RE: [tdf-discuss] Re: Top Posting... Can we have an LO Mailing List Guidelines Page?

2011-10-03 Thread Mark Wielaard
Dear Dennis,

On Sun, October 2, 2011 22:00, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
 Mark, I think my question was concrete and very clear:
   How about you just read the goddamn RFC's for email protocol and stop
   whining about it?
  Which RFC's are you talking about?  Numbers please.

 I don't see how RFC 1885 can be meant.

RFC 1885 is one of the inspirations for the document foundation
netiquette page: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette

These guidelines have been inspired by Mozilla Posting Guidelines,
with important additions from
http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php and
http://www.woodgate.org/FAQs/netiquette.html.

Original Netiquette guidelines: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855.
Netiquette on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette.
Other useful information about the Netiquette:
http://www.livinginternet.com/i/ia_nq.htm.;

They are just guidelines, but ones which are generally considered good
practice on mailing lists. Please read them and try to follow them as
much as possible to keep discussions as pleasant and productive.

With respect to your question on top-vs-bottom-posting, the netiquette
gives a guideline, it is best to just follow that and use some tools
that facilitate the bottom-post/interspersed-style. And please refer to
the section on Let Sleeping Dogs Lie. We all have out pet-peeves that
we would like to discuss and rehash indefinitely. Please resist the urge.

Thanks,

Mark


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



RE: [tdf-discuss] Re: Top Posting... Can we have an LO Mailing List Guidelines Page?

2011-10-02 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi,

On Sun, October 2, 2011 20:29, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
  How about you just read the goddamn RFC's for email protocol and stop
  whining about it?
 Which RFC's are you talking about?  Numbers please.

Please don't top-post (fixed it for you in this message).

I assume the reference is to basic netiquette, which is RFC 1885.
But for this list, please refer to (which is also in the mailinglist
footer): http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette

Thanks,

Mark


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] More statistics

2011-08-05 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi,

There was a little discussion on lwn.net about the staggering amount of
support that LibreOffice is seeing. I hunted down some statistics from
various pages because at first I also couldn't believe the numbers:
https://lwn.net/Articles/454200/

According to ohloh (BTW is there a free alternative to that
service?) it is even more than 400 committers over the last
year: http://www.ohloh.net/p/libreoffice/factoids/7758072

cia.vc also reports a staggering amount of commit messages:
32812 messages since the first one, 0.84 years ago, for an
average of 13.39 minutes between messages
http://cia.vc/stats/project/libreoffice

Their wiki says there are 277 active users (who made changes the
last 3 months), with a total of 32,311 edits:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Special:Statistics

The LibreOffice credits page has even more people listed (611
committers, 1005 wiki contributors), but read the fine print
about double counting and also recognizing previous
OpenOffice.org contributors:
http://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/credits/

I could not find statistics for their mailinglists:
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/
But their main development mailinglist
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/ is seeing
between 1200 and 1700 messages a month. gmane might be able to
give some statistics about the others:
http://gmane.org/find.php?list=documentfoundation

There were some followup questions about statistics of contributors for
translations and documentation. Does anybody have more accurate numbers
on those (or as accurate as these things get, I understand that all
statistics are lies)? Or better estimates of the numbers I found above?

Thanks,

Mark

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] News about the world outside LO :)

2011-07-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 10:30 -0400, Benjamin Horst wrote:
 I think Symphony has done a great job with its UI work--that's what I'd most 
 like to see come under an open source license.
 - tabbed document interface lets you open multiple files in one window
 - a dashboard like the OOo / LibO splash screen, but you can open it from a 
 button that appears on the tab bar. This fits into the dashboard 
 functionality with potential integration into online services, as I have 
 envisioned and previously described: 
 http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org_Dashboard_Concept
 - formatting and other tools appear in a vertical column on the side of the 
 main document window, which is one of the most-frequently requested UI 
 features I've seen come through the OOo and LibO communities

That would be interesting indeed. But according to one of the IBM
engineers [*] they are only interested in contributing the C++ parts
(and strangely seem to want to keep using their own in-house ClearCase
setup for integration). The GUI (menu/toolbars and the tab windows)
stuff is all implemented using Expeditor [**] a giant (proprietary)
eclipse based java framework that embeds the C++ document views. So
hopefully they are also prepared to free Expeditor.

 Symphony also has some problems:
 - it's very slow to open the application initially
 - removed the Draw component
 - I think (?) it's even more Java-dependent than OOo ever was

Yes, it includes a JVM (IBM's proprietary J9 one) and most of the
Eclipse framework for the GUI stuff.

I have seen some questions on what exactly it is that is being offered,
but nobody from IBM has replied with any specifics yet.

Cheers,

Mark

[*]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201107.mbox/%
3coffe6eaa9d.2c929e08-on482578cd.000d5e79-482578cd.00116...@cn.ibm.com%
3E

[**]
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/downloads/ls/lxpd/
(a 800MB proprietary download...)

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] The Document Foundation background

2011-06-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Florian,

On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:57 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
 Indeed, we seem to lack some comprehensible page directly reachable with 
 all the details. However, we have been regular announcing status and 
 facts via e-mail, our blog, social networks, and the donations 
 (challenge) page has also some background on it.
 
 I would say anyone who looked a bit at the project would find out 
 things. I agree, however, at a first glance, things might indeed be a 
 bit hard to discover, and looking at how fast things went at Apache, I 
 understand that things needed explanation.
 
 We should indeed add a short note to http://www.documentfoundation.org/faq/

And if possible please also add a News from the TDF Blog widget to the
frontpage like already on libreoffice.org. Then it would be immediately
clear that The Document Foundation is a lively and active entity.
Currently it takes some poking around from the homepage to finally end
up on http://blog.documentfoundation.org/ where all the latest news is.

Cheers,

Mark


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted