Re: [Discuss] GPG encryption and gmail
It sends content type text/HTML. We do not accept. HTML only messages. Mail.com sends multi-part/alternative which includes a plain text section and an HTML section that we discard Sent from Galaxy S6 Android Jerry Feldman <gaf.li...@gmail.com> Boston Linux and Unix http://www.blu.org PGP key id:3BC1EB90 PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66 C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90 On Sep 2, 2016 6:28 PM, <edwa...@linuxmail.org> wrote: Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 18:36:16 -0400 From: David Rosenstrauch < > dar...@darose.net> To: discuss@blu.org Subject: Re: [Discuss] GPG > encryption and gmail Message-ID: fbd3...@darose.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; > format=flowed On 09/01/2016 06:01 PM, edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote: > >> I would not recommend K-9. I found that it would repeatedly hang when >> trying to connect to either the Comcast or Gmail servers, while using it >> on multiple mobile networks. And once that occurs, a manual poll of any >> other account with K-9, would not go through. >> >> The only way to fix (?) this, would be do a Force Stop of K-9 each time >> it hung and relaunch the app. >> > I've used k-9 with gmail for years - as well as with my work email (MS > exchange server) and my home server email (exim/dovecot) - with no > issues. Not criticizing, just providing another data point. > > DR > K-9 worked perfectly a few years back, not known what had changed since then. But it clearly shouldn't hang the way it does. I've looked at other e-mail apps and really haven't found one yet that suits my needs. The one I'm using currently (mail.com), by default, sends e-mails as text/html, which I learned the BLU list server blocks, if I understood Jerry correctly. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [Discuss] GPG encryption and gmail
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 18:36:16 -0400 From: David Rosenstrauch <dar...@darose.net> To: discuss@blu.org Subject: Re: [Discuss] GPG encryption and gmail Message-ID: <ef8ff476-49d3-fb76-4342-ade5efbd3...@darose.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On 09/01/2016 06:01 PM, edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote: I would not recommend K-9. I found that it would repeatedly hang when trying to connect to either the Comcast or Gmail servers, while using it on multiple mobile networks. And once that occurs, a manual poll of any other account with K-9, would not go through. The only way to fix (?) this, would be do a Force Stop of K-9 each time it hung and relaunch the app. I've used k-9 with gmail for years - as well as with my work email (MS exchange server) and my home server email (exim/dovecot) - with no issues. Not criticizing, just providing another data point. DR K-9 worked perfectly a few years back, not known what had changed since then. But it clearly shouldn't hang the way it does. I've looked at other e-mail apps and really haven't found one yet that suits my needs. The one I'm using currently (mail.com), by default, sends e-mails as text/html, which I learned the BLU list server blocks, if I understood Jerry correctly. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [Discuss] GPG encryption and gmail
On 09/01/2016 06:01 PM, edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote: I would not recommend K-9. I found that it would repeatedly hang when trying to connect to either the Comcast or Gmail servers, while using it on multiple mobile networks. And once that occurs, a manual poll of any other account with K-9, would not go through. The only way to fix (?) this, would be do a Force Stop of K-9 each time it hung and relaunch the app. I've used k-9 with gmail for years - as well as with my work email (MS exchange server) and my home server email (exim/dovecot) - with no issues. Not criticizing, just providing another data point. DR ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [Discuss] GPG encryption and gmail
I would not recommend K-9. I found that it would repeatedly hang when trying to connect to either the Comcast or Gmail servers, while using it on multiple mobile networks. And once that occurs, a manual poll of any other account with K-9, would not go through. The only way to fix (?) this, would be do a Force Stop of K-9 each time it hung and relaunch the app. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [Discuss] GPG encryption and gmail
OH, I agree, which is why the new key, but it turns out GPG injection is possible, so someone could do it. Yeah, he¹s trying to starup, but it¹s not like open sourcing thing have help ed in the end see *racle. Anyway, Yes, Thunderbird has support on desktop. GPG Suite plugs in a bunch. I still don¹t understand why chromium doesn¹t support plugins at all. -Ben On 8/31/16, 11:14 PM, "Discuss on behalf of Kent Borg"wrote: >On 08/31/2016 11:04 PM, Ben Carr wrote: >> It does GPG injection of Outlook and Google, the dev is also SUPER SUPER >> responsive, thought not open to relicensing the code. > >Which doesn't very open source. > >-kb, the Kent who sees little reason to trust security code that no is >supposed to look at. > >___ >Discuss mailing list >Discuss@blu.org >http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [Discuss] GPG encryption and gmail
On 08/31/2016 11:04 PM, Ben Carr wrote: It does GPG injection of Outlook and Google, the dev is also SUPER SUPER responsive, thought not open to relicensing the code. Which doesn't very open source. -kb, the Kent who sees little reason to trust security code that no is supposed to look at. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [Discuss] GPG encryption and gmail
There is another option, not sure I feel about it, I generated a new key to test: ExtensionJumble Email Encryption offered by https://www.jumble.io https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/jumble-email-encryption/fjiggkonckoakfpobglkbckakfgcnidh?hl=en It does GPG injection of Outlook and Google, the dev is also SUPER SUPER responsive, thought not open to relicensing the code. On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Kent Borgwrote: > On 08/31/2016 07:58 PM, Rich Pieri wrote: > >> Actually, I suggest not using Android at all in this capacity. Android >> is not a secure, reliable platform. >> > > Good point. > > I don't dare use Android for anything sensitive, it is too big a target, > too weakly secured. I use NO Android banking apps. (Were I an Apple type, > same answer.) > > Actually, I do use a cheap and very off-brand Android phone for sensitive > stuff--but I keep it /incommunicado/. I have never put a SIM in it (it came > from Hong Kong, it is all international, it has two SIM slots!). I have > never let it connect to the internet. So I don't need to trust it so much. > > But my daily phone and Nexus 7 tablet? No way I will type any sensitive > passwords on either of them. > > My e-mail? Not so sensitive. I don't bother to encrypt messages. > > If I had really sensitive e-mail, how would I do that? An interesting > question. It would depend on the details: What am I doing that is so damn > special and who might be after it? How hard might they try? How much money > do they have to spend, how good is the sound proofing where they keep the > $5 wrenches (https://xkcd.com/538/)? > > There is a general-purpose good reason to encrypt e-mail: to make life > harder for the spies. More encrypted traffic means more inaccessible hay > for them to stack up in frustration. > > -kb > > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [Discuss] GPG encryption and gmail
On 08/31/2016 07:58 PM, Rich Pieri wrote: Actually, I suggest not using Android at all in this capacity. Android is not a secure, reliable platform. Good point. I don't dare use Android for anything sensitive, it is too big a target, too weakly secured. I use NO Android banking apps. (Were I an Apple type, same answer.) Actually, I do use a cheap and very off-brand Android phone for sensitive stuff--but I keep it /incommunicado/. I have never put a SIM in it (it came from Hong Kong, it is all international, it has two SIM slots!). I have never let it connect to the internet. So I don't need to trust it so much. But my daily phone and Nexus 7 tablet? No way I will type any sensitive passwords on either of them. My e-mail? Not so sensitive. I don't bother to encrypt messages. If I had really sensitive e-mail, how would I do that? An interesting question. It would depend on the details: What am I doing that is so damn special and who might be after it? How hard might they try? How much money do they have to spend, how good is the sound proofing where they keep the $5 wrenches (https://xkcd.com/538/)? There is a general-purpose good reason to encrypt e-mail: to make life harder for the spies. More encrypted traffic means more inaccessible hay for them to stack up in frustration. -kb ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [Discuss] GPG encryption and gmail
On 8/31/2016 4:05 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote: > I'm weaning away from Thunderbird for a few reasons, but I don't like the > way Thunderbird handles folders with respect to gmail's labels. That's because Gmail's labels aren't folders and don't quite act like folders. You'll have similar quirky behavior with any IMAP client, not just Thunderbird. > Also, I have not looked into encrypting emails in Android yet. K-9 Mail with OpenKeychain. Don't use APG. It's effectively unmaintained with known security vulnerabilities which have gone unfixed for several years. Actually, I suggest not using Android at all in this capacity. Android is not a secure, reliable platform. -- Rich P. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [Discuss] GPG encryption and gmail
AFIK, the only mail client on Android that works with APG (and a few others) is K-9. I did try out K-9 a few years ago but went back to the gmail app. It is worth another try. On 08/31/2016 04:25 PM, Kent Borg wrote: On 08/31/2016 04:05 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote: Also, I have not looked into encrypting emails in Android yet. I use K-9 Mail on Android a little, it doesn't do any spam filtering, and that gets overwhelming, so I don't use it much. It seems willing to talk to APG for its PGP service, which I have installed, but haven't tried it. -- Jerry FeldmanBoston Linux and Unix http://www.blu.org PGP key id:B7F14F2F PGP Key fingerprint: D937 A424 4836 E052 2E1B 8DC6 24D7 000F B7F1 4F2F ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [Discuss] GPG encryption and gmail
On 08/31/2016 04:05 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote: Also, I have not looked into encrypting emails in Android yet. I use K-9 Mail on Android a little, it doesn't do any spam filtering, and that gets overwhelming, so I don't use it much. It seems willing to talk to APG for its PGP service, which I have installed, but haven't tried it. -kb ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[Discuss] GPG encryption and gmail
As we are nearing the September GPG key signing party, I was wondering if anyone has tried out webmail packages like mailvelope and other browser extensions for gmail. I know that clients like Thunderbird and Evolution do it. I'm weaning away from Thunderbird for a few reasons, but I don't like the way Thunderbird handles folders with respect to gmail's labels. Also, I have not looked into encrypting emails in Android yet. -- -- Jerry FeldmanBoston Linux and Unix PGP key id: B7F14F2F Key fingerprint: D937 A424 4836 E052 2E1B 8DC6 24D7 000F B7F1 4F2F ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss