Re: [digitalradio] RFSM-8000 v.0536
I notice that they have the 75 bps very robust mode implemented. Has anyone tried this and compared it to Pactor 3's most robust mode? 73, Rick, KV9U dmitry_d2d wrote: > New releases RFSM-8000 v.0536 on http://rfsm2400.radioscanner.ru > >
Re: [digitalradio] RFSM 8000 Different pricing structure
Changing the pricing structure three times in a very short amount of time gives me concern to this marketing approach. The early adopters may not have been given a fair treatment or have they been given rebates? If these releases are 0.xxx, are they still considered to be beta efforts? Although some hams erroneously think that I oppose other hams or commercial companies from charging for their products, I want to make it clear that this is not the case. My major concern is that due to the drastically changing world we live in, it may no longer be possible to get enough to pay for software to arrive at a critical mass and make the mode useful for the purposes we want to employ. 73, Rick, KV9U Leskep wrote: > Just looked at the RFSM2400 site to check for new versions > and Dmitry has a new pricing structure for the Amateur version > of RFSM8000 with the release of ver .528 > > http://rfsm2400.radioscanner.ru/ > > Regards > Les VK2DSG > >
Re: [digitalradio] RFSM 8000
The standard shows multiple bit rates (3200, 4800, 6400, 8000 and 9600 bps), but all at 2400 Baud (symbols per second). 73, John KD6OZH - Original Message - From: "Leskep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 22:38 UTC Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM 8000 > Hi All > > Re RFSM2400 > > Dont think it is quite right to say it operates at 2400 baud - it operates > at 2400 bits per second > > > SEE > http://library.thinkquest.org/27887/gather/fundamentals/bare_basics.shtml > > for info regarding bits - bytes - bauds > > And Andy - you may well be more confused when you read from the above link > > Les VK2DSG > > > > -- > From: "John B. Stephensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 7:19 AM > To: > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM 8000 > >> From what I've seen, it implements MIL-STD-188-110B appendix C which >> operates at 2400 baud. It can be used in the HF phone/image segments for >> digital voice and facsimile and above 50.1 MHz for any purpose. >> >> 73, >> >> John >> KD6OZH >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: >> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:40 UTC >> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM 8000 >> >> >> Thanks John. >> >> Anyone in the USA care to remind us where on the bands the baud rates >> of RFSM can be used and where they cannot, and why ? I'm confused. >> >> Andy K3UK >> >> >> On Jan 27, 2008 11:06 PM, John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at > http://www.obriensweb.com/sked > > > DRCC contest info : http://www.obriensweb.com/drcc.htm > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked DRCC contest info : http://www.obriensweb.com/drcc.htm Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] RFSM 8000
Hi All Re RFSM2400 Dont think it is quite right to say it operates at 2400 baud - it operates at 2400 bits per second SEE http://library.thinkquest.org/27887/gather/fundamentals/bare_basics.shtml for info regarding bits - bytes - bauds And Andy - you may well be more confused when you read from the above link Les VK2DSG -- From: "John B. Stephensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 7:19 AM To: Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM 8000 > From what I've seen, it implements MIL-STD-188-110B appendix C which > operates at 2400 baud. It can be used in the HF phone/image segments for > digital voice and facsimile and above 50.1 MHz for any purpose. > > 73, > > John > KD6OZH > > - Original Message - > From: "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:40 UTC > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM 8000 > > > Thanks John. > > Anyone in the USA care to remind us where on the bands the baud rates > of RFSM can be used and where they cannot, and why ? I'm confused. > > Andy K3UK > > > On Jan 27, 2008 11:06 PM, John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked DRCC contest info : http://www.obriensweb.com/drcc.htm Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] RFSM 8000
>From what I've seen, it implements MIL-STD-188-110B appendix C which operates at 2400 baud. It can be used in the HF phone/image segments for digital voice and facsimile and above 50.1 MHz for any purpose. 73, John KD6OZH - Original Message - From: "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:40 UTC Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM 8000 Thanks John. Anyone in the USA care to remind us where on the bands the baud rates of RFSM can be used and where they cannot, and why ? I'm confused. Andy K3UK On Jan 27, 2008 11:06 PM, John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Couple of points about RFSM8000……… > > > > · Have been using this up here in VE land, version .527, and our > file transfer results are similar to what the VK's are running, around > 3000 > baud average. > > · we have a test station running 24/7 using either RFSM8000 or > ALE400, VE5GPM on 14103.0 .try a connect. It is also a mail server with > the > email address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] . If you are interested in testing or > want > to be involved in testing , contact me off list. > > · Have not had the opportunity to test this under average to poor > band conditions yet but are trying to put together a testing group to do > so. More difficult since rfsm8000 using mil std 188 modulation may or may > not be legal in the US, so have not pushed including US hams in the > testing > process. Can move to whatever frequency works in the US. > > · Like MultiPSK , RFSM8000 is a work in progress. Both Patrick and > Dmitry have put in long hours developing the software, and to suggest that > this software should be open source is an insult to both of these fine > gentlemen, in my humble opinion. > > · Dmity's price of $60 is not out of line to what the licensed > versions of MixW, MultiPSK and others are. Why shouldn't they gain some > reward, and they continue to supply a functional product that is freeware > , > just without all the bells and whistles? > > > > For emergency communications, the ideal program would have the simplicity > and speed of RFSM8000, the bandwidth and robustness of ALE400, and an > improved connection to the internet email over that presently offered with > RFSM8000 . > > > > Both Patrick and Dmitry are pretty talented individuals. would be nice to > see their directions converge into one super piece of software. > > > > John > > VE5MU > > -- Andy K3UK www.obriensweb.com (QSL via N2RJ) Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked DRCC contest info : http://www.obriensweb.com/drcc.htm Yahoo! Groups Links Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked DRCC contest info : http://www.obriensweb.com/drcc.htm Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] RFSM 8000
Thanks John. Anyone in the USA care to remind us where on the bands the baud rates of RFSM can be used and where they cannot, and why ? I'm confused. Andy K3UK On Jan 27, 2008 11:06 PM, John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Couple of points about RFSM8000……… > > > > · Have been using this up here in VE land, version .527, and our > file transfer results are similar to what the VK's are running, around 3000 > baud average. > > · we have a test station running 24/7 using either RFSM8000 or > ALE400, VE5GPM on 14103.0 .try a connect. It is also a mail server with the > email address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] . If you are interested in testing or want > to be involved in testing , contact me off list. > > · Have not had the opportunity to test this under average to poor > band conditions yet but are trying to put together a testing group to do > so. More difficult since rfsm8000 using mil std 188 modulation may or may > not be legal in the US, so have not pushed including US hams in the testing > process. Can move to whatever frequency works in the US. > > · Like MultiPSK , RFSM8000 is a work in progress. Both Patrick and > Dmitry have put in long hours developing the software, and to suggest that > this software should be open source is an insult to both of these fine > gentlemen, in my humble opinion. > > · Dmity's price of $60 is not out of line to what the licensed > versions of MixW, MultiPSK and others are. Why shouldn't they gain some > reward, and they continue to supply a functional product that is freeware , > just without all the bells and whistles? > > > > For emergency communications, the ideal program would have the simplicity > and speed of RFSM8000, the bandwidth and robustness of ALE400, and an > improved connection to the internet email over that presently offered with > RFSM8000 . > > > > Both Patrick and Dmitry are pretty talented individuals. would be nice to > see their directions converge into one super piece of software. > > > > John > > VE5MU > > -- Andy K3UK www.obriensweb.com (QSL via N2RJ) Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked DRCC contest info : http://www.obriensweb.com/drcc.htm Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
