Re: [steering-discuss] Add LGPL as license for wiki uploads?
Hi, Bernhard Dippold wrote on 2010-12-18 01.29: I don't know if it should read and instead of or: The selection is presented to the author of the upload, so she has to license her work under all the three of them, if she choose this option. Or is for the people using the uploaded content, as they can choose between the licenses. good point. Thanks, but... 1) the text is too long for the selection list Perhaps you could write: CC Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 / LGPL 3+ / MPL 1.1 Changed it now to CC Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0, and LGPL 3+, and MPL 1.1 and move the long version to the template? 2) the template showing the license texts (or linking to them) hasn't been created by now. Which template? Florian -- Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] Re: Add LGPL as license for wiki uploads?
Hi, Dr. Bernhard Dippold wrote on 2010-12-18 12.23: Once you chose a license, a template is added to the page. For the CC by-sa license I created http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Template:CC-by-sa-3.0 because I got a redlink when wanted to license my first upload. (As I didn't read any negative feedback, I hope the wording is allright) The new license doesn't have a template containing the license information / links to the license texts, so I got a redlink again. But instead of describing what I think has to be done, I just managed to write a short description and added the necessary links: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Template:CC-by-sa-LGPL-MPL Please improve my wording and/or change the links if necessary. ah, thanks for clarifying! Don't have the time for this before my Christmas vacation, but if someone wants to improve the wording (if necessary :-) let me know, I can then upload the modified text. Florian -- Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] [website][drupal] The Drupal website development update - December 2010
I thought it was about time to share some of the progress that the Drupal website development team has made since the last update. You can view the progress of the site at www.libreofficeaustralia.org (Note that international pages have not yet been setup) I would like to express my thanks to everyone who has been contributing to the Drupal site development so far, the development of the workflows and behind the scenes systems is fantastic. Since the last update we have: Put together a temporary theme (So people can get a feel for the site) Created a video support section, where authorised people can submit externally hosted tutorial videos Refined some of the forums systems (Still working on the mailing list type functionality) Created a governance system whereby SC members can propose agendas and submit meeting minutes The system automatically displays info on the next upcoming meeting from proposed agendas and you can play minutes recordings without downloading the file Setup a facebook support page where anyone can ask questions. We are currently working on ways for two way communication with FB and other social networks. In the process of creating an interactive FAQ section Creating the concept for the brainstorm system - This is a big undertaking and needs to be planned carefully for integration with other systems Interactive Project Teams now have their own forums and announcement areas (restricted posting to team members only) There are many other facets of work which I will not go into right now, but suffice to say that I am very proud of the work that the Drupal Website Development Team is doing. We will soon have more contact with the project teams to refine and revise the work we have implemented to suit their UI and workflow needs. The main area which we will concentrate on after the new year will be internationalisation and working with the native language teams to adapt our website design to suit their needs and incorporate suggestions from those teams across all languages. Again, a huge thankyou to all of those who have been involved with the development so far. There is still a lot of development to go for the resulting community site ,I encourage you to get more involved (time permitting) now, or after LibreOffice 3.3 has been released into the wild. Michael Wheatland -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] [Change executable names] Re: Digest of discuss@documentfoundation.org issue 127 (3742-3762)
Il 18/12/2010 14:21, MiguelAngel ha scritto: What is critical and impossible? The associations are with a executable file in a specific path. No problem for two files with same name in different paths. No problem to change the association to an executable file with the same name in a different path. Libo 3.3rc1 and OOo 3.3rc8 on same disk, also OOo 3.2.1 in a portable mode (3.2.1 over 3.2.0 portable) On 18/12/10 2:09, NoOp wrote: On 12/17/2010 05:53 AM, Jaime R. Garza wrote: As many others already commented, I believe it's time that LibreOffice changes the names of some of the individual applications, my humble proposal: Write Spread I think Calc is better than Spread because point out the application main purpose that is to execute many *calcs* rather than being mainly (a) spread (sheet), isn't it? However I think for 3.3 it is better to maintain the OOo names and then (3.4, 4.0, ...) rethinking icons, names and so on. Carlo Present Draw Formula Base This is critical when attempting to have OOo and LibO co-exist on Windows. - LO takes over all OOo application defaults icons. - LO uses the same executable names as OOo (soffice.exe, swriter.exe, etc). This makes it impossible to select an .odt and re-associate it with OOo. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] [Change executable names] Re: Digest of discuss@documentfoundation.org issue 127 (3742-3762)
On 12/18/2010 7:52 AM, Carlo Strata wrote: Il 18/12/2010 14:21, MiguelAngel ha scritto: What is critical and impossible? The associations are with a executable file in a specific path. No problem for two files with same name in different paths. No problem to change the association to an executable file with the same name in a different path. Libo 3.3rc1 and OOo 3.3rc8 on same disk, also OOo 3.2.1 in a portable mode (3.2.1 over 3.2.0 portable) On 18/12/10 2:09, NoOp wrote: On 12/17/2010 05:53 AM, Jaime R. Garza wrote: As many others already commented, I believe it's time that LibreOffice changes the names of some of the individual applications, my humble proposal: Write Spread I think Calc is better than Spread because point out the application main purpose that is to execute many *calcs* rather than being mainly (a) spread (sheet), isn't it? Several people have commented here that Calc sounds like a calculator program, not one with the kinds of features a spreadsheet provides. A spreadsheet is well understood to provide not only calculations, but also simple database-type and text layout capabilities -- there are plenty of people who use a spreadsheet when what they're really doing is creating a text document! Spreadsheet includes, but is not limited to, calculations, so being a spreadsheet is more accurate. It truly is the purpose of Calc (or Spread, or whatever we call it). However I think for 3.3 it is better to maintain the OOo names and then (3.4, 4.0, ...) rethinking icons, names and so on. Any documentation released with the first LibO will necessarily have the old names to avoid delays, but we'll need this determined soon for the development of LibO-specific documentation. Carlo -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] [website][drupal] The Drupal website development update - December 2010
Thanks to this group for all the work. After working on a Drupal site for a F/OSS Fest in the U.S., I appreciate how much work this can be. Carl On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Michael Wheatland mich...@wheatland.com.au wrote: I thought it was about time to share some of the progress that the Drupal website development team has made since the last update. You can view the progress of the site at www.libreofficeaustralia.org (Note that international pages have not yet been setup) I would like to express my thanks to everyone who has been contributing to the Drupal site development so far, the development of the workflows and behind the scenes systems is fantastic. Since the last update we have: Put together a temporary theme (So people can get a feel for the site) Created a video support section, where authorised people can submit externally hosted tutorial videos Refined some of the forums systems (Still working on the mailing list type functionality) Created a governance system whereby SC members can propose agendas and submit meeting minutes The system automatically displays info on the next upcoming meeting from proposed agendas and you can play minutes recordings without downloading the file Setup a facebook support page where anyone can ask questions. We are currently working on ways for two way communication with FB and other social networks. In the process of creating an interactive FAQ section Creating the concept for the brainstorm system - This is a big undertaking and needs to be planned carefully for integration with other systems Interactive Project Teams now have their own forums and announcement areas (restricted posting to team members only) There are many other facets of work which I will not go into right now, but suffice to say that I am very proud of the work that the Drupal Website Development Team is doing. We will soon have more contact with the project teams to refine and revise the work we have implemented to suit their UI and workflow needs. The main area which we will concentrate on after the new year will be internationalisation and working with the native language teams to adapt our website design to suit their needs and incorporate suggestions from those teams across all languages. Again, a huge thankyou to all of those who have been involved with the development so far. There is still a lot of development to go for the resulting community site ,I encourage you to get more involved (time permitting) now, or after LibreOffice 3.3 has been released into the wild. Michael Wheatland -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] [Change executable names] Re: Digest of discuss@documentfoundation.org issue 127 (3742-3762)
NoOp wrote: On 12/17/2010 05:53 AM, Jaime R. Garza wrote: As many others already commented, I believe it's time that LibreOffice changes the names of some of the individual applications, my humble proposal: Write Spread Present Draw Formula Base This is critical when attempting to have OOo and LibO co-exist on Windows. - LO takes over all OOo application defaults icons. - LO uses the same executable names as OOo (soffice.exe, swriter.exe, etc). This makes it impossible to select an .odt and re-associate it with OOo. Instead of this I think that LO should have all its own extensions and accessories and should completely divorce itself from OOo sooner rather than later. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
