dbase files to append to the log. I have been using this program 
since 2001 maybe some one can give me a pointer or two. I am using excel and it 
is not showing any changes to the cells when looking at the data.

  I am getting the following error:
  tblLogbook: Type mismach for fieldTen_Ten, expecting: Float actual: String.

  Gary WD9DUI
   

Re: [digitalradio] HRD: Script error when running DX Cluster

2008-06-20 Thread Brent Gourley
uncheck the box at

Tools -- Internet Options -- Advanced --  disable script debugging


KE4MZ, Brent
Dothan, AL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wb4zpi.org

- Original Message - 
From: Simon Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 3:10 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] HRD: Script error when running DX Cluster


 Sorry Ian,

 I read hundreds of mails each day, I forgot you had told me this.

 The title of the error tells everything: Internet Explorer Script Error.
 The solution is to stop IE displaying script errors, using Google and
 searching for Disable Internet Explorer Script Error I get many hits. I
 know I can do something with the software, I wonder what version of IE you
 are using?

 The problem you have is stopping IE displaying the script error popups. 
 I'll
 look at the coding this evening.

 Simon Brown, HB9DRV

 --
 From: Ian Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 As I explained in this thread recently, I have already done this. My IE
 settings are:

 ~
 [x] Disable script debugging (Internet Explorer)
 [x] Disable script debugging (Other)
 [  ] Display a notification about every script error
 ~




 

 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/sked

 Check our other Yahoo Groups
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup
 Yahoo! Groups Links



 




Re: [digitalradio] Chinese Transmitter Re: broadcast music on 14.070

2008-06-06 Thread Brent Gourley
Sounds like the music is intended to jam the mandarin broadcast. Must be a 
broadcast from outside the targeted country and disfavored by the current 
administration. It quits every now and then so targeted country can judge 
its effectiveness, and so they can shut it off if the voice broadcast stops; 
no sense in wasting electricity. The country that sends it probably doesn't 
care a about amateur radio communications or the pirates that operate in our 
band.

KE4MZ, Brent
Dothan, AL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wb4zpi.org

No trees were destroyed in the sending of this contaminant-free message.
However, we do concede a significant number of electrons may have been 
inconvenienced..


- Original Message - 
From: expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 12:07 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Chinese Transmitter Re: broadcast music on 14.070


 The signal started at 1600UTC, and it
 is extremely strong here in Hong Kong
 (local time midnight morning of Friday 06 June 2008).

 It makes it impossible to copy any ham
 radio stations between 14061 and 14079 kHz.

 Chinese jamming music... music intended
 to be used as a audio source for a jamming station.

 I can hear the same audio program material
 on 11750kHz and several other freqs.
 During short pauses in the music,
 I can also hear some background audio
 bleedover of news and commentary in
 Mandarin Chinese language...
 Likely a Chinese transmitter that is
 co-located at a multi-transmitter
 shortwave broadcast site.

 73 Bonnie VR2/KQ6XA

 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Am I the only one hearing an AM broadcaster on 14.070 right now ?
 Walt



 

 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/sked

 Check our other Yahoo Groups
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup
 Yahoo! Groups Links



 




Re: [digitalradio] Chinese Transmitter Re: broadcast music on 14.070

2008-06-06 Thread Brent Gourley
cool. I don't have any satellite capability, and don't have line of sight 
from SE Alabama anyway.
at least, my last sentence is still correct!!




- Original Message - 
From: expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 12:27 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Chinese Transmitter Re: broadcast music on 14.070


 Actually, Brent, the source of the jamming music audio feed that
 directly drives the transmitter is satellite audio, the right channel
 of a stereo satellite downlink 4GHz source. The left channel carries
 other programming on it in Mandarin and other Chinese dialects. There
 may be 60 to 80dB of separation, but it is easy to hear that far down
 when the signal is so strong here. If you have a large dish, or are
 within the footprint of the Chinasat satellite, you can pick up the
 jamming audio that feeds the jamming transmitters. I've attached the
 satellite information below.

 73 Bonnie VR2/KQ6XA



 China National Radio and  the Firedrake audio feeds are available via
 Chinasat 6B.

 Firedrake - Right Audio Lzh8Rdjy Circuit
 Satellite : Chinasat 6B
 Orbit Location : 115.5 East
 Frequency : 4175 MHz
 Polarity : Vertical
 Symbol Rate : 5990
 FEC: 1/2


 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Brent Gourley [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:

 Sounds like the music is intended to jam the mandarin broadcast.
 Must be a
 broadcast from outside the targeted country and disfavored by the
 current
 administration.
 KE4MZ, Brent
 Dothan, AL
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.wb4zpi.org


 

 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/sked

 Check our other Yahoo Groups
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup
 Yahoo! Groups Links



 




Re: [digitalradio] Interfacing a PK-232 to IC-746 (non-Pro)

2007-01-19 Thread Brent Gourley
I used to do FSK with an IC-740 through the molex on the back panel. Must 
have done something like that. The correct pin pulls the xmit freq the 
correct shift. Don't remember which, and don't have the book here at the 
office.

KE4MZ, Brent
Dothan, AL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wb4zpi.org

No trees were destroyed in the sending of this contaminant-free message.
However, we do concede a significant number of electrons may have been 
inconvenienced.
- Original Message - 
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:08 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Interfacing a PK-232 to IC-746 (non-Pro)


 Can anyone confirm my plan to run FSK RTTY with the PK-232 and the 746
 non-Pro using pin 1 from the 5-pin DIN plug on the back of the 232, to
 pin 1 of the ACC-1 jack on the back of the 746, and, of course, gnd to
 gnd? The 746 manual calls pin 1 of ACC 1 RTTY and states it
 Controls RTTY Keying. Since there are no other obvious choices, this
 seems correct, but want to get some verification before I wire it up.

 Tnx es 73
 Dave
 KB3MOW




 Announce your digital  presence via our DX Cluster 
 telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

 Our other groups:

 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97


 Yahoo! Groups Links



 




Re: [digitalradio] Odd PC Issue

2007-01-11 Thread Brent Gourley
Here's an article on ms that explains svchost.
It appears, if you want services to run, you gotta have svchost.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314056

KE4MZ, Brent
Dothan, AL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wb4zpi.org

No trees were destroyed in the sending of this contaminant-free message.
However, we do concede a significant number of electrons may have been 
inconvenienced.
- Original Message - 
From: Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Odd PC Issue


 DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA wrote:

  SVCHOST (svchost.exe) IS a dog and CAN eat up performance on such a
  short term/time basis that it will never show up in your task manager
  and perhaps not even as a spike on you CPU performance.

  The other possibility is that something is running in the background
  (a ham radio program that you don't have running on other computers)
  that has not totally closed down.

  Go to your task manager and control panel  services and kill/stop
  all un-needed programs/services and see if the problem goes away.

  73,

  Walt/K5YFW

 This is an old doubtwhat does SVCHOST do? What is it good for to
 have running on a
 Windows PC?

 I usually see SEVERAL instances simultaneously on the task manager.

 Jose, CO2JA





 Announce your digital  presence via our DX Cluster 
 telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

 Our other groups:

 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97


 Yahoo! Groups Links