[tdf-discuss] Re: Hackfest - September 9th, Ohio Linux Fest
Seems to me this thread used to be longer in Nabble 8-0 I am still interested Drew and I had this thought: Even if a HackFest can't be drawn together it would be very useful to the attendees and LibreOffice to have at least a table where people could report issues (as new or as confirmation of existing issues), get coaching on appropriate upgrades, and maybe do a little testing around their known issues, hard to reproduce issues or just visit areas that are important to them as users. Seems like an excellent chance for solid feedback from committed and skillful users. LeMoyne -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Hackfest-September-9th-Ohio-Linux-Fest-tp3069297p3089492.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: Availability of source code (Was: Re: OFF TOPIC about GPL enforcement (Was: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice))
Dennis, Tanstaafl, I take your point. Users that have 3.3.2 installed can only get the code for 3.3.3 from the website. As discussed above, I think this meets the spirit of the license but not the specific letter. Simon's idea about downloading the repo at the 3.3.2 marker is a great one, but there is no path to that on either website or wiki. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Availability-of-source-code-Was-Re-OFF-TOPIC-about-GPL-enforcement-Was-Re-tdf-discuss-Re-Libreoffice-tp3078442p3087960.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] Re: Simple solution to avoid #VALUE required
I put another workaround example on the bug -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37860 Can reuse same condition that determines whether source term is Blank or Numeric. I fully appreciate attempts to improve VBA interop as this is the way LO can gain placement on the myriad desktops stalling at XP waiting for a better solution than tithing to M$0. The Basic module has VBA_Interop (sp?) flag(s?) but in some places they make the Basic core logic more complex and hard to understand/maintain. I am all for a standard solution that treats empty strings, blanks strings and all other nothings as zeros in math context, but see the need for the VBA style results as well, however bizarre they are. Dang needy M$ - nothing is not acceptable - give me VALUE NOW!!! :-0 jlc -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Simple-solution-to-avoid-VALUE-required-tp3030643p3038328.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
