[digitalradio] Re: All Channels are Busy Channels? Free Decoding Rights?

2006-06-23 Thread Jon Maguire

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/message/15268

Just out of curiosity, and not meant as a flame

Wouldn't two Hams talking in Navajo or some other very obscure language 
be illegal? It could easily be construed that this was being done to 
obscure the meaning of the message.

Also, take a mode like PSK31... very common mode. What about two Hams 
using that mode, but sending multi digit groups that only they hold the 
key to decrypt. Would that be considered an attempt to obscure the message?

Just a couple of thoughts for discussion purposes.

73... Jon W1MNK



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups.  See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM
~- 

Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

Other areas of interest:

The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion)

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [digitalradio] Re: All Channels are Busy Channels? Free Decoding Rights?

2006-06-23 Thread KV9U
Jon,

It is legal to use a foreign language and many hams do this, however,  
Part 97 requires FCC licensed hams to ID using English.

Using any language or code would be in violation of  Part 97 if you were 
doing it for the purpose of obscuring the meaning of any communication.

Using Navaho, or any less well known language could theoretically be 
recorded and played back to an interpreter to determine the content.

Public key encryption or similar encryption/decryption techniques are 
not normally permitted.

There are some exceptions for telecommand, telemetry, and space 
communications.

73,

Rick, KV9U




Jon Maguire wrote:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/message/15268

Just out of curiosity, and not meant as a flame

Wouldn't two Hams talking in Navajo or some other very obscure language 
be illegal? It could easily be construed that this was being done to 
obscure the meaning of the message.

Also, take a mode like PSK31... very common mode. What about two Hams 
using that mode, but sending multi digit groups that only they hold the 
key to decrypt. Would that be considered an attempt to obscure the message?

Just a couple of thoughts for discussion purposes.

73... Jon W1MNK

  




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups.  See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM
~- 

Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

Other areas of interest:

The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion)

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/