[digitalradio] Re: Re-inventing the JT65A messages for HF?
-Thanks Bill and Jose, I agree. Andy -- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, I think it is not a good idea, at least so far. RRR, RO, and 73 are shorthand messages, no real text sent, but a combo of tones, and that has adventages at very low levels compared to real text. Watch the waterfall when you get called and when you get those shortand messages, 73, Jose, CO2JA __ V Conferencia Internacional de Energ�a Renovable, Ahorro de Energ�a y Educaci�n Energ�tica. 22 al 25 de mayo de 2007 Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba http://www.cujae.edu.cu/eventos/cier Participe en Universidad 2008. 11 al 15 de febrero del 2008. Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba http://www.universidad2008.cu
[digitalradio] Re: Re-inventing the JT65A messages for HF?
Hi Andy, Think there is a mixed bag; some of use have used the WSJT modes for some time on vhf/uhf for EME and MS;p so we tend to stick to known conventions. So far I have seen no reason to deviate from that... 73 es be well, Bill N9DSJ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see a few are confused about the proper sequence and meaning of the EME/MS related messages within JT65A of WSJT. So, am I. I wonder if us HFer's should try to be more straight forward? The general use is described as.. When a station copies both calls, he sends calls and report. If he gets both calls and a report, he sends his report Roger. If he gets report and Roger, he sends Rogers. When both get a pair of Rogers, the QSO is officially complete. The report mentioned above is traditionally the gridsquare in JT65A, I find that useful. So , How about these messages CQ P5DX K3UK replies with message 1 P5DX K3UK FN02hk P5DX sees both calls and sends K3UK P5DX PM27 OOO QSL K3UK receives the report and sends QSL , thanks PD5DX sends... RRR 73 K3UK sends ... RRR 73 I would keep RO, OOO, RRR in the messages because they also get displayed in the waterfall. I'm not sure how/why yet, but that is my weekend learning objective. As I read more about the mdoe and the software, K1JT advocates the use of standard operatings procedurees. So, maybe changing his convention is not a good idea? Andy
