Re: [digitalradio] 160M DIGI OPS.....do as we say, not what we do
He who tries to inflict political statements on amateur radio is a DAMN FOOL. 73, Chuck, AA5J At 02:26 PM 2/26/2006, you wrote: >Its because the ARRL has gone nuts, like Bush. > >73 de WB4M >Buddy > Regards, ChuckM mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com/~clmayfield http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~mayfield Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] 160M DIGI OPS.....do as we say, not what we do
I checked up and down the 160 band this weekend and there were SSB contesters all the way from 1.801 up to 1.950. There is NO bandplan on 160. US Amateurs are allowed all modes over the entire 160 spectrum. We need a REAL bandplan which separates the band so that SSB and other wide modes stay in the top half of it, and that doesnt mean from 1.840 up. That isnt half. - Original Message - From: "David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 2:15 PM Subject: [digitalradio] 160M DIGI OPS.....do as we say, not what we do > GEE...I THOUGHT I WAS THE ONLY ONE THAT NOTICED THIS LAST NIGHT !!! > A QUOTE FROM ANOTHER REFLECTOR. > > > > > > "W1AW has decided to break the ARRL's own bandplan and > operate on 1807.5. > > I have a big problem with this. DXers do not own 160. They > can bend a little bit. The ARRL also sets a terrible > example. In one breath they open claim bandplans work, in > the next breath they move W1AW to a frequency in direct > violation of their own bandplan. This is just like when W1AW > operated a SSB contest, and W1AW was working local stations > on SSB below 1840. How can the ARRL claim bandplans work, > and then ignore their own bandplans? > > Apparently it is OK for the ARRL and DX'ers to tell others > one thing, and then do exactly the opposite themselves. > Either that or they simply cannot "think" logically about > how their actions appear to others. The ARRL appears to be > trying to sabotage the very bandplan they claim makes > mandatory mode restrictions unnecessary!" > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org > > Other areas of interest: > > The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ > DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.0/269 - Release Date: 2/24/2006 > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] 160M DIGI OPS.....do as we say, not what we do
Its because the ARRL has gone nuts, like Bush. 73 de WB4M Buddy - Original Message - From: "David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 2:15 PM Subject: [digitalradio] 160M DIGI OPS.....do as we say, not what we do > GEE...I THOUGHT I WAS THE ONLY ONE THAT NOTICED THIS LAST NIGHT !!! > A QUOTE FROM ANOTHER REFLECTOR. > > > > > > "W1AW has decided to break the ARRL's own bandplan and > operate on 1807.5. > > I have a big problem with this. DXers do not own 160. They > can bend a little bit. The ARRL also sets a terrible > example. In one breath they open claim bandplans work, in > the next breath they move W1AW to a frequency in direct > violation of their own bandplan. This is just like when W1AW > operated a SSB contest, and W1AW was working local stations > on SSB below 1840. How can the ARRL claim bandplans work, > and then ignore their own bandplans? > > Apparently it is OK for the ARRL and DX'ers to tell others > one thing, and then do exactly the opposite themselves. > Either that or they simply cannot "think" logically about > how their actions appear to others. The ARRL appears to be > trying to sabotage the very bandplan they claim makes > mandatory mode restrictions unnecessary!" > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org > > Other areas of interest: > > The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ > DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy > discussion) > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] 160M DIGI OPS.....do as we say, not what we do
GEE...I THOUGHT I WAS THE ONLY ONE THAT NOTICED THIS LAST NIGHT !!! A QUOTE FROM ANOTHER REFLECTOR. "W1AW has decided to break the ARRL's own bandplan and operate on 1807.5. I have a big problem with this. DXers do not own 160. They can bend a little bit. The ARRL also sets a terrible example. In one breath they open claim bandplans work, in the next breath they move W1AW to a frequency in direct violation of their own bandplan. This is just like when W1AW operated a SSB contest, and W1AW was working local stations on SSB below 1840. How can the ARRL claim bandplans work, and then ignore their own bandplans? Apparently it is OK for the ARRL and DX'ers to tell others one thing, and then do exactly the opposite themselves. Either that or they simply cannot "think" logically about how their actions appear to others. The ARRL appears to be trying to sabotage the very bandplan they claim makes mandatory mode restrictions unnecessary!" Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
