Re: [digitalradio] Re: HF International Automatic Subbands

2009-11-23 Thread David Struebel
Bonnie,

Just a point... I don't believe the HF automatic sub bands are internationally 
recognized.

To my knowledge it is only the FCC in the US that has set up these automatic 
control sub bands.

73 Dave WB2FTX
  - Original Message - 
  From: expeditionradio 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 7:21 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] Re: HF International Automatic Subbands



   I would also like the ALE and digital community to 
   recognise that they share the bands with everyone else 
   Dave (G0DJA) 

  Hi Dave,

  While I can't speak for the whole digital community, 
  I can probably speak with some authority for 
  the ALE community... 

  ALE operators have been sharing the ham bands 
  for many many years without harmful interference. 
  This is primarily due to the way that ALE has been 
  adapted to amateur radio by hams, a protocol adaption 
  known as ham-friendly ALE. 

  99% of ALE operation is in organised emcomm networks 
  and 99% of the organised networks are operating in the 
  internationally recogised HF automatic sub-bands, 
  where automatic modes have been in use for many years. 

  73 Bonnie VR2/KQ6XA




  


--



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 9.0.709 / Virus Database: 270.14.79/2522 - Release Date: 11/23/09 
14:45:00


Re: [digitalradio] Re: HF International Automatic Subbands

2009-11-23 Thread Andy obrien
 When there's no emergency underway, however, the automatic bands are 
 available to all amateur stations, not just unattended stations. Its no more 
 acceptable for unattended stations to QRM ongoing QSOs in the automatic 
 bands than it is to QRM them anywhere else within the amateur spectrum.

 73,

 Dave, AA6YQ



Excuse me for being so dumb, Dave...  what is the purpose for allowing
unattended stations in a specific part of a band if they have to
listen to make sure a frequency is clear?  I don't get it.  Also, am
I wrong in thinking  that unattended versus automatic means the
same thing?


Hmm, in thinking back to the days that all this may have started,
packet days,   I remember that my TNC would not transmit a packet if
the TNC detected another station, it would wait a second or two.  is
this the difference , that unattended with busy detect is fine ?

Andy K3UK


Re: [digitalradio] Re: HF International Automatic Subbands

2009-11-23 Thread Charles Brabham
I agree 100% - and I operate an automated Packet station in one of the 
sub-bands. 

Fairly often, on weekends I see a good deal of RTTY contest activity there, and 
the RTTY guys have proven to be good nieghbors.

I use MixW as an HF Packet modem, which allows me to open up a second or third 
window in RTTY mode and read the mail during the contests. Seeing how much fun 
those guys have, I've decided that if I ever get into contesting, it will be in 
RTTY mode first.


73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL

Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at 
HamRadioNet.Org !

http://www.hamradionet.org

  - Original Message - 
  From: aa6yq 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 7:34 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] Re: HF International Automatic Subbands



  During an emergency, no one has a problem ceding frequencies to emcomm 
stations; its like heading for the shoulder when you hear an ambulance while 
driving.

  When there's no emergency underway, however, the automatic bands are 
available to all amateur stations, not just unattended stations. Its no more 
acceptable for unattended stations to QRM ongoing QSOs in the automatic bands 
than it is to QRM them anywhere else within the amateur spectrum.

  73,

  Dave, AA6YQ

  --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio expeditionra...@... 
wrote:
  
I would also like the ALE and digital community to 
recognise that they share the bands with everyone else 
Dave (G0DJA) 
   
   Hi Dave,
   
   While I can't speak for the whole digital community, 
   I can probably speak with some authority for 
   the ALE community... 
   
   ALE operators have been sharing the ham bands 
   for many many years without harmful interference. 
   This is primarily due to the way that ALE has been 
   adapted to amateur radio by hams, a protocol adaption 
   known as ham-friendly ALE. 
   
   99% of ALE operation is in organised emcomm networks 
   and 99% of the organised networks are operating in the 
   internationally recogised HF automatic sub-bands, 
   where automatic modes have been in use for many years. 
   
   73 Bonnie VR2/KQ6XA
  



  

RE: [digitalradio] Re: HF International Automatic Subbands

2009-11-23 Thread John Bradley
This is true that only the FCC has set up automatic sub-bands.

 

Most other countries adhere to the RECOMMENDATIONS of the IARU with respect
to where and how to operate but these do not

carry the force of law.  This, and years of good operating practices has
defined band operations. 

 

In Canada, amateurs are limited to a maximum power output, and a maximum
bandwidth (6khz) except on 30M where it is 1khz bandwidth. Even with the
freedom to operate any mode anywhere, the vast majority of operators more or
less follow the established band plans. 

 

John

VE5MU

 

From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of David Struebel
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 7:50 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: HF International Automatic Subbands

 

  

Bonnie,

 

Just a point... I don't believe the HF automatic sub bands are
internationally recognized.

 

To my knowledge it is only the FCC in the US that has set up these automatic
control sub bands.

 

73 Dave WB2FTX

- Original Message - 

From: expeditionradio mailto:expeditionra...@yahoo.com  

To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 7:21 PM

Subject: [digitalradio] Re: HF International Automatic Subbands

 

  

 I would also like the ALE and digital community to 
 recognise that they share the bands with everyone else 
 Dave (G0DJA) 

Hi Dave,

While I can't speak for the whole digital community, 
I can probably speak with some authority for 
the ALE community... 

ALE operators have been sharing the ham bands 
for many many years without harmful interference. 
This is primarily due to the way that ALE has been 
adapted to amateur radio by hams, a protocol adaption 
known as ham-friendly ALE. 

99% of ALE operation is in organised emcomm networks 
and 99% of the organised networks are operating in the 
internationally recogised HF automatic sub-bands, 
where automatic modes have been in use for many years. 

73 Bonnie VR2/KQ6XA



  _  


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.709 / Virus Database: 270.14.79/2522 - Release Date: 11/23/09
14:45:00