Re: [tdf-discuss] Incomplete Coverity scan chart
Ok. But who can update chart published on wiki? 2015-01-18 20:06 GMT+01:00 Italo Vignoli : > Data from the published report refet to LibreOffice 4.3, but the scan is > always referring to the latest version. You should access the data from > this link: https://scan.coverity.com/projects/211?tab=overview. > > On 18/01/15 17:16, Mateusz Zasuwik wrote: > > > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/4.4#Coverity > > > The chart doesn't include date for LO 4.3. Why and who can repair it? I > > also download Coverity report from their website and it turned out to be > > report for old (4.3) version. Not for the new one just incoming. > > -- > Italo Vignoli - The Document Foundation > mob IT +39.348.5653829 - mob EU +39.392.7481795 > email it...@libreoffice.org - skype italovignoli > email / hangout italo.vign...@gmail.com > GPG Key ID - 0xAAB8D5C0 > DB75 1534 3FD0 EA5F 56B5 FDA6 DE82 934C AAB8 D5C0 > > -- > To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > -- Miłego dnia życzę, hej M.Z. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] Incomplete Coverity scan chart
Hey https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/4.4#Coverity The chart doesn't include date for LO 4.3. Why and who can repair it? I also download Coverity report from their website and it turned out to be report for old (4.3) version. Not for the new one just incoming. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Better PDF import?
2014-06-21 11:22 GMT+02:00 Italo Vignoli : > On 21/06/14 11:07, Mateusz Zasuwik wrote: > > > I noticed you guys heavily work over many dead formats. But did anyone > > think about better PDF Import? I lost my data lately and I had open some > > old PDF files which turn out to be normal PDF (not hybrid PDF/ODT). I > > opened it via LO but document was rendered within Draw, not Writer or > > Impress as it should be done. You also should take account of fact that > MS > > Office opens every PDF file and easily convert it on its native format > what > > makes this software more useful for normal users. Hybrid PDF is cool > > feature, but probably it won't become major file format for long time. > The > > market is dominated by normal PDF and in this area LireOffice just suck. > So > > maybe someone who assigns aims for future (TDF Board?) should regroup > > thoughts once again and concentrates for features needed on a daily > basis? > > The right behaviour is to open PDFs in Draw. > Why is it right behavior? Bigger part of documents floating around in Internet are documents crated in text editor. Later in the queue we have presentations or spreadsheets. The likelihood that user will need open "PDF-ed text document" is incomparably greater than anything else and in spite of it, these documents are opened in "picture module". > Have you ever used MS Office 2013 to open a PDF? It sucks at least as > much as any other software. > I did and it worked much better than LibreOffice does. There is no faultless software but in this case, LibreOffice just sucks more than MS Office. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] Better PDF import?
Hello TDF members! I noticed you guys heavily work over many dead formats. But did anyone think about better PDF Import? I lost my data lately and I had open some old PDF files which turn out to be normal PDF (not hybrid PDF/ODT). I opened it via LO but document was rendered within Draw, not Writer or Impress as it should be done. You also should take account of fact that MS Office opens every PDF file and easily convert it on its native format what makes this software more useful for normal users. Hybrid PDF is cool feature, but probably it won't become major file format for long time. The market is dominated by normal PDF and in this area LireOffice just suck. So maybe someone who assigns aims for future (TDF Board?) should regroup thoughts once again and concentrates for features needed on a daily basis? Have a nice day, hey M.Z. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Web version of Libre Office
2012/1/27 Jonathan Aquilina > Please correct me if im wrong i remember seeing on one of the mailing > lists that someone was working on a web based version. > > What is the status if such a thing does exist? > Maybe this will be helpful. http://fosdem.org/2012/schedule/event/lo_online -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice should have own "LibreOfficeFont"
> >This is the right link: > > http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/332612Kind regards > > I get: > Sign In > http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/sign_in/show_fontstruction > Try http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/332612 ;) -- Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
[tdf-discuss] LibreOffice should have own "LibreOfficeFont"
Hello Early this year FlashCounter published a statistic showed popularity OOo in selected countries. We found out that it had 22% in Poland and Czech Republic and 21% in Germany. http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html http://ooblog.pl/2010/02/06/polska-swiatowym-liderem-we-wdrozeniu-openoffice/(polish) The study relies on extricating fonts installed on the system and identify the installed Office suites. For OOo it's OpenSymbol and for MSO it's Calibri. I think LibreOffice should have own unique font (not RedHat Liberation Fonts). It can be ugly and useless but should "be" to next compare in future. -- Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
