[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-28 Thread Marc Paré

Le 2011-10-28 18:16, Cor Nouws a écrit :

Hi,

I noticed that the old users forums from OOo are not available any more.
I was not a frequent visitor, but helped a bit with questions (on the
Dutch language version) now and then. There was a mixture of questions
related to OOo and of course increasingly LibreOffice.

I heard about migration of the old OOo infrastructure to the Apache
project. I guess the forums will be part of that.

Now I wonder: what about the future of forums for LibreOffice?
It looks convenient to have all at one place. On the other side:
LibreOffice will grow to be different more and more. Different code
base, more functions.
So apart from that it is maybe not fair ;-) to profit too much on the
work of the forums at Apache (when life), it will be increasingly
insufficient for our own users.
Well, that is one way I could look at it.
But of course having own LibreOffice forums ask resources and especially
time..

What do other people think about this?

Cheers,



I thought the purpose of the Nabble site was to fill this purpose. This 
way the mailing lists and "forums" questions are merged, even if it is 
not a "real" forums site.


I would vote to promote more Nabble as our "forums" site and develop our 
own "Nabble" independent site.


Marc


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Larry Gusaas


On 2011-10-28 5:21 PM  Stefan Weigel wrote:

Am 29.10.2011 00:16, schrieb Cor Nouws:


>  I noticed that the old users forums from OOo are not available any
>  more.

Hm. Aren´t they still available?

http://user.services.openoffice.org/

But, you are right, it´s likely they will disappear or be migrated.


The forums have been migrated to Apache servers. The DNS records have been updated and the 
forum is available at the same URL as before.


--
_

Larry I. Gusaas
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada
Website: http://larry-gusaas.com
"An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs." - 
Edgard Varese




--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Larry Gusaas


On 2011-10-29 1:11 AM  Jonathan Aquilina wrote:

On 29/10/2011 08:23, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:

Migration has been done : http://ooo-forums.apache.org/
It works for FR forum but I do not know how users will be aware of the
new url.

Best regards.
JBF


Simple fix. Setup a redirect from the old url to the new one if possible.


The URL is the same as before – http://user.services.openoffice.org
The Apache address was a temporary one until the DNS records got updated.

--
_

Larry I. Gusaas
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada
Website: http://larry-gusaas.com
"An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs." - 
Edgard Varese




--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Olivier R.
Hello Cor,


Cor Nouws wrote:
> 
> So apart from that it is maybe not fair ;-) to profit too much on the 
> work of the forums at Apache (when life), it will be increasingly 
> insufficient for our own users.
> 

Forums administrators and volonteers have always claim to be
non-discriminative. They support all versions of the software: LibreOffice,
OpenOffice.org, NeoOffice, etc. And almost all of us have already switched
to LibreOffice. Is it really necessary to split again the community in
smaller parts? I don’t think so.

AFAIK, forums migrated on Apache server only because TDF has always favored
mailing-lists and seemed to have low respect for forums. Before Apache, TDF
seemed not concerned with forums hosting.

The forums are now available at the same address than before.

Regards,
Olivier.

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/user-forums-tp3462202p3463016.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Olivier R.
Hello Charles,

> providing mailing lists seems to mean that we don't
> respect forums

No. You are twisting what I said.

Apache offered to host forums. There have been a lot of discussions, and it
was not easy to find a common ground.
Did TDF offer to host forums ?

Regards,
Olivier

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/user-forums-tp3462202p3463110.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Olivier R.
Hello,


Italo Vignoli wrote:
> 
> Recently, we have offered a server - without any condition - to host the 
> forums, but the admins have decided to go to Apache. The answer I got 
> when I wrote to the ooo-user@apache mailing list is a testament of forum 
> admins positioning (no answer at all).
> 

I had not heard of it.
I read only sometimes the new new ooo-dev list at Apache, but there is too
many mails to follow it.


Italo Vignoli wrote:
> 
> LibreOffice is going forward and bringing new features to users, with an 
> increasingly different code base. OOo is going backwards, because of the 
> meaningless "license sanification" imposed by Apache (one of the forum 
> admins has recently asked a question on this subject, which - of course 
> - has not been answered).
> 

This is what I think too. I prefer TDF over Apache, even if I am not a TDF
member. What I was stating was only my point of view as a forum user.


Best regards,
Olivier

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/user-forums-tp3462202p3463116.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Olivier R.
Charles,


Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> 
> Perhaps, but  I actually heard a similar argument about "the lack of
> respect" to the forums (but apparently you make a different point) from
> several people over the last months, hence my reaction.
> 

Maybe I should have written “lack of consideration” instead of “lack of
respect”.

I don’t know what are the relations between forums admins and TDF, and I do
not want to widen the gap.

Regards,
Olivier


--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/user-forums-tp3462202p3463151.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Marc Paré

Le 2011-10-29 08:55, Jonathan Aquilina a écrit :

On 29/10/2011 14:38, Florian Effenberger wrote:

Hi Jonathan,

Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-10-29 14:33:

I am more then willing to volunteer a section on my forums for
Libreoffice and the TDF discussion and support as well. I am using phpbb
for the forums though :(


thanks a lot for that offer. If we, however, decide for TDF forums, I
then would like to host our own ones, within our infrastructure.

We have other choices, of course, one of them being to use one of the
existing forums and appoint them as "official". As I understand it,
the reason of this thread is to find out whether we should go for
hosting our own ones.

If we decide to, I would be more than happy of course of having you as
a contributor there. ;-)

Florian


If you opt to name one as an official TDF mirror it wont take me a
second to setup a TDF section and LO section for use.

I am wondering though if you go for self hosted solution i am wondering
instead of using a seperate user login to login to the forums if one has
an account to edit the wiki lets say can that be used for existing
users, as well as allowing those users who dont edit the wiki to sign up
for an account through the forums and end up as contributors as well for
the wiki if they need it down the road?

Regards

Jonathan Aquilina



I would favour TDF/LibreOffice forums service using OpenID support[1]. 
Drew's Nabble site has shown that we can run forums and in fact, most 
likely, the moderators who do the work there, may want to keep 
moderating on our own forums. The moderators, and, especially Drew have 
done a wonderful job of it. BTW, I don't think we have done this often 
enough, but, thanks to all of these people. I personally don't think 
that we would have any problems finding moderators for a forums if we 
need any. Our community will "step up to the plate" if there is a call 
for help for forums moderators.


Of course we would have to tie everything in with the mailing lists and 
gmane so that all communication is done seamlessly.


As for the duplication of forums services at TDF/LibreOffice, Apache and 
community-run forums. I don't think there is any way to avoid the 
problem of an overall general shake-out where there will be a period of 
anarchy in the office suite forums service. This is an eventuality that 
we have all been putting off. The reality of the matter is that, whoever 
has the largest user-base and the best service will gain the most use. 
Such is nature of the "forums beast". This should be enough incentive 
for us to offer an unbiased approach to a forums service and moderate 
with the utmost of fairness. If we want to run forums we need to run 
them really well and keep in mind that the overlying rule is that we 
want to "community build" and not scare users away.


Cheers,

Marc

[1] http://openid.net/


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread jeanmi2403
It is here :
http://user.services.openoffice.org/nl/forum/index.php
http://user.services.openoffice.org/nl/forum/index.php 
Friendly

-
]LibO 3.4.2  Windows 7 Familiale Premium SP1 x64
--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/user-forums-tp3462202p3463075.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-30 Thread Marc Paré

Le 2011-10-30 11:40, Florian Effenberger a écrit :

Single sign-on is indeed something I'd like to see soon, but there are
no concrete plans as of now. One option would be OpenID, another one an
LDAP connection - let's see what we can come up with. ;-)

Florian


OpenId is the option that users would be most familiar, there are many 
sites using it. Doing LDAP would not be familiar at all.


Marc


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-30 Thread Marc Paré

Le 2011-10-30 20:15, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit :

Um, lest I confuse everyone:  After the English language forum, the French and 
then the Spanish language forums are the next most active in terms of 
registered users and other statistics.  The remainder are in the 1,000-2,000 
range and then Vietnamese is the smallest.  I don't have figures for the 
independent German language Forum.  I'm confident it would create a top 4.

  - Dennis


Thanks for the info Dennis.

Cheers,

Marc


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-31 Thread Marc Paré

Le 2011-10-31 15:49, Florian Effenberger a écrit :

Hello,

thanks everyone for your feedback and your kind offers to help, that's
really much appreciated!

As for which type to use, I must say that a "normal" forum is the only
way, IMHO. We've been experimenting with Nabble, and the result has been
rather mixed. People prefer a forum they know, nothing else. At least
based on my experience.

There are several forums running. What I would like to have is one
"official" LibO forum, either done by us or someone else, that is open
for all languages, and run by a group that does not have members who
openly show hostility towards TDF. I am not saying that everyone does
so, but at least I have heard from some forums, where definitely FUD was
spread, and this leaves me with bad feelings.

What I took from this thread is, that there are two options: One
de.openoffice.org, and the other one the LibreOffice forum.

Anyone already got in touch with those folks? IIRC, there had been
discussions, with some groups, and that didn't work out - but I must
confess I don't know which ones.

Honestly, my preference would be to have our own forum and see if it
works. If not, we tried it, and we don't lose that much.

Florian



I really don't think this is a case where anyone can win with any of 
these decisions. If de.openoffice.org is "awarded" the care of the 
LibreOffice maintenance of the forums, there will be those who will 
complain about it as not being a real native LibreOffice forums. If the 
TDF raises its own forums, then there will those who will complain that 
communities have been broken and all of the past discussions have been 
lost. The LibreOffice fork of OpenOffice has created a shift in 
community use/support and that is just the reality of the situation. The 
code base differences between LibreOffice and AOO will only get wider 
over time and LibreOffice may find itself at this same situation later on.


Therefore, as there would be no clear way to win, it would seem to make 
the most sense for the TDF/LibreOffice to create its own forums 
infrastructure, offer and invite participation of "already established" 
interested forums related to LibreOffice. The TDF/LibreOffice forums 
could also offer to help facilitate the migration of any historical data 
to its own servers of any group wishing to join the new LibreOffice 
forums project.


It is still early in the game for LibreOffice and it is the right time 
to move on to its own forums services. This will in effect offer our 
users a complete office suite service under the same banner that is 
TDF/LibreOffice.


Marc



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-01 Thread Marc Paré

Le 2011-11-01 04:02, Stefan Weigel a écrit :

I estimate at least 80% of the topics/questions/answers will still
be common for all these products. We need to look at this from the
users point of view. The user does not benefit, if the knowledge
base is split up and unequally distributed over several places.

Stefan


I think most of us will agree that ideally this would be preferable. 
However, LibreOffice is considered an important opensource project and 
as such serves a large number of users and if AOO follows in OOo 
footsteps, may also serve a large number of users. I don't think we can 
avoid having the doubling of services until at some point there is a 
shake up of one of these two where the one with the largest user base 
will dominate the forums service.


So, let's have the doubling now and worry about the past knowledge base 
as different forums decide, if they wish, to migrate to one or the 
other's forums. I think TDF/LibreOffice can make a good job of running 
its own forums.


Marc


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-02 Thread Marc Paré

Le 2011-11-02 06:17, Florian Effenberger a écrit :

Hi,

Stefan Weigel wrote on 2011-11-02 11:13:

Ok. The forum will sure have a search function, just like every
forum has, right? Could our new forum combine automatically three
searches at once?

(1) Show the matches inside our forum
(2) Show the matches within the ML archives
(3) Show Google matches


totally depends on the forum we install and its options. In case we go
for an own solution, there are many options, no decision on any software
yet.

Florian



If I remember correctly, there was previously some comparison research 
done on different forum software solutions. I can't seem to find it on 
GMane, I think my ISP provider only supplies so many of previous posts 
and deletes the rest. Not sure.


But anyway, you may be able to find it somewhere. I am not sure on which 
discussion list. It was a really well research effort and may be 
interesting to review.


Cheers,


Marc


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-02 Thread Ken Springer

On 10/28/11 4:16 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:

Hi,

I noticed that the old users forums from OOo are not available any more.
I was not a frequent visitor, but helped a bit with questions (on the
Dutch language version) now and then. There was a mixture of questions
related to OOo and of course increasingly LibreOffice.




I've been reading this thread as it has developed, and will admit, the 
technical aspects of the discussion are well over my head.


My interest in the discussion was not the technical issues of who does 
this, how LO help areas are interfaced with others, where this or that 
is stored, but what does the average user discover when he/she comes to 
the LO or TDF website in search of help.


With all due respect to those reading this message and using the LO 
mailing lists, regardless of how they access the mailing list, you are 
*not* the average user I encounter.


IMO, when a person finally figures out what's going on with the help 
system at LO, it is the best overall system I've seen in years.  (The 
website needs a lot of help, IMO.  :-) )


What I like about LO's overall help system is any individual can access 
*all* community help efforts regardless of the method of help the user 
prefers.  Although, it's not always easy.  :-)


If you prefer your help system to be a mailing list, that's available 
directly from LO.


If you prefer your help system to be a forum, that's available through 
the Nabble interface and Gmane.


If you like the threaded type view, it's available through LO, and 
Gmane, with varying degrees of sophistication vs. ease of use.


If you prefer printed documentation, it's available via the various 
guides available on LO's website.


Regardless of the technical issues discussed in this thread, if you 
maintain the 4 above methods of obtaining help, or equivalents to those 
options, you will be ahead of everyone else's help system I've used.




--
Ken

Mac OS X 10.6.8
Firefox 7.0.1
Thunderbird 7.0.1
LibreOffice 3.3.4


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-03 Thread Ken Springer

On 11/3/11 5:19 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:

Hello,

Ken Springer wrote on 2011-11-02 22:48:

If you prefer your help system to be a forum, that's available through
the Nabble interface and Gmane.


sadly, Nabble is not seen as forum at all. I don't know why, but many -
especially novice - users have complained and do not use Nabble. My wish
was indeed to have this forum-style gateway to have access to the same
content with two interfaces, but it obviously didn't work out, which is
why I am considering a "real" forum.


I'm not a regular forum user or fan, I only use them when there is no 
other option, and Google, Ask.com, and others have failed me.  I quit 
going to MS when they dropped official support for newsgroups.  My 
feeling is, if you have to resort to Google and others to find answers 
that should be easy to find on an official website, then there is 
something wrong with the help system on that website.  So maybe there is 
something to a forum that I'm missing.


I sure don't see the difference between Nabble and any other forum 
layout.  Are the complaints about Nabble that it's hard to use, hard to 
find, or something else?


To me, a forum is like going to a public bulletin board at your local 
store, posting a note, then coming back later to see if anyone posted an 
answer.  You leave another note, and come back later to try to find a 
reply.  After awhile, the notes you want to read are spread all over the 
bulletin board, and trying to find a previous note that relates to 
something you wrote is just time wasting.  I have other things I'd 
rather do.


Which is why I prefer the threaded view of a newsgroup.  It's like a 
well organized filing system, everything sorted and arranged to be 
easily found.  So much easier to find the relevant messages.


Whatever happens with the the Nabble/forum style of help, I think a big 
plus would be to have a way of handling images, rather than forcing the 
user/poster to put those images somewhere else on the web and then 
provide a link.  That may be something a new LO user may not understand 
how to do.



--
Ken

Mac OS X 10.6.8
Firefox 7.0.1
Thunderbird 7.0.1
LibreOffice 3.3.4


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-03 Thread Marc Paré

Hi Florian et al,

Le 2011-11-02 17:03, Marc Paré a écrit :

Le 2011-11-02 06:17, Florian Effenberger a écrit :

Hi,

Stefan Weigel wrote on 2011-11-02 11:13:

Ok. The forum will sure have a search function, just like every
forum has, right? Could our new forum combine automatically three
searches at once?

(1) Show the matches inside our forum
(2) Show the matches within the ML archives
(3) Show Google matches


totally depends on the forum we install and its options. In case we go
for an own solution, there are many options, no decision on any software
yet.

Florian



If I remember correctly, there was previously some comparison research
done on different forum software solutions. I can't seem to find it on
GMane, I think my ISP provider only supplies so many of previous posts
and deletes the rest. Not sure.

But anyway, you may be able to find it somewhere. I am not sure on which
discussion list. It was a really well research effort and may be
interesting to review.

Cheers,


Marc




Sorry, I just now realized that the research on Forums software was done 
for Mageia. However, you can find some of the resources they used here:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Internet_forum_software_%28PHP%29


http://www.forummatrix.org/compare/bbPress+FluxBB+FUDforum+Invision-Power-Board+MyBB+Phorum+phpBB+punBB+SMF+vBulletin

After leaving Mandriva, the Mageia project built their own forums in EN 
using phpBB[1] and I believe they are also pointing to other established 
community driven language group forums.



Marc

[1] https://forums.mageia.org/en/


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-03 Thread Ken Springer

Hi, Augustine,

On 11/3/11 8:12 AM, Augustine Souza wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2011, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> "sadly, Nabble is not seen as forum at all. I don't know why, but many
> - especially novice - users have complained and do not use Nabble. My
> wish was indeed to have this forum-style gateway to have access to the
> same content with two interfaces, but it obviously didn't work out,
> which is why I am considering a "real" forum."
>
> As a novice user, I made two posts in the Nabble "forum" under the
> login name "chimak111". The first was promptly and efficiently dealt
> with by Cor Nouys (I'm spelling from memory).
And this is a perfect example of what is truly excellent with the LO
help system.

As you stated later in your post, you prefer a forums format, but I
prefer a newsgroup style format.  Essentially, a newsgroup format is
similar to Nabble's threaded view.

What is important, IMO, to us as end users, is the ability to see
absolutely all help requests regardless of the format you prefer to use.
  You cannot do this at Apple.  You cannot do this at Microsoft.  You
cannot do this at Mozilla (Thunderbird, Firefox, and others).  At least,
I have not discovered any way to do it.  I actually just discovered
Nabble's threaded view today, researching for this post.

I do not use Nabble at all, I use Thunderbird to read the LO mailing
lists, because of the things I can do with Thunderbird, overall, that I
cannot accomplish if I used the threaded view of Nabble.

If you want to know why I use Thunderbird vs. Nabble, please start a new
thread so we are not off topic, or send an email asking the question.
> The second post may be used to illustrate the current state of the
> Nabble "forum". At issue was the functioning of the global menu bar to
> "integrate" LibreOffice with the Unity aspect of Ubuntu 11.10. A
> couple of responses by "Tom" were to the point. The rest was the type
> of thing seen when there isn't active moderation of posts. The thread
> digressed to the merits and demerits of Unity, Ubuntu, Canonical,
> Linux, and what have you.
You wrote "The rest was the type of thing seen when there isn't active
moderation of posts."  And that is the crux of the problem, as I stated
in a different thread.  LO needs to have active moderation of posts,
ensuring the posts follow the netiquette rules adopted by TDF/LO.  As I
pointed out in another thread, I think the subject was on top posting,
if you don't enforce the rules, why bother to even have them?
> The link to this second post is here:
> 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-3-4-3-on-Ubuntu-11-10-Unity-3D-td3431366.html#a3431583

>
> Nabble, not per se but for want of moderation or etiquette, shows the
> same weakness of mailing lists in that material is quoted and
> requoted, mostly unnecessarily. Then there are the unwanted headers
> and footers that just bulk up each post and make havoc in posts
> containing quotes and requotes.
I think the problem is twofold.

Problem 1:  In the case of LO, all of the support options, Nabble,
Gmane, mailing lists, etc., all access the same database in the
background (if I understand the inner workings correctly.  So the
moderation only needs to be active on the database.  But as you noted,
there is no one enforcing the netiquette rules.  IMO, the rules are
nicely done, but inadequate in some areas.  That's not meant to
criticize the author, I do not know what guidelines he was working under.

Problem 2:  Lack of knowledge on the part of the user.  How many users
of the LO help system have ever read the netiquette link at the bottom
of every posted message?

IMO, LO could do a lot to solve problem 2, but I don't know if that
subject has ever been discussed.
> I know that moderators are not a dime a dozen, but without strong
> moderation, any forum or mailing list can become quite unattractive.
> All the same, I'd prefer a forum.
 >
> Here's wishing that LibreOffice and its volunteers all the best.


--
Ken

Mac OS X 10.6.8
Firefox 7.0.1
Thunderbird 7.0.1
LibreOffice 3.3.4


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-03 Thread Ken Springer

Hi, Augustine,

On 11/3/11 8:12 AM, Augustine Souza wrote:

On Nov 3, 2011, Florian Effenberger wrote:
"sadly, Nabble is not seen as forum at all. I don't know why, but many
- especially novice - users have complained and do not use Nabble. My
wish was indeed to have this forum-style gateway to have access to the
same content with two interfaces, but it obviously didn't work out,
which is why I am considering a "real" forum."

As a novice user, I made two posts in the Nabble "forum" under the
login name "chimak111". The first was promptly and efficiently dealt
with by Cor Nouys (I'm spelling from memory).


And this is a perfect example of what is truly excellent with the LO 
help system.


As you stated later in your post, you prefer a forums format, but I 
prefer a newsgroup style format.  Essentially, a newsgroup format is 
similar to Nabble's threaded view.


What is important, IMO, to us as end users, is the ability to see 
absolutely all help requests regardless of the format you prefer to use. 
 You cannot do this at Apple.  You cannot do this at Microsoft.  You 
cannot do this at Mozilla (Thunderbird, Firefox, and others).  At least, 
I have not discovered any way to do it.  I actually just discovered 
Nabble's threaded view today, researching for this post.


I do not use Nabble at all, I use Thunderbird to read the LO mailing 
lists, because of the things I can do with Thunderbird, overall, that I 
cannot accomplish if I used the threaded view of Nabble.


If you want to know why I use Thunderbird vs. Nabble, please start a new 
thread so we are not off topic, or send an email asking the question.



The second post may be used to illustrate the current state of the
Nabble "forum". At issue was the functioning of the global menu bar to
"integrate" LibreOffice with the Unity aspect of Ubuntu 11.10. A
couple of responses by "Tom" were to the point. The rest was the type
of thing seen when there isn't active moderation of posts. The thread
digressed to the merits and demerits of Unity, Ubuntu, Canonical,
Linux, and what have you.


You wrote "The rest was the type of thing seen when there isn't active 
moderation of posts."  And that is the crux of the problem, as I stated 
in a different thread.  LO needs to have active moderation of posts, 
ensuring the posts follow the netiquette rules adopted by TDF/LO.  As I 
pointed out in another thread, I think the subject was on top posting, 
if you don't enforce the rules, why bother to even have them?



The link to this second post is here:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-3-4-3-on-Ubuntu-11-10-Unity-3D-td3431366.html#a3431583

Nabble, not per se but for want of moderation or etiquette, shows the
same weakness of mailing lists in that material is quoted and
requoted, mostly unnecessarily. Then there are the unwanted headers
and footers that just bulk up each post and make havoc in posts
containing quotes and requotes.


I think the problem is twofold.

Problem 1:  In the case of LO, all of the support options, Nabble, 
Gmane, mailing lists, etc., all access the same database in the 
background (if I understand the inner workings correctly.  So the 
moderation only needs to be active on the database.  But as you noted, 
there is no one enforcing the netiquette rules.  IMO, the rules are 
nicely done, but inadequate in some areas.  That's not meant to 
criticize the author, I do not know what guidelines he was working under.


Problem 2:  Lack of knowledge on the part of the user.  How many users 
of the LO help system have ever read the netiquette link at the bottom 
of every posted message?


IMO, LO could do a lot to solve problem 2, but I don't know if that 
subject has ever been discussed.



I know that moderators are not a dime a dozen, but without strong
moderation, any forum or mailing list can become quite unattractive.
All the same, I'd prefer a forum.

>

Here's wishing that LibreOffice and its volunteers all the best.



--
Ken

Mac OS X 10.6.8
Firefox 7.0.1
Thunderbird 7.0.1
LibreOffice 3.3.4


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-04 Thread Marc Paré

Hi Drew, Florian, ...

Le 2011-11-04 06:18, Florian Effenberger a écrit :



It would be great, in case we go with own forums, to have a handful of
moderators right from the beginning. If not, I would even be willing to
see how things develop and have the guts to just do it. In case the
forum gets just messy and has to be shut down, c'est la vie, but we at
least tried it.

Florian



I really don't think we will have problems getting moderators from our 
membership. Moderating is a forums job that is very trainable and I 
think that once we put a call out for moderators, we will have enough 
who volunteer to run a forums board with enough moderator support.


Once the forums is definitely OK'd and once the decision on whether it 
will be an EN forums only (which is what I think you are talking about) 
or multiple languages, we should just make a call for help on all lists.


If we are talking about a multiple languages forums, then we should only 
support those where the mailing lists are most busy. We could then 
branch out to other languages once moderator support is available.


I could also help out with moderating if need be.

Marc


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-04 Thread Ken Springer
Apologies for the double post, but the Gmane system is giving me 
fits...  Again!  :-(


I actually wrote and sent the second post before the first post even 
showed up for me.  Note the huge difference between the timestamps.


--
Ken

Mac OS X 10.6.8
Firefox 7.0.1
Thunderbird 7.0.1
LibreOffice 3.3.4


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-06 Thread Tom Hart

Am 04.11.2011 11:18, schrieb Florian Effenberger:

Hi,

Christian Lohmaier wrote on 2011-11-03 16:17:


You cannot move threads to other topics, you cannot edit messages
afterwards, you cannot delete posts, you cannot mark posts as sticky
or "resolved", etc.


indeed, good points. However, I am not sure if this is what the majority
of users would do anyways (althought it's agreeably a nice feature), but
I think it's simply a "It doesn't look like a forum I know"-thing that
keeps people from using it.

When people complained we have nothing like a forum, and I pointed them
to Nabble, all I got was a "This is not a forum", without further
explanation, which makes nailing down the problem a bit troublesome. ;-)


Maybe this looks more like a forum?

http://arkanis.de/projects#nntp-forum
https://github.com/arkanis/nntp-forum

The key idea here is to have an etablished system newsgroup under the 
hood (for the more "conserative" users) and a fancy webinterface forum 
(for the "new" generation). So to enable exchange between those two user 
groups (the author also writes about the ides behind this software on 
his blog) - and free choice of reader for everyone.



just my 2cents (and to throw in another alternative in the pot *d&r* ;-)
tom


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-07 Thread Ken Springer

Hi, Florian,

On 11/7/11 3:55 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:

Hi,

Tom Hart wrote on 2011-11-07 02:11:

Maybe this looks more like a forum?

http://arkanis.de/projects#nntp-forum
https://github.com/arkanis/nntp-forum

The key idea here is to have an etablished system newsgroup under the
hood (for the more "conserative" users) and a fancy webinterface forum
(for the "new" generation). So to enable exchange between those two user
groups (the author also writes about the ides behind this software on
his blog) - and free choice of reader for everyone.


thanks for this proposal! Indeed, an interesting approach, as in the
beginning, I was also thinking about setting up an NNTP server (which
could even interact with the mailing lists).

However, the clear feedback I got from users it that they want "a forum
they know", i.e. phpBB or something in these terms. That's why I am so
hesitant against other solutions, although technology-wise, they would
make sense.


If the look and feel of a newsgroup server is "a forum they know", does 
it make any difference what is running in the background?


How would that be any different than reading the LO mailings lists in a 
newsgroup reader using Gmane?



It's about the users and their needs, and even if we see things
different, we should follow their demands to give them a good
experience, IMHO.


Exactly, and give users the interface they are comfortable using.  For 
me, it's a newsgroup "experience".  I, and I suspect most users, care 
less what is the driving force behind what they see on their monitor. 
They just need to have something on their monitor they are used to 
using, and/or are satisfied with the way they perceive the system to work.


I know mailing lists, which I despise and find horribly wasteful for me, 
are the underpinnings of the NNTP display I see, but I don't care.  :-) 
 I can access the content of the mailing list using a format that fits 
me.   :-)


FWIW, if nothing else, I would suggest LO look at their own Gmane and 
Nabble type access to the mailing list.  Recent and ongoing experiences 
with those interfaces for a different software product indicates to me 
that using third party services to provide those types of access is not 
the way to go.  You have no control over the performance of third party 
products.


I will once again say, that of all the open source programs I've tried 
and would like to use, LO is far and away the best organization at 
providing a help system for everyone.



--
Ken

Mac OS X 10.6.8
Firefox 7.0.1
Thunderbird 7.0.1
LibreOffice 3.3.4


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-10 Thread Marc Paré

Le 2011-11-08 11:52, drew a écrit :

On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 15:34 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:

Hi,

ads, independent to what they advertise for, are basically a no go for me.


Howdy Florian



right, well I have no doubt of the sincerity behind that comment, but it
does get a bit dicey in practice IMO.

For instance very few had a problem with pointing directly to the
official Document Foundation and LibreOffice pages on Facebook - ads.

Document Foundation and LibreOffice twitter accounts - ads.

TDF/Libo G+ pages - no ads, yet.

Alright, so a simple aversion to on-line ads is not the only determining
factor, exceptions are made all the time.

This is not a way to argue in favor of treating LibreOfficeForum.org or
lo-portal.de/forum as 'official' sites, but I would like to again
suggest that it, alone, is not a reason to in effect shun them either.

IIRC Micheal Meeks, in one of his presentations, suggested a goal of 200
Million users for the LibreOffice suite - I think that is a laudable
goal, and also believe that it will not be attained without this wealth
of extended, external, activity.

Which of course if not exactly on-topic and I will get directly back to
topic in reply to an earlier email but for this point - I hope we can
find some useful way to incorporate all the energy coming from these
auxiliary effots - it's not easy I know but I think it will be well
worth the effort.

Now - off to write the on-topic email,

//drew




Yes, well, then there are strange ad behaviour that you would see like 
on http://www.LinuxToday.com where Microsoft banners show regularly and 
where there are regular ads disputing the validity of linux as an OS.


Good points and bad points all round. But, for me, preferably, no 
outside ads and forums hosted on TDF/LibreOffice servers where we are in 
control of ad content and decide which ones are published rather than 
leave it in the hands of "whoever".


Marc


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hello Olivier,

Le 29/10/2011 10:16, Olivier R. a écrit :
> Hello Cor,
> 
> 
> Cor Nouws wrote:
>>
>> So apart from that it is maybe not fair ;-) to profit too much on the 
>> work of the forums at Apache (when life), it will be increasingly 
>> insufficient for our own users.
>>
> 
> Forums administrators and volonteers have always claim to be
> non-discriminative. They support all versions of the software: LibreOffice,
> OpenOffice.org, NeoOffice, etc. And almost all of us have already switched
> to LibreOffice. Is it really necessary to split again the community in
> smaller parts? I don’t think so.
> 
> AFAIK, forums migrated on Apache server only because TDF has always favored
> mailing-lists and seemed to have low respect for forums. Before Apache, TDF
> seemed not concerned with forums hosting.


No, I would not put it like that. We just did not have the time and we
were told repeatedly -and this sounds quite ironic now- that if we were
to open forums all of a sudden it would be a lack of respect for the
forums. So now we find ourselves in an interesting situation, as not
being hostile to the forums (what would that mean?) and providing
mailing lists seems to mean that we don't respect forums.

I must admit I am a bit confused

best,
Charles.



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Italo Vignoli

On 10/29/2011 10:16 AM, Olivier R. wrote:


AFAIK, forums migrated on Apache server only because TDF has always favored
mailing-lists and seemed to have low respect for forums. Before Apache, TDF
seemed not concerned with forums hosting.


When we started the project in 2010, "human" bandwidth was limited, and 
managing forums - which need more dedication than a mailing list, and a 
number of focused volunteers - would represent a problem.


We have never favoured mailing lists, and we have always had a lot of 
respect for forums. What has happened, is that forum admins have never 
had the patience to wait for the LibreOffice project to grow and mature 
over time, and get the human bandwidth necessary to host the forums.


Recently, we have offered a server - without any condition - to host the 
forums, but the admins have decided to go to Apache. The answer I got 
when I wrote to the ooo-user@apache mailing list is a testament of forum 
admins positioning (no answer at all).


The unfortunate situation at Apache, where an increasingly higher number 
of people exercise their right of spreading FUD over TDF (and this 
includes people in forums, and is very easy to spot their names), and a 
number of forum admins who have expressed their hostility vs TDF, do not 
make it acceptable - IMHO - to have the LibreOffice forum at Apache.


LibreOffice is going forward and bringing new features to users, with an 
increasingly different code base. OOo is going backwards, because of the 
meaningless "license sanification" imposed by Apache (one of the forum 
admins has recently asked a question on this subject, which - of course 
- has not been answered).


I think that this is the situation that we are facing today. Of course, 
we do not want to upset or divide the user base, but on the other hand 
we start to be pissed off by the attitude of some people.


If forum admins are reading this thread, I think this is the right 
opportunity to have an open discussion. If forum admins are not reading 
mailing lists, we can switch the discussion to the forum (I am open to 
any positive solution).


Best, Italo

--
Italo Vignoli
italo.vign...@gmail.com
mobile +39.348.5653829
VoIP +39.02.320621813
skype italovignoli

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Stefan Weigel
Hi,

Am 29.10.2011 10:16, schrieb Olivier R.:

> Forums administrators and volonteers have always claim to be
> non-discriminative. They support all versions of the software: LibreOffice,
> OpenOffice.org, NeoOffice, etc. 

That´s correct. And that´s why the following is *not* correct:

> TDF has always favored
> mailing-lists and seemed to have low respect for forums.

It´s not a matter of low respect. It´s just not necessary to mess
around and create yet another forum, since there are already
well-settled forums, driven by the community, that fully cover
LibreOffice. ;-)

Stefan


-- 
LibreOffice - Die Freiheit nehm' ich mir!

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Le 29/10/2011 11:37, Olivier R. a écrit :
> Hello Charles,
> 
>> providing mailing lists seems to mean that we don't
>> respect forums
> 
> No. You are twisting what I said.


Perhaps, but  I actually heard a similar argument about "the lack of
respect" to the forums (but apparently you make a different point) from
several people over the last months, hence my reaction.

> 
> Apache offered to host forums. There have been a lot of discussions, and it
> was not easy to find a common ground.
> Did TDF offer to host forums ?

Yes. To be perfectly fair we have not offered it in public as some of us
thought it was not right to let " the mustard go up" as you and I say in
French, and so we were very (too?) cautious, approaching one or two
persons off list. Clearly if the story that goes out now is that TDF did
not offer that, then it will seem and look accurate, but the forum
admins certainly know we have been very polite, very understanding and
we did propose them to host the forums, so in any case, it's really
unfortunate.

Best,

Charles.




-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hello,

Stefan Weigel wrote on 2011-10-29 11:35:

It´s not a matter of low respect. It´s just not necessary to mess
around and create yet another forum, since there are already
well-settled forums, driven by the community, that fully cover
LibreOffice.;-)


the points raised by Italo are not invalid, though. There has been a lot 
of FUD spreading around at certain groups, and that is not only ashaming 
for those groups, but also very embarassing for us. A good home for a 
forum requires that the involved people are not ranting against TDF and 
spreading false assumptions.


Apart from that, the forums topic is indeed a "hot" one that has often 
made it to our agenda items. I must confess that right now I am indeed 
in favor of having our own forums. It would not only put an end to these 
discussions, but also be something official that we can not only support 
marketing- but also infrastructure-wise.


Let's see what opinions and thoughts come out of this thread. :-)

Florian

--
Florian Effenberger 
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

On 29/10/2011 14:30, Florian Effenberger wrote:

Hello,

Stefan Weigel wrote on 2011-10-29 11:35:

It´s not a matter of low respect. It´s just not necessary to mess
around and create yet another forum, since there are already
well-settled forums, driven by the community, that fully cover
LibreOffice.;-)


the points raised by Italo are not invalid, though. There has been a 
lot of FUD spreading around at certain groups, and that is not only 
ashaming for those groups, but also very embarassing for us. A good 
home for a forum requires that the involved people are not ranting 
against TDF and spreading false assumptions.


Apart from that, the forums topic is indeed a "hot" one that has often 
made it to our agenda items. I must confess that right now I am indeed 
in favor of having our own forums. It would not only put an end to 
these discussions, but also be something official that we can not only 
support marketing- but also infrastructure-wise.


Let's see what opinions and thoughts come out of this thread. :-)

Florian

I am more then willing to volunteer a section on my forums for 
Libreoffice and the TDF discussion and support as well. I am using phpbb 
for the forums though :(


Regards

Jonathan Aquilina

Get a signature like this. 
 
CLICK HERE. 
 



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi Jonathan,

Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-10-29 14:33:

I am more then willing to volunteer a section on my forums for
Libreoffice and the TDF discussion and support as well. I am using phpbb
for the forums though :(


thanks a lot for that offer. If we, however, decide for TDF forums, I 
then would like to host our own ones, within our infrastructure.


We have other choices, of course, one of them being to use one of the 
existing forums and appoint them as "official". As I understand it, the 
reason of this thread is to find out whether we should go for hosting 
our own ones.


If we decide to, I would be more than happy of course of having you as a 
contributor there. ;-)


Florian

--
Florian Effenberger 
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

On 29/10/2011 14:38, Florian Effenberger wrote:

Hi Jonathan,

Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-10-29 14:33:

I am more then willing to volunteer a section on my forums for
Libreoffice and the TDF discussion and support as well. I am using phpbb
for the forums though :(


thanks a lot for that offer. If we, however, decide for TDF forums, I 
then would like to host our own ones, within our infrastructure.


We have other choices, of course, one of them being to use one of the 
existing forums and appoint them as "official". As I understand it, 
the reason of this thread is to find out whether we should go for 
hosting our own ones.


If we decide to, I would be more than happy of course of having you as 
a contributor there. ;-)


Florian

If you opt to name one as an official TDF mirror it wont take me a 
second to setup a TDF section and LO section for use.


I am wondering though if you go for self hosted solution i am wondering 
instead of using a seperate user login to login to the forums if one has 
an account to edit the wiki lets say can that be used for existing 
users, as well as allowing those users who dont edit the wiki to sign up 
for an account through the forums and end up as contributors as well for 
the wiki if they need it down the road?


Regards

Jonathan Aquilina

Get a signature like this. 
 
CLICK HERE. 
 



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Italo Vignoli

On 10/29/2011 11:37 AM, Olivier R. wrote:


Did TDF offer to host forums ?


Yes

--
Italo Vignoli
italo.vign...@gmail.com
mobile +39.348.5653829
VoIP +39.02.320621813
skype italovignoli

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



RE: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
I'm one of the Forum-invited Apache Observers.  I worked with the OOo Forum 
Administrators and other Apache Observers to arrive at an acceptable 
accommodation of the Forum governance with requirements that Apache has for web 
properties in its custody.

I am not aware of *any* statements from AOOo or Forum operators that suggested 
TDF antipathy for forums or anything like that.  If there were any such 
remarks, I believe they were simply ignored as irrelevant to the problem at 
hand.

I am also not aware of any discussion that was antagonistic to TDF whatsoever 
among those involved with finding a resolution for the migration of the OOo 
Forums to a reliable hosting. The key objection was to preserve and continue 
that valuable activity with as little disruption as possible for the coummunity 
of users and for the operators themselves.  

There are the usual highly-speculative misgivings from the usual parties about 
the direction of one group or the other (even both), but that seems to be 
invariable and unrelated to the problems of user forums operation.  My 
experience is that whatever those cynical pontifications are, it works best to 
ignore them and keep moving forward.

Italo's two posts on ooo-users@ incubator.apache.org each have statements to 
the effect that "as you know at TDF w+e are ready to host the forums."  I 
believe these were in response to expressions of angst by some that Apache 
custody raised unacceptable obstacles for the current Forum operators and that 
the possible demise of the Oracle-hosted service would happen before that was 
all worked out.  There was also concern for the incivility experienced in 
various settings.  The dates of Italo's posts are 30 September and 11 October. 

Fortunately, the forum migration has been successful and the forums are now 
operating pretty much the same as before.  I don't know what the outlook of the 
forum administrators now is.  It is unreasonable to expect that they are all of 
one mind any more than are the TDF and ASF communities.

The key objective has been achieved: 

 * the forums continue to be available where they have already been, 
 * all of the operations, content, and integration into other portions of the 
OpenOffice.org site are preserved, 
 * logins were preserved, etc.  

I.e., the least destabilizing migration possible has been accomplished.  

Now use and support of the OOo User Forums can proceed in a more deliberate and 
straightforward way.  This was probably the most important factor in the course 
chosen, and other options would have been important had this effort failed.  

Having the offer from TDF was certainly valuable in knowing that a contingency 
course was available.  Some found reassurance in the TDF offer as providing an 
important safety net.  It wasn't needed.  

All of this is without prejudice to other forums that exist and might come into 
existence, wherever hosted, in the future.  The communities and products will 
evolve and the forums that support the communities will as well.

For now, and the forseeable near-term future, there is significant value in the 
OpenOffice.org Forums to users of OO.o releases and LO releases.  I am 
confident that any divergence of products will be accommodated in ways that 
serve the mutual community of interest.  There is now the opportunity to deal 
with that in non-disruptive ways whenever the time comes.

 - Dennis

-Original Message-
From: charles.h.sch...@gmail.com [mailto:charles.h.sch...@gmail.com] On Behalf 
Of Charles-H. Schulz
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 02:54
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

Le 29/10/2011 11:37, Olivier R. a écrit :
> Hello Charles,
> 
>> providing mailing lists seems to mean that we don't
>> respect forums
> 
> No. You are twisting what I said.


Perhaps, but  I actually heard a similar argument about "the lack of
respect" to the forums (but apparently you make a different point) from
several people over the last months, hence my reaction.

> 
> Apache offered to host forums. There have been a lot of discussions, and it
> was not easy to find a common ground.
> Did TDF offer to host forums ?

Yes. To be perfectly fair we have not offered it in public as some of us
thought it was not right to let " the mustard go up" as you and I say in
French, and so we were very (too?) cautious, approaching one or two
persons off list. Clearly if the story that goes out now is that TDF did
not offer that, then it will seem and look accurate, but the forum
admins certainly know we have been very polite, very understanding and
we did propose them to host the forums, so in any case, it's really
unfortunate.

Best,

Charles.




-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-uns

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Cor Nouws

Hi Olivier,

Olivier R. wrote (29-10-11 10:16)


Forums administrators and volonteers have always claim to be
non-discriminative. They support all versions of the software: LibreOffice,
OpenOffice.org, NeoOffice, etc. And almost all of us have already switched
to LibreOffice. Is it really necessary to split again the community in
smaller parts? I don’t think so.


Apart from what I read in some other mails in this thread (about wrong 
information in some comments) I agree with you that is should be like as 
you write.


Another side of the current situation, is that it looks a bit strange 
that users go to OpenOffice forums for LibreOffice questions.

Over the time, the differences will grow and OpenOffice is not LibreOffice.
But for users, since similarities are far more then differences (at 
least for the foreseeable future), it is pretty easy to go to one place.
Good thing too of course is, that OpenOffice users will be easily 
informed about LibreOffice and the benefits that it can bring them.

So that is a fine way to spread our good new ;-)
Hmm..  obviously, I am a bit undetermined here.


AFAIK, forums migrated on Apache server only because TDF has always favored
mailing-lists and seemed to have low respect for forums. Before Apache, TDF
seemed not concerned with forums hosting.


(I see others that have been envolved in contacts, already responded on 
this subject.)


Regards,

--
 - Cor
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Cor Nouws

Hi Italo,

Italo Vignoli wrote (29-10-11 11:26)


LibreOffice is going forward and bringing new features to users, with an
increasingly different code base. OOo is going backwards, [...]


From what I've seen the past year, I am not positive too about OO, 
especially not compared to LibreOffice. But that does not necessarily 
have to mean that there will be no improvement at all after some time.



I think that this is the situation that we are facing today. Of course,
we do not want to upset or divide the user base, but on the other hand
we start to be pissed off by the attitude of some people.


It would have my preference to ignore the last as much as possible. 
Reply kindly now and then maybe. And focus on the first.
I trust that this in the end will help us most, showing the truth and 
being reasonable.


Since I do not follow any AOO list, and see the forums only now and 
then, I have no idea what is going on there. But if people insist on 
writing silly things, maybe it is time that we write some short but 
clear FAQ's ?
Of course, we should take care to make it to positive statements rather 
then negative, defensive. But that should not be a problem ;-)


Regards,


--
 - Cor
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-29 Thread Cor Nouws

Hi Dennis,

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote (29-10-11 20:47)


I am also not aware of any discussion that was antagonistic to TDF
whatsoever among those involved with finding a resolution for the
migration of the OOo Forums to a reliable hosting. The key objection
was to preserve and continue that valuable activity with as little
disruption as possible for the coummunity of users and for the
operators themselves.


I agree that this is valuable.
And honestly: there is enough work to do on our side to, so maybe we 
should say thank for the effort you (at AOO) made for this :-)


I've posted some related thoughts in other mails.
But I think that is more for TDF to think about how to handle forums and 
information in the (nearby or more distant) future.


Regards,

--
 - Cor
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-30 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi,

Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-10-29 14:55:

If you opt to name one as an official TDF mirror it wont take me a
second to setup a TDF section and LO section for use.


what is the URL of your existing forum, so I can have a look?


I am wondering though if you go for self hosted solution i am wondering
instead of using a seperate user login to login to the forums if one has
an account to edit the wiki lets say can that be used for existing
users, as well as allowing those users who dont edit the wiki to sign up
for an account through the forums and end up as contributors as well for
the wiki if they need it down the road?


Single sign-on is indeed something I'd like to see soon, but there are 
no concrete plans as of now. One option would be OpenID, another one an 
LDAP connection - let's see what we can come up with. ;-)


Florian

--
Florian Effenberger 
Board of Directors at The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-30 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

On 30/10/2011 16:40, Florian Effenberger wrote:

Hi,

Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-10-29 14:55:

If you opt to name one as an official TDF mirror it wont take me a
second to setup a TDF section and LO section for use.


what is the URL of your existing forum, so I can have a look?


I am wondering though if you go for self hosted solution i am wondering
instead of using a seperate user login to login to the forums if one has
an account to edit the wiki lets say can that be used for existing
users, as well as allowing those users who dont edit the wiki to sign up
for an account through the forums and end up as contributors as well for
the wiki if they need it down the road?


Single sign-on is indeed something I'd like to see soon, but there are 
no concrete plans as of now. One option would be OpenID, another one 
an LDAP connection - let's see what we can come up with. ;-)


Florian

Florian forgot to mention the other part. Currently my forums are read 
only for guests meaning they cant post and registration is required.


Regards

Jonathan Aquilina

Get a signature like this. 
 
CLICK HERE. 
 



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-30 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

On 30/10/2011 16:40, Florian Effenberger wrote:

Hi,

Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-10-29 14:55:

If you opt to name one as an official TDF mirror it wont take me a
second to setup a TDF section and LO section for use.


what is the URL of your existing forum, so I can have a look?


I am wondering though if you go for self hosted solution i am wondering
instead of using a seperate user login to login to the forums if one has
an account to edit the wiki lets say can that be used for existing
users, as well as allowing those users who dont edit the wiki to sign up
for an account through the forums and end up as contributors as well for
the wiki if they need it down the road?


Single sign-on is indeed something I'd like to see soon, but there are 
no concrete plans as of now. One option would be OpenID, another one 
an LDAP connection - let's see what we can come up with. ;-)


Florian

http://forums.eagleeyet.net I am actually in the process of adding more 
topics etc. the nice thing i think that i could do which i failed to 
mention if i am unable to host i think then i could backup lets say the 
TDF and LO related sections and hand them over to the foundation itself 
to host.


Regards

Jonathan Aquilina

Get a signature like this. 
 
CLICK HERE. 
 



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-30 Thread Marc-André Laverdière
+

On 30 Oct 2011 13:49, "Marc Paré"  wrote:

Le 2011-10-30 11:40, Florian Effenberger a écrit :


>
> Single sign-on is indeed something I'd like to see soon, but there are
> no concrete plans as o...
OpenId is the option that users would be most familiar, there are many
sites using it. Doing LDAP would not be familiar at all.

Marc




-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-10-30 Thread Marc-André Laverdière
+1 for open id.
Sorry for the extra email... my phone's touch screen is a bit off
sometimes.

On 30 Oct 2011 13:49, "Marc Paré"  wrote:

Le 2011-10-30 11:40, Florian Effenberger a écrit :


>
> Single sign-on is indeed something I'd like to see soon, but there are
> no concrete plans as o...
OpenId is the option that users would be most familiar, there are many
sites using it. Doing LDAP would not be familiar at all.

Marc




-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-01 Thread Stefan Weigel
Hi,

Am 01.11.2011 05:45, schrieb Marc Paré:

> If de.openoffice.org is "awarded" the care of
> the LibreOffice maintenance of the forums, there will be those
> who will complain about it as not being a real native LibreOffice
> forums. If the TDF raises its own forums, then there will those
> who will complain that communities have been broken and all of
> the past discussions have been lost.

With OpenOffice.org we used to have a number of derivates (that I
wouldn´t call a fork) and that made sense for special types of
users, for example OOo4Kids. It´s likely that we will see similar
derivates from LibreOffice in the future.

Wouldn´t it be good to have *one* *common* place for the support of
*all* suites, that are somehow related to what evolved from
StarOffice? This place does not need to be exclusively labelled
"LibreOffice".

I estimate at least 80% of the topics/questions/answers will still
be common for all these products. We need to look at this from the
users point of view. The user does not benefit, if the knowledge
base is split up and unequally distributed over several places.

Stefan

-- 
LibreOffice - Die Freiheit nehm' ich mir!

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-01 Thread Marc-André Laverdière
I understand the logic. I am not too happy about it, but there is no
perfect solution, as you pointed out.

I like the Shapado site. I am not sure we can vote up answers, which I
think is a killer feature. If that is there, it would have my blessing for
an official Q&A. I guess we can worry about migrating a little bit later,
once the thing proves to be viable.

How does that sound to everyone?

Marc-André LAVERDIÈRE
"Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete,
not lacking anything." -James 1:4
http://asimplediscipleslife.blogspot.com/
mlaverd.theunixplace.com




On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Marc Paré  wrote:

> Le 2011-10-31 15:49, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
>
>  Hello,
>>
>> thanks everyone for your feedback and your kind offers to help, that's
>> really much appreciated!
>>
>> As for which type to use, I must say that a "normal" forum is the only
>> way, IMHO. We've been experimenting with Nabble, and the result has been
>> rather mixed. People prefer a forum they know, nothing else. At least
>> based on my experience.
>>
>> There are several forums running. What I would like to have is one
>> "official" LibO forum, either done by us or someone else, that is open
>> for all languages, and run by a group that does not have members who
>> openly show hostility towards TDF. I am not saying that everyone does
>> so, but at least I have heard from some forums, where definitely FUD was
>> spread, and this leaves me with bad feelings.
>>
>> What I took from this thread is, that there are two options: One
>> de.openoffice.org, and the other one the LibreOffice forum.
>>
>> Anyone already got in touch with those folks? IIRC, there had been
>> discussions, with some groups, and that didn't work out - but I must
>> confess I don't know which ones.
>>
>> Honestly, my preference would be to have our own forum and see if it
>> works. If not, we tried it, and we don't lose that much.
>>
>> Florian
>>
>>
> I really don't think this is a case where anyone can win with any of these
> decisions. If de.openoffice.org is "awarded" the care of the LibreOffice
> maintenance of the forums, there will be those who will complain about it
> as not being a real native LibreOffice forums. If the TDF raises its own
> forums, then there will those who will complain that communities have been
> broken and all of the past discussions have been lost. The LibreOffice fork
> of OpenOffice has created a shift in community use/support and that is just
> the reality of the situation. The code base differences between LibreOffice
> and AOO will only get wider over time and LibreOffice may find itself at
> this same situation later on.
>
> Therefore, as there would be no clear way to win, it would seem to make
> the most sense for the TDF/LibreOffice to create its own forums
> infrastructure, offer and invite participation of "already established"
> interested forums related to LibreOffice. The TDF/LibreOffice forums could
> also offer to help facilitate the migration of any historical data to its
> own servers of any group wishing to join the new LibreOffice forums project.
>
> It is still early in the game for LibreOffice and it is the right time to
> move on to its own forums services. This will in effect offer our users a
> complete office suite service under the same banner that is TDF/LibreOffice.
>
> Marc
>
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to 
> discuss+help@**documentfoundation.org
> Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/**get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-**
> unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/**
> Netiquette 
> List archive: 
> http://listarchives.**documentfoundation.org/www/**discuss/
> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
> deleted
>

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-03 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hello,

Ken Springer wrote on 2011-11-02 22:48:

If you prefer your help system to be a forum, that's available through
the Nabble interface and Gmane.


sadly, Nabble is not seen as forum at all. I don't know why, but many - 
especially novice - users have complained and do not use Nabble. My wish 
was indeed to have this forum-style gateway to have access to the same 
content with two interfaces, but it obviously didn't work out, which is 
why I am considering a "real" forum.


Florian

--
Florian Effenberger 
Board of Directors at The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-03 Thread Augustine Souza
On Nov 3, 2011, Florian Effenberger wrote:
"sadly, Nabble is not seen as forum at all. I don't know why, but many
- especially novice - users have complained and do not use Nabble. My
wish was indeed to have this forum-style gateway to have access to the
same content with two interfaces, but it obviously didn't work out,
which is why I am considering a "real" forum."

As a novice user, I made two posts in the Nabble "forum" under the
login name "chimak111". The first was promptly and efficiently dealt
with by Cor Nouys (I'm spelling from memory).

The second post may be used to illustrate the current state of the
Nabble "forum". At issue was the functioning of the global menu bar to
"integrate" LibreOffice with the Unity aspect of Ubuntu 11.10. A
couple of responses by "Tom" were to the point. The rest was the type
of thing seen when there isn't active moderation of posts. The thread
digressed to the merits and demerits of Unity, Ubuntu, Canonical,
Linux, and what have you.
The link to this second post is here:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-3-4-3-on-Ubuntu-11-10-Unity-3D-td3431366.html#a3431583

Nabble, not per se but for want of moderation or etiquette, shows the
same weakness of mailing lists in that material is quoted and
requoted, mostly unnecessarily. Then there are the unwanted headers
and footers that just bulk up each post and make havoc in posts
containing quotes and requotes.

I know that moderators are not a dime a dozen, but without strong
moderation, any forum or mailing list can become quite unattractive.
All the same, I'd prefer a forum.

Here's wishing that LibreOffice and its volunteers all the best.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-03 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *,

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Florian Effenberger
 wrote:
> Ken Springer wrote on 2011-11-02 22:48:
>>
>> If you prefer your help system to be a forum, that's available through
>> the Nabble interface and Gmane.
>
> sadly, Nabble is not seen as forum at all.

Yes, because it is none.

> I don't know why, but many -
> especially novice - users have complained and do not use Nabble.

You cannot move threads to other topics, you cannot edit messages
afterwards, you cannot delete posts, you cannot mark posts as sticky
or "resolved", etc.

All those features are considerably useful when used properly, but
from my experience too many clueless people join forums, and the same
old questions get posted over and over again, people don't make use of
those additional features and in the end it is used as a mailinglist
with reduced functionality.

If LO is going to have an own forum, then there shall be a bunch of
moderators that are to ensure to keep the different topics organized,
ensure that a certain level of posting discipline is respected, make
sure that the repeated questions or spam-posts to just put an older
topic further up the list are kept to a minimum. Forum-Sheriffs if you
want to use a loaded term.

This is where I see the biggest problem. You need to have a big number
of dedicated people who clean up the mess that the mass of regular
users create to keep a forum usable. And I'm not sure that a new forum
will have those people.

In former times, when you had a technical problem, you would use your
search-engine of choice and after browsing through 5 or 6 links, you
would get your answer.
Nowadays, you get thousands of hits, many to forums where the same
question is posted to a sh*tload of different forums, full of "I have
the same problem" style posts but with no answer. Or the answer is
"solved by using different hardware/software" instead. And the best of
all are those are the "fixed the problem, topic can be closed" style
posts (don't even bother to tell others how you fixed that problem).
And of course then there is the forum-post signature spam when looking
for info regarding a specific hardware or similar, people put a big
list of stuff they once owned to all of their posts, rendering any
search useless as all irrelevant posts are returned just because the
term appears in the signature in every post/thread the user does post.

My fear is that the same will happen to any newly created Forum when
there is already a big userbase.

And as you might have noticed, I'm not a big fan of forums. I'm
actually only using one forum, one that one is tightly scoped.
And my aversion against forums is not the technology, but rather what
the people make of it. As long as it has a sane
mail-notification/subscription system and doesn't force me to visit a
webpage and hunt for replies myself, I would be fine.

Replying to topics via mail would be a great plus though. - But I am
not aware of any of the big forum-software that would support this.

ciao
Christian

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-03 Thread drew
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 16:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi *,
> 
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Florian Effenberger
>  wrote:
> > Ken Springer wrote on 2011-11-02 22:48:
> >>
> >> If you prefer your help system to be a forum, that's available through
> >> the Nabble interface and Gmane.
> >
> > sadly, Nabble is not seen as forum at all.
> 
> Yes, because it is none.

Right - as it is currently configured. 

> 
> > I don't know why, but many -
> > especially novice - users have complained and do not use Nabble.
> 
> You cannot move threads to other topics, you cannot edit messages
> afterwards, you cannot delete posts, you cannot mark posts as sticky
> or "resolved", etc.

This type of behavior is possible using the service features, BUT, this
then renders a database that is not tied in structure to the underling
mail archive - I'm not saying that Nabble's forum features would be a
suitable platform, or not, I think there are other concerns, most of
which would be there with any third party service provider IMO. 

Perhaps as a side note - when I setup the initial Nabble link I was not
expecting it to wind up so tightly coupled with the main website, I just
saw it as a ancillary service that could be setup with a minimum of fuss
that would offer some value to part of the user base, while not adding
(much) overhead to the real infrastructure teams workload.

> 
> All those features are considerably useful when used properly, but
> from my experience too many clueless people join forums, and the same
> old questions get posted over and over again, people don't make use of
> those additional features and in the end it is used as a mailinglist
> with reduced functionality.
> 
> If LO is going to have an own forum, then there shall be a bunch of
> moderators that are to ensure to keep the different topics organized,
> ensure that a certain level of posting discipline is respected, make
> sure that the repeated questions or spam-posts to just put an older
> topic further up the list are kept to a minimum. Forum-Sheriffs if you
> want to use a loaded term.
> 
> This is where I see the biggest problem. You need to have a big number
> of dedicated people who clean up the mess that the mass of regular
> users create to keep a forum usable. And I'm not sure that a new forum
> will have those people.

Good points for sure. 

> 
> In former times, when you had a technical problem, you would use your
> search-engine of choice and after browsing through 5 or 6 links, you
> would get your answer.
> Nowadays, you get thousands of hits, many to forums where the same
> question is posted to a sh*tload of different forums, full of "I have
> the same problem" style posts but with no answer. Or the answer is
> "solved by using different hardware/software" instead. And the best of
> all are those are the "fixed the problem, topic can be closed" style
> posts (don't even bother to tell others how you fixed that problem).
> And of course then there is the forum-post signature spam when looking
> for info regarding a specific hardware or similar, people put a big
> list of stuff they once owned to all of their posts, rendering any
> search useless as all irrelevant posts are returned just because the
> term appears in the signature in every post/thread the user does post.
> 
> My fear is that the same will happen to any newly created Forum when
> there is already a big userbase.

Ok, I understand that and though IMO it is  a problem with any attempt
to deliver services - it's less about the tools and more about the
execution.


> And as you might have noticed, I'm not a big fan of forums. 

A web forum is not a panacea - it is one tool, one access point if you
will. 

This thread has touched on a number of tools - the real question to be
asked is I think - what or which of those tools make sense to include in
the mix of options available for support.

> I'm
> actually only using one forum, one that one is tightly scoped.
> And my aversion against forums is not the technology, but rather what
> the people make of it. As long as it has a sane
> mail-notification/subscription system and doesn't force me to visit a
> webpage and hunt for replies myself, I would be fine.
> 
> Replying to topics via mail would be a great plus though. - But I am
> not aware of any of the big forum-software that would support this.

Actually there are a number of solutions for different web forum
platforms, they have limitations - but they are there.

Finally, just a thought - I think it is a mistake to look at human
resources vs support options as a net sum game. Each different platform
is likely to appeal to somewhat different groups of individuals and
though there needs to be some folks that look after things as a whole,
or at least with a view beyond just one service. 

In other words recruiting (meeting the needs of) new volunteers
(responders) is, by definition IMO, part of running a well functioning
support service, be it a BBS style web fo

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-04 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi,

Christian Lohmaier wrote on 2011-11-03 16:17:


You cannot move threads to other topics, you cannot edit messages
afterwards, you cannot delete posts, you cannot mark posts as sticky
or "resolved", etc.


indeed, good points. However, I am not sure if this is what the majority 
of users would do anyways (althought it's agreeably a nice feature), but 
I think it's simply a "It doesn't look like a forum I know"-thing that 
keeps people from using it.


When people complained we have nothing like a forum, and I pointed them 
to Nabble, all I got was a "This is not a forum", without further 
explanation, which makes nailing down the problem a bit troublesome. ;-)



If LO is going to have an own forum, then there shall be a bunch of
moderators that are to ensure to keep the different topics organized,
ensure that a certain level of posting discipline is respected, make
sure that the repeated questions or spam-posts to just put an older
topic further up the list are kept to a minimum. Forum-Sheriffs if you
want to use a loaded term.


Yes, I agree. Moderators in forums are even more important than on 
mailing lists, because forums will attract more casual users to whom the 
term Netiquette does not ring any bell, usually. ;-)


It would be great, in case we go with own forums, to have a handful of 
moderators right from the beginning. If not, I would even be willing to 
see how things develop and have the guts to just do it. In case the 
forum gets just messy and has to be shut down, c'est la vie, but we at 
least tried it.


Florian

--
Florian Effenberger 
Board of Directors at The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-04 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi,

Marc Paré wrote on 2011-11-04 18:06:


Once the forums is definitely OK'd and once the decision on whether it
will be an EN forums only (which is what I think you are talking about)
or multiple languages, we should just make a call for help on all lists.


I definitely plan, should we go with own forums, to have them 
multi-language, to serve all our users at one place. :-)



If we are talking about a multiple languages forums, then we should only
support those where the mailing lists are most busy. We could then
branch out to other languages once moderator support is available.


Sounds good.


I could also help out with moderating if need be.


Thanks a lot!
I am still waiting for some feedback from others, to see where we should 
be going.


Florian

--
Florian Effenberger 
Board of Directors at The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-07 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi,

Tom Hart wrote on 2011-11-07 02:11:

Maybe this looks more like a forum?

http://arkanis.de/projects#nntp-forum
https://github.com/arkanis/nntp-forum

The key idea here is to have an etablished system newsgroup under the
hood (for the more "conserative" users) and a fancy webinterface forum
(for the "new" generation). So to enable exchange between those two user
groups (the author also writes about the ides behind this software on
his blog) - and free choice of reader for everyone.


thanks for this proposal! Indeed, an interesting approach, as in the 
beginning, I was also thinking about setting up an NNTP server (which 
could even interact with the mailing lists).


However, the clear feedback I got from users it that they want "a forum 
they know", i.e. phpBB or something in these terms. That's why I am so 
hesitant against other solutions, although technology-wise, they would 
make sense.


It's about the users and their needs, and even if we see things 
different, we should follow their demands to give them a good 
experience, IMHO.


But thanks for throwing this in!

Florian

--
Florian Effenberger 
Board of Directors at The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-07 Thread Kazunari Hirano
Hi Ken and all,

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Ken Springer  wrote:
> I will once again say, that of all the open source programs I've tried and
> would like to use, LO is far and away the best organization at providing a
> help system for everyone.

You are right.  But http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Language_Teams
are trying the forums they like :)
Chinese (Traditional) :
http://ooo.tn.edu.tw/modules/xforum/viewforum.php?forum=6&type=0&mode=0&since=100&start=0&sortorder=DESC&sortname=f.forum_order
Georgian:
http://ka.libreoffice.org/forum
Japanese:
http://ja.libreofficeforum.org/forum
Serbian:
http://otvorenidokument.com/

It seems they are doing fine :)

Thanks,
khirano

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-07 Thread drew
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 06:20 +0900, Kazunari Hirano wrote:
> Hi Ken and all,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Ken Springer  wrote:
> > I will once again say, that of all the open source programs I've tried and
> > would like to use, LO is far and away the best organization at providing a
> > help system for everyone.
> 
> You are right.  But http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Language_Teams
> are trying the forums they like :)

> Chinese (Traditional) :
> http://ooo.tn.edu.tw/modules/xforum/viewforum.php?forum=6&type=0&mode=0&since=100&start=0&sortorder=DESC&sortname=f.forum_order

A university based site is quite cool IMO

> Georgian:
> http://ka.libreoffice.org/forum

Well, the forum module on the main LibreOffice site has been used to
manage user accounts for those individuals granted publishing rights to
the NL site, not as an actual end user forum to date. So I think this is
an anomily.

With specific reference to Georgia I don't think we need to concern
ourselves about an end user forum as the Georgian govt. is funding a
full blown LibreOffice Portal project - they are well into the phase of
finding and funding contractors to build the site now IIRC.

> Japanese:
> http://ja.libreofficeforum.org/forum

Right, LibreOfficeForum.org was almost first out of the gate, but there
has been a certain amount of resistance to referring users to the site
from the main projects web properties.

> Serbian:
> http://otvorenidokument.com/

Didn't know about this one - quite nice - I like MyBB at least what I've
seen of it before..

> 
> It seems they are doing fine :)

The last one for sure.

Best wishes,

//drew


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-07 Thread drew
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 17:07 -0500, drew wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 06:20 +0900, Kazunari Hirano wrote:
> > Hi Ken and all,
> > 
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Ken Springer  wrote:
> > > I will once again say, that of all the open source programs I've tried and
> > > would like to use, LO is far and away the best organization at providing a
> > > help system for everyone.
> > 
> > You are right.  But http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Language_Teams
> > are trying the forums they like :)
> 
> > Chinese (Traditional) :
> > http://ooo.tn.edu.tw/modules/xforum/viewforum.php?forum=6&type=0&mode=0&since=100&start=0&sortorder=DESC&sortname=f.forum_order
> 
> A university based site is quite cool IMO
> 
> > Georgian:
> > http://ka.libreoffice.org/forum
> 
> Well, the forum module on the main LibreOffice site has been used to
> manage user accounts for those individuals granted publishing rights to
> the NL site, not as an actual end user forum to date. So I think this is
> an anomily.
> 



> > Japanese:
> > http://ja.libreofficeforum.org/forum
> 
> Right, LibreOfficeForum.org was almost first out of the gate, but there
> has been a certain amount of resistance to referring users to the site
> from the main projects web properties.
> 
> > Serbian:
> > http://otvorenidokument.com/
> 
> Didn't know about this one - quite nice - I like MyBB at least what I've
> seen of it before..
> 
> > 
> > It seems they are doing fine :)
> 
> The last one for sure.

and I will add one more to the inventory.

The Danish community page http://da.libreoffice.org links from the
Support entry on the main menu to http://www.oooforum.dk/ which has been
around for a good while, prior to the fork. As you see this group chose
a very simple joint branding approach.

//drew



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-07 Thread Augustine Souza
On 11/8/11, drew  wrote:
...
>
> Right, LibreOfficeForum.org was almost first out of the gate, but there
> has been a certain amount of resistance to referring users to the site
> from the main projects web properties.
>
...

en.libreofficeforum.org is not too shabby at all and would serve the purpose.

If I remember there was some opposition to Google ads featuring
competing software but that's really a non-issue.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-07 Thread Jonathan Aquilina

On 08/11/2011 07:42, Augustine Souza wrote:

On 11/8/11, drew  wrote:
...

Right, LibreOfficeForum.org was almost first out of the gate, but there
has been a certain amount of resistance to referring users to the site
from the main projects web properties.


...

en.libreofficeforum.org is not too shabby at all and would serve the purpose.

If I remember there was some opposition to Google ads featuring
competing software but that's really a non-issue.

I feel a TDF based subdomain such as forums.documentfoundation.org is 
better. Like this any project that is part of the tdf can have a section 
in the forums for it.


Regards

Jonathan Aquilina

Want a signature like mine? 
 
CLICK HERE. 
 



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-08 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Augustine, *,

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Augustine Souza  wrote:
> On 11/8/11, drew  wrote:
>
> en.libreofficeforum.org is not too shabby at all and would serve the purpose.
>
> If I remember there was some opposition to Google ads featuring
> competing software but that's really a non-issue.

I still dislike the adds as a whole, and also I don't really like the
choice of presenting the posts. I'd like the default category view
like for example on http://libreoffice-forum.de/ much better

(The adds are also the main reason why I personally wouldn't like to
feature it as the official forum - if people don't mind the "recent
post" view I don't care)

ciao
Christian

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-08 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi,

ads, independent to what they advertise for, are basically a no go for me.

Florian

*** This message has been sent from my tablet. Please excuse the possible 
briefness.



Augustine Souza  schrieb:

>On 11/8/11, drew  wrote:
>...
>>
>> Right, LibreOfficeForum.org was almost first out of the gate, but
>there
>> has been a certain amount of resistance to referring users to the
>site
>> from the main projects web properties.
>>
>...
>
>en.libreofficeforum.org is not too shabby at all and would serve the
>purpose.
>
>If I remember there was some opposition to Google ads featuring
>competing software but that's really a non-issue.
>
>-- 
>Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
>Problems?
>http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
>Posting guidelines + more:
>http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
>List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
>All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
>deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-08 Thread drew
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 15:34 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> ads, independent to what they advertise for, are basically a no go for me.
> 
Howdy Florian



right, well I have no doubt of the sincerity behind that comment, but it
does get a bit dicey in practice IMO.

For instance very few had a problem with pointing directly to the
official Document Foundation and LibreOffice pages on Facebook - ads.

Document Foundation and LibreOffice twitter accounts - ads.

TDF/Libo G+ pages - no ads, yet.

Alright, so a simple aversion to on-line ads is not the only determining
factor, exceptions are made all the time.

This is not a way to argue in favor of treating LibreOfficeForum.org or
lo-portal.de/forum as 'official' sites, but I would like to again
suggest that it, alone, is not a reason to in effect shun them either.

IIRC Micheal Meeks, in one of his presentations, suggested a goal of 200
Million users for the LibreOffice suite - I think that is a laudable
goal, and also believe that it will not be attained without this wealth
of extended, external, activity. 

Which of course if not exactly on-topic and I will get directly back to
topic in reply to an earlier email but for this point - I hope we can
find some useful way to incorporate all the energy coming from these
auxiliary effots - it's not easy I know but I think it will be well
worth the effort.

Now - off to write the on-topic email,

//drew  


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

2011-11-08 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi,

maybe I put it the wrong way. Of course, there are always services that are 
inly available with ads, then we sometimes have no choice. However, when 
thinking about eithe modifying existing services that have ads, to fit our 
needs, like for a forum, or to setup our own without ads, I have a very strong 
preference for thelatter one.

Or, otherwise said, I would only accept ads when ther is no other choice, it ks 
always the last choice for me.

That,of course,is only my personal opinion and not binding. :-)

Florian

*** This message has been sent from my tablet. Please excuse the possible 
briefness.



drew  schrieb:

>On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 15:34 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> ads, independent to what they advertise for, are basically a no go
>for me.
>> 
>Howdy Florian
>
>
>
>right, well I have no doubt of the sincerity behind that comment, but
>it
>does get a bit dicey in practice IMO.
>
>For instance very few had a problem with pointing directly to the
>official Document Foundation and LibreOffice pages on Facebook - ads.
>
>Document Foundation and LibreOffice twitter accounts - ads.
>
>TDF/Libo G+ pages - no ads, yet.
>
>Alright, so a simple aversion to on-line ads is not the only
>determining
>factor, exceptions are made all the time.
>
>This is not a way to argue in favor of treating LibreOfficeForum.org or
>lo-portal.de/forum as 'official' sites, but I would like to again
>suggest that it, alone, is not a reason to in effect shun them either.
>
>IIRC Micheal Meeks, in one of his presentations, suggested a goal of
>200
>Million users for the LibreOffice suite - I think that is a laudable
>goal, and also believe that it will not be attained without this wealth
>of extended, external, activity. 
>
>Which of course if not exactly on-topic and I will get directly back to
>topic in reply to an earlier email but for this point - I hope we can
>find some useful way to incorporate all the energy coming from these
>auxiliary effots - it's not easy I know but I think it will be well
>worth the effort.
>
>Now - off to write the on-topic email,
>
>//drew  
>
>
>-- 
>Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
>Problems?
>http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
>Posting guidelines + more:
>http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
>List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
>All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
>deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted