Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-20 Thread Carlo Strata 

Il 20/10/2010 19:14, Petr Mladek ha scritto:

Petr Mladek píše v Út 19. 10. 2010 v 19:04 +0200:

Carlo Strata píše v Út 19. 10. 2010 v 18:25 +0200:

Il 15/10/2010 12:50, Petr Mladek ha scritto:

You might find the first packages at
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable/




I'm preparing my notebook to the Italian Linux Day (on October the 23th).

On my OpenSuSE 11.2 (I'm not sure to install a new 11.3 from scratch
before that day, but may be I've just bought a new 2.5" 7.200 rpm hd)
I've just:
- uninstalled OOo 3.2.1.6 Novell/Go-OO from OBS (STABLE);
- unistalled vanilla Libò 3.3 beta 2;
- installed vanilla OOo 3.3 RC1 italian;
- installed Novell/TDF Libò 3.3 beta 2 from OBS (UNSTABLE).

All packages are/were x86-64.

Libò 3.3b2 inherit OOo 3.2.1.6 configuration data (i.e. User Information
and so on), while OOo 3.3 RC1 doesn't.

All goes well, but OBS Libò 3.3b2 UI (and help too) is (are) in English
and not in Italian. Vanilla OOo 3.3 RC1 has Italian UI and Help.

This are installed packages:
-->  libreoffice-help-it-3.2.99.2-4.1.noarch
-->  libreoffice-l10n-it-3.2.99.2-3.1.noarch



Libò Writer ->  Tools ->  Options ->  Language Settings ->  Languages ->
Language of ->  User interface shows only:
- Default - English (USA)
- English (USA)

Any setting yields English UI!

What's wrong? What is my mistake? Is it a bug?


I will try to install it here tomorrow if time permits. I am sorry, I am
on our team workshop this week and work only when time permits.


I reproduced it here. The problem is that the following files are
missing in the openSUSE packages:

/usr/lib64/libreoffice/basis3.3/share/registry/Langpack-it.xcd
/usr/lib64/libreoffice/basis3.3/share/registry/res/fcfg_langpack_it.xcd
/usr/lib64/libreoffice/basis3.3/share/registry/res/registry_it.xcd

I will need to investigate it a bit more to get a fix.

A temporary solution would be to copy the files from the universal
LibreOffice build. I mean
from /opt/libreoffice3/basis3.3/share/registry.

I am sorry for the inconveniece.

Best Regards,
Petr



We are here to improve our product all together not to judge ourselves ;-)

You are the best! Sorry for my late answer but I'm just go back home!

Have a nice evening,

Carlo

p.s. Before posting this problem I had tried to re-install "-it-" 
packages you pointed out in your previous mail, but as you can guess it 
doesn't help me! :-)


--
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to 
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-20 Thread Petr Mladek 
Petr Mladek píše v Út 19. 10. 2010 v 19:04 +0200:
> Carlo Strata píše v Út 19. 10. 2010 v 18:25 +0200:
> > Il 15/10/2010 12:50, Petr Mladek ha scritto:
> > > You might find the first packages at
> > > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable/
> > >
> 
> > I'm preparing my notebook to the Italian Linux Day (on October the 23th).
> > 
> > On my OpenSuSE 11.2 (I'm not sure to install a new 11.3 from scratch 
> > before that day, but may be I've just bought a new 2.5" 7.200 rpm hd) 
> > I've just:
> > - uninstalled OOo 3.2.1.6 Novell/Go-OO from OBS (STABLE);
> > - unistalled vanilla Libò 3.3 beta 2;
> > - installed vanilla OOo 3.3 RC1 italian;
> > - installed Novell/TDF Libò 3.3 beta 2 from OBS (UNSTABLE).
> > 
> > All packages are/were x86-64.
> > 
> > Libò 3.3b2 inherit OOo 3.2.1.6 configuration data (i.e. User Information 
> > and so on), while OOo 3.3 RC1 doesn't.
> > 
> > All goes well, but OBS Libò 3.3b2 UI (and help too) is (are) in English 
> > and not in Italian. Vanilla OOo 3.3 RC1 has Italian UI and Help.
> > 
> > This are installed packages:
> > --> libreoffice-help-it-3.2.99.2-4.1.noarch
> > --> libreoffice-l10n-it-3.2.99.2-3.1.noarch
> 
> > Libò Writer -> Tools -> Options -> Language Settings -> Languages -> 
> > Language of -> User interface shows only:
> > - Default - English (USA)
> > - English (USA)
> > 
> > Any setting yields English UI!
> > 
> > What's wrong? What is my mistake? Is it a bug?
> 
> I will try to install it here tomorrow if time permits. I am sorry, I am
> on our team workshop this week and work only when time permits.

I reproduced it here. The problem is that the following files are
missing in the openSUSE packages:

/usr/lib64/libreoffice/basis3.3/share/registry/Langpack-it.xcd
/usr/lib64/libreoffice/basis3.3/share/registry/res/fcfg_langpack_it.xcd
/usr/lib64/libreoffice/basis3.3/share/registry/res/registry_it.xcd

I will need to investigate it a bit more to get a fix.

A temporary solution would be to copy the files from the universal
LibreOffice build. I mean
from /opt/libreoffice3/basis3.3/share/registry.

I am sorry for the inconveniece.

Best Regards,
Petr


-- 
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to 
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-19 Thread Petr Mladek 
Carlo Strata píše v Út 19. 10. 2010 v 18:25 +0200:
> Il 15/10/2010 12:50, Petr Mladek ha scritto:
> > You might find the first packages at
> > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable/
> >

> I'm preparing my notebook to the Italian Linux Day (on October the 23th).
> 
> On my OpenSuSE 11.2 (I'm not sure to install a new 11.3 from scratch 
> before that day, but may be I've just bought a new 2.5" 7.200 rpm hd) 
> I've just:
> - uninstalled OOo 3.2.1.6 Novell/Go-OO from OBS (STABLE);
> - unistalled vanilla Libò 3.3 beta 2;
> - installed vanilla OOo 3.3 RC1 italian;
> - installed Novell/TDF Libò 3.3 beta 2 from OBS (UNSTABLE).
> 
> All packages are/were x86-64.
> 
> Libò 3.3b2 inherit OOo 3.2.1.6 configuration data (i.e. User Information 
> and so on), while OOo 3.3 RC1 doesn't.
> 
> All goes well, but OBS Libò 3.3b2 UI (and help too) is (are) in English 
> and not in Italian. Vanilla OOo 3.3 RC1 has Italian UI and Help.
> 
> This are installed packages:
> --> libreoffice-help-it-3.2.99.2-4.1.noarch
> --> libreoffice-l10n-it-3.2.99.2-3.1.noarch

> Libò Writer -> Tools -> Options -> Language Settings -> Languages -> 
> Language of -> User interface shows only:
> - Default - English (USA)
> - English (USA)
> 
> Any setting yields English UI!
> 
> What's wrong? What is my mistake? Is it a bug?

Could you please try to remove the packages:

libreoffice-help-it
libreoffice-l10n-it

,install them once again, and try to set Italian UI in Tools -> Options
-> Language Settings -> Languages -> 
> Language of -> User interface once again?

The noarch packages install the stuff into /usr/share/libreoffice/. They
should create compat symlinks into /usr/lib64/libreoffice in the post
install script. It might have failed from some reasons.

I will try to install it here tomorrow if time permits. I am sorry, I am
on our team workshop this week and work only when time permits.


Best Regards,
Petr


-- 
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to 
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-19 Thread Scott Furry 

 On 19/10/10 10:25 AM, Carlo Strata wrote:

Il 15/10/2010 12:50, Petr Mladek ha scritto:
Libò Writer -> Tools -> Options -> Language Settings -> Languages -> 
Language of -> User interface shows only:

- Default - English (USA)
- English (USA)

Any setting yields English UI!
What's wrong? What is my mistake? Is it a bug?

Thank you,
Carlo

Carlo,
This isn't a bug.
Beta2 has been released as EN-US so far.
Regards,
Scott Furry

--
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to 
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-19 Thread Carlo Strata 

Il 15/10/2010 12:50, Petr Mladek ha scritto:

Kohei Yoshida píše v St 13. 10. 2010 v 11:55 -0400:

Sorry for the top-posting, but I wanted to preserve the context for Petr
(CC'ed).

Petr is the man you want to talk to with this sort of question.  I'm
sure he'll provide more details on this.

Kohei

On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:44 +0200, Carlo Strata wrote:

2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS? I
mean here:


You might find the first packages at
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable/

Known bugs:

+ shell wrappers are still ooffice, oowriter, ...; need to discuss the
   new wrapper names with other distros first
+ only the LibreOffice branding package is available =>  you need to
   replace OpenOffice_org-branding-openSUSE with
   libreoffice-branding-upstream
+ must start the application twice for the first time; there is a
   problem with the automatic extension registration; need to look at it;
+ extensions are not registered after the update from OpenOffice_org-*
   packages; a workaround is to reinstall the packages once again;
   I plan to remove the installation during installation; it will allow
   users to disable the extensions by themselves
+ some packages were not renamed, .e.g. OpenOffice_org-thesaurus, ...;
   they are not built from the main LO sources =>  will do it later
+ store user configuration into ~/.libreoffice/3-suse; we might try to
   share the directory ~/.libreoffice/3 after we fix the incompatible
   BerkleyDB; I am not sure if it is enough and it is a good idea, though
+ packages can't be installed in parallel with the generic LibreOffice
   linux packages; the problem is that both builds use the
   libreoffice-ure package name; will be solved in beta3; workaround is
   to install the package using "rpm -i" instead of "rpm -U"
+ SLED10 build is not available; need more love

See more known bugs at:

+ FreeDesktop.org bugzilla: http://alturl.com/dmqve
+ OOo issuezilla: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/query.cgi
+ Novell bugzilla: http://alturl.com/qaq5


Best Regards,
Petr




Hi Petr,

I'm preparing my notebook to the Italian Linux Day (on October the 23th).

On my OpenSuSE 11.2 (I'm not sure to install a new 11.3 from scratch 
before that day, but may be I've just bought a new 2.5" 7.200 rpm hd) 
I've just:

- uninstalled OOo 3.2.1.6 Novell/Go-OO from OBS (STABLE);
- unistalled vanilla Libò 3.3 beta 2;
- installed vanilla OOo 3.3 RC1 italian;
- installed Novell/TDF Libò 3.3 beta 2 from OBS (UNSTABLE).

All packages are/were x86-64.

Libò 3.3b2 inherit OOo 3.2.1.6 configuration data (i.e. User Information 
and so on), while OOo 3.3 RC1 doesn't.


All goes well, but OBS Libò 3.3b2 UI (and help too) is (are) in English 
and not in Italian. Vanilla OOo 3.3 RC1 has Italian UI and Help.


This are installed packages:
libreoffice-gnome-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-help-en-US-3.2.99.2-3.1.noarch
libreoffice-libs-extern-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-mailmerge-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-impress-extensions-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-icon-theme-crystal-3.2.99.2-2.1.noarch
libreoffice-math-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-ure-3.2.99.2-2.2.x86_64
libreoffice-branding-upstream-3.2.99.2-2.1.noarch
libreoffice-base-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
--> libreoffice-help-it-3.2.99.2-4.1.noarch
libreoffice-filters-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-base-drivers-mysql-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-writer-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-icon-theme-oxygen-3.2.99.2-2.1.noarch
libreoffice-writer-extensions-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-impress-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-icon-theme-galaxy-3.2.99.2-2.1.noarch
libreoffice-pyuno-3.2.99.2-2.2.x86_64
libreoffice-libs-core-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-filters-optional-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-l10n-extras-3.2.99.2-2.1.noarch
libreoffice-base-extensions-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-components-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-calc-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-icon-theme-hicontrast-3.2.99.2-2.1.noarch
libreoffice-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-libs-gui-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-draw-extensions-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-draw-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
--> libreoffice-l10n-it-3.2.99.2-3.1.noarch
libreoffice-calc-extensions-3.2.99.2-2.1.x86_64
libreoffice-icon-theme-tango-3.2.99.2-2.1.noarch

Libò Writer -> Tools -> Options -> Language Settings -> Languages -> 
Language of -> User interface shows only:

- Default - English (USA)
- English (USA)

Any setting yields English UI!

What's wrong? What is my mistake? Is it a bug?

Thank you,

Carlo

--
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to 
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-15 Thread Carlo Strata 

Il 15/10/2010 12:50, Petr Mladek ha scritto:

Kohei Yoshida píše v St 13. 10. 2010 v 11:55 -0400:

Sorry for the top-posting, but I wanted to preserve the context for Petr
(CC'ed).

Petr is the man you want to talk to with this sort of question.  I'm
sure he'll provide more details on this.

Kohei

On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:44 +0200, Carlo Strata wrote:

2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS? I
mean here:


You might find the first packages at
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable/

Known bugs:

+ shell wrappers are still ooffice, oowriter, ...; need to discuss the
   new wrapper names with other distros first
+ only the LibreOffice branding package is available =>  you need to
   replace OpenOffice_org-branding-openSUSE with
   libreoffice-branding-upstream
+ must start the application twice for the first time; there is a
   problem with the automatic extension registration; need to look at it;
+ extensions are not registered after the update from OpenOffice_org-*
   packages; a workaround is to reinstall the packages once again;
   I plan to remove the installation during installation; it will allow
   users to disable the extensions by themselves
+ some packages were not renamed, .e.g. OpenOffice_org-thesaurus, ...;
   they are not built from the main LO sources =>  will do it later
+ store user configuration into ~/.libreoffice/3-suse; we might try to
   share the directory ~/.libreoffice/3 after we fix the incompatible
   BerkleyDB; I am not sure if it is enough and it is a good idea, though
+ packages can't be installed in parallel with the generic LibreOffice
   linux packages; the problem is that both builds use the
   libreoffice-ure package name; will be solved in beta3; workaround is
   to install the package using "rpm -i" instead of "rpm -U"
+ SLED10 build is not available; need more love

See more known bugs at:

+ FreeDesktop.org bugzilla: http://alturl.com/dmqve
+ OOo issuezilla: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/query.cgi
+ Novell bugzilla: http://alturl.com/qaq5


Best Regards,
Petr



Thank you very much! ;-)

Carlo

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-15 Thread Petr Mladek 
Carlo Strata píše v Čt 14. 10. 2010 v 19:32 +0200:
> Il 14/10/2010 18:39, Petr Mladek ha scritto:
> > Carlo Strata píše v Čt 14. 10. 2010 v 17:52 +0200:
> >> Il 14/10/2010 12:12, Petr Mladek ha scritto:
> >> But after install on my OpenSuSE 11.2 x86-64, I got this message:
> >> "ca...@carlobook:~>  /opt/libreoffice3/program/soffice
> >> /opt/libreoffice3/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared
> >> libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file
> >> or directory
> >> "
> >>
> >> After googling I understood that this was probably due to the URE package:
> >>
> >> libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm
> >>
> >> which most install in
> >> /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure
> >>
> >> but all other packages instead install themselves in
> >> /opt/libreoffice3
> >
> > Hmm, where did you get the libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm? Mine has
> > the stuff under /opt/libreoffice3
> >
>
> I'm 64 bit!!!
> 
>  From here:
> http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/testing/3.3.0-beta2/rpm/x86_64/
> 
> I download and install:
> LibO-SDK_3.3_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz 10-Oct-2010 
> 14:26 8.3M

This is needed only if you want to build your own extension without the
complete sources.

> LibO-URE_1.7_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz 10-Oct-2010 
> 14:27 3.8M

Hmm, I am not sure why we uploaded this. The URE package is included in
the main LibO_3.3.0_beta2 tarball.

Thorsten, Fridrich, it seems to cause confusion. Of course, we should
fix the default installation prefix but I would remove it from 
http://download.documentfoundation.org at all.

> LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz 10-Oct-2010 
> 05:29 181M

Normal English-speaking users need just this tarball.

> LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_it.tar.gz 10-Oct-2010 08:40
>  13M

The lang pack is needed for normal non-English speaking users.

> untarring the second file, you'll get the RPMs from which the right one 
> yields:
> carlobook:/home/condivisioni/Download/OpenOffice/LibreOffice/ure/en-US/RPMS 
> # rpm -qlp libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm
> /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice
> /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure
> /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/LICENSE
> /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/README
> /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.html

This is bug. I am going to fix it. Well, in fact, Rene suggested to use 
/opt/libreoffice even for the main package.

> But in the "URE" package inside the main tar.gz 
> (LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz) the URE package 
> is ok! Look here:
> 
> carlobook:/home/condivisioni/Download/OpenOffice/LibreOffice/main # rpm 
> -qlp en-US/RPMS/libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm
> /opt/libreoffice3
> /opt/libreoffice3/ure
> /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin
> /opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/javaldx

Please ignore the standalone
LibO-URE_1.7_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Thanks for help with debugging.


Best Regards,
Petr


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-15 Thread Petr Mladek 
Kohei Yoshida píše v St 13. 10. 2010 v 11:55 -0400:
> Sorry for the top-posting, but I wanted to preserve the context for Petr
> (CC'ed).
> 
> Petr is the man you want to talk to with this sort of question.  I'm
> sure he'll provide more details on this.
> 
> Kohei
> 
> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:44 +0200, Carlo Strata wrote:
> > 2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS? I 
> > mean here:

You might find the first packages at
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable/

Known bugs:

+ shell wrappers are still ooffice, oowriter, ...; need to discuss the
  new wrapper names with other distros first
+ only the LibreOffice branding package is available => you need to
  replace OpenOffice_org-branding-openSUSE with
  libreoffice-branding-upstream
+ must start the application twice for the first time; there is a
  problem with the automatic extension registration; need to look at it;
+ extensions are not registered after the update from OpenOffice_org-*
  packages; a workaround is to reinstall the packages once again;
  I plan to remove the installation during installation; it will allow
  users to disable the extensions by themselves
+ some packages were not renamed, .e.g. OpenOffice_org-thesaurus, ...;
  they are not built from the main LO sources => will do it later
+ store user configuration into ~/.libreoffice/3-suse; we might try to
  share the directory ~/.libreoffice/3 after we fix the incompatible
  BerkleyDB; I am not sure if it is enough and it is a good idea, though
+ packages can't be installed in parallel with the generic LibreOffice
  linux packages; the problem is that both builds use the
  libreoffice-ure package name; will be solved in beta3; workaround is
  to install the package using "rpm -i" instead of "rpm -U"
+ SLED10 build is not available; need more love

See more known bugs at:

+ FreeDesktop.org bugzilla: http://alturl.com/dmqve
+ OOo issuezilla: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/query.cgi
+ Novell bugzilla: http://alturl.com/qaq5


Best Regards,
Petr


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-14 Thread Carlo Strata 

Il 14/10/2010 18:39, Petr Mladek ha scritto:

Carlo Strata píše v Čt 14. 10. 2010 v 17:52 +0200:

Il 14/10/2010 12:12, Petr Mladek ha scritto:

If you want more packages in parallel, you might use the universal
LibreOffice Linux packages. They might be installed in parallel with the
universal OOo packages, old openSUSE OpenOffice_org packages and the
upcoming openSUSE libreoffice packages. It is because they are installed
into /opt/libreoffice while the others are installed
below /opt/openoffice*, /usr/lib/ooo3, /usr/lib/libreoffice


I was curious and than I'll install "vanilla Libò" ;-)

But after install on my OpenSuSE 11.2 x86-64, I got this message:
"ca...@carlobook:~>  /opt/libreoffice3/program/soffice
/opt/libreoffice3/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared
libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
"

After googling I understood that this was probably due to the URE package:

libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm

which most install in
/opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure

but all other packages instead install themselves in
/opt/libreoffice3

so I tried fixing the bug with two test:

1. fails:
carlobook:/opt/libreoffice3 # ln -s /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/
libreoffice

2. successes:
carlobook:/opt/libreoffice3 # ln -s /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure ure


Great catch.

Hmm, where did you get the libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm? Mine has
the stuff under /opt/libreoffice3

I have just double checked the official beta2 build from
http://www.documentfoundation.org/download/. It was
http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/testing/3.3.0-beta2/rpm/x86/LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz


--- cut ---
en-US/RPMS>  rpm -qlp libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.i586.rpm
/opt/libreoffice3
/opt/libreoffice3/ure
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/javaldx
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/regcomp
--- cut ---


I'm 64 bit!!!

From here:
http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/testing/3.3.0-beta2/rpm/x86_64/

I download and install:
LibO-SDK_3.3_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz 10-Oct-2010 
14:26 	8.3M


LibO-URE_1.7_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz 10-Oct-2010 
14:27 	3.8M


LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz 10-Oct-2010 
05:29 	181M


LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_it.tar.gz 10-Oct-2010 08:40   13M

untarring the second file, you'll get the RPMs from which the right one 
yields:
carlobook:/home/condivisioni/Download/OpenOffice/LibreOffice/ure/en-US/RPMS 
# rpm -qlp libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm

/opt/libreoffice/libreoffice
/opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure
/opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/LICENSE
/opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/README
/opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.html
/opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/bin
/opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/bin/javaldx
/opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/bin/regcomp
/opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/bin/regcomp.bin
/opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/bin/regmerge
/opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/bin/regview
/opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure/bin/startup.sh
[...]

But in the "URE" package inside the main tar.gz 
(LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz) the URE package 
is ok! Look here:


carlobook:/home/condivisioni/Download/OpenOffice/LibreOffice/main # rpm 
-qlp en-US/RPMS/libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm

/opt/libreoffice3
/opt/libreoffice3/ure
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/javaldx
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/regcomp
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/regcomp.bin
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/regmerge
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/regview
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/startup.sh
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/uno
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/uno.bin
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/versionrc
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/lib
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/lib/JREProperties.class
[...]

So I ask myself what does need the file
LibO-URE_1.7_beta2_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

in the directory
http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/testing/3.3.0-beta2/rpm/x86_64/
?

;-)

Delete it! It's wrong and overwrite the right one (if you untar it next 
the main one)! ;-)


Thank you,

Carlo



BTW: The package libreoffice-ure-1.7.0 will conflict with the upcoming
openSUSE-specific package libreoffice-ure-3.2.99.2. We will solve it in
3.3-beta3 release, see
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2010-October/000973.html

It means that you will not be able to install the universal
libreoffice-3.3-beta2 build and the opensuse libreoffice-*-3.2.99.2
packages at the same time. It should be possible with beta3. I am sorry
for the inconvenience.

Well, you could install both packages even with beta2 if you use "rpm
-i" instead of "rpm -U". Though, it might get broken if you do "rpm -U"
later. Note that YaST/zypper uses "rpm -U" by default.

Best Regards,
Petr




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted.
List archi

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-14 Thread Petr Mladek 
Carlo Strata píše v Čt 14. 10. 2010 v 17:52 +0200:
> Il 14/10/2010 12:12, Petr Mladek ha scritto:
> > If you want more packages in parallel, you might use the universal
> > LibreOffice Linux packages. They might be installed in parallel with the
> > universal OOo packages, old openSUSE OpenOffice_org packages and the
> > upcoming openSUSE libreoffice packages. It is because they are installed
> > into /opt/libreoffice while the others are installed
> > below /opt/openoffice*, /usr/lib/ooo3, /usr/lib/libreoffice
> 
> I was curious and than I'll install "vanilla Libò" ;-)
> 
> But after install on my OpenSuSE 11.2 x86-64, I got this message:
> "ca...@carlobook:~> /opt/libreoffice3/program/soffice
> /opt/libreoffice3/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared 
> libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file 
> or directory
> "
> 
> After googling I understood that this was probably due to the URE package:
> 
> libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm
> 
> which most install in
> /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure
> 
> but all other packages instead install themselves in
> /opt/libreoffice3
> 
> so I tried fixing the bug with two test:
> 
> 1. fails:
> carlobook:/opt/libreoffice3 # ln -s /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ 
> libreoffice
> 
> 2. successes:
> carlobook:/opt/libreoffice3 # ln -s /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure ure

Great catch.

Hmm, where did you get the libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm? Mine has
the stuff under /opt/libreoffice3

I have just double checked the official beta2 build from
http://www.documentfoundation.org/download/. It was 
http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/testing/3.3.0-beta2/rpm/x86/LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz


--- cut ---
en-US/RPMS> rpm -qlp libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.i586.rpm
/opt/libreoffice3
/opt/libreoffice3/ure
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/javaldx
/opt/libreoffice3/ure/bin/regcomp
--- cut ---

BTW: The package libreoffice-ure-1.7.0 will conflict with the upcoming
openSUSE-specific package libreoffice-ure-3.2.99.2. We will solve it in
3.3-beta3 release, see
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2010-October/000973.html

It means that you will not be able to install the universal
libreoffice-3.3-beta2 build and the opensuse libreoffice-*-3.2.99.2
packages at the same time. It should be possible with beta3. I am sorry
for the inconvenience.

Well, you could install both packages even with beta2 if you use "rpm
-i" instead of "rpm -U". Though, it might get broken if you do "rpm -U"
later. Note that YaST/zypper uses "rpm -U" by default.

Best Regards,
Petr


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-14 Thread Carlo Strata 

Il 14/10/2010 00:29, Fridrich Strba ha scritto:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 13/10/2010 17:44, Carlo Strata wrote:

1. May OOo 3.2.1.x/3.3.x and Libò coexist (in the same operating system
instance, I mean)? At least in linux? May I go on with just downloaded
Libò x86-64 beta2?


Yes, you can take the rpm version of beta2 and install on your openSUSE.
It will not conflict (at most you will have to give it a --force for
some two or three mimetype files). Install the freedesktop menus and you
should be having nice working shortcuts in your Menu under Office.


Thank you: see my today's mail (13/10/2010, 17:52, for me) to this 
thread and to Petr and Kohei to read about the bug and the fix I tested 
and suggested.





2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS? I
mean here:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/

or here
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Office:/ (in a new
"LibreOffice" directory)

or here, too
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/OpenOffice.org:/ (in a new
"LibreOffice" directory)?

To search in the OBS you could go here (The Famous Webpin page)
http://packages.opensuse-community.org/


Here, Petr Mladek will for sure tell you more


He did that! ;-)




It's now time for Novell and OpenSuSE whole Community to start giving
solid/concrete Libò/TDF support signs! :-)


Yeah, I also think that it is now hight time for Novell and openSUSE
Community to get finally involved ;)


:-)



Fridrich


Carlo


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAky2Mq0ACgkQu9a1imXPdA/pbgCfVijhOdyCWuTWbuDDNLXUWsth
MM8AnRj2MEKuZ/zuNISMHMNLP2bz2EME
=p/gc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-14 Thread Carlo Strata 

Il 14/10/2010 12:12, Petr Mladek ha scritto:

On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:44 +0200, Carlo Strata wrote:

Hi Everyone,

this is my first TDF post! :-)

I'm an active and long time OpenSuSE and Novell's OOo user and bug
poster, too!

Now, in my OpenSuSE daily updated 11.2, x86-64, notebook I have
Novell/OpenSuSE OBS OOo 3.2.1.6 (x86-64) (still with the famous fixed
but not released pdf bug
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812).


More helping hands are always welcome. Feel free to add the fix to the
package, see http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_Collaboration


My two questions are:

1. May OOo 3.2.1.x/3.3.x and Libò coexist (in the same operating system
instance, I mean)? At least in linux? May I go on with just downloaded
Libò x86-64 beta2?


LibreOffice is continuation of the OpenOffice.org project. We do not
plan to provide OpenOffice.org-3.3 for openSUSE. Instead of we are going
to provide libreoffice-*-3.3* packages that will replace the older
OpenOffice_org packages during the system update.

Note that we newer provided the plain OOo packages for openSUSE. We
always added the extra patches from the Go-oo project. We are still
going to use these extra changes on top of the LibreOffice code.

If you want more packages in parallel, you might use the universal
LibreOffice Linux packages. They might be installed in parallel with the
universal OOo packages, old openSUSE OpenOffice_org packages and the
upcoming openSUSE libreoffice packages. It is because they are installed
into /opt/libreoffice while the others are installed
below /opt/openoffice*, /usr/lib/ooo3, /usr/lib/libreoffice


I was curious and than I'll install "vanilla Libò" ;-)

But after install on my OpenSuSE 11.2 x86-64, I got this message:
"ca...@carlobook:~> /opt/libreoffice3/program/soffice
/opt/libreoffice3/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared 
libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file 
or directory

"

After googling I understood that this was probably due to the URE package:

libreoffice-ure-1.7.0-1.x86_64.rpm

which most install in
/opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure

but all other packages instead install themselves in
/opt/libreoffice3

so I tried fixing the bug with two test:

1. fails:
carlobook:/opt/libreoffice3 # ln -s /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ 
libreoffice


2. successes:
carlobook:/opt/libreoffice3 # ln -s /opt/libreoffice/libreoffice/ure ure

:-) :-) ;-)

My first Libò run! Very fast load!!!

I suggest you fixing the problem!

HTH,

Carlo




2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS?


I have created the LibreOffice:Unstable project in OBS yesterday. I am
running a first test build there. If it goes well, I would publish the
libreoffice-3.3-beta2 packages on Friday or Monday.

It means that the packages might appear at
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable over the
weekend or in the beginning of the following week.


It's now time for Novell and OpenSuSE whole Community to start giving
solid/concrete Libò/TDF support signs! :-)


Sure. We do out best. There are just too many things to do.


Thank you very much for your great work, ideas and answers! Have a
nice evening


Thanks for support and understanding.

Best Regards,
Petr


PS: Please, keep me in CC if you want fater answer. I have many unread
mails on the mailing list :-(




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-14 Thread Carlo Strata 

Il 14/10/2010 12:12, Petr Mladek ha scritto:

On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:44 +0200, Carlo Strata wrote:

Hi Everyone,

this is my first TDF post! :-)

I'm an active and long time OpenSuSE and Novell's OOo user and bug
poster, too!

Now, in my OpenSuSE daily updated 11.2, x86-64, notebook I have
Novell/OpenSuSE OBS OOo 3.2.1.6 (x86-64) (still with the famous fixed
but not released pdf bug
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812).


More helping hands are always welcome. Feel free to add the fix to the
package, see http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_Collaboration



Ciao Petr! Thank you!

I'd like to make it, but I'm not sure using how much time! Sure there is 
a more efficient person to do that. And for 3.2.1.x branch remaining 
life it is convenient that is so. If you take a look to the bug history 
(last few comments) you could see Debian has already added (merged) and 
relaesed this fix: now I'm asking why the "system" force me repeating a 
task that at least one person has already done all over the world. ;-)


More communication, information exchange between distros and between 
distros and main project portals and newer ideas are needed by XXI 
century social/cloud development: I'm waiting something revolutionary in 
this meaning from TDF!!!


Efficiency means more reliable and functionality richer code!!!

If you look for my Novell/OpenSuSE issues you see that, until now, I had 
been a bug poster and a bug documenting provider, sometime enhancement 
suggester too. But in the life we never know the future... ;-)


Surely I'll read that collaborating page...



My two questions are:

1. May OOo 3.2.1.x/3.3.x and Libò coexist (in the same operating system
instance, I mean)? At least in linux? May I go on with just downloaded
Libò x86-64 beta2?


LibreOffice is continuation of the OpenOffice.org project. We do not
plan to provide OpenOffice.org-3.3 for openSUSE. Instead of we are going
to provide libreoffice-*-3.3* packages that will replace the older
OpenOffice_org packages during the system update.

Note that we newer provided the plain OOo packages for openSUSE. We
always added the extra patches from the Go-oo project. We are still
going to use these extra changes on top of the LibreOffice code.


About this there would be many things to say... wouldn't it?

From the upper bug history people could see that we know 
Novell/OpenSuSE OOo is from Go-OO (e.g. 1 million rows in Calc...!) and 
with the whole features set here

http://go-oo.org/discover/

Until OOo - Oracle thread is still foggy, Libò must be identical to 
vanilla OOo and you/we must still merge remaining Go-OO exclusive 
features over and in Libò...


I hope we soon stop wasting human being time (developer and user too) 
and refuse creating regression like upper bug is.


We all hope Oracle give the whole OOo world, infrastructure, rights, 
names, and so on to TDF so that we (OOo, Go-OO, NeoO, OOo4Kids, ... and 
Libò) develop only once. Deo Gratias!





If you want more packages in parallel, you might use the universal
LibreOffice Linux packages. They might be installed in parallel with the
universal OOo packages, old openSUSE OpenOffice_org packages and the
upcoming openSUSE libreoffice packages. It is because they are installed
into /opt/libreoffice while the others are installed
below /opt/openoffice*, /usr/lib/ooo3, /usr/lib/libreoffice


You are simply the best! The clearest person all over the World! :-)
Thank you!






2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS?


I have created the LibreOffice:Unstable project in OBS yesterday. I am
running a first test build there. If it goes well, I would publish the
libreoffice-3.3-beta2 packages on Friday or Monday.

It means that the packages might appear at
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable over the
weekend or in the beginning of the following week.


So I'll probably wait your builds instead of using the universal 
LibreOffice Linux packages.






It's now time for Novell and OpenSuSE whole Community to start giving
solid/concrete Libò/TDF support signs! :-)


Sure. We do out best. There are just too many things to do.


Thank you very much for your great work, ideas and answers! Have a
nice evening


Thanks for support and understanding.


You are always welcome!



Best Regards,
Petr


Sunny day,

Carlo




PS: Please, keep me in CC if you want fater answer. I have many unread
mails on the mailing list :-(



Mee too, but I'm happy with TDF time! :-)





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-14 Thread Petr Mladek 
> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:44 +0200, Carlo Strata wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> > 
> > this is my first TDF post! :-)
> > 
> > I'm an active and long time OpenSuSE and Novell's OOo user and bug 
> > poster, too!
> > 
> > Now, in my OpenSuSE daily updated 11.2, x86-64, notebook I have 
> > Novell/OpenSuSE OBS OOo 3.2.1.6 (x86-64) (still with the famous fixed 
> > but not released pdf bug 
> > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812).

More helping hands are always welcome. Feel free to add the fix to the
package, see http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_Collaboration

> > My two questions are:
> > 
> > 1. May OOo 3.2.1.x/3.3.x and Libò coexist (in the same operating system 
> > instance, I mean)? At least in linux? May I go on with just downloaded 
> > Libò x86-64 beta2?

LibreOffice is continuation of the OpenOffice.org project. We do not
plan to provide OpenOffice.org-3.3 for openSUSE. Instead of we are going
to provide libreoffice-*-3.3* packages that will replace the older
OpenOffice_org packages during the system update.

Note that we newer provided the plain OOo packages for openSUSE. We
always added the extra patches from the Go-oo project. We are still
going to use these extra changes on top of the LibreOffice code.

If you want more packages in parallel, you might use the universal
LibreOffice Linux packages. They might be installed in parallel with the
universal OOo packages, old openSUSE OpenOffice_org packages and the
upcoming openSUSE libreoffice packages. It is because they are installed
into /opt/libreoffice while the others are installed
below /opt/openoffice*, /usr/lib/ooo3, /usr/lib/libreoffice


> > 2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS?

I have created the LibreOffice:Unstable project in OBS yesterday. I am
running a first test build there. If it goes well, I would publish the
libreoffice-3.3-beta2 packages on Friday or Monday.

It means that the packages might appear at
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable over the
weekend or in the beginning of the following week.

> It's now time for Novell and OpenSuSE whole Community to start giving 
> solid/concrete Libò/TDF support signs! :-)

Sure. We do out best. There are just too many things to do.

> Thank you very much for your great work, ideas and answers! Have a
> nice evening

Thanks for support and understanding.

Best Regards,
Petr


PS: Please, keep me in CC if you want fater answer. I have many unread
mails on the mailing list :-(


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-13 Thread Fridrich Strba 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 13/10/2010 17:44, Carlo Strata wrote:
> 1. May OOo 3.2.1.x/3.3.x and Libò coexist (in the same operating system
> instance, I mean)? At least in linux? May I go on with just downloaded
> Libò x86-64 beta2?

Yes, you can take the rpm version of beta2 and install on your openSUSE.
It will not conflict (at most you will have to give it a --force for
some two or three mimetype files). Install the freedesktop menus and you
should be having nice working shortcuts in your Menu under Office.

> 2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS? I
> mean here:
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/
> 
> or here
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Office:/ (in a new
> "LibreOffice" directory)
> 
> or here, too
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/OpenOffice.org:/ (in a new
> "LibreOffice" directory)?
> 
> To search in the OBS you could go here (The Famous Webpin page)
> http://packages.opensuse-community.org/

Here, Petr Mladek will for sure tell you more

> It's now time for Novell and OpenSuSE whole Community to start giving
> solid/concrete Libò/TDF support signs! :-)

Yeah, I also think that it is now hight time for Novell and openSUSE
Community to get finally involved ;)

Fridrich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAky2Mq0ACgkQu9a1imXPdA/pbgCfVijhOdyCWuTWbuDDNLXUWsth
MM8AnRj2MEKuZ/zuNISMHMNLP2bz2EME
=p/gc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-13 Thread todd rme 
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Carlo Strata  wrote:
> I love top post because when you read a message it is quite normal that you
> have already red the preceding ones!!! ;-)
>
> Thank you having CC'ed to the right person!
>
> I'll wait his answer!
>
> Carlo
>
> Il 13/10/2010 17:55, Kohei Yoshida ha scritto:
>>
>> Sorry for the top-posting, but I wanted to preserve the context for Petr
>> (CC'ed).
>>
>> Petr is the man you want to talk to with this sort of question.  I'm
>> sure he'll provide more details on this.
>>
>> Kohei
>>
>> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:44 +0200, Carlo Strata wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> this is my first TDF post! :-)
>>>
>>> I'm an active and long time OpenSuSE and Novell's OOo user and bug
>>> poster, too!
>>>
>>> Now, in my OpenSuSE daily updated 11.2, x86-64, notebook I have
>>> Novell/OpenSuSE OBS OOo 3.2.1.6 (x86-64) (still with the famous fixed
>>> but not released pdf bug
>>> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812).
>>>
>>> Now I want to install both:
>>>
>>> - Libò 3.3>= beta2 and
>>>
>>> - OBS (OpenSuSE Build Service, *ubuntu's Launch Pad analog) OOo>
>>> 3.2.1.6 and/or becoming 3.3
>>>
>>> This because:
>>>
>>> - on October the 23th I will participate as OOo/Libò/TDF speaker in
>>> Padua's (Italy's NE) Linux Day (in the Padua's FSUG kind People group);
>>>
>>> - I want to start my soft migration from OOo to... Libò, obviously!!! ;-)
>>>
>>> My two questions are:
>>>
>>> 1. May OOo 3.2.1.x/3.3.x and Libò coexist (in the same operating system
>>> instance, I mean)? At least in linux? May I go on with just downloaded
>>> Libò x86-64 beta2?
>>>
>>> 2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS? I
>>> mean here:
>>> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/
>>>
>>> or here
>>> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Office:/ (in a new
>>> "LibreOffice" directory)
>>>
>>> or here, too
>>> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/OpenOffice.org:/ (in a new
>>> "LibreOffice" directory)?
>>>
>>> To search in the OBS you could go here (The Famous Webpin page)
>>> http://packages.opensuse-community.org/
>>>
>>> It's now time for Novell and OpenSuSE whole Community to start giving
>>> solid/concrete Libò/TDF support signs! :-)
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for your great work, ideas and answers! Have a nice
>>> evening,
>>>
>>> Carlo
>>>

Please keep us informed of what you find out, I am curious as well.

-Todd

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-13 Thread Carlo Strata 
I love top post because when you read a message it is quite normal that 
you have already red the preceding ones!!! ;-)


Thank you having CC'ed to the right person!

I'll wait his answer!

Carlo

Il 13/10/2010 17:55, Kohei Yoshida ha scritto:

Sorry for the top-posting, but I wanted to preserve the context for Petr
(CC'ed).

Petr is the man you want to talk to with this sort of question.  I'm
sure he'll provide more details on this.

Kohei

On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:44 +0200, Carlo Strata wrote:

Hi Everyone,

this is my first TDF post! :-)

I'm an active and long time OpenSuSE and Novell's OOo user and bug
poster, too!

Now, in my OpenSuSE daily updated 11.2, x86-64, notebook I have
Novell/OpenSuSE OBS OOo 3.2.1.6 (x86-64) (still with the famous fixed
but not released pdf bug
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812).

Now I want to install both:

- Libò 3.3>= beta2 and

- OBS (OpenSuSE Build Service, *ubuntu's Launch Pad analog) OOo>
3.2.1.6 and/or becoming 3.3

This because:

- on October the 23th I will participate as OOo/Libò/TDF speaker in
Padua's (Italy's NE) Linux Day (in the Padua's FSUG kind People group);

- I want to start my soft migration from OOo to... Libò, obviously!!! ;-)

My two questions are:

1. May OOo 3.2.1.x/3.3.x and Libò coexist (in the same operating system
instance, I mean)? At least in linux? May I go on with just downloaded
Libò x86-64 beta2?

2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS? I
mean here:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/

or here
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Office:/ (in a new
"LibreOffice" directory)

or here, too
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/OpenOffice.org:/ (in a new
"LibreOffice" directory)?

To search in the OBS you could go here (The Famous Webpin page)
http://packages.opensuse-community.org/

It's now time for Novell and OpenSuSE whole Community to start giving
solid/concrete Libò/TDF support signs! :-)

Thank you very much for your great work, ideas and answers! Have a nice
evening,

Carlo





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-13 Thread Kohei Yoshida 
Sorry for the top-posting, but I wanted to preserve the context for Petr
(CC'ed).

Petr is the man you want to talk to with this sort of question.  I'm
sure he'll provide more details on this.

Kohei

On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:44 +0200, Carlo Strata wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> this is my first TDF post! :-)
> 
> I'm an active and long time OpenSuSE and Novell's OOo user and bug 
> poster, too!
> 
> Now, in my OpenSuSE daily updated 11.2, x86-64, notebook I have 
> Novell/OpenSuSE OBS OOo 3.2.1.6 (x86-64) (still with the famous fixed 
> but not released pdf bug 
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812).
> 
> Now I want to install both:
> 
> - Libò 3.3 >= beta2 and
> 
> - OBS (OpenSuSE Build Service, *ubuntu's Launch Pad analog) OOo > 
> 3.2.1.6 and/or becoming 3.3
> 
> This because:
> 
> - on October the 23th I will participate as OOo/Libò/TDF speaker in 
> Padua's (Italy's NE) Linux Day (in the Padua's FSUG kind People group);
> 
> - I want to start my soft migration from OOo to... Libò, obviously!!! ;-)
> 
> My two questions are:
> 
> 1. May OOo 3.2.1.x/3.3.x and Libò coexist (in the same operating system 
> instance, I mean)? At least in linux? May I go on with just downloaded 
> Libò x86-64 beta2?
> 
> 2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS? I 
> mean here:
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/
> 
> or here
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Office:/ (in a new 
> "LibreOffice" directory)
> 
> or here, too
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/OpenOffice.org:/ (in a new 
> "LibreOffice" directory)?
> 
> To search in the OBS you could go here (The Famous Webpin page)
> http://packages.opensuse-community.org/
> 
> It's now time for Novell and OpenSuSE whole Community to start giving 
> solid/concrete Libò/TDF support signs! :-)
> 
> Thank you very much for your great work, ideas and answers! Have a nice 
> evening,
> 
> Carlo
> 

-- 
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc



-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

[tdf-discuss] OpenSuSE and Libò

2010-10-13 Thread Carlo Strata 

Hi Everyone,

this is my first TDF post! :-)

I'm an active and long time OpenSuSE and Novell's OOo user and bug 
poster, too!


Now, in my OpenSuSE daily updated 11.2, x86-64, notebook I have 
Novell/OpenSuSE OBS OOo 3.2.1.6 (x86-64) (still with the famous fixed 
but not released pdf bug 
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812).


Now I want to install both:

- Libò 3.3 >= beta2 and

- OBS (OpenSuSE Build Service, *ubuntu's Launch Pad analog) OOo > 
3.2.1.6 and/or becoming 3.3


This because:

- on October the 23th I will participate as OOo/Libò/TDF speaker in 
Padua's (Italy's NE) Linux Day (in the Padua's FSUG kind People group);


- I want to start my soft migration from OOo to... Libò, obviously!!! ;-)

My two questions are:

1. May OOo 3.2.1.x/3.3.x and Libò coexist (in the same operating system 
instance, I mean)? At least in linux? May I go on with just downloaded 
Libò x86-64 beta2?


2. When does Novell/OpenSuSE start to build Libò in his (our!) OBS? I 
mean here:

http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/

or here
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Office:/ (in a new 
"LibreOffice" directory)


or here, too
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/OpenOffice.org:/ (in a new 
"LibreOffice" directory)?


To search in the OBS you could go here (The Famous Webpin page)
http://packages.opensuse-community.org/

It's now time for Novell and OpenSuSE whole Community to start giving 
solid/concrete Libò/TDF support signs! :-)


Thank you very much for your great work, ideas and answers! Have a nice 
evening,


Carlo

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/