[digitalradio] What is SS and what it is good for to HAMs, was: ARRL/FCC Announcement

2010-03-07 Thread Vojtech
I did not follow the whole conversation. Anyway, spread spectrum has following 
benefits as far as I am known: 

It allows more stations to use the spectrum. The trick is in spreading the 
signal by a sequence, which appears to be random. Many stations transmitting 
spread spectrum signals at various time and frequency offsets will all together 
resemble white noise. On the contrary, many conventional narrow band signals 
will approach white noise much slower. There is a classic article from Costas 
(of the PSK Costa's loop decoder algorithm) explaining why even DSB has 
theoretical benefits over SSB because it spreads the signal to higher 
bandwidth, which makes the total interference look more like white noise.

The spreading in frequency makes the signal less sensitive to narrow band 
carriers, it makes it difficult to jam a signal by a single or couple of 
carriers.

The other benefit is critical to military use. It is difficult to detect and if 
one does not know the spreading sequence, it is impossible to decode.

Spread spectrum somehow contradicts the HAM radio philosophy. Spread spectrum 
to be useful mandates the software itself to identify and lock to the signal. 
It is impossible identify weak SS signal from white noise by ears. The operator 
will just enumerate the channels and the machine will do the rest. Higher 
amount of SS stations at the same frequency will increase background noise, so 
it will create an interference to let's say a CW operator. Therefore one would 
need to dedicate SS channels, otherwise there would be plenty of complaints 
from CW operators.

I don't see a real benefit in running SS signal in just 2.5kHz SSB bandwidth. 
Olivia or MFSK will do better because they use the whole spectrum for itself, 
while SS on purpose leaves all the orthogonal spreading sequences to be used by 
other stations. For the same bandwidth, SS is designed to share frequency, 
classic multitone signals for best coding gain. That is a whole world of 
difference.

SS would be very beneficial for beacon network, where all beacons share the 
same channel. This is what the GPS satellite network does indeed.

SS may be used for single channel world wide chatting mode. One will be able to 
decode many signals at once with powerful computer.

73, Vojtech OK1IAK




Re: [digitalradio] What is SS? Senor Ros is not an honest person !

2010-03-06 Thread Jose A. Amador
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Arnaldo Coro  wrote:
>> So, amigos at "digital radio ",  my advise , and that's what I am going to 
>> do, is to
>> alert ROS users of the possibility that the author of the software may even 
>> be
>> attempting to use it for other purposes that are not related to amateur 
>> radio...
>>  

Yep, the "dark side" may be lurking. Ham transceivers are not used only 
by hams, so it may as well apply...

Jose, CO2JA




Re: [digitalradio] What is SS? Senor Ros is not an honest person !

2010-03-06 Thread charles standlee
Something was telling me not to install this software, maybe it's a good thing 
I didn't.





From: Arnaldo Coro 
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Cc: David Sumner ; Richard Moseson 
Sent: Sat, March 6, 2010 8:12:29 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] What is SS? Senor Ros is not an honest person !

  

Dear amigos:
I am really concerned about the damage to the amateur radio hobby generated by
a NON AMATEUR in Spain that wrote a software program for a new digital
mode that very clearly to me, without any doubts , is a FHSS communications 
mode.

I wrote e-mail messages to this person, and received some very aggressive
replies from him... he even used several " bad words" in his messages that show
that besides his very primitive knowledge of the English language _  ( he can
not communicate effectively using English, as he has demonstrated many times
with this very poorly written postings ) he lacks the most basic education and
ethics.

The topic we are dealing now is not, in my humble opinion, if ROS is or is not
FHSS, it this person sent messages explaining or attempting to explain the 
nature
of the ROS software, and then when faced with clear evidence that part of the
"market" , and a signficant one indeed , to which he was aiming, could not
make use of the ROS software.

Now we are seeing on the 20 meters band, under better propagation conditions due
to the so far sustained increase in solar activity, that Olivia users are 
facing 
interference from ROS users, caused by the ignorance of the Spanish "inventor"
about amateur radio.

He replied to a senior Cuban professor,  a very prestigious telecommunications
expert, using what could be described as "foul" language, an indication that 
confirmed
that he was not only answering to my advice in such a disrespectful language.

Just to add one more element... when I asked him about the possibility of 
writing
the ROS software for LINUX users, his answer was also a clear demonstration
of his ignorance about today's world.

So, amigos at "digital radio ",  my advise , and that's what I am going to do, 
is to
alert ROS users of the possibility that the author of the software may even be
attempting to use it for other purposes that are not related to amateur radio...
After all, once you load a program of which you don't known the source code, 
into your computer, you are at the mercy of those who wrote the computer code...

73 and DX
Arnie Coro
CO2KK
IARU Region II Area C
Emergency Coordinator


>> 




  

Re: [digitalradio] What is SS? Senor Ros is not an honest person !

2010-03-06 Thread KH6TY
Thanks for the caution, Arnie. I will definitely scan my computer for 
viruses and trojans after installing running loading ROS. The fact that 
it already sends automatic emails makes one imagine what else might be 
possible once I have configured it with my email address!


73 - Skip KH6TY




Arnaldo Coro wrote:
 



Dear amigos:
I am really concerned about the damage to the amateur radio hobby 
generated by

a NON AMATEUR in Spain that wrote a software program for a new digital
mode that very clearly to me, without any doubts , is a FHSS 
communications mode.


I wrote e-mail messages to this person, and received some very aggressive
replies from him... he even used several " bad words" in his messages 
that show
that besides his very primitive knowledge of the English language _  ( 
he can
not communicate effectively using English, as he has demonstrated many 
times
with this very poorly written postings ) he lacks the most basic 
education and

ethics.

The topic we are dealing now is not, in my humble opinion, if ROS is 
or is not
FHSS, it this person sent messages explaining or attempting to explain 
the nature
of the ROS software, and then when faced with clear evidence that part 
of the

"market" , and a signficant one indeed , to which he was aiming, could not
make use of the ROS software.

Now we are seeing on the 20 meters band, under better propagation 
conditions due
to the so far sustained increase in solar activity, that Olivia users 
are facing
interference from ROS users, caused by the ignorance of the Spanish 
"inventor"

about amateur radio.

He replied to a senior Cuban professor,  a very prestigious 
telecommunications
expert, using what could be described as "foul" language, an 
indication that confirmed
that he was not only answering to my advice in such a disrespectful 
language.


Just to add one more element... when I asked him about the possibility 
of writing
the ROS software for LINUX users, his answer was also a clear 
demonstration

of his ignorance about today's world.

So, amigos at "digital radio ",  my advise , and that's what I am 
going to do, is to
alert ROS users of the possibility that the author of the software may 
even be
attempting to use it for other purposes that are not related to 
amateur radio...
After all, once you load a program of which you don't known the source 
code,
into your computer, you are at the mercy of those who wrote the 
computer code...


73 and DX
Arnie Coro
CO2KK
IARU Region II Area C
Emergency Coordinator
--- On *Sat, 3/6/10, John B. Stephensen //* wrote:


    From: John B. Stephensen 
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] What is SS?
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, March 6, 2010, 4:00 AM

 


The document that the author of ROS originally published,
"Introduction to ROS: The Spread Spectrum", contains a good
description of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum
(FHSS) techniques. Section 4 describes taking a 250 Hz wide mode
(MFSK16) and spreading it over 2 kHz by shifting the center
frequency in a pseuorandom sequence. The receiver changes
frequencies in the same sequence and the logic used to
detect a special tone sequence to obtain synchronization is
described in section 5. The amount of spectrum occupied increases
by a factor of 8. FHSS is one way to minimize the effects of
multipath spread but there are also other techniques that occupy
less spectrum.
 
Note that the author of ROS published a second doucument,"ROS

Technical Description" , that contains elements of the original
but does not mention FHSS and omits any description of how data
is mapped to tones. Users comparing the original and later
versions of the code haven't seen a difference in the transmitted
spectrum.
 
73,
 
John

KD6OZH

- Original Message -
*From:* Rein A 
*To:* digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
    
    *Sent:* Friday, March 05, 2010 19:16 UTC
*Subject:* [digitalradio] What is SS?

Here is a reprint that for my limited mental capacities defines
the core quite well.

I have asked Mike the author for some references, no lack of trust
though.

 - - - - -

> -Original Message-
> >From: n4qlb 
> >Sent: Mar 5, 2010 1:15 PM
> >To: ROSDIGITALMODEMGROU p...@yahoogroups. com

> >Subject: [ROSDIGITALMODEMGRO UP] Re: How do you like ROS Now?
> >
> >Thank You for your comments Sig. Let me explain what SS is.
Spread spectrum is a method by which a bank of channels
(Frequencies) are designated between a Transmitter and
Receiver and are shared or (Frequency Hopped) to facilitate a
clear Tra

Re: [digitalradio] What is SS? Senor Ros is not an honest person !

2010-03-06 Thread Andy obrien
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Arnaldo Coro  wrote:
>
>
>
> So, amigos at "digital radio ",  my advise , and that's what I am going to 
> do, is to
> alert ROS users of the possibility that the author of the software may even be
> attempting to use it for other purposes that are not related to amateur 
> radio...
> After all, once you load a program of which you don't known the source code,
> into your computer, you are at the mercy of those who wrote the computer 
> code...
>
> 73 and DX
> Arnie Coro
> CO2KK


Yikes!  That would not be good.

Andy K3UK


Re: [digitalradio] What is SS? Senor Ros is not an honest person !

2010-03-06 Thread Arnaldo Coro

Dear amigos:
I am really concerned about the damage to the amateur radio hobby generated by
a NON AMATEUR in Spain that wrote a software program for a new digital
mode that very clearly to me, without any doubts , is a FHSS communications 
mode.

I wrote e-mail messages to this person, and received some very aggressive
replies from him... he even used several " bad words" in his messages that show
that besides his very primitive knowledge of the English language _  ( he can
not communicate effectively using English, as he has demonstrated many times
with this very poorly written postings ) he lacks the most basic education and
ethics.

The topic we are dealing now is not, in my humble opinion, if ROS is or is not
FHSS, it this person sent messages explaining or attempting to explain the 
nature
of the ROS software, and then when faced with clear evidence that part of the
"market" , and a signficant one indeed , to which he was aiming, could not
make use of the ROS software.

Now we are seeing on the 20 meters band, under better propagation conditions due
to the so far sustained increase in solar activity, that Olivia users are 
facing 
interference from ROS users, caused by the ignorance of the Spanish "inventor"
about amateur radio.

He replied to a senior Cuban professor,  a very prestigious telecommunications
expert, using what could be described as "foul" language, an indication that 
confirmed
that he was not only answering to my advice in such a disrespectful language.

Just to add one more element... when I asked him about the possibility of 
writing
the ROS software for LINUX users, his answer was also a clear demonstration
of his ignorance about today's world.

So, amigos at "digital radio ",  my advise , and that's what I am going to do, 
is to
alert ROS users of the possibility that the author of the software may even be
attempting to use it for other purposes that are not related to amateur radio...
After all, once you load a program of which you don't known the source code, 
into your computer, you are at the mercy of those who wrote the computer code...

73 and DX
Arnie Coro
CO2KK
IARU Region II Area C
Emergency Coordinator
--- On Sat, 3/6/10, John B. Stephensen  wrote:

From: John B. Stephensen 
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] What is SS?
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, March 6, 2010, 4:00 AM







 



  



  
  
  


The document that the author of ROS 
originally published, "Introduction to ROS: The Spread 
Spectrum", contains a good description of frequency-hopping 
spread-spectrum (FHSS) techniques. Section 4 describes taking a 
250 Hz wide mode (MFSK16) and spreading it over 2 kHz by shifting the 
center frequency in a pseuorandom sequence. The receiver changes frequencies in 
the same sequence and the logic used to detect a special 
tone sequence to obtain synchronization is described in section 5. The 
amount of spectrum occupied increases by a factor of 8. FHSS is one way to 
minimize the effects of multipath spread but there are also other techniques 
that occupy less spectrum.
 
Note that the author of ROS published a second 
doucument,"ROS Technical Description" , that contains elements of the 
original but does not mention FHSS and omits any description of how data 
is mapped to tones. Users comparing the original and later versions of 
the code haven't seen a difference in the transmitted spectrum. 
 
73,
 
John
KD6OZH

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Rein A 
  
  To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com 
  
  Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 19:16 
  UTC
  Subject: [digitalradio] What is SS?
  
Here is a reprint that for my limited 
  mental capacities defines
the core quite well.

I have asked Mike the 
  author for some references, no lack of 
  trust
though.

 - - - - -

> 
  -Original Message-
> >From: n4qlb 
> 
  >Sent: Mar 5, 2010 1:15 PM
> >To: ROSDIGITALMODEMGROU p...@yahoogroups. com
> 
  >Subject: [ROSDIGITALMODEMGRO UP] Re: How do you like ROS Now?
> 
  >
> >Thank You for your comments Sig. Let me explain what SS is. 
  Spread spectrum is a method by which a bank of channels (Frequencies) are 
  designated between a Transmitter and Receiver and are shared or (Frequency 
  Hopped) to facilitate a clear Transmisson. The Transmitter actually signals 
  the Receiver to Hop from one frequency to another. A good example is a 900mhz 
  digital cordless telephone or a 800Mhz digital radio truncking system. 
  (Motorla Astro). A frequency in Ham radio consist of a 3kh wide channel. Ros 
  does not signal a receiver to hop outside of that channel (3 Khz) therefore 
it 
  is not SS and is just like anyother FSK mode used in the amatuer radio 
  service. The ease of obtaining a License in the U.S. by people that are not 
  technically qualified to hold 

Re: [digitalradio] What is SS?

2010-03-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi John

I can confirm .There is no difference in the transmitted spectrum.
Here some comparing done with DL4YHF's Spectrum Lab

ROS v2.6.1
x's   http://home.broadpark.no/~saanes/bilder/ROS%20v2.6.1_xxx.jpg
Idling   http://home.broadpark.no/~saanes/bilder/ROS%20v2.6.1_idling.jpg

ROS v1.6.2
x's   http://home.broadpark.no/~saanes/bilder/ROS%20v1.6.2_xxx.jpg
Idling   http://home.broadpark.no/~saanes/bilder/ROS%20v1.6.2_idling.jpg

la5vna Steinar




On 06.03.2010 10:00, John B. Stephensen wrote:
> The document that the author of ROS originally published, "Introduction to 
> ROS: The Spread Spectrum", contains a good description of frequency-hopping 
> spread-spectrum (FHSS) techniques. Section 4 describes taking a 250 Hz wide 
> mode (MFSK16) and spreading it over 2 kHz by shifting the center frequency in 
> a pseuorandom sequence. The receiver changes frequencies in the same sequence 
> and the logic used to detect a special tone sequence to obtain 
> synchronization is described in section 5. The amount of spectrum occupied 
> increases by a factor of 8. FHSS is one way to minimize the effects of 
> multipath spread but there are also other techniques that occupy less 
> spectrum.
>
> Note that the author of ROS published a second doucument,"ROS Technical 
> Description", that contains elements of the original but does not mention 
> FHSS and omits any description of how data is mapped to tones. Users 
> comparing the original and later versions of the code haven't seen a 
> difference in the transmitted spectrum. 
>
> 73,
>
>   



Re: [digitalradio] What is SS?

2010-03-06 Thread John B. Stephensen
The document that the author of ROS originally published, "Introduction to ROS: 
The Spread Spectrum", contains a good description of frequency-hopping 
spread-spectrum (FHSS) techniques. Section 4 describes taking a 250 Hz wide 
mode (MFSK16) and spreading it over 2 kHz by shifting the center frequency in a 
pseuorandom sequence. The receiver changes frequencies in the same sequence and 
the logic used to detect a special tone sequence to obtain synchronization is 
described in section 5. The amount of spectrum occupied increases by a factor 
of 8. FHSS is one way to minimize the effects of multipath spread but there are 
also other techniques that occupy less spectrum.

Note that the author of ROS published a second doucument,"ROS Technical 
Description", that contains elements of the original but does not mention FHSS 
and omits any description of how data is mapped to tones. Users comparing the 
original and later versions of the code haven't seen a difference in the 
transmitted spectrum. 

73,

John
KD6OZH
  - Original Message - 
  From: Rein A 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 19:16 UTC
  Subject: [digitalradio] What is SS?

  Here is a reprint that for my limited mental capacities defines
  the core quite well.

  I have asked Mike the author for some references, no lack of trust
  though.

  -

  > -Original Message-
  > >From: n4qlb 
  > >Sent: Mar 5, 2010 1:15 PM
  > >To: rosdigitalmodemgr...@yahoogroups.com
  > >Subject: [ROSDIGITALMODEMGROUP] Re: How do you like ROS Now?
  > >
  > >Thank You for your comments Sig. Let me explain what SS is. Spread 
spectrum is a method by which a bank of channels (Frequencies)are designated 
between a Transmitter and Receiver and are shared or (Frequency Hopped) to 
facilitate a clear Transmisson. The Transmitter actually signals the Receiver 
to Hop from one frequency to another. A good example is a 900mhz digital 
cordless telephone or a 800Mhz digital radio truncking system. (Motorla Astro). 
A frequency in Ham radio consist of a 3kh wide channel. Ros does not signal a 
receiver to hop outside of that channel (3 Khz) therefore it is not SS and is 
just like anyother FSK mode used in the amatuer radio service. The ease of 
obtaining a License in the U.S. by people that are not technically qualified to 
hold one is the main culprit regarding the controversy over new modes such as 
ROS. I am confident that all variations of ROS are perfectly legal in the U.S.
  > >
  > 

RE: [digitalradio] What is SS?

2010-03-05 Thread Dave AA6YQ
Mike N4QLB's claims that "A frequency in Ham radio consist of a 3kh wide
channel. Ros does not signal a receiver to hop outside of that channel (3
Khz) therefore it is not SS and is just like anyother FSK mode used in the
amatuer radio service." are incorrect, in my opinion.

 

Amateur radio frequencies on HF bands are not channelized at 3 khz or any
other bandwidth (with the exception of 60m).

 

I have asked Mike to cite justification for his claim on the ROS reflector
that spreading a ~50 hz signal across 3 khz using classic spread spectrum
techniques (e.g. a pseudo-random sequence) isn't spread spectrum.

 

73,

 

  Dave, AA6YQ

 

From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rein A
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 3:16 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] What is SS?

 

  

Hello All,

I have been trying to understand from the very beginning of this
circus what the real problem was and where I could read about it,
from 3d independant sources.

Jose the programmer has done a poor job in pinning down the core
of the problem.

Here is a reprint that for my limited mental capacities defines
the core quite well.

I have asked Mike the author for some references, no lack of trust
though.

In my searches on the internet I had seen pieces directing to Mike's
arguments but never connected the dots.

After checking with Mike N4QLB, he has been able to hear me on
ROS with a couple of hundred mW, he allowed me to post it here.

-

> -Original Message-
> >From: n4qlb 
> >Sent: Mar 5, 2010 1:15 PM
> >To: rosdigitalmodemgr...@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:ROSDIGITALMODEMGROUP%40yahoogroups.com> 
> >Subject: [ROSDIGITALMODEMGROUP] Re: How do you like ROS Now?
> >
> >Thank You for your comments Sig. Let me explain what SS is. Spread
spectrum is a method by which a bank of channels (Frequencies)are designated
between a Transmitter and Receiver and are shared or (Frequency Hopped) to
facilitate a clear Transmisson. The Transmitter actually signals the
Receiver to Hop from one frequency to another. A good example is a 900mhz
digital cordless telephone or a 800Mhz digital radio truncking system.
(Motorla Astro). A frequency in Ham radio consist of a 3kh wide channel. Ros
does not signal a receiver to hop outside of that channel (3 Khz) therefore
it is not SS and is just like anyother FSK mode used in the amatuer radio
service. The ease of obtaining a License in the U.S. by people that are not
technically qualified to hold one is the main culprit regarding the
controversy over new modes such as ROS. I am confident that all variations
of ROS are perfectly legal in the U.S.
> >
> >Mike
> >N4QLB

--

Hope this is a positive contribution to the ongoing discussions.

73 Rein W6SZ





[digitalradio] What is SS?

2010-03-05 Thread Rein A
Hello All,


I have been trying to understand from the very beginning of this
circus what the real problem was and where I could read about it,
from 3d independant sources.

Jose the programmer has done a poor job in pinning down the core
of the problem.

Here is a reprint that for my limited mental capacities defines
the core quite well.

I have asked Mike the author for some references, no lack of trust
though.

In my searches on the internet I had seen pieces directing to Mike's
arguments but never connected the dots.

After checking with Mike N4QLB, he has been able to hear me on
ROS with a couple of hundred mW,  he allowed me to post it here.

-

> -Original Message-
> >From: n4qlb 
> >Sent: Mar 5, 2010 1:15 PM
> >To: rosdigitalmodemgr...@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [ROSDIGITALMODEMGROUP] Re: How do you like ROS Now?
> >
> >Thank You for your comments Sig. Let me explain what SS is. Spread spectrum 
> >is a method by which a bank of channels (Frequencies)are designated between 
> >a Transmitter and Receiver and are shared or (Frequency Hopped) to 
> >facilitate a clear Transmisson. The Transmitter actually signals the 
> >Receiver to Hop from one frequency to another. A good example is a 900mhz 
> >digital cordless telephone or a 800Mhz digital radio truncking system. 
> >(Motorla Astro). A frequency in Ham radio consist of a 3kh wide channel. Ros 
> >does not signal a receiver to hop outside of that channel (3 Khz) therefore 
> >it is not SS and is just like anyother FSK mode used in the amatuer radio 
> >service. The ease of obtaining a License in the U.S. by people that are not 
> >technically qualified to hold one is the main culprit regarding the 
> >controversy over new modes such as ROS. I am confident that all variations 
> >of ROS are perfectly legal in the U.S.
> >
> >Mike
> >N4QLB

-


Hope this is a positive contribution to the ongoing discussions.

73 Rein W6SZ