Re: [tdf-discuss] Two simple writer annoyances

2011-05-02 Thread Ian Lynch
On 1 May 2011 11:22, Sigrid Carrera sigrid.carr...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Hi Alexander,

 On Sun, 01 May 2011 07:16:37 +0200
 Alexander Ostuni folkfr...@gmx.de wrote:

  Yes, it is build to produce Dokuments and because of that I need to
  rotate a picture. I work in a bank. We have restrictions on the
  installed programms. I am not allowed to install any application that
  can rotate pictures.
  I have to create our formulars/documents. Each of them has a barcode. I
  get the barcodes horizontally but need them vertically in the
  formulars/dokuments.
  In MS word I can rotate them, in LO (wich is allowed in our bank and
  also the software we shall use over Word) not, so I can't use LO but
  have to use Word.



 If you have LibO on your computer, why don't you use then Draw to rotate
 the barcode? Sure, it is more convenient to have that feature in Writer, but
 Draw is the specialised component for drawings and it has a lot more
 functions and capabilities, that you could ever built into a text processing
 component.


Good point. I'm probably just out of the habit of using Draw because I find
Inkscape better for me in many ways.  On the other hand, being able to right
click on an image and rotate it situ is a bit more elegant than having to
OLE to Draw just for a simple change in position, size or orientation.
Personally I think you should be able to adjust size and position in situ
and just go to Draw if you need to edit. Just seems better ergonomics. The
case of the barcode shows that going to Draw is probably not intutitive for
most users and that is also quite an important consideration.


 Sigrid

 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted




-- 
Ian

Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications
The Schools ITQ

www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940

You have received this email from the following company: The Learning
Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79
8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: Two simple writer annoyances

2011-05-02 Thread JFL

Krabina Bernhard wrote:
 
 Hi,
 I think there are two annoyances in writer that should not be that hard to
 fix. I hope someone can fix these:
 1. Why can't writer have image descriptions ABOVE the image as well? It
 can do it with tables, but with images, image captions have to be below
 the image...
 2. Why can't writer have the possibility to rotate an image...
 regards,
 Berhard
 
Hello Berhard
You can flip upside-down a picture in writer if this can bring some help :
left-flick the picture, tab picture, check flip Vertically and Horizontally.
Greetings.
JFL


--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Two-simple-writer-annoyances-tp2878308p2889784.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: Two simple writer annoyances

2011-05-02 Thread JFL

Alexander Ostuni wrote:
 
 Yes, it is build to produce Dokuments and because of that I need to 
 rotate a picture. I work in a bank. We have restrictions on the 
 installed programms. I am not allowed to install any application that 
 can rotate pictures.
 I have to create our formulars/documents. Each of them has a barcode. I 
 get the barcodes horizontally but need them vertically in the 
 formulars/dokuments.
 In MS word I can rotate them, in LO (wich is allowed in our bank and 
 also the software we shall use over Word) not, so I can't use LO but 
 have to use Word.
 
 So,a big yes. I need that function, too.
 
 Alex
 

Hi Alex.
Have you considered the use of a barcode font ? Your IT department should be
less twitchy about deploying a font than a full fledged graphic editing
program. You could then add a barcode style  in your doc with 90 or 270
degrees rotation.
Greetings
JFL


--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Two-simple-writer-annoyances-tp2878308p2889818.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: Forums - A Different Question

2011-05-02 Thread NoOp
On 04/30/2011 01:56 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
 Harold Fuchs wrote:
 Has Oracle given permission for TDF to use its forum, or doesn't TDF need 
 such permission? Does TDF *want* to use an Oracle resource?
 
 I think Drew has already explained this on multiple mailing lists,
 anyway: the forums at http://user.services.openoffice.org/ are run by
 community members and not by Oracle, they explicitly include LibreOffice
 among the supported software (see page header), they can be used with no
 need for permissions from Oracle, and they are probably the best place
 where LibreOffice users can get support if they don't like mailing
 lists.
 
 Regards,
   Andrea.
 
 

Sorry, but I'd have to disagree...
http://openoffice.org/terms_of_use
The resources are owned and operated by Oracle.

Whilst http://user.services.openoffice.org may (currently) tolerate LO
posts, certainly LO/TDF should prefer to not continue to send
users/prospective users to OOo properties for support and answers
regarding LO. Doing so is akin to having OOo send users/prospective
users to the LO users list for support.






-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted