[digitalradio] Re: Try some JT65A

2010-02-22 Thread Steve


I keep returning to DM780 as my main digi mode program. It does NOT support  
Olivia 32/500 or 64/500. I'm running v5.0 beta. I think one of the older 
releases had an option to set the tones/baud parameters separately.

I think MixW will work on these Olivia sub modes.

Are these sub modes are slower than the staple 16/500?

73,

Steve N6VL

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, sholtofish sho...@... wrote:

 Andy,
 
 Another very sensitive mode to try is Olivia 32/500 or even 64/500. Tony and 
 I managed perfect copy at QRP levels with a very poor path. Bit faster than 
 JT65 too.
 
 73
 
 Sholto
 




Re: [digitalradio] Re: Try some JT65A

2010-02-22 Thread Dave Ackrill
Steve wrote:
 
 I keep returning to DM780 as my main digi mode program. It does NOT support  
 Olivia 32/500 or 64/500. I'm running v5.0 beta. I think one of the older 
 releases had an option to set the tones/baud parameters separately.

Version 4.1 of DM780 does allow these Olivia modes to be selected. 
That's what I use if I'm going to use Olivia.

Dave (G0DJA)


[digitalradio] Re: Try some JT65A

2010-02-22 Thread sholtofish
Steve,

Yes, MixW allows these sub-modes as does the excellent  free FLDigi program.

73

Sholto


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steve n...@... wrote:

 
 
 I keep returning to DM780 as my main digi mode program. It does NOT support  
 Olivia 32/500 or 64/500. I'm running v5.0 beta. I think one of the older 
 releases had an option to set the tones/baud parameters separately.
 
 I think MixW will work on these Olivia sub modes.
 
 Are these sub modes are slower than the staple 16/500?
 
 73,
 
 Steve N6VL
 
 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, sholtofish sholto@ wrote:
 
  Andy,
  
  Another very sensitive mode to try is Olivia 32/500 or even 64/500. Tony 
  and I managed perfect copy at QRP levels with a very poor path. Bit faster 
  than JT65 too.
  
  73
  
  Sholto
 





[digitalradio] Re: Try some JT65A

2010-02-21 Thread sholtofish
Andy,

Another very sensitive mode to try is Olivia 32/500 or even 64/500. Tony and I 
managed perfect copy at QRP levels with a very poor path. Bit faster than JT65 
too.

73

Sholto


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote:

 Well, ROS 1 and 16 look like good new modes.  I think I will give up
 on this mode until the FCC clarifies the legality for USA hams.  For
 those having fun With ROS, don't forget much the same fun can be had
 with JT65A (ROS1) or Olivia (ROS 16).
 
 I am monitoring  3576 JT65A overnight
 
 Andy K3UK





Re: [digitalradio] Re: Try some JT65A

2010-02-21 Thread Andy obrien
Interesting, I will have to give 64/500 a try.

Andy K3UK

On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:02 PM, sholtofish sho...@probikekit.com wrote:



 Andy,

 Another very sensitive mode to try is Olivia 32/500 or even 64/500. Tony
 and I managed perfect copy at QRP levels with a very poor path. Bit faster
 than JT65 too.

 73

 Sholto


 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com, Andy
 obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
 
  Well, ROS 1 and 16 look like good new modes. I think I will give up
  on this mode until the FCC clarifies the legality for USA hams. For
  those having fun With ROS, don't forget much the same fun can be had
  with JT65A (ROS1) or Olivia (ROS 16).
 
  I am monitoring 3576 JT65A overnight
 
  Andy K3UK