Re: [digitalradio] Nomic vs. Signalink USB

2010-06-13 Thread Jeremy Cowgar
What the SignaLink has going for it over the Nomic (which is what I own) 
is a built in sound card. Thus, you do not have to fuss with trying to 
share a sound card w/your system. i.e. listen to the popular digital 
frequencies and your bound to hear a windows Ding message now and 
then. That's the least of the problem, however, the real problem is you 
listen to your MP3 player on the computer, turn the volume up a bit then 
go to use digital modes. Now you have to readjust your output, of which 
you will forget now and then, everyone does, and you'll be over-driving 
your transmitter producing horrible tones that causes interference for all.


So... had I to do it again, I'd go the SignaLink.

Maybe SignaLink owners can speak up, would any of you rather had a 
Nomic? BTW... I solved the above problems by adding an additional sound 
card to my system that is devoted to the ham radio.


Also... one other thing to think about... I know you didn't mention RTTY 
or CW, but you may want to look into an interface that provides the 
ability to key your transmitter for CW and for FSK RTTY. You can do RTTY 
w/o FSK by using AFSK but typically if you use FSK RTTY you benefit from 
some functions your radio may provide (nice filters for one).


Also... one more thing :-D ... for either, I'd see if it can connect to 
your rear accessory port instead of interfacing through your mic port. 
That may be a personal preference but I think it's just less hassles to 
deal with in setup and every day operations.


Jeremy
KB8LFA

On 6/13/2010 3:25 PM, kneiper wrote:


Newbie to the digital scene and am looking for opinions on the above 
devices to be used with a Yeasu FT-747G. Right now I'm primarily 
interested in PSK31, MFSK16, and Hellschreiber.






Re: [digitalradio] Nomic vs. Signalink USB

2010-06-13 Thread Mike M
Mike -

I have been using the USB Signalink with an FT817 and an old Kenwood TS-140
for the better part of a year, and am very satisfied with its performance.
It was easy to set up (you need a separate cable for each rig, and need to
reconfigure some jumpers) and works very well with my Mac laptops (using
fldigi).

73,
Mike, KL7MJ


Re: [digitalradio] Nomic vs. Signalink USB

2010-06-13 Thread chas
Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
 
 
 What the SignaLink has going for it over the Nomic (which is what I own) 
 is a built in sound card. Thus, you do not have to fuss with trying to 
 share a sound card w/your system. i.e. listen to the popular digital 
 frequencies and your bound to hear a windows Ding message now and 
 then. That's the least of the problem, however, the real problem is you 
 listen to your MP3 player on the computer, turn the volume up a bit then 
 go to use digital modes. Now you have to readjust your output, of which 
 you will forget now and then, everyone does, and you'll be over-driving 
 your transmitter producing horrible tones that causes interference for all.
 
 So... had I to do it again, I'd go the SignaLink.
 
 Maybe SignaLink owners can speak up, would any of you rather had a 
 Nomic? BTW... I solved the above problems by adding an additional sound 
 card to my system that is devoted to the ham radio.
 
 Also... one other thing to think about... I know you didn't mention RTTY 
 or CW, but you may want to look into an interface that provides the 
 ability to key your transmitter for CW and for FSK RTTY. You can do RTTY 
 w/o FSK by using AFSK but typically if you use FSK RTTY you benefit from 
 some functions your radio may provide (nice filters for one).
 
 Also... one more thing :-D ... for either, I'd see if it can connect to 
 your rear accessory port instead of interfacing through your mic port. 
 That may be a personal preference but I think it's just less hassles to 
 deal with in setup and every day operations.
 
 Jeremy
 KB8LFA
 

don't ask me anything about Yaesu (hate red-orange screens) - it is all I can 
do to keep up with my Icoms and my KWs.  I have a separate SL/USB on both my 
TS480 and my IC Pro3.   both are hooked up thru the rear accy ports which 
allow me to  talk as quickly as my message is sent.  this is as automatic as 
it can get, and I can only suggest that you buy a share in MixW and use that 
program.  I even bought a refurbed T-41 ThinkPad to run the doze programs on 
it as that was the fastest and simplest way to go.  that way I keep the 
minimum software on the XP and I do all else on my MacPro.

As a MARS station, I have to be able to receive and pass SoundCard, Pactor 
and Telnet as well as SSB nets, etc.  So, this set up allows me to send 
Pactor while I am relaying or supporting NCS activities and traffic.  Using 
MixW I can stop talking, press a button on the laptop, send or relay traffic 
via soundcard and immediately resume talking after sending the message.

I can take messages received via MixW and paste them into WL2K and either 
send them via telnet or via Pactor using the same program.  All of this is 
done with two radios, two SL/USBs, a laptop and two antennas.  Additional of 
course are tuners and amplifiers, scanners and printers and necesary coax 
switches, SWR/wattmeters, power supplies, etc.

fwiw

73

chas

-- 
ch...@texas.net   k5dam  Houston, TX

http://militarysignatures.com/signatures/member14013.png
--


Re: [digitalradio] Nomic vs. Signalink USB

2010-06-13 Thread Rick Westerfield
I love my Signalink. It effectively doubled my Winmor data rate.

Rick KH2DF

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 13, 2010, at 2:25 PM, kneiper flin...@comcast.net wrote:

Newbie to the digital scene and am looking for opinions on the above devices to 
be used with a Yeasu FT-747G. Right now I'm primarily interested in PSK31, 
MFSK16, and Hellschreiber.

Thanks,

Mike
KD8KZT