Re: [digitalradio] Operating ROS In USA
BINGO!!! I invoke Godwin's Law!!! See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law Dave NK7Z On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:56:58 -0700 (PDT) AA0OI aa...@yahoo.com thus spake: Spoken like a good Nazi Garrett / AA0OI From: Thomas F. Giella NZ4O n...@tampabay.rr.com To: digital radio eGroup digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 8:18:24 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Operating ROS In USA If I print any ham in the U.S. transmitting via the ROS mode I'm going to call Laura Smith of the FCC and give her the callsign of the offender. 73 GUD DX, Thomas F. Giella, NZ4O Lakeland, FL, USA n...@tampabay.rr.com PODXS 070 Club #349 Feld Hell Club #141 30 Meter Digital Group #691 Digital Modes Club #1243 WARC Bands Century Club #20 NZ4O Amateur SWL Autobiography: http://www.nz4o.org http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html Chat, Skeds, and Spots all in one (resize to suit) Facebook= http://www.facebook.com/pages/digitalradio/123270301037522 Yahoo! Groups Links
RE: [digitalradio] Re: Fwd: [mixw] Happy New Year
I noticed that the SPLIT issue for Icom is fixed!!! -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of Andrew O'Brien Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 9:45 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Fwd: [mixw] Happy New Year -Anyone notice any major changes? Seems about the same to me. Andy K3UK Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked Yahoo! Groups Links No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.2/1872 - Release Date: 1/3/2009 2:14 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.2/1872 - Release Date: 1/3/2009 2:14 PM
RE: [digitalradio] RTTY WAS 5 needed
I can do Oregon for you... -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter G. Viscarola Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 7:29 AM To: DIGITALRADIO Subject: RE: [digitalradio] RTTY WAS 5 needed New Hampshire! I'll be more than happy to setup an RTTY sched with you, and I'll confirm immediately via LoTW. Please email me direct, Peter K1PGV -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew O'Brien Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 10:59 PM To: DIGITALRADIO Subject: [digitalradio] RTTY WAS 5 needed I don't really chase RTTY awards but when playing around with DX Keeper and LOTW tonight, I find that I am 5 states short of WAS via LOTW. Anyone from these states active in this group and use LOTW ? Not confirmed Montana Nevada New Hampshire North Dakota Oregon Vermont Confirmed via LOTW Alabama KE4KWE Alaska KL7AC Arizona K7WM Arkansas N5ZM California K6HGF Colorado AE0Q Connecticut W1EQ Delaware K1RY Florida W4OX Georgia WW4LL Hawaii AH6OZ Idaho N7UVH Illinois KE9NA Indiana N7GVV Iowa K0FG Kansas KI6DY/0 Kentucky W4LC Louisiana AA5AU Maine NY1S Maryland K3MM Massachusetts W1ZT Michigan K8UT Minnesota K0XB Mississippi KK5OQ Missouri KI0ET Nebraska WN0L New Hampshire New Jersey W2QO New Mexico K5AM New York N2WK North Carolina K4SV Ohio AI8P Oklahoma W1DY Pennsylvania K3FH Rhode Island N1HRA South Carolina W4UK South Dakota W0SD Tennessee AD4EB Texas W5BBR Utah W7CT Virginia WD4GBW Washington W7NN West Virginia N8YYS Wisconsin N9CK Wyoming KO7X -- Andy K3UK Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked Check our other Yahoo Groups http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup Yahoo! Groups Links Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked Check our other Yahoo Groups http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup Yahoo! Groups Links No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.14/1643 - Release Date: 9/1/2008 6:03 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.14/1647 - Release Date: 9/2/2008 6:02 AM Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked Check our other Yahoo Groups http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] HAARP and Moon Echo of HAARP received well in South Bend, Indiana 6.7925
I too got a few HAARP echoes, see www.nk7z.net select HAARP for the images... Thanks, Dave NK7Z/NNN0RDO http://www.nk7z.net Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. --Carl Sagan -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of WD8ARZ Comcast Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 09:55 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] HAARP and Moon Echo of HAARP received well in South Bend, Indiana 6.7925 Copied 6.7925 HAARP and the Moon Echo of HAARP real well in South Bend, Indiana using a SDR-IQ on a 10-160 Carolina Windom Antenna. Also copied the signal of a carrier around 0503Z that tuned / swept into the frequency. Thought it was the HAARP signal looking for the sweet spot, but now not sure. Did record a 50 kHz spectrum to the hard drive using the SDR-IQ, and the HAARP primary signal and he moon reflected signal were both recorded. They can be heard and seen on the 3D running spectrum display. Other signals coming and going up and down the band from the HAARP frequency are also copyable in these files. I limited file size to below 45 Megs per file in the series of files covering the time period. The one with the moving carrier is about 22 megs. The first half of the time period I couldn't hear HAARP echo's due to the interfering signal on the low end of the frequency, but great copy after the frequency cleared up. No copy at all on 7.4075 due to the Dentro Cuban Jamming Command and Radio Martí as identified by Glenn Hauser. 73 from Bill - WD8ARZ http://hflink.net/qso/ Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked DRCC contest info : http://www.obriensweb.com/drcc.htm Yahoo! Groups Links No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.7/1232 - Release Date: 01/18/08 19:32 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.7/1232 - Release Date: 01/18/08 19:32
RE: [digitalradio] Re: callbook look-up tool bar ?
Anything like that for Firefox? Thanks, Dave NK7Z/NNN0RDO http://www.nk7z.net
RE: [digitalradio] Re: callbook look-up tool bar ?
Now that's a cute feature... THANKS!!! Thanks, Dave NK7Z/NNN0RDO http://www.nk7z.net The ideal man bears the accidents of life with dignity and grace, making the best of circumstances. --Aristotle -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Leigh L Klotz, Jr. Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 07:37 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: callbook look-up tool bar ? In Firefox, you can use Keyword Searech. 1. Go to your favorite lookup site 2. Right click on the search box, where you type in a callsign, and select Add a Keyword for This Search. 3. Type qrz in both input fields in the resulting dialog box. Now, when you want to do a lookup, instead of a URL in the location bar, type qrz w1aw Leigh/WA5ZNU On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 6:41 am, Dave Cole (NK7Z/NNN0RDO) wrote: Anything like that for Firefox? Thanks, Dave NK7Z/NNN0RDO Announce your digital presence via our DX Cluster telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Our other groups: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97 Yahoo! Groups Links -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.4/615 - Release Date: 01/03/07 13:34 Announce your digital presence via our DX Cluster telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Our other groups: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97 Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] Re: RTTY Hall of Shame
Hi, While I enjoy the use of the beacons, (and try and stay away from the freqs), I agree with the last post, the idea of putting them in the middle of the band was not a scaleable, or even a well thought out solution. Unless there has been a rule change, enforcement of this must be on a voluntary basis, period, I saw a post about involving the OOs, and the FCC. Has this frequency been officially allocated? If not, then involving an OO would be real abuse of power, as they are supposed to enforce rules not wishes. RANT ON: Assuming the rules have not allocated the frequency for beacons, IMHO the entire idea of a Hall of Shame, goes against the amateur traditions of tolerance... Things happen, people will transmit on the beacon freq, can't be helped, get used to this, and stop publishing Hall of Shame like rants. For that is what a Hall of Shame list is, a vaguely disguised rant because someone transmitted on a sacred frequency some other folks believe they have reserved, and have decided to punish those that don't believe by publishing their names in a negative light. For that matter, perhaps the beacons operators should be the first stations on the list for not listening before they transmit, and insisting that they own a frequency to the point they are publishing lists of people they don't like... Now don't get me wrong, I love the beacon system, (use it all the time), and actually believe that it can work as long as folks don't get extreme about things, (like publishing rants because of QRM to the beacons), I avoid the beacon frequencies as much as possible, if however a really rare DX station is on that frequency, I would use it in a moment. The frequency is simply misplaced, pick a new one, then get it to the band edge, and half of your QRM will go away. RANT OFF: Thanks, Dave NK7Z/NNN0RDO http://www.nk7z.net If pigs could vote, the man with the slop bucket would be elected swineherd every time, no matter how much slaughtering he did on the side. --Orson Scott Card -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dav1dSm1th Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 23:07 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] Re: RTTY Hall of Shame Whilst your list can be construed as informative, contentious, destructive etc etc depending on your point of view, it really highlights the nonsense of trying to maintain a beacon system in the middle of a very active band. Whilst education should work, surely 95% of the problem could have been avoided if the beacons had been located on 14350 or 14000 for instance (plus or minus a bit to avoid being outside the band of course). And logically you are much more likely to avoid inadvertently transmitting on a beacon if you are operating in the same mode as the beacon itself. Putting a CW beacons in the middle of a band plan allocated for data is just asking for trouble. (I know you can operate CW in this section but no one does - especially in the middle of an RTTY contest). And then again - in the middle of a contest do you need beacons to tell you where the propagation is? 73 David A92GE --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RTTY Hall of Shame Here is a list of some of the RTTY operators transmitting on the international IARU beacon frequency 14100.0kHz today. 73---Bonnie KQ6XA Saturday 23 SEP 2006 WM3T/4 (repeat offender) W4VD (repeat offender) N6CK JE2PMC IW5ABF IK1ZFO N6IU EA1DZL JA1GHH DF4ZW DH3JF YU7AM OE9SLH DD1UN F5OQL W5PUF K0GEO The list continues... Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.8/455 - Release Date: 09/22/06 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.8/455 - Release Date: 09/22/06 Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] navtex on linux (was: Do we really need to know?)
Can someone tell me what freq NAVTEX transmissions are on please? Thanks, Dave NK7Z/NNN0RDO http://www.nk7z.net Limiting the freedom of news 'just a little bit' is in the same category with the classic example 'a little bit pregnant. --Robert Heinlein Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] Why is Mix W so popular ?
My .02 cents worth: From what I have seen MixW seems to be a very stable, very easy to use program. Currently it covers 17 modes, most of which I don't use, but almost all of which I have used at some point. It has enough controls to allow me to lock the transmit frequency, while shifting the RX freq, it has macros, etc... All in all it was well worth the 50 bucks it cost. Thanks, Dave NK7Z/NNN0RDO http://www.nk7z.net Don't ever become a pessimist; a pessimist is correct oftener than an optimist, but an optimist has more fun -- and neither can stop the march of events. --Lazarus Long -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mel Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 14:38 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] Why is Mix W so popular ? During the past month I've been noting the types of operating software used by PSK operators, and the most popular one in use is Mix W. I've never used it, in fact I've never seen illustrations of the operating page. Why is it so popular.? And it isn't even free ! What advantages has Mix W over other software ? 73, Mel G0GQK Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] 7070 Sig ID Request
MT63 maybe? Thanks,DaveNK7Z/NNN0RDOhttp://www.nk7z.netMoney is truthful. If a man speaks of his honor, make him pay cash. --Robert A. Heinlein -Original Message-From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kevin der KinderenSent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 19:04To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.comSubject: [digitalradio] 7070 Sig ID Request Is anyone around 7070 that can identify a signal? Best I can describe it, it sounds like the wind blowing strong. It looks very wide 2KHz or more on the waterfall. Pretty much nothing else exists at 7070 when that signal is present. It's there for a few minutes, gone for a few and back again. I can't imagine it being local. 73 de K4VD Kevin Kevin der Kinderen http://kj4qf.net/ The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[digitalradio] AMTOR/Pactor etc
Can someone suggest a good unit for listening and transmitting Pactor/AMTOR, etc? Thanks, Dave NK7Z/NNN0RDO http://www.nk7z.net The truest measure of a society is how it treats its elderly, its pets, and its prisoners The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] AMTOR/Pactor etc
Hi, I will get it on line next weekend, however I suspect it will need an upgrade, I know it is not the MBX version, and it is probably from 1987 as well, what are the upgrade steps for this to get it to current levels? Thanks, Dave NK7Z/NNN0RDO http://www.nk7z.net The truest measure of a society is how it treats its elderly, its pets, and its prisoners -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Becker Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 15:19 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [digitalradio] AMTOR/Pactor etc Dave, to see if you have pactor. at the cmd: prompt type pt it should come back with Opmode was (whatever it's in at the time) Opmode now PACTOR if it does not have pactor it will cam back with ?What? Cmd: Any question feel free to ask. I have had one of these animals since 1987.. John, WØJAB At 02:20 PM 6/5/05, you wrote: Hi all, OK the PK-232 seems to be the device of choice, I have one, how do I discover if it needs upgrading etc? Is the manual still available for it on line? I got it several weeks ago and I suspect it is very old as PK-232's go... Thanks to everyone for the replies... Once I get things straight on the upgrade path, and get a manual I will be getting it on line... Thanks, Dave NK7Z/NNN0RDO http://www.nk7z.net The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ Yahoo! Groups Links The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] PSK10 or MFSK16
Hi Rick, I just caught your second question... Sorry for the delay... I find that MT-63 seems to work no matter where it is run. We routinely run it on clear frequencies, in the 4 Mhz. range and it works very well, under VERY poor conditions. WinDRM on the other hand is nice, but in a pinch I would rather try MT-63, DRM needs a very good signal to really work well. I have not used MFSK16 enough to be able to say if it is better or worse yet, so I will reserve opinion until after I get some use under my belt. I would expect the lowest bandwidth would do the best in general, sometime if you would like we can do some testing of the two modes... I would LOVE to see an ARQ version of MT-63! Thanks, Dave NK7Z/NNN0RDO http://www.nk7z.net The truest measure of a society is how it treats its elderly, its pets, and its prisoners The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
