[digitalradio] Re: Omnibus rules published in Federal Register

2006-11-15 Thread Bill McLaughlin
I hate people that reply to their own posts but I was being 
curt...besides the obvious response to the onmibus rules, what was 
interesting to me was the ARRL page specifically saying The 
elimination of J2D emissions, data sent by modulating an SSB 
transmitter, of more than 500 Hz bandwidth (thus making PACTOR III at 
full capability illegal).why only mention PACTOR III? This 
certainly impacts other digital modes as well that run wider than 500 
Hz. Am I missing something as usual?

Perhaps the most ironic part is the omnibus ruling's continual use 
of the phrase more efficient in speaking of band usage for their 
explanations of the changes, especially in regard to 80 meters. I see 
a big squish coming below 3.600 as people will have few options as to 
where to operate...

Bill, N9DSJ



--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Yes, I bet they petition *real* hard over that issue!
 
 73 
 
 Bill N9DSJ
 
 
 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Theodore A. Antanaitis 
 WA7ZZB@ wrote:
 
  Received this reply today:
  
  Hi Ted:
  
  As of Dec 15 Pactor-III running at a bandwidth of greater than 
500 Hz
  (such as Winlink) is not permissible below 30 MHz.  This is one 
of the
  petition to reconsider items being considered by the ARRL Board of
  Directors.
  
  Thanks and 73
  
  Dan Henderson, N1ND
  ARRL Regulatory Information Specialist
 






[digitalradio] Re: Omnibus rules published in Federal Register

2006-11-15 Thread Jon Maguire
 As of Dec 15 Pactor-III running at a bandwidth of greater than 500 Hz
 (such as Winlink) is not permissible below 30 MHz. This is one of the
 petition to reconsider items being considered by the ARRL Board of
 Directors.

Of course any digital mode 500Hz bandwidth on any frequency =30Mhz is 
not permissible now.  Bummer. Digital imaging with embedded symbols 
(stegenography) anyone? Please?

73... Jon W1MNK