[digitalradio] Re: Adventures in CMSK land

2010-08-14 Thread jhhaynes


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, garylinnrobinson grobin1...@... wrote:

 After almost giving up - I started again playing with the SampleRate settings 
 and FINALLY started getting a docode!! By using Phil's signal I finally got 
 perfect copy with a samplerate of 8062.  
 
Hmmm - if it's that sensitive to sample rate settings then we need
some method of assuring that the sending station has a correct
sample rate and then a way of setting the receiving station to
agree with it.  Unless someone is sending a long test message I can't
see just randomly playing with the sample rate setting until I get
good copy.




Re: [digitalradio] Re: Adventures in CMSK land

2010-08-14 Thread Russell Blair
I havent been able to get the beacon to work eather for any type of test 
message.
10141 CQing.

Russell NC5O
 1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving door!
2- A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to 
take everything you have. 

- Gerald Ford 


 IN GOD WE TRUST  


Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693
Digital Mode Club #03198 





From: jhhay...@earthlink.net jhhay...@earthlink.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, August 14, 2010 12:18:30 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Adventures in CMSK land

  


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, garylinnrobinson grobin1...@... wrote:

 After almost giving up - I started again playing with the SampleRate settings 
and FINALLY started getting a docode!! By using Phil's signal I finally got 
perfect copy with a samplerate of 8062. 

 
Hmmm - if it's that sensitive to sample rate settings then we need
some method of assuring that the sending station has a correct
sample rate and then a way of setting the receiving station to
agree with it. Unless someone is sending a long test message I can't
see just randomly playing with the sample rate setting until I get
good copy.





  

[digitalradio] Re: Adventures in CMSK land

2010-08-14 Thread g4ilo
I don't think it's the only mode that is sensitive. I've noticed similar 
problems with a few stations on Olivia. I'd get a few seconds of perfect copy 
and then several more of complete garbage, even if their signal is strong. I'm 
sure the problem isn't my end as I've had lengthy Olivia QSOs when the signals 
were really weak and had perfect copy throughout. Perhaps both our sound cards 
were identically malajusted?

Julian, G4ILO

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jhhay...@... wrote:

 Hmmm - if it's that sensitive to sample rate settings then we need
 some method of assuring that the sending station has a correct
 sample rate and then a way of setting the receiving station to
 agree with it.  Unless someone is sending a long test message I can't
 see just randomly playing with the sample rate setting until I get
 good copy.





[digitalradio] Re: Adventures in CMSK land

2010-08-14 Thread garylinnrobinson
Olivia, Domino, and even MFSK16 can both fail to get good copy for the exact 
same reason. So CMSK is not alone for sure.

However, it's surprises me that MultiPSK seldom fails to decode an olivia 
signal while FLDigi (my fav program) does it much more often.  I suspect there 
is something that can be done to mitigate that problem in the DSP code but NOT 
being a DSP programmer I have no idea what it is.

Since I had already calibrated my sound card with checkSR program I wonder if 
Phil had done so too?

One would assume that IF checkSR had calculated the correct offsets for my 
SignalLink USB (-14 for both input and output) that I should have been able to 
receive another calibrated station with a Sample rate of 7986 and NOT 8062.

BUT  then again, I don't know what is going on under the hood with CMSK 
program. When I set the sample rate does that apply to input and output?  Rx 
and TX both??  Maybe not. 

I assume, maybe wrongly, that the CMSK is sort of a test program and NOT the 
final word on this mode. I wonder if the source code will be open source?  I 
would like to think that it will be available to other programs but so far 
don't really know that much about it other than that when it works - it is 
kinda neat mode - 32wpm in 63hz signal with good FEC.

---Gary WB8ROL

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, g4ilo jul...@... wrote:

 I don't think it's the only mode that is sensitive. I've noticed similar 
 problems with a few stations on Olivia. I'd get a few seconds of perfect copy 
 and then several more of complete garbage, even if their signal is strong. 
 I'm sure the problem isn't my end as I've had lengthy Olivia QSOs when the 
 signals were really weak and had perfect copy throughout. Perhaps both our 
 sound cards were identically malajusted?
 
 Julian, G4ILO
 
 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jhhaynes@ wrote:
 
  Hmmm - if it's that sensitive to sample rate settings then we need
  some method of assuring that the sending station has a correct
  sample rate and then a way of setting the receiving station to
  agree with it.  Unless someone is sending a long test message I can't
  see just randomly playing with the sample rate setting until I get
  good copy.
 





[digitalradio] Re: Adventures in CMSK land

2010-08-14 Thread garylinnrobinson
Hmmm, I heard a real narrow mode on 10.141 today and was fairly sure it might 
have been a CMSK8 Beacon. Probably yours.  BUT NO LUCK decoding it. I was 
playing around with the samplerate and tuning but just no luck. Of course, 
maybe it wasn't a beacon hi hi Sure makes it difficult to know what's going on 
with this mode.

Maybe you might want to put a CW ID on it too hi hi

---Gary WB8ROL

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Russell Blair russell_blai...@... wrote:

 I havent been able to get the beacon to work eather for any type of test 
 message.
 10141 CQing.
 
 Russell NC5O
  1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving door!
 2- A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough 
 to 
 take everything you have. 
 
 - Gerald Ford 
 
 
  IN GOD WE TRUST  
 
 
 Russell Blair (NC5O)
 Skype-Russell.Blair
 Hell Field #300
 DRCC #55
 30m Dig-group #693
 Digital Mode Club #03198 
 
 
 
 
 
 From: jhhay...@... jhhay...@...
 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Sat, August 14, 2010 12:18:30 PM
 Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Adventures in CMSK land
 
   
 
 
 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, garylinnrobinson grobin1949@ wrote:
 
  After almost giving up - I started again playing with the SampleRate 
  settings 
 and FINALLY started getting a docode!! By using Phil's signal I finally got 
 perfect copy with a samplerate of 8062. 
 
  
 Hmmm - if it's that sensitive to sample rate settings then we need
 some method of assuring that the sending station has a correct
 sample rate and then a way of setting the receiving station to
 agree with it. Unless someone is sending a long test message I can't
 see just randomly playing with the sample rate setting until I get
 good copy.





Re: [digitalradio] Re: Adventures in CMSK land

2010-08-14 Thread Russell Blair
Gary, well it could have been, I was there calling CQ on and off for about 
an hour or two. Not my beacon, I had not been able to get the beacon to key the 
transmitter, enable the beacon for over a hour and it never tryed to key the 
Transmitter. I was on CSMK31 during this time. I am also using a Signalink USB 
and it has not been Cal yet use anything.

I also saw a few station during the same time and I was unabl to decode them as 
well.

Russell NC5O  
 1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving door!
2- A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to 
take everything you have. 

- Gerald Ford 


 IN GOD WE TRUST  


Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693
Digital Mode Club #03198 





From: garylinnrobinson grobin1...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, August 14, 2010 2:27:34 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Adventures in CMSK land

  
Hmmm, I heard a real narrow mode on 10.141 today and was fairly sure it might 
have been a CMSK8 Beacon. Probably yours. BUT NO LUCK decoding it. I was 
playing 
around with the samplerate and tuning but just no luck. Of course, maybe it 
wasn't a beacon hi hi Sure makes it difficult to know what's going on with this 
mode.

Maybe you might want to put a CW ID on it too hi hi

---Gary WB8ROL

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Russell Blair russell_blai...@... wrote:

 I havent been able to get the beacon to work eather for any type of test 
 message.
 10141 CQing.
 
 Russell NC5O
  1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving door!
 2- A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough 
 to 

 take everything you have. 
 
 - Gerald Ford 
 
 
  IN GOD WE TRUST  
 
 
 Russell Blair (NC5O)
 Skype-Russell.Blair
 Hell Field #300
 DRCC #55
 30m Dig-group #693
 Digital Mode Club #03198 
 
 
 
 
 
 From: jhhay...@... jhhay...@...
 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Sat, August 14, 2010 12:18:30 PM
 Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Adventures in CMSK land
 
   
 
 
 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, garylinnrobinson grobin1949@ wrote:
 
  After almost giving up - I started again playing with the SampleRate 
  settings 

 and FINALLY started getting a docode!! By using Phil's signal I finally got 
 perfect copy with a samplerate of 8062. 
 
  
 Hmmm - if it's that sensitive to sample rate settings then we need
 some method of assuring that the sending station has a correct
 sample rate and then a way of setting the receiving station to
 agree with it. Unless someone is sending a long test message I can't
 see just randomly playing with the sample rate setting until I get
 good copy.