Hi Dave,
But did you not just state "In today's world, (e)
is arguably the most important"
To me your statement read that you placed 97.1(e) in the priority.
My purpose of the posting on Part 97.1 was to
make a point that the rules are very much
interpreted by all that read them, to include the
entire basis for the existence of the Amateur Radio Service.
I believe the bandwidth on this forum would be
much better utilized to discuss the technical
aspects of digital radio communications and to
assist our fellow Amateurs seeking help with the
digital modes rather than moving off focus. The
statement intent of intent for focus of this
forum lists many protocols and tools and I think is pretty clear as follows:
" This is a meeting place to discuss amateur
radio digital applications such as RTTY, CW,
PSK31,PSK63/125, MFSK16, Olivia-MFSK, PAX,
Chip64, DominoEX, THROB, ALE, PACTOR, AMTOR,
HELL, SSTV, Digital SSTV, and more. There are
several reflectors dedicated to these separate
modes but this group focuses on ALL digital
modes. Software applications such as MixW,
Logger32, MMVARI, MMTTY, MultiPSK, Hamscope,
Winwarbler/DXLAB, Digipan, etc, etc, are often
discussed. Theory of digital communications is
encouraged. Experimentation with new digital modes is also encouraged.
Questions from newcomers are welcome"
If is of course all up to Andy as to the direction personality of this forum.
Personally, I am interested in discussing many
aspects of Amateur Digital Communications and of
course those of which I am most involved will be
of more interest to me than ones that I am not so
much involved. I do not knock another digital
mode for its existence or use, I look for ways to
coexist with all modes. I am not pushing
anything, just interested in discussing the
technical aspects of technology and being of assistance,
this is where I am coming from in my use of this forum.
/s/ Steve, N2CKH
At 10:39 AM 8/27/2006, you wrote:
>No priority is stated, thus all of the principles set forth in §97.1
>are equally important.
>
>In particular, no one can claim that one activity is more important
>than another solely because its applicable principle has a lower
>ordinal.
>
>This is not a matter of interpretation. Regulations are explicit when
>they convey an order of priority.
>
>73,
>
> Dave, AA6YQ
>
>--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steve Hajducek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dave,
> >
> > We have a fundamental difference of opinion here
> > which I feel speaks volumes on your part.
> >
> > So tell us, as you feel 97.1(e) should be first,
> > what order would you place the others ?
> >
> >
> > /s/ Steve, N2CKH
> >
> > At 10:01 AM 8/27/2006, you wrote:
> > >There is no implied priority in the enumeration of principles in
> > >§97.1, Steve; had a priority been intended, it would have been made
> > >explicit.
> > >
> > >In today's world, (e) is arguably the most important.
> > >
> > > 73,
> > >
> > >Dave, AA6YQ
> >
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/