[tdf-discuss] Text Object view problems after copy / paste

[Rainer Bielefeld]

Hi,

can someone confirm problems from
 with other OS than 
WIN? Please comment in the Bug!


Best regards

Rainer

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Re: [tdf-discuss] 64bit now works in OO

[Rene Engelhard]

On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:18:21PM -0500, Susan Cragin wrote:
> >On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 11:52 -0500, Susan Cragin wrote:
> >> LibO_3.3.0rc1_Linux_x86-64 is based on that earlier version that still had 
> >> bugs.
> >
> >So, may I ask what the bugs are?
> 
> I don't know. I'm not a programmer, nor affiliated with OO. 
> Just a user who just switched from Ubuntu 32-bit to Ubuntu 64-bit. 
> LibO ran great in 32-bit, and I became dependent upon the ability to fold 
> sections in Navigator.  
> 
> I can only tell you this, LibO's current 64-bit version does not run, at 
> least on my Intel core duo machine.
> 
> @ubuntu:/opt/libreoffice/program$ swriter
> swriter: command not found

Of course that doesn't work. swriter apparently is not in $PATH (and you didn't 
use ./swriter).
The current dir is not in the path per default (is a security issue)

Grüße/Regards,

René

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Re: [tdf-discuss] Bring up libreoffice.org website to world *now*

[Italo Vignoli]

Johannes A. Bodwing December 8, 2010 10:20 PM:



Stands LO in the competition with every other Office-Suite? Or will it
be a work for fun till the fun is gone and than there will be something
else (like it was said some times ago on OOo in a greater dispute)?


Of course.


If LO accepts this challenge (competition with other Suites), than
everything is based on the next question:
What has to do that LO becomes the best Office Suite, better than the
rest and for a long time? That so many people as possible are sure of LO
is the best they could find for Office-Work in private and business or
profession.


First, being known, and when I say being know I mean being exposed at 
least a dozen times per year to any prospect user, as this is the number 
of times they read about MS Office.


When you reach this first target, then we can discuss about other 
targets. In Italy, when we have reached this objective we have realized 
that we were at 15% market share, with 50 volunteers, no money at all, 
the product that you know and a lame web site.


Something similar happened in France and Germany.


And this leads automaticly to the most useful website-design, to the
best marketing, the features we need, how many money, how many people
and so on.

In my opinion OOo ignored this to long. And LO copies some of that.


TDF will have some money, but not enough money to compete with MS 
Office, some people, but not as many as MS Office, some features, but 
features are just bullshit for 80% of users (provided that LO has all 
the features needed by this 80% of users, which is already true), but we 
will have more fun, more enthusiasm and more brainpower than MS.


TDF will be a case history for guerrilla marketing, not for marketing 
warfare.


-- Italo Vignoli - The Document Foundation
E-mail: italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org
Mobile +39.348.5653829 - VoIP: +39.02.320621813
Skype: italovignoli - GTalk: italo.vign...@gmail.com

-- Italo Vignoli
italo.vign...@gmail.com
Mobile +39.348.5653829
VoIP: +39.02.320621813
Skype: italovignoli

--
Italo Vignoli
italo.vign...@gmail.com
Mobile +39.348.5653829
VoIP: +39.02.320621813
Skype: italovignoli

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***