Re: [digitalradio] Time-Sharing Our Ham Bands, Designing Digital Methods for Time-Sharing
John, I was thinking the exact same thing earlier today. Consider it done! Andy K3UK On 1/4/06, John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Amen... Please, please start another thread... getting very weary of 50+ emails daily mostly with the same argument or slight variation of same. I know that you regard this as a burning issue, and as Kevin suggests maybe some wonderful plan will come out of this. Plan B is to set up another digital radio group and ban all discussions on band plans, referring them back here! John VE5MU - Original Message - From: Kevin der Kinderen To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 3:32 PM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Time-Sharing Our Ham Bands, Designing Digital Methods for Time-Sharing >< > I have to say that with Bonnie's attitude it is no wonder > there is so much contention. The practices that Bonnie are > recommending are the exact opposite of proper amateur conduct > and should not be supported by those of us who believe in > the Amateur Code. Hi Rick,Maybe you are confusing my "attitude" with my observations of reality. It is human nature, and good amateur practice, for communicators to do what they can to get their message through QRM, QRN, or harsh conditions. No, I think Rick has it right. It's your attitude – and the attitude of the opposition. Andy's decision to keep this thread going here is a mistake. But that's just my observation of reality. Bonnie, Dave, etc… I know this is an important subject. It might even be worth its own Yahoo! group so that those that want to take part can sign up. It will be interesting to see how things go with a more specialized audience. Maybe someone can provide a weekly summary to this group of your discussions. Weekly is about all I can take. Just take it away somewhere else. Maybe you guys will actually come up with a good plan to propose to somebody who can actually do something about it. 73 & Happy New Year – just not a year of this discussion please. Kevin – K4VD Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.0.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/200 - Release Date: 12/14/05 Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/Other areas of interest:The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html SPONSORED LINKS Ham radio Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- Andy Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html SPONSORED LINKS Ham radio Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [digitalradio] Time-Sharing Our Ham Bands, Designing Digital Methods for Time-Sharing
Amen... Please, please start another thread... getting very weary of 50+ emails daily mostly with the same argument or slight variation of same. I know that you regard this as a burning issue, and as Kevin suggests maybe some wonderful plan will come out of this. Plan B is to set up another digital radio group and ban all discussions on band plans, referring them back here! John VE5MU - Original Message - From: Kevin der Kinderen To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 3:32 PM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Time-Sharing Our Ham Bands, Designing Digital Methods for Time-Sharing ><> I have to say that with Bonnie's attitude it is no wonder > there is so much contention. The practices that Bonnie are > recommending are the exact opposite of proper amateur conduct > and should not be supported by those of us who believe in > the Amateur Code. Hi Rick,Maybe you are confusing my "attitude" with my observations of reality.It is human nature, and good amateur practice, for communicators to dowhat they can to get their message through QRM, QRN, or harsh conditions. No, I think Rick has it right. It's your attitude and the attitude of the opposition. Andy's decision to keep this thread going here is a mistake. But that's just my observation of reality. Bonnie, Dave, etc I know this is an important subject. It might even be worth its own Yahoo! group so that those that want to take part can sign up. It will be interesting to see how things go with a more specialized audience. Maybe someone can provide a weekly summary to this group of your discussions. Weekly is about all I can take. Just take it away somewhere else. Maybe you guys will actually come up with a good plan to propose to somebody who can actually do something about it. 73 & Happy New Year just not a year of this discussion please. Kevin K4VD Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.0.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/200 - Release Date: 12/14/05 Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html SPONSORED LINKS Ham radio Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [digitalradio] Time-Sharing Our Ham Bands, Designing Digital Methods for Time-Sharing
I think it is NOT a mistake to discuss such a subject, in as wide an audience as possible. The one here on digitalradio is very concerned with digital modes ( that is why we are here). Putting it on its own group, would indeed take the information off here, and confine it to the few who probably know more or care more about it. Its like watching the tv news, or reading newspapers: You dont know what you were missing until you see it. Danny - Original Message - From: Kevin der Kinderen To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 4:32 PM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Time-Sharing Our Ham Bands, Designing Digital Methods for Time-Sharing ><> I have to say that with Bonnie's attitude it is no wonder > there is so much contention. The practices that Bonnie are > recommending are the exact opposite of proper amateur conduct > and should not be supported by those of us who believe in > the Amateur Code. Hi Rick,Maybe you are confusing my "attitude" with my observations of reality.It is human nature, and good amateur practice, for communicators to dowhat they can to get their message through QRM, QRN, or harsh conditions. No, I think Rick has it right. It's your attitude and the attitude of the opposition. Andy's decision to keep this thread going here is a mistake. But that's just my observation of reality. Bonnie, Dave, etc I know this is an important subject. It might even be worth its own Yahoo! group so that those that want to take part can sign up. It will be interesting to see how things go with a more specialized audience. Maybe someone can provide a weekly summary to this group of your discussions. Weekly is about all I can take. Just take it away somewhere else. Maybe you guys will actually come up with a good plan to propose to somebody who can actually do something about it. 73 & Happy New Year just not a year of this discussion please. Kevin K4VD No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/217 - Release Date: 12/30/2005 Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html SPONSORED LINKS Ham radio Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
RE: [digitalradio] Time-Sharing Our Ham Bands, Designing Digital Methods for Time-Sharing
>< > I have to say that with Bonnie's attitude it is no wonder > there is so much contention. The practices that Bonnie are > recommending are the exact opposite of proper amateur conduct > and should not be supported by those of us who believe in > the Amateur Code. Hi Rick, Maybe you are confusing my "attitude" with my observations of reality. It is human nature, and good amateur practice, for communicators to do what they can to get their message through QRM, QRN, or harsh conditions. No, I think Rick has it right. It's your attitude – and the attitude of the opposition. Andy's decision to keep this thread going here is a mistake. But that's just my observation of reality. Bonnie, Dave, etc… I know this is an important subject. It might even be worth its own Yahoo! group so that those that want to take part can sign up. It will be interesting to see how things go with a more specialized audience. Maybe someone can provide a weekly summary to this group of your discussions. Weekly is about all I can take. Just take it away somewhere else. Maybe you guys will actually come up with a good plan to propose to somebody who can actually do something about it. 73 & Happy New Year – just not a year of this discussion please. Kevin – K4VD Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
