Re: [Libreoffice] [tdf-discuss] Re: EasyHack on EasyHacks
Am 29.03.2011 23:24, schrieb Norbert Thiebaud: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Michael Meeks > wrote: >> >>I'd also like to hear from some of our new developers that liked that >> page - again, on the dev list. >> > The easy hack page has hugely grown since I started. I guess that is a > good thing, but in my opinion it's current form is not very practical > nor inviting. > > I think that grouping easy-hack by 'nature' and then by difficulty do > make sense. Difficulty is a very subjective measure, > and something that is a 'easy gui hack' for someone may be a daunting > task for someone else... when I was parsing this > list I would first look at the title, then the skill required and > _then_ the degree of difficulty announced - mostly to > verify my first impression based on the previous 2 items. > So, I do like the 'nature' oriented classification proposed, but maybe > we could keep a one line overview of each task with a link for a > dedicated page per task > That way, a given task can be expended with as much information as > needed without flooding the main page, including volunteer's progress > report, declaration of intent and/or > questions/answer section to clarify the task if need be. > > That way the main page still give a global overview of all easy-hack, > but become much more readable... > If the task are limited, on the main page to a one-liner, then the ToC > doesn't have to be 3 pages long > > Norbert > just a question: Is there a database in the wiki? in this case could we build a table with the necessary variables and display the tasks by selection of skills and difficulty? Regards Karl-Heinz -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Sorry wrong list Re: [tdf-discuss] Und schon wieder eine Frage zu Übersetzungen
Am 16.02.2011 15:38, schrieb Karl-Heinz Gödderz: > Hallo, > > ich stoße in den englischen Texten ab und zu auf Schlagworte wie > "dispatch framework". Gibt es eine Stelle, an der ich nachsehen kann, > wie dieser Terminus technicus zu übersetzen ist, wenn überhaupt. Ich > denke dabei insbesondere an eine Konsistenz zwischen Dokumentation, > Onlinehilfe und Hilfe. > > Gruß > Karl-Heinz > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] Und schon wieder eine Frage zu Übersetzungen
Hallo, ich stoße in den englischen Texten ab und zu auf Schlagworte wie "dispatch framework". Gibt es eine Stelle, an der ich nachsehen kann, wie dieser Terminus technicus zu übersetzen ist, wenn überhaupt. Ich denke dabei insbesondere an eine Konsistenz zwischen Dokumentation, Onlinehilfe und Hilfe. Gruß Karl-Heinz -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] Trademark Policy of the Document Foundation
Michael Meeks schrieb: > Hi there, > > On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 15:46 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > > There is some concern about the lack of clarity on whether > incorporating libreoffice (or other marks) into a domain name > is allowed - this is an area people often want to tread on, and > we should probably directly address it. > > > So I suggest we add a clarification of both of these to the end of the > "Non permitted use section". > > "Thus uses of the Marks in a domain name, or business name >without explicit written permission from TDF are prohibited." > > > > So - do people have problems with any of that ? > > > So what about all the sites built in best intentions to support LibreOffice and that are not under the control of TDF. I would prefer to say that TDF can demand not to use the name, when it is misused(right word?). In the other way TDF gives his placet once and if the domain does forbidden things, they can state they have a permission so there should be a revokation too. I don't know if I could make me clear. Regards Karl-Heinz -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] [Forum]How will the forum be organized?
Hi, Stefan Weigel schrieb: > Hi, > > Am 10.01.2011 00:51, schrieb Sigrid Carrera: > > >> Reason for not using those forums was that there are already a few >> (good!) fora out there and we don't want to fight against them. In >> contrast, I think, it was planned to link to those forums from our >> website. >> > That´s why I even advocate closing down http://libreofficeforum.org/ > > However, there is lots of discussion about creating yet another > forum. And I fear lots of energy is being put into this. Kind of > makes me desperate. > > Stefan Just a question: Are they LibO-fora? OOo-fora? or mixed fora? is there any other forum only for LibO ? my 2 cent Karl-Heinz -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [steering-discuss] By-Laws / BOD elections
Charles-H. Schulz schrieb: > Hello Varun > > > Le Wed, 17 Nov 2010 06:08:01 +0800, > Varun Mittal a écrit : > > >> Hi All, >> >> Maybe we can have a JCP like system wherein all members vote. >> >> We can also give the sponsors a particular number of seats ( non-veto >> powers) to the sponsors who have supported it . >> >> I propose not exactly a JCP like system but we can look at a modified >> version of JCP voting system >> >> What do you guys feel ? >> > > I am very much against your proposal that sponsors could have more > seats or something similar. One Member = One Vote. Clear and Simple. > > +1 > OTOH, I am not familiar with the JCP voting process. > But if I may suggest: perhaps that level of details does not need to be > mentioned in the bylaws? Keep in mind that everything we put there will > automatically be difficult to change. > > The difficulty of changing the voting procedure is a point to mention it in the by-laws. It shows from the beginning a distinct procedure of voting (whatever it looks like). This gives a reliability to each member/sponsor etc. that the voting-process isn't changeable that easy. Nobody must fear, that for the next election her/his vote doesn't count any more because a minority/small majority thinks to have found a better way of election. just 0,02 € Karl-Heinz -- E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/steering-discuss/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] About Cacert SSL certificates (was: Feature request for 3.3 still possible?)
Guy Voets schrieb: >> It's happening because the project is using a free certificate >> provider (http://cacert.org). Cacert is not configured in most >> browsers as one of the "trusted providers". However, technically, >> their certificates do their job just fine. It's a "political" thing. >> Certificates are sold by corporations such as Verisign for quite a lot >> of money, and the big boys don't like a free provider like Cacert >> spoiling their otherwise-captive market. Don't worry, you can accept >> the certificate and add it to your browser's list of trusted >> providers. Neither Cacert nor the bug tracker site is trying to scam >> you. >> >> I've seen this question posted before a few times, so I'll post this >> answer in a dedicated thread. HTH. >> >> David Nelson >> > > Thanks David for the explanation. > By that: is LibO also with CAcert? Regards Karl-Heinz -- Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] [SC] How to define "Membership" within TDF?
Hi, André Schnabel schrieb: <> > One of the very basic questions to answer is: > "Who is a member at TDF." > Is there meant the membership in the TDF or in the LibreOffice-Community? > Well - we (the Steering Committee) do not have a detailed answer on > this, as we think that the voice of our contributors should be > respected for this very important topic. So we want to discuss this > here, before we come to a decision. > > To get things started, I put some notes at the wiki: >http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Membership > <> In my eyes this means a user, only watching the users-supportlist can not be a member of the community? Or how much mails has he/she to send with helpful tips to become a member of the community? How will you measure the contribution? Or depends it on the willing of others, higher in the hierarchy (with boardmembers highest), if a contribution is a contribution? Regards Karl-Heinz -- E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] [WEBSITE] Improvements for the wiki?
Christoph Noack schrieb: > Good evening everyone, > > the subject already tells you, this mail is about Wiki improvements. > > but no matter what wiki you use, plese set it up in a way that *all* languages are in this one. So we do not have tobuild a wiki for each language. cheers Karl-Heinz -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Re: [tdf-discuss] [MAILING LIST] interim structuring - a proposal
Bernhard Dippold schrieb: > > [BUGS] > discussions/proposals about *bugs* in LibreOffice > > [FEATURES] > discussions/proposals about new *features* for LibreOffice > > [L10N] > for discussions/proposals about *localization* of the product > > [WEBSITE] > for discussions/proposals about the *website*, forums, wiki, IRC etc > > [MAILING LIST] > for discussions/proposals about the *mailing lists* structures > > [NATIVE-LANG] > discussions/proposals about *native-language* structures > > [DOCUMENTATION] > discussions/proposals about the *documentation* of LibreOffice > > [MARKETING] > discussions/proposals about *marketing* for The Document Foundation > and LibreOffice > > [GENERAL] > discussions/proposals about *everything else* > think of [FORUM] too for *LibreOfficeForum.org* -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Re: [tdf-discuss] [Legalese] "Foundation" or "Group"?
I' ve got another question. is LibreOffice now a registered trademark? and in what countries? or international? best regards Karl-Heinz -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOfficeForum.org is now functioning
Mike Houben schrieb: > Why making several forums? Make 1 Forum, 1 Maincategorie for language. > So people like me, who speaks french, german, english, nederlands, can > use the same forum and don't have to register 4 different accounts! > Thank you Mike. This is the point. I wanted to ask, if this is possible.
Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOfficeForum.org is now functioning
thank you Sam Sam schrieb: > Hello Document Foundation / LibreOffice, <> > > I would like to offer to the LibreOffice community a support forum > that I have just > created on a reliable host: > http://libreofficeforum.org > It is my hope that LibreOfficeForum.org will serve as a central point > for English > language support. I am also fluent in the Spanish language, and if > necessary I could > create a similar forum for that language if you would like. I have > been administering > community forums with Drupal for quite a few years now, and I feel > confident that with > the help of some additional honest, polite moderators, we could > maintain a high level of > organization on LibreOfficeForum.org. > > Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks again for your time and efforts. > > Sincerely, > Sam > Same question as I posted in the forum: can we support other languages also in that forum? I thought about having http://libreofficeforum.org/de/ for german e.g. or /es/ for spanish. so anyone can search his problem in all languages he can understand and doesn't have to remember that the english forum has the name x, the german y and the spanish z or so. could anyone see what I mean? Best regards Karl-Heinz -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
