Re: [Discuss] Large DVI monitor

2011-08-07 Thread Shankar Viswanathan
2011/8/7 Shirley Márquez Dúlcey :
>> Recent high-end Radeon and NVidia video cards tend to come with
>> DisplayPort, too.
>
> I haven't seen that; the ones I've seen come with HDMI rather than
> DisplayPort. That doesn't mean that all of them do, but if I'm spending I'd
> rather have an HDMI port. DisplayPort never really caught on with anybody
> other than Apple, and it strikes me as a standard that has no good reason
> for existence; what technical advantage does it have over the more widely
> adopted HDMI? (I'm prepared to be enlightened if it actually has one.)

DP has two main differences compared to HDMI, one non-technical and
one technical:
 1. DP is an open royalty-free standard supported by VESA, HDMI has
royalties per connector. One is free to extend the DP standard for
customized applications (e.g. embedded markets)
 2. DP allows for a 720Mbps AUX channel that could be used for data
transfer. Most practical use is for touchscreens, DPMS and for using
it for USB data (think USB hubs in the monitor without needing a
separate USB cable). HDMI allows for a relatively low-speed "Consumer
Electronics Control" channel and is used by several consumer
electronics vendors for vendor-specific remote controls (e.g. Sony
BluRay player talking to Sony TV or Sony A/V receiver). DP also
supports multiple audio/video streams over the same cable.

Practically, you'll find most computer/graphics card vendors
supporting both DP & HDMI, though some may have only DP ports and ask
you to buy a separate DP -> HDMI dongle to connect to your TV (thus
passing the HDMI royalty fee to the dongle). IMHO, the DP connector is
more robust compared to HDMI.

A point to note is that both standards are continually evolving, and
the technical differences between the two are getting blurred with
each revision.

Hope this helps,
Shankar
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [Discuss] Large DVI monitor

2011-08-07 Thread Richard Pieri
On Aug 7, 2011, at 9:52 PM, Shirley Márquez Dúlcey wrote:
> 
> I haven't seen that; the ones I've seen come with HDMI rather than 
> DisplayPort. 

I have, but it isn't necessarily the high-end cards, nor are the two mutually 
exclusive.  I have a budget Radeon HD 5670, cost me $82 from Newegg earlier 
this year, that has one each DVI, HDMI and DisplayPort.  Overall, I've seen 
more DisplayPort than HDMI on non-Apple computer equipment, the exception being 
computer equipment intended for home theater applications.

--Rich P.

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [Discuss] Large DVI monitor

2011-08-07 Thread Shirley Márquez Dúlcey

On 8/7/2011 9:44 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:


Recent high-end Radeon and NVidia video cards tend to come with
DisplayPort, too.


I haven't seen that; the ones I've seen come with HDMI rather than 
DisplayPort. That doesn't mean that all of them do, but if I'm spending 
I'd rather have an HDMI port. DisplayPort never really caught on with 
anybody other than Apple, and it strikes me as a standard that has no 
good reason for existence; what technical advantage does it have over 
the more widely adopted HDMI? (I'm prepared to be enlightened if it 
actually has one.)



___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [Discuss] Large DVI monitor

2011-08-07 Thread Dan Ritter
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 09:22:23PM -0400, Shirley Márquez Dúlcey wrote:
> Monitors bigger than 1920x1200 will need a dual-link DVI connection
> if they don't have a DisplayPort input (which means pretty much
> anybody other than Apple), so make sure to get the dual-link DVI
> adapter for your MacBook Pro. (The first message said a Mac Pro
> which would be a desktop system but a later one said it was a
> MacBook Pro.) There are two versions of the DVI adapter; the
> dual-link one costs more.

Recent high-end Radeon and NVidia video cards tend to come with
DisplayPort, too.

-dsr-


-- 
http://tao.merseine.nu/~dsr/eula.html is hereby incorporated by reference.
You can't fight for freedom by taking away rights.
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [Discuss] Large DVI monitor

2011-08-07 Thread Shirley Márquez Dúlcey

On 8/7/2011 12:02 PM, Glenn Hoffman wrote:

I use a Mac Pro as my principle coding machine and am looking for a good, 
large, DVI monitor for it. Any suggestions?


If you want the highest resolution monitor you can get (leaving out the 
old IBM ultra-high-definition one that was only 21" and really meant for 
medical imaging rather than general use), pretty much any of the 30" 
ones are good if you can still find one. That includes Apple's old 
Cinema HD Display; they don't make them any more. (They're a victim of 
the manufacturing shift from 16:10 panels to 16:9 panels because the 
HDTV industry wants the latter aspect ratio.) HP's similar product is 
also gone, but Dell still makes one: the Dell UltraSharp U3011. At that 
size and price class, nobody makes cheap displays in either sense of the 
word. Those displays are 2560x1600.


Moving slightly down in size, the new 27" Apple display is nice but 
pricey; it's higher resolution than the usual 24" or smaller display but 
doesn't show quite as many pixels as the old Cinema HD. It will consume 
a lot less power because of the LED backlight. Make sure not to get the 
Thunderbolt Display; that only works with new Macs that have that port. 
Dell has a comparable product at the same $1000 price. These are 2560x1440.


Stepping down another notch, there are a few 1920x1200 24" displays 
still around, and lots of 1920x1080 displays in all sizes. Paying more 
tends to get you wider viewing angles, better color accuracy, faster 
pixel response, and/or LED backlighting.


If you want an physically larger display, DVI, DisplayPort, and HDMI use 
compatible signalling for video. (HDMI can also carry audio.) All you 
need is a cable adapter to go from one to the other, and then you can 
hook up the HDTV of your choice.


Monitors bigger than 1920x1200 will need a dual-link DVI connection if 
they don't have a DisplayPort input (which means pretty much anybody 
other than Apple), so make sure to get the dual-link DVI adapter for 
your MacBook Pro. (The first message said a Mac Pro which would be a 
desktop system but a later one said it was a MacBook Pro.) There are two 
versions of the DVI adapter; the dual-link one costs more.


There are also adapters to go from Thunderbolt to DVI, so the monitor 
won't be wasted if you later upgrade to a newer Mac.

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [Discuss] [OT] Apple is the AOL of consumer electronics

2011-08-07 Thread Richard Pieri
On Aug 7, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Tom Metro wrote:
> 
> I had the thought that Apple is the AOL of consumer electronics. Sure
> enough, not an original thought. Google finds, "Apple is the new AOL
> because of iPad, which offers a safe, easy way to consume content
> without venturing out onto the vast Information Superhighway."[1] (And
> deeper analysis in the latter half of this blog posting[2].)

Apple isn't the new AOL although it is easy to make that comparison.  The logic 
is deeply flawed, however, just as comparing Apple to Microsoft is flawed.  
Apple is neither hardware vendor nor software vendor, nor is it a service 
vendor despite selling hardware, software and services.  Apple is, as I've 
pointed out several times in the past, a user experience vendor.  It sells The 
Apple Experience.  The hardware, software and services are the packing used to 
deliver that experience.

Apple has no serious competition at this time.  Google and Microsoft are the 
most obvious contenders but neither are actually competing with Apple on the 
same field.  Google is a services company and Microsoft is a software company.  
That said, Microsoft has started to figure it out.  First with the hiring of 
dedicated UI people to work on Vista and Windows 7 and to further refine that 
work in Windows 8.  Second with the genuinely cross-platform Windows 8 with its 
single developer path for multiple devices.  This last is going to be very 
painful for both Microsoft and .NET developers alike but it needs to happen.  
Apple went through something similar twice in recent years, with the transition 
from OS 9 to OS X and then the transition from PowerPC to Intel.

Google isn't even trying to compete with Apple.  You can see it in the 
applications.  The most obvious thing about OS X applications is that they all 
look and act consistently.  The same goes for iOS applications.  I haven't seen 
any two different Google applications or services that do that.  Google Mail 
and Google Reader should be practically indistinguishable from each other, but 
they're not.  Google+ looks and acts like yet another completely different code 
base.  And that's not even looking at the "diversity" in Google's own Android 
applications.  It is, quite frankly, an unholy mess.

Not that everything is rosy for Apple.  While The Steve has a 10-year head 
start over Microsoft in the experience department, Google is at least 5 years 
ahead of Apple in on-line services, and it shows.  OS X Lion has been called 
the big step in the convergence of OS X and iOS.  It is this, but this isn't 
the biggest change.  Lion marks the shift from Macintosh as the digital hub, 
the core of Apple's strategy for the last decade, to the cloud, where Google 
and Amazon excel.

At the end, it is not a matter of picking a side.  It is a matter of picking 
hardware-software-service or user experience.

--Rich P.


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[Discuss] [OT] Apple is the AOL of consumer electronics

2011-08-07 Thread Tom Metro
I had the thought that Apple is the AOL of consumer electronics. Sure
enough, not an original thought. Google finds, "Apple is the new AOL
because of iPad, which offers a safe, easy way to consume content
without venturing out onto the vast Information Superhighway."[1] (And
deeper analysis in the latter half of this blog posting[2].)

1.
http://www.betanews.com/joewilcox/article/Apple-is-the-new-AOL-and-new-Microsoft-and-whoa-that-cant-be-a-good-thing/1275406379
2.
http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/is_the_ipad_a_disappointment_depends_when_you_sold_your_aol_stock.php

Anyway, my thought wasn't limited to the iPad and not quite as literal
as these comparisons between AOL's restricted information sources and
the similar restricted information sources on some Apple devices. (The
latter article makes the comparison that you can't deep link between iOS
apps. and it was this very lack of linking with the broader world that
was AOL's downfall.)

It was more along the lines of how those of us who knew the Internet,
and not Compuserve or AOL, was going to be the future, avoided AOL, even
if it offered some short term ease-of-use advantages.

I raise the point not for the purpose of Apple bashing, but instead to
ask the question, do these long term bets pay off for those of us who
bet on the "winning" side?

What if we are right, and the phone and tablet markets do evolve into
something that more closely resembles Android, or perhaps even more
open, like the PC market (was), what do we gain by avoiding the long
term losers in the short term?

You can argue that it is better for the market, and expedites reaching
the desired end-state, by investing in the long term solution, rather
than the easy short term solution, but that isn't necessarily in one's
best self-interest in the near term.

On the other hand, avoiding a siloed environment does potentially reduce
frustration, if you are the type of person who wants to be able to do
anything with the hardware you own, even at the price of using a less
polished end-product.

 -Tom

-- 
Tom Metro
Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA
"Enterprise solutions through open source."
Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [Discuss] Large DVI monitor

2011-08-07 Thread Richard Pieri
On Aug 7, 2011, at 2:41 PM, Rajiv Aaron Manglani wrote:
> 
> i love my 24" hp zr24w. hp also makes a 30" model, the zr30w. both have 
> mate-finish s-ips panels which have great uniformity, viewing angles, and 
> color reproduction. the apple displays use similar panels, and have a glossy 
> finish.

As a data point: Dell also uses the same panels that Apple uses.  This does not 
mean that you will see exactly the same thing if you put them side by side -- 
because you won't.  On the other hand, if you aren't doing professional work on 
it then you probably don't care.

--Rich P.

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [Discuss] Large DVI monitor

2011-08-07 Thread Rajiv Aaron Manglani
On Aug 7, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Glenn Hoffman wrote:

> I use a Mac Pro as my principle coding machine and am looking for a good, 
> large, DVI monitor for it. Any suggestions?

i love my 24" hp zr24w. hp also makes a 30" model, the zr30w. both have 
mate-finish s-ips panels which have great uniformity, viewing angles, and color 
reproduction. the apple displays use similar panels, and have a glossy finish.

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [Discuss] Power consumption

2011-08-07 Thread Tom Metro
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> The [stb from Verizon], surprisingly, whether Powered "on"
> or "off" maintained 15 watts continuous.

Were you inspired by one of the articles on this that made the rounds a
few months ago?

Our Set-Top Boxes Suck Up $3 Billion In Energy Every Year
http://gizmodo.com/5812142/our-dvrs-and-cable-boxes-suck-up-3-billion-in-energy-every-year

  ...the 160 million set-top boxes installed in 80% of American homes
  consume more than $3 billion in annual power costs. Mostly from after
  we turn them off.

  [Natural Resources Defense Council study said,] "In 2010, set-top
  boxes in the United States consumed approximately 27 billion
  kilowatt-hours of electricity, which is equivalent to the annual
  output of nine average (500 MW) coal-fired power plants."

  ..consider that a recent model HD-DVR consumes more power than an
  Energy Star-certified 42" LCD screen and consumes more than half the
  power of your new household refrigerator.


Jack Coats wrote:
> My guess is that the strip really contains a GFI.  They normally consume
> 1 to 3 watts.

Leakage through the line filter[1] used to suppress transient voltages
is more probable than a GFI on a common power strip.  (Most mid-range
power strips contain some sort of filtering. Rarely do they have a GFI.)
The filtering circuit contains components like capacitors that are
placed across the line.

1. http://www.cor.com/Series/PEM/C/ (see Electrical Schematics)

 -Tom

-- 
Tom Metro
Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA
"Enterprise solutions through open source."
Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [Discuss] Large DVI monitor

2011-08-07 Thread Richard Pieri
On Aug 7, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Glenn Hoffman wrote:
> 
> I use a Mac Pro as my principle coding machine and am looking for a good, 
> large, DVI monitor for it. Any suggestions?

Depends.  Are you doing professional work where things like Pantone color 
matching matters?  If so then get the Apple Cinema Display.  That's what it's 
made for -- and why it costs so much.

If not then any reasonably priced Samsung or ViewSonic should work just fine.

--Rich P.

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [Discuss] Large DVI monitor

2011-08-07 Thread Matt Shields
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Scott Ehrlich  wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Matt Shields  wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Glenn Hoffman 
> wrote:
> >
> >> I use a Mac Pro as my principle coding machine and am looking for a
> good,
> >> large, DVI monitor for it. Any suggestions?
> >>
> >> Glenn
> >> ___
> >> Discuss mailing list
> >> Discuss@blu.org
> >> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >>
> >
> > If you can afford it, go with the 27" Apple Cinema Display.  You won't
> > regret it.  I've had one for 6 months and it's amazing, now just need to
> > save up enough to buy one for my home office.
> >
>
> Displayport or dual-link DVI for the full resolution?
>
> Scott
>
> > Matthew Shields
> > Owner
> > BeanTown Host - Web Hosting, Domain Names, Dedicated Servers, Colocation,
> > Managed Services
> > www.beantownhost.com
> > www.sysadminvalley.com
> > www.jeeprally.com
> > ___
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss@blu.org
> > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
>

I'm using displayport to my MBP

Matthew Shields
Owner
BeanTown Host - Web Hosting, Domain Names, Dedicated Servers, Colocation,
Managed Services
www.beantownhost.com
www.sysadminvalley.com
www.jeeprally.com
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [Discuss] Large DVI monitor

2011-08-07 Thread Scott Ehrlich
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Matt Shields  wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Glenn Hoffman  wrote:
>
>> I use a Mac Pro as my principle coding machine and am looking for a good,
>> large, DVI monitor for it. Any suggestions?
>>
>> Glenn
>> ___
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss@blu.org
>> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
> If you can afford it, go with the 27" Apple Cinema Display.  You won't
> regret it.  I've had one for 6 months and it's amazing, now just need to
> save up enough to buy one for my home office.
>

Displayport or dual-link DVI for the full resolution?

Scott

> Matthew Shields
> Owner
> BeanTown Host - Web Hosting, Domain Names, Dedicated Servers, Colocation,
> Managed Services
> www.beantownhost.com
> www.sysadminvalley.com
> www.jeeprally.com
> ___
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@blu.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [Discuss] Large DVI monitor

2011-08-07 Thread Matt Shields
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Glenn Hoffman  wrote:

> I use a Mac Pro as my principle coding machine and am looking for a good,
> large, DVI monitor for it. Any suggestions?
>
> Glenn
> ___
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@blu.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>

If you can afford it, go with the 27" Apple Cinema Display.  You won't
regret it.  I've had one for 6 months and it's amazing, now just need to
save up enough to buy one for my home office.

Matthew Shields
Owner
BeanTown Host - Web Hosting, Domain Names, Dedicated Servers, Colocation,
Managed Services
www.beantownhost.com
www.sysadminvalley.com
www.jeeprally.com
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[Discuss] Large DVI monitor

2011-08-07 Thread Glenn Hoffman
I use a Mac Pro as my principle coding machine and am looking for a good, 
large, DVI monitor for it. Any suggestions?

Glenn
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [Discuss] Power consumption

2011-08-07 Thread Jack Coats
My guess is that the strip really contains a GFI.  They normally consume
1 to 3 watts.

We normally think of GFI outlets keeping us safe outdoors or in possibly
wet areas (kitchen, bathroom, near exterior windows), but the convenience
they provide does come at a continuing cost.

><> ... Jack


They are plugged into a power strip.The strip, when turned off,
> consumes just 1 watt.  Not sure why, but I can live with that compared
> to 20 watts.
>
> Scott
> ___
>
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[Discuss] Power consumption

2011-08-07 Thread Scott Ehrlich
We learn something new every day -

I just installed another stb from Verizon for our FIOS.   I picked up
the DCT700 (wedge-shaped) box, and wanted to measure its power
consumption.   It is connected to an "older" tube tv (13 inch) but
still works well.

Using my kill-o-watt:

The tv drew an average of 58 - 70 watts at any given time while on,
and 5 watts standby (or "off").

The dct700, surprisingly, whether Powered "on" or "off" maintained 15
watts continuous.

In summary, with the tv "off", both devices consumed a total of 20
watts continuous.

They are plugged into a power strip.The strip, when turned off,
consumes just 1 watt.  Not sure why, but I can live with that compared
to 20 watts.

Scott
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss