Re: [tdf-discuss] Problematic digest mail answering - Buggy mailclient? (was: Paid Developers)
A hyperlink to gnuplot was provided (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.gnuplot.user/5655) but as originally stated, how this would help is not understood. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Problematic digest mail answering - Buggy mailclient? (was: Paid Developers)
Hi e-letter, *, well, I give up. I only see tons of quoted text which doesn't help in any way and neither get answers on my qestions nor the desired links or information. No chance to go further. Maybe it's an option for you to subscribe in normal mode to make some conversation possible. Sorry, no help possible as long I don't get the information and links I asked for here: http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@documentfoundation.org/msg06370.html and having You subscribed at t...@documentfoundation.org in both digest and normal mode in order to stop spamming the discuss list with garbage. Get information on subscription process by sending a mail to: test+h...@documentfoundation.org which sends you a mail containing the info. e-letter schrieb: >This hyperlink shows email message > digest...http://pastebin.com/HYdu0rCz which unfortunatly doesn't help. Gruß/regards -- Friedrich Libreoffice-Box http://libreofficebox.org/ LibreOffice and more on CD/DVD images -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Problematic digest mail answering - Buggy mailclient? (was: Paid Developers)
Still blocked; > > Below is copy of the digest mode message received > > > Delivered-To: inp...@gmail.com > Received: by 10.216.54.85 with SMTP id h63cs4144wec; > Wed, 25 May 2011 23:00:06 -0700 (PDT) > Received: by 10.213.4.198 with SMTP id 6mr174974ebs.124.1306389605519; > Wed, 25 May 2011 23:00:05 -0700 (PDT) > Return-Path: > > Received: from bilbo.documentfoundation.org > (bilbo.documentfoundation.org [178.63.91.70]) > by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id > v13si792201eef.81.2011.05.25.23.00.05 > (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); > Wed, 25 May 2011 23:00:05 -0700 (PDT) > Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of > discuss+bounces-digest-inpost=gmail@documentfoundation.org > designates 178.63.91.70 as permitted sender) client-ip=178.63.91.70; > Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of > discuss+bounces-digest-inpost=gmail@documentfoundation.org > designates 178.63.91.70 as permitted sender) > smtp.mail=discuss+bounces-digest-inpost=gmail@documentfoundation.org > Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 23:00:05 -0700 (PDT) > Message-Id: <4dddec65.8d620e0a.588b.51a8smtpin_ad...@mx.google.com> > Received: from bilbo.documentfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by bilbo.documentfoundation.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1942C1BF21E4 > for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 08:00:05 +0200 (CEST) > From: discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/digest; boundary=7b72ac84340cf61c > Subject: > =?utf-8?q?Digest_of_discuss=40documentfoundation.org_issue_289_=286272-6280=29?= > Reply-To: discuss@documentfoundation.org > Errors-To: postmas...@documentfoundation.org > Precedence: list > List-Id: > List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org> > List-Archive: <http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/> > List-Post: <mailto:discuss@documentfoundation.org> > List-Help: <mailto:discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org> > List-Subscribe: <mailto:discuss+subscr...@documentfoundation.org> > List-Owner: <mailto:postmas...@documentfoundation.org> > To: inp...@gmail.com > > > --7b72ac84340cf61c > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Content-Encoding: 8bit > > Topics (messages 6272 through 6280): > > [tdf-discuss] Mailing List FAQ > 6272 - NoOp > > [tdf-discuss] Mailing List FAQ > 6273 - Volker Merschmann > > [tdf-discuss] Problematic digest mail answering - Buggy mailclient? > (was: Paid Developers) > 6274 - e-letter > > [tdf-discuss] Fwd: Why TDF should be the place for one united Community > 6275 - Florian Effenberger > > [tdf-discuss] Problematic digest mail answering - Buggy mailclient? > 6276 - Friedrich Strohmaier > > [tdf-discuss] Re: Mailing List FAQ > 6277 - NoOp > > [tdf-discuss] Re: Mailing List FAQ > 6278 - Steve Edmonds > > [tdf-discuss] Re: Mailing List FAQ > 6279 - Jean Hollis Weber > > [tdf-discuss] Re: Mailing List FAQ > 6280 - Steve Edmonds > > > > --7b72ac84340cf61c > Content-Type: message/rfc822 > Content-Disposition: inline; filename="discuss_6272.eml" > > X-Original-To: discuss@documentfoundation.org > Delivered-To: documentfoundation.org--disc...@bilbo.documentfoundation.org > Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by bilbo.documentfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E824E1BF2124 > for ; > Wed, 25 May 2011 06:24:59 +0200 (CEST) > X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new-2.6.4 (20090625) at > bilbo.documentfoundation.org > X-Spam-Flag: NO > X-Spam-Score: -4.212 > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.212 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 > tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, > SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham > Received: from bilbo.documentfoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) > by localhost (bilbo.documentfoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, > port 10024) > with LMTP id ZSXezR7cJO2G for ; > Wed, 25 May 2011 06:24:47 +0200 (CEST) > X-policyd-weight: using cached result; rate: -7.35 > Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) > by bilbo.documentfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920AD1BF2143 > for ; > Wed, 25 May 2011 06:24:10 +0200 (CEST) > Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) > (envelope-from ) id 1QP5dh-00068b-IC > for discuss@documentfoundation.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 06:24:09 +0200 > Received: from adsl-69-228-81-206.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net ([69.228.81.206]) > by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) > id 1Alnu
Re: [tdf-discuss] Problematic digest mail answering - Buggy mailclient? (was: Paid Developers)
This message sent previously failed to be accepted my the mail server; being resent in two parts. Part one of two On 26/05/2011, e-letter wrote: >>e-letter schrieb: >> >>>A link would not show the behaviour; >> >>Thanks for your estimation. My intention was rather to have easy access >>to information of that list and to an example where Your answer really >>worked. >> > See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.gnuplot.user/5655, > but this does not show anything. > >>As I spend enough time investigating Your problem >>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.test >>I hoped to save the time of searching myself.. >> >>>would be better to subscribe to gnuplot mailing list digest mode. >> >>A link where to do so was really great - allthough not helpful *for me* >>as I don't have gmail running and I don't intend to do so. >> >>>When the 'reply' function is activated in gmail web-mail interface, the >>>mail message format is retained. >> >>As told, I would like to see a succesful example of an answer sent by >>You if You make possible to provide a link. >> >>By the way: >>As workaround to send proper answers is "ordering" the desired mail >>sending a mail to: >>discuss+ge...@documentfoundation.org where "N" is the number of that >>mail provided with the digest. >> > > This does not seem to be an acceptable alternative method. The user > would reply, change manually the recipient e-mail address and then > wait for a response from the servers. > >>Additionally You're hereby invited to subscribe to >>test+subscribe-dig...@documentfoundation.org >>where we try to solve Your problem. We need your experience with digest >>handling and your testing skills. ;o)) >> > Subscription has been enabled. > > Below is copy of the digest mode message received > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Problematic digest mail answering - Buggy mailclient? (was: Paid Developers)
A link would not show the behaviour; would be better to subscribe to gnuplot mailing list digest mode. When the 'reply' function is activated in gmail web-mail interface, the mail message format is retained. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] Problematic digest mail answering - Buggy mailclient? (was: Paid Developers)
Hi e-letter, *, e-letter schrieb: >> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:36 PM, e-letter wrote: [..] >>> When can someone improve mailing list behaviour with web mail >>> clients like gmail??? [..] > The problem is that replies to messages cannot be performed directly. > This behaviour does not occur in other mailing lists, e.g. gnuplot. can You give a link to gnuplot list archive, where it worked? Gruß/regards -- Friedrich Libreoffice-Box http://libreofficebox.org/ LibreOffice and more on CD/DVD images -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] Problematic digest mail answering - Buggy mailclient? (was: Paid Developers)
Hi e-letter, *, e-letter schrieb: >> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:36 PM, e-letter wrote: [..] >>> When can someone improve mailing list behaviour with web mail >>> clients like gmail??? Well I did some testing. Might be it's a good Idea to find the reason *before* declaring the mailing list software the culprit ;o)). Look here: http://www.mail-archive.com/test@documentfoundation.org/msg00118.html >> Sorry, but what do you mean? >> Obviously the mailinglist has no influence whatsoever how a webmail >> or regular mailclient behaves. > Is this true? Surely different mailing list manager software will > function differently? >>> Even for this e-mail digest, the reply function results >>> in deletion of the original message content, apart from the text >>> shown above. This means a text editor has to be used...:( .. Which is the case anyway - even if provided by the mail client software :o)) >> Sorry, please be more descriptive. That mail (#6131) is this one: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@documentfoundation.org/msg06225.html >> http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/msg06096.html > A digest message is received > Opening the message shows all of the content > After activating the 'reply' function, the reply text box does not > contain the original digest message content As written in testmails - Thunderbird also makes trouble regarding this - 4 Year old kmail doesn't. ==> Bug?? [..] > The problem is that replies to messages cannot be performed directly. > This behaviour does not occur in other mailing lists, e.g. gnuplot. So might be they provide digest mails in a gmail more digestible manner - i.e. not base64 encoded? But as long as nobody claims base64 encoded mailcontent beeing improper mail handling, this is buggy behaviour of the client software and should be reported as Bug to the software vendor. Gruß/regards -- Friedrich Libreoffice-Box http://libreofficebox.org/ LibreOffice and more on CD/DVD images -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
